Impact of acute symptomatic seizures and their management on patient-reported outcomes after stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Acute symptomatic seizures (ASyS) after stroke are not uncommon. However, the impact of ASyS and its management with anti-seizure medications (ASMs) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remains poorly investigated. The objective of our study is to evaluate the association between PROMs and ASyS and ASMs following stroke. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all stroke patients who underwent inpatient continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring performed due to suspected ASyS, including the ones with observed convulsive ASyS, from 04/01/2012 to 03/31/2018, who completed PROMs within 6 months of hospital discharge. Patient-reported outcome measures, including one Neuro-QoL and six PROMIS v1.0 domain scales, were completed by patients as the standard of care in ambulatory stroke clinics. Since ASMs are sometimes used without clearly diagnosed ASyS, we performed group comparisons based on ASM status at discharge, irrespective of their ASyS status. T-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared continuous variables across groups and chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 508 patients were included in the study [mean age 62.0 ± 14.1 years, 51.6% female; 244 (48.0%) ischemic stroke, 165 (32.5%) intracerebral hemorrhage, and 99 (19.5%) subarachnoid hemorrhage]. A total of 190 (37.4%) patients were discharged on ASMs. At the time of the first PROM, conducted a median of 47 (IQR = 33-78) days after the suspected ASyS, and 162 (31.9%) were on ASMs. ASM use was significantly higher in patients diagnosed with ASyS. Physical Function and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities were the most affected health domains. Patient-reported outcome measures were not significantly different between groups based on ASyS (electrographic and/or convulsive), ASM use at hospital discharge, or ASM status on the day of PROM completion. SIGNIFICANCE: There were no differences in multiple domain-specific PROMs in patients with recent stroke according to ASyS status or ASM use suggesting the possible lack of the former's sensitivity to detect their impact. Additional research is necessary to determine if there is a need for developing ASyS-specific PROMs.

Electroencephalographic Abnormalities are Common in COVID-19 and are Associated with Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for electrographic seizures and other electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) undergoing clinically indicated continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring and to assess whether EEG findings are associated with outcomes. METHODS: We identified 197 patients with COVID-19 referred for cEEG at 9 participating centers. Medical records and EEG reports were reviewed retrospectively to determine the incidence of and clinical risk factors for seizures and other epileptiform patterns. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis assessed the relationship between EEG patterns and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Electrographic seizures were detected in 19 (9.6%) patients, including nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in 11 (5.6%). Epileptiform abnormalities (either ictal or interictal) were present in 96 (48.7%). Preceding clinical seizures during hospitalization were associated with both electrographic seizures (36.4% in those with vs 8.1% in those without prior clinical seizures, odds ratio [OR] 6.51, p = 0.01) and NCSE (27.3% vs 4.3%, OR 8.34, p = 0.01). A pre-existing intracranial lesion on neuroimaging was associated with NCSE (14.3% vs 3.7%; OR 4.33, p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis of outcomes, electrographic seizures were an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 4.07 [1.44-11.51], p < 0.01). In competing risks analysis, hospital length of stay increased in the presence of NCSE (30 day proportion discharged with vs without NCSE: HR 0.21 [0.03-0.33] vs 0.43 [0.36-0.49]). INTERPRETATION: This multicenter retrospective cohort study demonstrates that seizures and other epileptiform abnormalities are common in patients with COVID-19 undergoing clinically indicated cEEG and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:872-883.

Personalized model to predict seizures based on dynamic and static continuous EEG monitoring data.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Early recognition of patients who may be at risk of developing acute symptomatic seizures would be useful. We aimed to determine whether continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) data using machine learning techniques such as neural networks and decision trees could predict seizure occurrence in hospitalized patients. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective cohort analysis of cEEG data in patients aged 18-90 years who were admitted and underwent cEEG monitoring between 2010 and 2019 limited to 72 h excluding those who were seizing at the onset of recording. A total of 41,491 patients were reviewed; of these, 3874 were used to develop the static model and 1687 to develop the dynamic model (half with seizure and half without seizure in each cohort). Of these, 80% were randomly selected as derivation cohorts for each model and 20% were randomly selected as validation cohorts. Dynamic and static machine learning models (long short term memory (LSTM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm (XGBoost)) based on day-to-day dynamic EEG changes and binary static EEG features over the prior 72 h or until seizure, which ever was earlier, were used. RESULTS: The static model was able to predict seizure occurrence based on cEEG data with sensitivity and specificity of 0.81 and 0.59, respectively, with an AUC of 0.70. The dynamic model was able to predict seizure occurrence with sensitivity and specificity of 0.72 and 0.80, respectively, and AUC of 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models could be applied to cEEG data to predict seizure occurrence based on available cEEG data. Dynamic day-to-day EEG data are more useful in predicting seizures than binary static EEG data. These models could potentially be used to determine the need for ongoing cEEG monitoring and to prioritize resources.

Acute Symptomatic Seizures in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: Is There an Association?

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) emerged as a global pandemic. Historically, the group of human coronaviruses can also affect the central nervous system leading to neurological symptoms; however, the causative mechanisms of the neurological manifestations of COVID-19 disease are not well known. Seizures have not been directly reported as a part of COVID-19 outside of patients with previously known brain injury or epilepsy. We report two cases of acute symptomatic seizures, in non-epileptic patients, associated with severe COVID-19 disease. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Two advanced-age, non-epileptic, male patients presented to our northeast Ohio-based health system with concern for infection in Mid-March 2020. Both had a history of lung disease and during their hospitalization tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. They developed acute encephalopathy days into their hospitalization with clinical and electrographic seizures. Resolution of seizures was achieved with levetiracetam. DISCUSSION: Patients with COVID-19 disease are at an elevated risk for seizures, and the mechanism of these seizures is likely multifactorial. Clinical (motor) seizures may not be readily detected in this population due to the expansive utilization of sedatives and paralytics for respiratory optimization strategies. Many of these patients are also not electrographically monitored for seizures due to limited resources, multifactorial risk for acute encephalopathy, and the risk of cross-contamination. Previously, several neurological symptoms were seen in patients with more advanced COVID-19 disease, and these were thought to be secondary to multi-system organ failure and/or disseminated intravascular coagulopathy-related brain injury. However, these patients may also have an advanced breakdown of the blood-brain barrier precipitated by pro-inflammatory cytokine reactions. The neurotropic effect and neuroinvasiveness of SARS-Coronavirus-2 have not been directly established. CONCLUSIONS: Acute symptomatic seizures are possible in patients with COVID-19 disease. These seizures are likely multifactorial in origin, including cortical irritation due to blood-brain barrier breakdown, precipitated by the cytokine reaction as a part of the viral infection. Patients with clinical signs of seizures or otherwise unexplained encephalopathy may benefit from electroencephalography monitoring and/or empiric anti-epileptic therapy. Further studies are needed to elucidate the risk of seizures and benefit of monitoring in this population.

Satisfaction with Care and Satisfaction with Decision Making are Similar Regardless of Staffing Model in a Neurocritical Care Unit.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-centered care, particularly shared medical decision making, is difficult to measure in critically ill patients where decisions are often made by a designated surrogate, often receiving information from multiple providers with varying degrees of training. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term satisfaction with care and decision making in patients or surrogates between two neurocritical care units [one staffed by a neurocritical care attending and advanced practice providers (APPs) and one staffed by a neurocritical care attending and resident/fellow trainees] using the Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU) survey. METHODS: Over a 6-month period, the FS-ICU was administered on a tablet device to patients or surrogates at least 24 h after admission and stored on REDCap database. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four patients or surrogates completed the FS-ICU. The response rates were 59.97% and 46.58% in the APP and trainee units, respectively. There were no differences in patient age, sex, ventilator days or ICU length of stay. Overall, there were no differences in satisfaction with care or perceived shared medical making between the units. Respondents who identified their relationship with the patient as "other" (not a spouse, parent, nor a sibling) were less satisfied with care. Additionally, surrogates who identified as parents of the patient were more satisfied with degree of shared medical decision making. CONCLUSION: This study showed that: (1) collecting FS-ICU in a neurocritical care unit is feasible, (2) overall there is no difference in short-term satisfaction with care or shared decision making between a NICU staffed with trainees compared to one staffed with APPs, and (3) parents of patients have a higher short-term satisfaction with degree of shared medical decision making.

Early detection of brainstem herniation using electroencephalography monitoring - case report.

BACKGROUND: Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is an important neuromonitoring tool in brain injured patients. It is commonly used for detection of seizure but can also be used to monitor changes in cerebral blood flow. One such event that can cause a change in cerebral blood flow is imminent, cerebral herniation. cEEG monitoring and quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) can be used as neurotelemetry to detect cerebral herniation prior to onset of clinical signs. CASE PRESENTATION: We discuss two cases highlighting the use of cEEG in cerebral herniation accompanied by clinical examination changes. The first case is a patient with multiorgan failure and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Given his coagulopathy status, his ICH expanded. The second case is a patient with intraventricular hemorrhage and worsening obstructive hydrocephalus. In both cases, the cEEG showed increasing regional/lateralized slowing. The Quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) showed a decrease in frequencies, worsening asymmetry, decreasing amplitude and increasing burst suppression ratio corresponding with the ongoing herniation. Clinically, these changes on cEEG preceded the bedside neurological changes by up to 1 h. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cEEG to monitor patients at high risk for herniation syndromes may identify changes earlier than bedside clinical exam. This earlier identification may allow for an earlier opportunity to intervene.

Central Nervous System Fungal Infection-Related Stroke: A Descriptive Study of Mold and Yeast-Associated Ischemic Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Central nervous system (CNS) ischemic events caused by fungal infections are rare, and clinical characteristics of these ischemic events are largely unknown. The objective of this manuscript is to highlight characteristics of fungal-related strokes and describe possible mechanistic differences between CNS mold and yeast infection-related strokes. METHODS: We report a single-center retrospective case series of all adult patients who presented with concurrent CNS fungal infection and stroke between 2010 and 2018. Patients believed to have a stroke etiology due to cardioembolic, atheroembolic, or strokes nontemporally associated with a CNS fungal infection and those with incomplete stroke workups were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were identified with ischemic stroke and concurrent CNS fungal infection without other known ischemic stroke etiology. Eight patients had a CNS yeast infection, and 6 had a CNS mold infection. All patients presented with recurrent or progressive stroke symptoms. Six patients were immune-compromised. Four patients admitted to intravenous drug use. All yeast infections were identified by cerebrospinal fluid culture or immunologic studies while all but one of the mold infections required identification by tissue biopsy. Leptomeningeal enhancement was only associated with CNS yeast infections, while basal ganglia stroke was only associated with CNS mold infections. CONCLUSION: Ischemic stroke secondary to CNS fungal infections should be considered in patients with recurrent or progressive cryptogenic stroke, regardless of immune status and cerebrospinal fluid profile. CNS yeast and mold infections have slightly different stroke and laboratory characteristics and should have a distinct diagnostic method. Depending on clinical suspicion, a thorough diagnostic approach including spinal fluid analysis and biopsy should be considered.

Fatal Brain Injury Following Carbon Dioxide Angiography.

INTRODUCTION: Carbon dioxide (CO2) as a contrast agent has been in use as early as the 1920s for visualization of retroperitoneal structures. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) using CO2 as a contrast agent for vascular imaging was developed in the 1980s. Currently, CO2  angiography is an alternative agent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and those who are at risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy. However, CO2 causes neurotoxicity if the gas inadvertently enters the cerebrovascular circulation leading to fatal brain injury. CASE PRESENTATION: A 71-year-old female with h/o sickle cell trait, hypertension, obesity, metastatic renal cell cancer status post nephrectomy, bone metastasis, chronic kidney disease was admitted for elective embolization of the humerus bone metastasis. Given the high probability of contrast-induced nephropathy, CO2 angiography was chosen for embolization of the metastasis. During the procedure, the patient became unresponsive. Emergent medical management with hyperventilation, 100% fraction oxygen inhalation was performed. Her neuroimaging showed global cerebral edema. An intracranial pressure monitor was placed which confirmed intracranial hypertension. Hyperosmolar therapy was administered with no improvement in clinical examination. She progressed to brain stem herniation. Given poor prognosis, the family opted for comfort measures and the patient expired. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Inadvertent carbon dioxide entry into cerebrovascular circulation during angiography can cause fatal brain injury. Caution must be exercised while performing CO2  angiography in blood vessels above the diaphragm.

New onset epilepsy among patients with periodic discharges on continuous electroencephalographic monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of new onset epilepsy and associated risk factors in patients with periodic patterns on continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) during critical illness. METHODS: The local cEEG database and then medical records were reviewed from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013 to find adult patients with no history of epilepsy who had periodic discharges-either lateralized (LPDs) or generalized (GPDs)-or nonperiodic/nonepileptogenic (NP/NE) findings on cEEG and ≥3 months of clinical follow-up. Clinical seizure after discharge was the primary outcome. Chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients (median age = 67.8 years) were included. There were 53 (27%), 73 (37%), and 69 (35%) patients with LPDs, GPDs, and NP/NE findings on cEEG, respectively. These three groups did not differ by demographic or clinical variables. A total of 29 (15%) patients (LPDs = 20 [38%], GPDs = 4 [6%], and NP/NE = 5 [7%]) developed epilepsy during a median follow-up of 32.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 13.2-42.8) months. The hazard ratio for epilepsy development among LPD patients was 7.7 (95% CI = 2.9-20.7) times compared to the NP/NE group, and the risk further increased to 11.4 (95% CI = 4-31.4) times if they also had electrographic seizures. This association remained significant despite adjusting for each covariate at a time. SIGNIFICANCE: Patients with LPDs on cEEG during critical illness are at least seven times more likely to develop epilepsy compared to patients with NP/NE findings. This risk is further increased if patients with LPDs have electrographic seizures. In comparison, the presence of GPDs does not seem to impact the risk for developing epilepsy. cEEG findings at the time of acute insult have potential to serve as prognostic biomarkers for epilepsy development.

Extubating the Neurocritical Care Patient: A Spontaneous Breathing Trial Algorithmic Approach.

BACKGROUND: Delaying extubation in neurologically impaired patients otherwise ready for extubation is a source for significant morbidity, mortality, and costs. There is no consensus to suggest one spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) over another in predicting extubation success. We studied an algorithm using zero pressure support and zero positive end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) SBT followed by 5-cm H2O pressure support and 5-cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (i.e., 5/5) SBT in those who failed ZEEP SBT. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of intubated patients in a neurosciences intensive care unit. All eligible patients were initially challenged with ZEEP SBT. If failed, a 5/5 SBT was immediately performed. If passed either the ZEEP SBT or the subsequent 5/5 SBT, patients were liberated from mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: In total, 108 adult patients were included. The majority of patients were successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation using ZEEP SBT alone (82.4%; p = 0.0007). Fifteen (13.8%) patients failed ZEEP SBT but immediately passed 5/5 SBT (p = 0.0005). One patient (0.93%) required reintubation. We found high sensitivity of this extubation algorithm (100; 95% CI 95.94-100%) but poor specificity (6.67; 95% CI 0.17-31.95%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the majority of patients could be successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation after a ZEEP SBT. In those who failed, a 5/5 SBT increased the successful liberation from mechanical ventilation.

Electro-Radiological Observations of Grade III/IV Hepatic Encephalopathy Patients with Seizures.

BACKGROUND: Neurological complications in liver failure are common. Often under-recognized neurological complications are seizures and status epilepticus. These may go unrecognized without continuous electroencephalography (CEEG). We highlight the observed electro-radiological changes in patients with grade III/IV hepatic encephalopathy (HE) found to have seizures and/or status epilepticus on CEEG and the associated neuroimaging. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of patients with West Haven grade III/IV HE and seizures/status epilepticus on CEEG. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included. Alcohol was the most common cause of HE (54.5%). All patients were either stuporous/comatose. The most common CEEG pattern was diffuse slowing (100%) followed by generalized periodic discharges (GPDs; 36.4%) and lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs, 36.4%). The subtype of GPDs with triphasic morphology was only seen in 27.3%. All seizures and/or status epilepticus were without clinical signs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was available in six patients. Cortical hyperintensities on diffusion weighted imaging sequence were seen in all six patients. One patient had CEEG seizure concomitantly with the MRI. Seven patients died prior to discharge. CONCLUSION: Seizures or status epilepticus in the setting of HE were without clinical findings and could go unrecognized without CEEG. The finding of cortical hyperintensity on MRI should lead to further evaluation for unrecognized seizure or status epilepticus.

Nurses Are as Specific and Are Earlier in Calling In-Hospital Stroke Alerts Compared to Physicians.

INTRODUCTION: In-hospital stroke alerts are typically activated by nurses or physicians when a patient's neurological status acutely changes from baseline. It is unclear if knowledge of stroke symptoms translates to accurate activation of the acute stroke team. We hypothesized that nurses who activate the stroke alert system would correctly identify as great a proportion of acute strokes as physicians. We also investigated the time to activation of these in-hospital stroke alerts. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive inpatient stroke team calls over a 12-month period at a single, tertiary care center. Calls and exact times were identified from the acute stroke pager log. The type of provider who called the stroke alert, patient characteristics, last known well time, and acute stroke symptoms was prospectively collected and retrospectively verified through electronic medical record review. Patients with definite stroke then were retrospectively identified by World Health Organization Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (WHO MONICA) criterion. RESULTS: A total of 93 calls were analyzed. Nurses and physicians/midlevel providers activated the in-hospital stroke alert with a similar percentage of correct stroke diagnosis (62.7% versus 58.8%, P = .82). Nurses activated stroke alerts significantly earlier than physicians/midlevel providers (median 2 hours [IQR .5-6 hours] versus 4.9 hours [IQR 1.3-21.3 hours], P = .0096) from last known well time. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses identify in-hospital ischemic events with a similar percentage as physicians, and they activate the stroke alerts significantly earlier. The median nursing activation time fell within a 3-hour window for potential systemic thrombolytic or early endovascular therapy. An intensive, focused, collaborative education of nursing staff may further improve inpatient stroke outcomes.

Medical Decision Making: Hyposphagma Prior to Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

The decision to administer intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) is based on standard exclusion and inclusion criteria, which include laboratories, imaging, and time of last known well. When patients present with a clinical scenario that is not addressed in these standards, the decision to administer IV tPA is more complex. We present a case of a patient with an acute stroke syndrome that also included acute subconjunctival hemorrhage (i.e., hyposphagma). We provide the medical decision making that occurred prior to the administration. Ultimately, the finding of hyposphagma should not disqualify eligible patients from receiving IV tPA.

Addition of hyperacute MRI AIDS in patient selection, decreasing the use of endovascular stroke therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The failure of recent trials to show the effectiveness of acute endovascular stroke therapy (EST) may be because of inadequate patient selection. We implemented a protocol to perform pretreatment MRI on patients with large-vessel occlusion eligible for EST to aid in patient selection. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with large-vessel occlusion considered for EST from January 2008 to August 2012. Patients before April 30, 2010, were selected based on computed tomography/computed tomography angiography (prehyperacute protocol), whereas patients on or after April 30, 2010, were selected based on computed tomography/computed tomography angiography and MRI (hyperacute MRI protocol). Demographic, clinical features, and outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: We identified 267 patients: 88 patients in prehyperacute MRI period and 179 in hyperacute MRI period. Fewer patients evaluated in the hyperacute MRI period received EST (85 of 88, 96.6% versus 92 of 179, 51.7%; P<0.05). The hyperacute-MRI group had a more favorable outcome of a modified Rankin scale 0 to 2 at 30 days as a group (6 of 66, 9.1% versus 33 of 140, 23.6%; P=0.01), and when taken for EST (6 of 63, 9.5% versus 17 of 71, 23.9%; P=0.03). On adjusted multivariate analysis, the EST in the hyperacute MRI period was associated with a more favorable outcome (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-10.6; P=0.03) and reduced mortality rate (odds ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.37; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of hyperacute MRI protocol decreases the number of endovascular stroke interventions by half. Further investigation of MRI use for patient selection is warranted.

Systematic Literature Review of the Association of Fever and Elevated Temperature with Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients.

Although most commonly associated with infection, elevated temperature and fever also occur in a variety of critically ill populations. Prior studies have suggested that fever and elevated temperature may be detrimental to critically ill patients and can lead to poor outcomes, but the evidence surrounding the association of fever with outcomes is rapidly evolving. To broadly assess potential associations of elevated temperature and fever with outcomes in critically ill adult patients, we performed a systematic literature review focusing on traumatic brain injury, stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic), cardiac arrest, sepsis, and general intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Searches were conducted in Embase® and PubMed® from 2016 to 2021, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, including dual-screening of abstracts, full texts, and extracted data. In total, 60 studies assessing traumatic brain injury and stroke (24), cardiac arrest (8), sepsis (22), and general ICU (6) patients were included. Mortality, functional, or neurological status and length of stay were the most frequently reported outcomes. Elevated temperature and fever were associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury, stroke, and cardiac arrest but not in patients with sepsis. Although a causal relationship between elevated temperature and poor outcomes cannot be definitively established, the association observed in this systematic literature review supports the concept that management of elevated temperature may factor in avoidance of detrimental outcomes in multiple critically ill populations. The analysis also highlights gaps in our understanding of fever and elevated temperature in critically ill adult patients.

Optimizing SPECT SISCOM analysis to localize seizure-onset zone by using varying z scores.

PURPOSE: Subtraction ictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) co-registered to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (SISCOM) is a useful modality to identify epileptogenic focus. Using this technique, several studies have generally considered the area of highest ictal hyperperfusion, as outlined by thresholding the difference images with a standard z score of 2, to be highly concordant to the epileptogenic focus. In clinical practice, several factors influence ictal hyperperfusion and using different SISCOM thresholds can be helpful. We aimed to systematically evaluate the localizing value of various z scores (1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5) in a seizure-free cohort following resective epilepsy surgery, and to examine the localizing information of perfusion patterns observed at each z score. METHODS: Twenty-six patients were identified as having ictal-interictal SPECT images, preoperative and postoperative MRI studies, and having remained seizure free for at least 6 months after temporal or extratemporal surgical resection. SISCOM analysis was performed using preoperative MRI studies, and then blindly reviewed for localization of hyperperfused regions. With the added information from postoperative, coregistered MRI, perfusion patterns were determined. KEY FINDINGS: Using pair-wise comparisons, we found that the optimal z score for SPECT-SISCOM localization of the epileptogenic zone was 1.5, not the commonly used z score of 2. The z score of 1.5 was 84.8% sensitive and 93.8% specific. The z score of 1.5 had a moderate interrater agreement (0.70). When an hourglass configuration hyperperfusion pattern was present, a trend toward correctly localizing the seizure onset region was suggested (100% of the 11 observed occurrences). Nonetheless this trend was not statistically significant, possibly reflecting the small number of occurrences in our study. SIGNIFICANCE: SISCOM is a useful modality in evaluating patients for epilepsy surgery. This study shows that the z score of 1.5 represents a highly sensitive and specific SISCOM threshold that should be examined in conjunction with the traditionally used z score of 2 to enhance the chances of correct localization. Further prospective investigations are needed to confirm this finding in large patient series.

Postanoxia-Induced Chorea Treated with Intravenous Fentanyl.

The case presented is that of a young male with postanoxic brain injury secondary to cocaine overdose who began to exhibit choreiform movements of the left upper extremity. Traditional treatment options for chorea were unsuccessful, leading to the administration of fentanyl, which rapidly resolved the patient's choreiform movements. There is a limited research involving the treatment of chorea in anoxic brain injury as well as fentanyl's role in the movement pathway. We hypothesize that chorea can be caused or exacerbated by opioid withdrawal in a patient with chronic opioid use through modulation of dopamine transmission.

Outpatient EEG in Routine Clinical Care of Patients With Stroke-Related Acute Symptomatic Seizure Concerns.

PURPOSE: Acute symptomatic seizures (ASyS) after stroke contribute the highest risk to poststroke epilepsy (PSE) development. We investigated the use of outpatient EEG (oEEG) among stroke patients with ASyS concerns. METHODS: Adults with acute stroke, ASyS concerns (underwent cEEG), and outpatient clinical follow-up were included (study population). Patients with oEEG (oEEG cohort) were analyzed for electrographic findings. Univariable and multivariable analyses helped identify predictors of oEEG use in routine clinical care. RESULTS: Among 507 patients, 83 (16.4%) underwent oEEG. The independent predictors of oEEG utilization included age (OR = 1.03 [1.01 to 1.05, P = 0.01]), electrographic ASyS on cEEG (OR 3.9 [1.77 to 8.9], P < 0.001), ASMs at discharge (OR 3.6 [1.9 to 6.6], P < 0.001), PSE development (OR 6.6 [3.5 to 12.6], P < 0.001), and follow-up duration (OR = 1.01 [1.002 to 1.02], P = 0.016). Almost 40% of oEEG cohort developed PSE, but only 12% had epileptiform abnormalities. Close to a quarter (23%) of oEEGs were within normal limits. CONCLUSIONS: One in six patients with ASyS concern after stroke undergoes oEEG. Electrographic ASyS, PSE development, and ASM at discharge are primary drivers of oEEG use. While PSE drives oEEG use, we need systematic, prospective investigation of outpatient EEG's role as prognostic tool for PSE development.

Cardiac Oscillations Complicating Brain Death Diagnosis.

Death by neurologic criteria (DNC) or brain death is a clinical diagnosis. It is often complicated by variations in policies as well as confounders on examination. We discuss here the case of a 27-year-old male who had a cardiac arrest following toxic gaseous exposure. He ultimately progressed to brain death but was identified as having cardiac oscillations during clinical assessments that complicated the diagnosis. We discuss the case as well as the maneuvers used to clarify that the "triggered breaths" on the ventilator were indeed cardiac oscillations.