How to treat proximal and middle one-third humeral shaft fractures: the role of helical plates.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of patients affected by proximal and middle one-third humeral shaft fractures treated with humeral helical plates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From October 2016 to June 2020, twenty-four (twenty women, four men) underwent humeral reduction and fixation with humeral helical plates (A.L.P.S.® Proximal Humeral Plating System, Zimmer Biomet) that preserve deltoid muscle insertion and reduce the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury. At one and six months after surgery, standard antero-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained, and at last follow-up (eighteen months on average), clinical evaluation was performed through range of motion assessment, Constant score and DASH score questionnaires. Only descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. RESULTS: At six months, all fractures have healed. At last follow-up (average eighteen months, 13-28) mean Constant score was 71 (range 33-96), mean Dash score was 19.2 (range 1.7-63). The average range of motion was calculated as follows: flexion 137.8° (range 90-180); abduction 125.8° (range 85-180°); external rotation 55° (range 20-80°), internal rotation at L3 (range between scapulae-trochanter). Three patients experienced temporary radial nerve palsy from injury, while in one case, a temporary iatrogenic palsy occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In our opinion, the helical plate may be an effective surgical tool for management of proximal and middle one-third diaphyseal humeral fractures. The humeral helical plate allows stable fixation avoiding the deltoid tuberosity proximally and radial nerve distally, thus increasing the possibility of rapid functional recovery after surgery.

Biochemical stress evaluation after medial parapatellar and subvastus approach in total knee replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Even if different surgical approaches for total knee arthroplasty are well known since decades, the standard medial parapatellar incision remains the most common one; general agreement about significant advantages with minimally invasive techniques is lacking. Furthermore, the surgical stress effect on the organism has always been analyzed through blood inflammatory parameters. This study aim was to compare the standard and subvastus approaches, using the salivary cortisol in particular as measure for systemic surgery-related stress. METHODS: Fifteen operations were performed in a consecutive series; clinical (Knee Society Knee Scoring System., a questionnaire score, range of motion, tourniquet time, intra-operative bleeding) and biochemical factors (salivary and hematic cortisol, C-reactive protein, muscular creatine phosphokinase levels) were evaluated. The final follow-up was at two months after the operation. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in most of the parameters; however, the subvastus group had a sharper and earlier functional improvement trend than the standard one. On the other side, it increased the CPK levels significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the medial subvastus approach, firstly associated with greater surgical stress, has then been characterized by a more favorable functional improvement trend. Moreover, the salivary cortisol measurement has proved to be a non-invasive and reliable method to evaluate the systemic surgery-related stress.