Association of reduced inner retinal thicknesses with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Tissue derived biomarkers may offer utility as indicators of accumulated damage. Reduced thickness of retinal neuronal tissue and the vascular choroid have previously been associated with vascular damage and diabetes. We evaluated associations between retinal thickness, retinal microvascular and choroidal measures, and renal function in a population with a high burden of comorbidity. METHODS: Participants were recruited from nuclear cardiology or renal medicine clinics. Retinal and choroidal thickness were measured from spectral-domain optical coherence tomograms. Retinal microvascular parameters were assessed from digital fundus photographs using a semi-automated software package. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) categorised as: CKD stages 1-2, eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2; CKD stage 3, eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73m2, and CKD stages 4-5, eGFR ≤29 ml/min/1.73m2. RESULTS: Participants (n = 241) had a mean age of 65 years and a mean eGFR of 66.9 ml/min/1.73m2. Thirty-nine % of the cohort had diabetes and 27% were using diuretics. Thinning of the inner retina and changes to its microvascular blood supply were associated with lower eGFR and CKD stages 4 and 5, while no associations were found between the outer retinal layers or their choroidal blood supply and CKD of any stage. These associations remained following adjustment for age, mean arterial blood pressure, diabetes status, low-density lipoprotein, body mass index, and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Inner retinal thinning and retinal microvascular variation is associated with advanced CKD (stages 4 & 5) independent of important confounding factors, but not with earlier stage CKD (stage 3) and, therefore, its utility as a biomarker for early CKD is not supported in this study.

Clinicoradiological outcomes after radical radiotherapy for lung cancer in patients with interstitial lung disease.

Objective: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is relatively common in patients with lung cancer with an incidence of 7.5%. Historically pre-existing ILD was a contraindication to radical radiotherapy owing to increased radiation pneumonitis rates, worsened fibrosis and poorer survival compared with non-ILD cohorts. Herein, the clinical and radiological toxicity outcomes of a contemporaneous cohort are described. Methods: Patients with ILD treated with radical radiotherapy for lung cancer at a regional cancer centre were collected prospectively. Radiotherapy planning, tumour characteristics, and pre- and post-treatment functional and radiological parameters were recorded. Cross-sectional images were independently assessed by two Consultant Thoracic Radiologists. Results: Twenty-seven patients with co-existing ILD received radical radiotherapy from February 2009 to April 2019, with predominance of usual interstitial pneumonia subtype (52%). According to ILD-GAP scores, most patients were Stage I. After radiotherapy, localised (41%) or extensive (41%) progressive interstitial changes were noted for most patients yet dyspnoea scores (n = 15 available) and spirometry (n = 10 available) were stable. One-third of patients with ILD went on to receive long-term oxygen therapy, which was significantly more than the non-ILD cohort. Median survival trended towards being worse compared with non-ILD cases (17.8 vs 24.0 months, p = 0.834). Conclusion: Radiological progression of ILD and reduced survival were observed post-radiotherapy in this small cohort receiving lung cancer radiotherapy, although a matched functional decline was frequently absent. Although there is an excess of early deaths, long-term disease control is achievable. Advances in knowledge: For selected patients with ILD, long-term lung cancer control without severely impacting respiratory function may be possible with radical radiotherapy, albeit with a slightly higher risk of death.

Serum amyloid A levels are associated with polymorphic variants in the serum amyloid A 1 and 2 genes.

BACKGROUND: Serum amyloid A (SAA) is secreted by liver hepatocytes in response to increased inflammation whereupon it associates with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and alters the protein and lipid composition of HDL negating some of its anti-atherogenic properties. AIMS: To identify variants within the SAA gene that may be associated with SAA levels and/or cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: We identified exonic variants within the SAA genes by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Sanger sequencing. We tested the association between SAA variants and serum SAA levels in 246 individuals with and without CVD. RESULTS: Increased SAA was associated with rs2468844 (beta [ß] = 1.73; confidence intervals [CI], 1.14-1.75; p = 0.01), rs1136747 (ß = 1.53 (CI, 1.11-1.73); p = 0.01) and rs149926073 (ß = 3.37 (CI, 1.70-4.00); p = 0.02), while rs1136745 was significantly associated with decreased SAA levels (ß = 0.70 (CI, 0.53-0.94); p = 0.02). Homozygous individuals with the SAA1.3 haplotype had significantly lower levels of SAA compared with those with SAA1.1 or SAA1.5 (ß = 0.43 (CI, 0.22-0.85); p = 0.02) while SAA1.3/1.5 heterozygotes had significantly higher SAA levels compared with those homozygous for SAA1.1 (ß = 2.58 (CI, 1.19-5.57); p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We have identified novel genetic variants in the SAA genes associated with SAA levels, a biomarker of inflammation and chronic disease. The utility of SAA as a biomarker for inflammation and chronic disease may be influenced by underlying genetic variation in baseline levels.