RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Due to the excess demand for deceased donor kidneys, risk quantification scores were developed to help with kidney allocation. The kidney donor risk index (KDRI) is used in the US kidney allocation system. We currently use expanded criteria (UNOS) and Remuzzi scoring for allocation of deceased donor kidneys and the utility of KDRI in our cohort is unknown. We aim to evaluate the association of KDRI with relation to 5 year graft and patient survival. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 225 adults who received a deceased donor kidney transplant between 1 Nov 2005 and 30 June 2014. Patients were followed up for 5 years or until graft-loss or death. Implant biopsies of donor kidneys were done and the Remuzzi score was calculated. RESULTS: The median age was 48 (IQR 42, 52.5) years and 50.7% were male. KDRI-USA, KDRI-THAI, and KDRI-AUST were found to have no correlation with 5 year graft survival. Donor characteristics which define an expanded criteria donor kidney, not associated with 5 year graft survival are age (p = 0.58), terminal creatinine (p = 0.71) and history of hypertension (p = 0.35). Donor cerebrovascular accident (CVA) as a cause of death (p = 0.02) and Remuzzi score were associated with graft survival at 5 years, with 75.8% with Remuzzi score ≤ 3 vs 24.2% with Remuzzi score of > 3 achieving 5 year graft survival (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The association of KDRI with graft and patient survival was not demonstrated in our cohort. Histological assessment of the transplant kidney remains the best method of predicting long-term survival during donor selection.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Glomerulonephritis is often treated with kidney-saving, but potentially diabetogenic immunosuppressants such as glucocorticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors. Unfortunately, there are little data on dysglycemia before and after diagnosis and during treatment of glomerulonephritis. We aimed to evaluate the occurrence and risk factors for pre-diabetes and incident diabetes among non-diabetic patients with glomerular disease with or without treatment with immunosuppressants. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed on 229 non-diabetic immunosuppressantnaïve adults diagnosed with glomerulonephritis and renal vasculitis. Patients with known diabetes and prior immunosuppressant treatment were excluded. Outcomes of new-onset pre-diabetes and new-onset diabetes were defined according to American Diabetic Association criteria. RESULTS: Pre-diabetes was present pre-biopsy in 74 of the 229 patients (32.3%). During the median follow-up of 34.0 (23.3-47.5) months, 29 patients (12.7%) developed new-onset diabetes and 58 (25.3%) had new-onset prediabetes. Immunosuppressive therapy in patients with pre-existing pre-diabetes was associated with increased odds of new-onset diabetes compared to those without either risk factor (26.0% versus 5.0%; odds ratio, 6.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41 to 31.64), P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: New-onset diabetes after immunosuppressant treatment occurred in one-quarter of patients with glomerulonephritis and pre-existing pre-diabetes. Physicians should screen for pre-diabetes when planning treatment with immunosuppressants, as its presence significantly increases the risk of diabetes mellitus.