Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
Skin Pharmacol Physiol ; 31(3): 125-133, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29539605

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ethnic skin types are known to differ in their morphological and physiological features. Thus, treatment responses may vary among different races. We aimed to assess skin morphology of different ethnicities and to compare the effect of short-term moisturizer application using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM). METHODS: Thirty healthy female subjects of European, Asian and Black ethnicity at 30-45 years of age were included in the study. OCT and RCM imaging was performed on the cheek to compare morphology. Following the 2-week application of a moisturizer cream (Sebamed® lotion) on one forearm, imaging was performed on both forearms to assess and compare treatment responses. RESULTS: Epidermal thickness and morphology of pores varied between the three ethnic groups, with Black subjects displaying the thickest epidermis and largest skin pores. On the treated forearm, OCT measurements revealed a significantly thicker epidermis in all groups as compared to the untreated forearm. Width of skin folds on the treated forearm was measured by RCM to be significantly lower in all ethnic groups as compared to the untreated forearm. CONCLUSION: Different ethnic skin types showed variations in skin morphology and treatment response to short-term moisturizer application. OCT and RCM were useful methods for noninvasive, real-time, repeated assessment of ethnic skin.


Asunto(s)
Emolientes/administración & dosificación , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Piel/metabolismo , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , Población Negra , Epidermis/diagnóstico por imagen , Epidermis/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piel/diagnóstico por imagen , Población Blanca
10.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(2): 689-697, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33825333

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The treatment of facial erythema and subjective symptoms of rosacea patients remains challenging in clinical practice. Cosmeceuticals, care components containing active ingredients such as phytochemicals, play a growing role in treatment plans. However, well-designed studies on their efficacy and limitations are widely missing. OBJECTIVE: A foam and a cream for rosacea patients were assessed based on objective and subjective methodology. The tolerability of skin and eyes was evaluated. METHODS: A randomized, double-blinded, split-face, and vehicle-controlled trial was conducted. At baseline and after four weeks of product use, dermatological and ophthalmological investigations were performed, employing image analysis of facial erythema, clinical assessments, and questionnaires. RESULTS: The patient cohort comprised 33 females with persistent facial erythema due to rosacea. No significant differences were found between the vehicle and the verum. According to the analysis of facial erythema, a "less pronounced" or "much less pronounced" appearance was seen in two thirds of patients comparing V1 to V0. Especially, the dryness of the skin improved by the use of the vehicle and the verum. Adverse subjective skin sensations decreased by 61.3% for the verum side and by 58.6% for the vehicle side. Subjective and objective analysis of ocular manifestation differed, with subjective manifestations reported more frequently, thus highlighting underdiagnosis of ocular rosacea. CONCLUSIONS: As no clear differences between the verum and the vehicle were found, an optimal skin care regime itself seems to have a superior effect in the relief of facial erythema and foremost of subjective symptoms, rather than certain active ingredients.


Asunto(s)
Detergentes , Rosácea , Detergentes/efectos adversos , Eritema/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Humanos , Rosácea/tratamiento farmacológico , Crema para la Piel , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Eur J Dermatol ; 31(2): 199-204, 2021 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33814358

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, wearing face masks is mandatory not only for health care workers (HCWs) but also for the general population in many countries around the globe. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the onset of adverse facial skin reactions due to compulsory face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic in HCWs and non-HCWs, and draw awareness of this new dermatological condition and its preventive measures. MATERIALS & METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to 550 patients and HCWs from the Department of Dermatology and Allergy of the University Hospital Munich (LMU), Germany. Participants were surveyed regarding mask type, duration of usage and adverse facial skin reactions. Information on symptoms and the use of skin care products and topical drugs were retrieved. RESULTS: The duration of wearing masks showed a significant impact on the prevalence of symptoms (p < 0.001). Type IV hypersensitivity was significantly more likely in participants with symptoms compared to those without symptoms (p = 0.001), whereas no increase in symptoms was observed in participants with atopic diathesis. HCWs used facial skin care products significantly more often than non-HCWs (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preventive and therapeutic measures should be established in order to avoid "face mask dermatitis", especially for people with underlying risk factors.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Dermatitis por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatosis Facial/etiología , Personal de Salud , Máscaras/efectos adversos , Dermatitis por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatosis Facial/epidemiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos
12.
Int J Cardiol ; 300: 127-131, 2020 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31668654

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proven to be safe and effective in patients with acquired heart disease. However, data regarding their use in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is scarce. METHODS: All ACHD under DOAC were retrospectively identified. Bleeding and thromboembolic events were registered. CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED scores were calculated. Risk factors for bleeding and thromboembolic events were identified. RESULTS: 215 ACHD patients (111 female, 48.4 ±â€¯15.5 years) were included. CHD was severe in 44.2%, moderate in 23.7%, and simple in 32.1%. Indications for anticoagulation were: atrial arrhythmias (66.8%), cerebrovascular accidents (32.7%), pulmonary thromboembolism (3.7%), deep vein thrombosis (11.2%), atrial thrombi (6.5%), and Fontan circulation/TCPC (5.6%). Mean follow-up was 15.8 ±â€¯15.8 months. Nine patients suffered a major and eight a minor bleeding. Thromboembolic events occurred in two patients. The annual risk for bleeding was 3.1%/patient/year and for thromboembolic events 0.7%/patient/year. A CHADS2-Score >2, HASBLED >3, and renal disease were identified as risk factors for bleeding (minor and major bleeding) in a univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, renal disease remained as an independent predictor for bleeding (HR 6.13, CI [1.04-36.27], p < 0.05). It was also the only risk factor for major bleedings (HR 13.75, CI [2.60-72.54], p = 0.002). Risk factors for thromboembolic events were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: A low rate of thromboembolic events was observed in ACHD patients under DOAC therapy. Bleeding complications were not negligible. Special attention has to be paid to those patients with advanced renal failure.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Cardiopatías Congénitas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardiopatías Congénitas/epidemiología , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/prevención & control
13.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 7(7): e13844, 2019 07 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31267978

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the emerging era of digitalization and electronic health, skin cancer-related apps represent useful tools to support dermatologic consultation and examination. Yet, little is known about how patients perceive the value of such apps. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate patient attitudes and their awareness toward skin cancer-related apps. METHODS: A cross-sectional study including 200 patients from the oncological outpatient unit was conducted at the University Hospital (LMU Munich, Germany) between September and December 2018. Patients were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire on the popularity and usefulness of health-related and skin cancer-related apps. A descriptive analysis was performed with the expression of categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. For continuous variables, the median and range were indicated. Contingency tables and chi-square tests were performed to investigate associations between sociodemographic data and selected items of the questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 98.9% (195/197) of patients had never used skin cancer-related apps or could not remember. In 49.7% (93/187) of cases, patients were unsure about the usefulness of skin cancer apps, whereas 42.6% (78/183) thought that skin cancer apps could supplement or support the professional skin examination performed by a physician. However, 47.9% (90/188) were interested in acquiring more information by their dermatologists about skin cancer apps. Young age (P=.002), male gender (P=.02), a previous history of melanoma (P=.004), and higher educational level (P=.002) were significantly associated with a positive attitude. Nevertheless, 55.9% (105/188) preferred a printed patient brochure on skin cancer to downloading and using an app. CONCLUSIONS: The experience and knowledge of skin cancer-related apps was surprisingly low in this population, although there was a high general interest in more information about such apps. Printed patient brochures were the preferred information source.


Asunto(s)
Aplicaciones Móviles/normas , Pacientes/psicología , Cuidados de la Piel/instrumentación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Alfabetización en Salud/normas , Alfabetización en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aplicaciones Móviles/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Cuidados de la Piel/normas , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
Oncol Res Treat ; 42(6): 319-325, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30995670

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Videodermatoscopy (VD) is a useful device for supporting dermatologists in the distinction between benign and malignant lesions. However, only few patients have access to VD in daily practice. OBJECTIVES: To investigate patient attitudes towards VD. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted between May and June 2018. Patients were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire on the popularity of VD. Descriptive analysis was performed including contingency tables and χ2 tests to investigate associations between sociodemographic data and the popularity of VD. RESULTS: A total of 61.2% (123/201) of the patients had not heard of VD at the time of assessment or were unsure. Of the 38.8% of patients (78/201) who already knew of VD, 64.1% (50/78) reported that they had already been investigated by VD; 57.5% (111/193) were willing to pay an extra fee for VD. A high level of education and private insurance status had a statistically significant association with the popularity of VD (p = 0.036 and p = 0.026, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong information deficit, especially in patients with lower education and statutory health insurance. Nevertheless, the willingness to pay an extra fee for a VD-assisted skin examination was high. Dermatologists should actively offer and inform their patients about VD when performing skin cancer screening.


Asunto(s)
Dermoscopía/psicología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Microscopía por Video , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Pacientes/psicología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Dermoscopía/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Educación , Femenino , Alemania , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Masculino , Microscopía por Video/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
Am J Cardiol ; 117(3): 450-5, 2016 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26725103

RESUMEN

As thromboembolic events (TEE) are common in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), adequate oral anticoagulation for prophylaxis or treatment of TEE is important. Until now, mainly vitamin K antagonists have been used in these patients. The purpose of this study was to provide first data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants in ACHD. This prospective, observational, and longitudinal study included 102 consecutive ACHD, of whom 75 (37 women and 38 men; mean age 50 ± 13 years) could be analyzed. Most common CHD were pre-tricuspid shunts (n = 31; 41%), complex CHD (n = 16; 21%), left heart/aortic valve anomalies (n = 5; 6%), right-sided cardiac/pulmonary artery anomalies (n = 9; 13%), post-tricuspid shunts (n = 3; 4%), and others (n = 11; 15%). Five patients had cyanosis and 3 patients a Fontan circulation. Mean follow-up was 12 ± 11 months. Rivaroxaban was administered in 55 patients, apixaban in 13 and dabigatran in 7 patients for TEE prophylaxis in atrial arrhythmias (n = 57), stroke/transient ischemic attacks (n = 11), deep vein thrombosis (n = 4), pulmonary embolism (n = 1) and atrial thrombi (n = 3). Some patients had >1 indication for adequate oral anticoagulation. CHA2-DS2-VASc score was ≥ 2 in 23 (31%), and 9 (12%) had a HAS-BLED score ≥ 2. There were neither thrombotic or major bleeding events nor major side effects. In conclusion, direct oral anticoagulants appear to be safe and effective in ACHD. Long-term follow-up is needed to substantiate these findings.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Cardiopatías Congénitas/complicaciones , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Tromboembolia/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA