Fexofenadine Plasma Concentrations to Estimate Systemic Exposure in Healthy Adults Using a Limited Sampling Strategy with a Population Pharmacokinetic Approach.

BACKGROUND: Fexofenadine is a recommended in vivo probe drug for phenotyping P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1/3 transporter activities. This study evaluated a limited sampling strategy using a population pharmacokinetic approach to estimate plasma fexofenadine exposure as an index of P-gp and OATP activities. METHODS: In a previous study, a single oral dose of fexofenadine (120 mg) was administered alone or in combination with grapefruit juice, Panax ginseng , or Echinacea purpurea to healthy adult participants. Serial plasma samples were collected up to 72 hours after administration and fexofenadine concentrations were measured. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Limited sampling models (LSMs) using single and 2-timepoint fexofenadine concentrations were compared with full profiles from intense sampling using empirical Bayesian post hoc estimations of systemic exposure derived from the population pharmacokinetic model. Predefined criteria for LSM selection and validation included a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) ≥ 0.90, relative percent mean prediction error ≥ -5 to ≤5%, relative percent mean absolute error ≤ 10%, and relative percent root mean square error ≤ 15%. RESULTS: Fexofenadine concentrations (n = 1520) were well described using a 2-compartment model. Grapefruit juice decreased the relative oral bioavailability of fexofenadine by 25%, whereas P. ginseng and E. purpurea had no effect. All the evaluated single timepoint fexofenadine LSMs showed unacceptable percent mean prediction error, percent mean absolute error, and/or percent root mean square error. Although adding a second time point improved precision, the predefined criteria were not met. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying novel fexofenadine LSMs to estimate P-gp and OATP1B1/3 activities in healthy adults for future transporter-mediated drug-drug interaction studies remains elusive.

Variable Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics After Cannabis Smoking in Regular Users.

BACKGROUND: Despite its federally restricted status, cannabis is widely used medicinally and recreationally. The pharmacokinetics (PK) and central nervous system (CNS) effects of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the major psychoactive cannabinoid, are not well understood. The objective of this study was to develop a population PK model of inhaled THC, including sources of variability, and to conduct an exploratory analysis of potential exposure-response relationships. METHODS: Regular adult cannabis users smoked a single cannabis cigarette containing 5.9% THC (Chemovar A) or 13.4% THC (Chemovar B) ad libitum. THC concentrations in whole blood were measured and used to develop a population PK model to identify potential factors contributing to interindividual variability in THC PK and to describe THC disposition. Relationships between model-predicted exposure and heart rate, change in composite driving score on a driving simulator, and perceived highness were evaluated. RESULTS: From the 102 participants, a total of 770 blood THC concentrations were obtained. A two-compartment structural model adequately fit the data. Chemovar and baseline THC (THC BL ) were found to be significant covariates for bioavailability, with Chemovar A having better THC absorption. The model predicted that heavy users-those with the highest THC BL -would have significantly higher absorption than those with lighter previous use. There was a statistically significant relationship between exposure and heart rate, and exposure and perceived highness. CONCLUSIONS: THC PK is highly variable and related to baseline THC concentrations and different chemovars. The developed population PK model showed that heavier users had higher THC bioavailability. To better understand the factors affecting THC PK and dose-response relationships, future studies should incorporate a wide range of doses, multiple routes of administration, and different formulations relevant to typical community use.

S-warfarin limited sampling strategy with a population pharmacokinetic approach to estimate exposure and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 activity in healthy adults.

PURPOSE: S-warfarin is used to phenotype cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 activity. This study evaluated S-warfarin limited sampling strategy with a population pharmacokinetic (PK) approach to estimate CYP2C9 activity in healthy adults. METHODS: In 6 previously published studies, a single oral dose of warfarin 10 mg was administered alone or with a CYP2C9 inducer to 100 healthy adults. S-warfarin concentrations were obtained from adults during conditions when subjects were not on any prescribed medications. A population PK model was developed using non-linear mixed effects modeling. Limited sampling models (LSMs) using single- or 2-timepoint concentrations were compared with full PK profiles from intense sampling using empiric Bayesian post hoc estimations of S-warfarin AUC derived from the population PK model. Preset criterion for LSM selection and validation were a correlation coefficient (R2) >0.9, relative percent mean prediction error (%MPE) >-5 to <5%, relative percent mean absolute error (%MAE) ≤ 10%, and relative percent root mean squared error (%RMSE) ≤ 15%. RESULTS: S-warfarin concentrations (n=2540) were well described with a two-compartment model. Mean apparent oral clearance was 0.56 L/hr and volume of distribution was 35.5 L. Clearance decreased 33% with the CYP2C9 *3 allele and increased 42% with lopinavir/ritonavir co-administration. During CYP2C9 constitutive conditions, LSMs at 48 hr and at 72 hr as well as 2-timepoint LSMs were within acceptable limits for R2, %MPE, %MAE, and %RMSE. During CYP2C9 induction, S-warfarin LSMs had unacceptable %MPE, %MAE, and %RMSE. CONCLUSIONS: Phenotyping studies with S-warfarin in healthy subjects can utilize a single- and/or a 2-timepoint LSM with a population PK approach to estimate constitutive CYP2C9 activity.

Relationship between protein biomarkers of chemotherapy response and microsatellite status, tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression in cancer patients.

Chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies are increasingly used in combinations. We determined associations between the presence of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapeutic biomarkers and protein markers of potential chemotherapy response. Data were extracted from a clinical-grade testing database (Caris Life Sciences; February 2015 through November 2017): immunotherapy response markers (microsatellite instability-high [MSI-H], tumor mutational burden-high [TMB-H], and PD-L1 protein expression) and protein chemotherapy response markers (excision repair complementation group 1 [ERCC1], topoisomerase 1 [TOPO1], topoisomerase 2 [TOP2A], thymidylate synthase [TS], tubulin beta 3 [TUBB3], ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M1 [RRM1] and O-6-methyl guanine DNA methyltransferase [MGMT]). Relationships were determined by the Mantel-Haenszel chi-squared test or Fischer's exact tests. Overall, 28,034 patients representing a total of 40 tumor types were assessed. MSI-H was found in 3.3% of patients (73% were also TMB-H), TMB-H, 8.4% (28.3% were also MSI-H) and PD-L1 expression in 11.0% of patients (5.1% were also MSI-H; 16.4% were also TMB-H). Based on concurrent biomarker expression, combinations of immunotherapy with platinum (ERCC1 negativity) or with doxorubicin, epirubicin or etoposide (TOP2A positivity) have a higher probability of response, whereas combinations with irinotecan or topotecan (TOPO1 positivity), with gemcitabine (RRM1 negativity), and fluorouracil, pemetrexed or capecitabine (TS negativity) may be of less benefit. The potential for immunotherapy and taxane (TUBB3 negativity) combinations is present for MSI-H but not TMB-H or PD-L1-expressing tumors; for temozolomide and dacarbazine (MGMT negative), PD-L1 is frequently coexpressed, but MSI-H and TMB-H are not associated. Protein markers of potential chemotherapy response along with next-generation sequencing for immunotherapy response markers can help support rational combinations as part of an individualized, precision oncology approach.

Targeting fusions for improved outcomes in oncology treatment.

BACKGROUND: Fusions are increasingly pursued as oncology therapeutic targets. The current study evaluated differences in outcomes for fusion versus nonfusion targets. METHODS: Outcomes were compared for patients with fusions versus those with other alterations for US Food and Drug Administration-approved single agents (from package inserts) and for patients treated at the University of California at San Diego. RESULTS: A total of 28 drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (6189 patients) were included in the analysis. The median response rate was 68% versus 50% for fusions versus nonfusion matches (odds ratio [OR], 1.67; P < .0001); solid tumor therapies had an OR of 2.07 (P < .0001) and hematologic therapies had an OR of 3.35 (P < .0001) for fusion versus nonfusion targets. The University of California at San Diego analysis included 79 patients in whom fusions were treated of the 2455 patients screened. Patients matched to fusions were found to have a longer median progression-free survival (PFS) (11.6 months; 95% CI, 4.0-35.4 months) compared with those unmatched to fusions (4.9 months; 95% CI, 3.5-8.8 months) (P = .034). Patients with fusions matched to other alterations present in the tumor had a median PFS that was indistinguishable from that of those patients with fusions who were treated with unmatched therapy (4.0 months vs 5.0 months; P = .75). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly higher response rates and a longer PFS were observed when targeting fusions compared with nonfusions. The observations reported in the current study suggest that fusions are important targets and that additional studies are needed to confirm that optimized therapy may require targeting fusions, even in the presence of other alterations.

Evaluation of Omeprazole Limited Sampling Strategies to Estimate Constitutive Cytochrome P450 2C19 Activity in Healthy Adults.

BACKGROUND: Limited sampling strategy (LSS) is a validated method to estimate pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters from a reduced number of samples. Omeprazole is used to phenotype in vivo cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 activity. This study examined an LSS using 2 estimation methods to determine apparent oral clearance (CL/F) and thus CYP2C19 activity. METHODS: Data from 7 previously published studies included healthy subjects receiving a single, oral dose of omeprazole with intensive PK sampling. CL/F was estimated using noncompartmental analysis (NCA) and population PK modeling. LSS was simulated by selecting the 1, 2, 4, and/or 6-hour postdose time points. Linear regression was performed to assess whether CL/F estimated from limited sampling could accurately predict CL/F from the full PK profile. RESULTS: Median CL/F was 23.7 L/h by NCA and 19.3 L/h by population PK modeling. In comparing the LSS NCA estimated versus observed CL/F, all evaluated linear regression models had unacceptable coefficients of determination (r, range: 0.14-0.81). With the population PK approach, 737 plasma concentrations (n = 71) and CYP2C19 genotype data were described with a 1-compartment structural model with mixed zero and first-order absorption and lag time. In comparing the population PK LSS estimated versus observed CL/F, all evaluated linear regression models had unacceptable r (range: 0.02-0.74). Post hoc comparison of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers versus CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers resulted in significantly lower CL/F in poor metabolizers versus extensive metabolizers. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole LSS performed poorly in estimating CL/F using 2 separate estimation approaches and does not seem to be a suitable method for determining CYP2C19 activity.

Vincristine-associated Neuropathy With Antifungal Usage: A Kaiser Northern California Experience.

The dose-limiting toxicity for vincristine is peripheral neuropathy which can be potentiated with concurrent usage of azole antifungals. The current retrospective study assessed the incidence of concurrent vincristine and azole antifungal usage to determine if it led to increased neurotoxicity for the Kaiser Northern California pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and Hodgkin lymphoma patient population. Data were obtained from the electronic medical record (2007 to 2014). In total, 130 subjects received at least one dose of vincristine for ALL or Hodgkin lymphoma (median age 9, 88% ALL, 58% male, 47% Caucasian). Thirty one percent of patients received concurrent antifungal usage (fluconazole, 78%; voriconazole, 10%; fluconazole/voriconazole, 12%); however, concurrent antifungal usage accounted for <15% of vincristine doses. Grade 2 or greater neuropathy occurred in 51% of patients; grade 3 neuropathy was present in 8% of patients. No difference in the incidence of grade 2 or greater neuropathy was observed with the concurrent use of antifungal therapy (P=0.35), sex (P=0.59), type of cancer (P=0.41), ethnicity (P=0.29), or age (P=0.39), but was higher with increasing amount of vincristine doses (P=0.004). These results suggest that concurrent azole antifungal usage with vincristine for patients with ALL and Hodgkin lymphoma was low in the Kaiser Northern California population and limited usage as needed may be reasonable and safe.

Dosing Three-Drug Combinations That Include Targeted Anti-Cancer Agents: Analysis of 37,763 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Combining targeted and cytotoxic agents has the potential to improve efficacy and attenuate resistance for metastatic cancer. Information regarding safe starting doses for clinical trials of novel three-drug combinations is lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Published phase I-III adult oncology clinical trials of three-drug combinations involving a targeted agent were identified by PubMed search (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013). A dose percentage was calculated to compare the dose used in combination to the single agent recommended dose: (U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved/recommended phase II dose/maximum tolerated dose). The additive dose percentage was the sum of the dose percentages for each drug in the combination. RESULTS: A total of 37,763 subjects and 243 drug combinations were included. Only 28% of studies could give each of the three agents at 100%. For combinations involving two targeted agents and a cytotoxic agent, the lowest starting additive dose percentage was 133%, which increased to 250% if two antibodies were included. For combinations of one targeted agent and two cytotoxic agents, the lowest additive safe dose percentage was 137%. When both cytotoxic agents were held at 100%, as occurred in 56% of studies (which generally used cytotoxic doublets with known combination safety dosing), the lowest safe dose percentage was 225% (providing that a histone deacetylase inhibitor was not the targeted agent). CONCLUSION: These findings serve as a safe starting point for dosing novel three-drug combinations involving a targeted agent in clinical trials and practice. The Oncologist 2017;22:576-584 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Targeted and cytotoxic drug combinations can improve efficacy and overcome resistance. More knowledge of safe starting doses would facilitate use of combinations in clinical trials and practice. Analysis of 37,763 subjects (243 combinations) showed three drugs could be safely administered, but less than 30% of combinations could include all three drugs at full dose. Dose reductions to 45% of the dose of each single agent may be required. Combinations involving two antibodies required fewer dose reductions, and the use of established cytotoxic doublets made initial dose assignment easier.

Dosing targeted and cytotoxic two-drug combinations: Lessons learned from analysis of 24,326 patients reported 2010 through 2013.

Combining agents has the potential to attenuate resistance in metastatic cancer. However, knowledge of appropriate starting doses for novel drug combinations in clinical trials and practice is lacking. Analysis of 372 published studies was used to ascertain safe starting doses for doublets involving a cytotoxic and targeted agent. Phase I-III adult oncology clinical trial publications (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013) were identified (PubMed). The dose of drug used in each combination was compared to the single agent recommended dose [FDA-approved/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D)/maximum tolerated dose (MTD)]. Dose percentages were calculated as: (safe dose of drug in combination/dose of drug as single agent at FDA/RP2D/MTD) × 100. Additive dose percentages were the sum of the dose percentage for each drug. A total of 24,326 patients (248 drug combinations) were analyzed. In 38% of studies, both drugs could be administered at 100% of their FDA-approved/RP2D/MTD dose. The lowest safe additive dose percentage was 41% with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) or histone deacetylase inhibitors as the targeted agents; 82%, in the absence of these agents; and 97%, with an antibody in the combination. If one drug was administered at 100% of the single agent dose, the lowest safe dose percentage for the second drug was 17% (cytotoxic at 100%) or 36% (targeted at 100%) of the FDA-approved/RP2D/MTD dose. The current findings can help inform safe starting doses for novel two-drug combinations (cytotoxic and targeted agents) in the context of clinical trials and practice.

Reverse repurposing: Potential utility of cancer drugs in nonmalignant illnesses.

Growth and immune process dysregulation can result in both cancer and nonmalignant disease (hereditary or acquired, with and without predisposition to malignancy). Moreover, perhaps unexpectedly, many nonmalignant illnesses harbor genomic alterations indistinguishable from druggable oncogenic drivers. Therefore, targeted compounds used successfully to treat cancer may have therapeutic potential for nonmalignant conditions harboring the same target. MEK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), and NRG1/ERBB pathway genes have all been implicated in both cancer and noncancerous conditions, and several cognate antagonists, as well as Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, and CD20-directed antibodies, have established or theoretical therapeutic potential to bridge cancer and benign diseases. Intriguingly, pharmacologically tractable cancer drivers characterize a wide spectrum of disorders without malignant potential, including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease and a variety of other neurodegenerative conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, achondroplastic dwarfism, and endometriosis. Expanded repositioning of oncology agents in order to benefit benign but serious medical illnesses is warranted.

Transcriptomic analysis of GITR and GITR ligand reveals cancer immune heterogeneity with implications for GITR targeting.

Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor related protein (GITR) is a transmembrane protein expressed mostly on CD25+CD4+ regulatory T-cells (Tregs) and upregulated on all T-cells upon activation. It is a T-cell co-stimulatory receptor and has demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in pre-clinical studies. To date, however, the efficacy of GITR agonism has been discouraging in clinical trials. This study explores GITR and GITR ligand (GITR-L) ribonucleic acid (RNA) expression in solid tumors in an attempt to delineate causes for variable responses to GITR agonists. RNA expression levels of 514 patients with a variety of cancer types were normalized to internal housekeeping gene profiles and ranked as percentiles. 99/514 patients (19.3%) had high GITR expression (defined as ≥ 75th percentile). Breast and lung cancer had the highest proportion of patients with high GITR expression (39% and 35%, respectively). The expression of concomitant high GITR and low-moderate GITR-L expression (defined as <75th percentile) was present in 31% and 30% of patients with breast and lung cancer respectively. High GITR expression also showed a significant independent association with high RNA expression of other immune modulator proteins, namely, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) ≥1 (odds ratio (OR) 2.15, P=0.008), CTLA4 (OR=2.17, P=0.05) and OX40 high RNA expression (OR=2.64, P=0.001). Overall, these results suggest that breast and lung cancer have a high proportion of patients with a GITR and GITR-L RNA expression profile that merits further investigation in GITR agonism studies. The association of high GITR expression with high CTLA4 and OX40 RNA expression, as well as positive PD-L1 IHC, provides a rationale for a combination approach targeting these specific immune modulator proteins in patients whose tumors show such co-expression.

At the right dose: personalised (N-of-1) dosing for precision oncology.

The objective of oncology therapeutics, especially in the age of precision medicine, is to give the right drug(s) to the right patient at the right time. Yet, a major challenge is finding the right dose for each patient. Determining safe and efficacious doses of oncology treatments, especially for novel combination therapies, can be challenging. Moreover, traditionally, dosing cancer drugs is based on giving each patient the same dose (a flat dose) or a dose based on surface area/weight. But patients' ability to tolerate drugs is influenced by additional factors including, but not limited to age, gender, race, comorbidities, organ function, and metabolism. Herein, we present evidence that, in the era of targeted drugs, individualised drug dosing determined by starting at reduced doses and using intrapatient dose escalation can yield safe and effective personalised dosing of novel combinations of approved drugs that have not previously undergone formal phase I trials and can also optimise dosing of tested drug regimens.

Brief Report: Dolutegravir Plasma Protein Binding and Unbound Concentrations During Pregnancy and Postpartum.

BACKGROUND: Clinical interpretation of the reduced dolutegravir (DTG) plasma concentrations reported during pregnancy is complicated by its high plasma protein binding. Plasma proteins significantly decrease during pregnancy, and understanding changes in DTG protein binding and its therapeutically active unbound concentrations are necessary to evaluate the impact of pregnancy changes on DTG pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Retrospective assessment of plasma samples from pregnant women living with HIV enrolled in the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network P1026s study receiving 50 mg DTG film-coated tablets once daily as part of clinical care. Unbound and total DTG concentrations were determined predose (C0) and at maximum (Cmax) concentrations during the second trimester (2T), third trimester (3T), and postpartum (PP). Percentage unbound was calculated as the ratio of ultrafiltrate unbound DTG concentration to total DTG concentration. RESULTS: Twenty-nine mothers were included for protein binding evaluations; 15, 27, and 23 from the 2T, 3T, and PP, respectively. DTG % unbound for C0 and Cmax were significantly different by stage of pregnancy, with 3T significantly higher compared with PP; 1.02% vs. 0.69% (P = 0.0067) for C0 and 0.76% vs. 0.46% for Cmax (P = 0.0056). Median (IQR) unbound concentrations for C0 were 6.3 (4.7-18.4) for the 2T, 8.0 (5.6-16.9) for the 3T, and 13.3 (8.4-22.7) ng/mL PP, significantly different between 2T and PP (P = 0.0039), but not different between 3T and PP (P = 0.46). CONCLUSION: Lower total DTG plasma concentrations during pregnancy coincide with temporal decreases in DTG protein binding, resulting in comparable unbound DTG concentrations during the 3T and PP.

Dosing of 3 Targeted Agents in Novel Drug Combinations Used at the Precision Medicine Clinic of the University of California San Diego.

BACKGROUND: The diversity in the genomic landscape of advanced and metastatic tumors calls for combination therapies based on the genomic signature associated with each tumor. Determining safe and tolerable doses for novel combinations of oncology drugs is essential for a precision medicine approach, but can also require dose reductions. Trametinib, palbociclib, and everolimus are among the targeted therapies most often used in novel combinations at our precision medicine clinic. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safe, tolerable dosing of trametinib, palbociclib, and everolimus when used as part of novel combinations with other agents for the treatment of advanced or metastatic solid tumors. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors who received trametinib, everolimus, or palbociclib plus other therapies as a part of novel combinations between December 2011 and July 2018 at the University of California San Diego. Patients were excluded if they received trametinib, everolimus, or palbociclib in standard combinations, such as dabrafenib plus trametinib, everolimus plus fulvestrant, everolimus plus letrozole, and palbociclib plus letrozole. Dosing and adverse events were determined through a review of the electronic medical records. A safe, tolerable drug combination dose was defined as being tolerated for at least 1 month, with no clinically significant serious adverse events. RESULTS: A safe, tolerable dose was determined for 76% of the 71 patients who received trametinib, 88% of the 48 patients who received everolimus, and 73% of the 41 patients receiving palbociclib when used in combination with other therapies. For patients with clinically significant adverse events, dose reductions were attempted in 30% of the trametinib recipients, in 17% of everolimus recipients, and in 45% of palbociclib recipients. When used in combination with other therapies, the optimal dosing of trametinib, palbociclib, and everolimus was lower than the standard single-agent dosing: it was 1 mg daily for trametinib; 5 mg daily for everolimus; and 75 mg daily, for 3 weeks on and 1 week off for palbociclib. Of note, everolimus could not be given concomitantly with trametinib at these doses. CONCLUSION: Safe and tolerable dosing of novel combination therapies that includes trametinib, everolimus, or palbociclib is feasible for a precision medicine approach. However, neither results from this study nor results from previous studies could support the use of everolimus in combination with trametinib, even at reduced doses.

Nevirapine exposure with WHO pediatric weight band dosing: enhanced therapeutic concentrations predicted based on extensive international pharmacokinetic experience.

Nevirapine (NVP) is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) used worldwide as part of combination antiretroviral therapy in infants and children to treat HIV infection. Dosing based on either weight or body surface area has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) but can be difficult to implement in resource-limited settings. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed simplified weight band dosing for NVP, but it has not been critically evaluated. NVP pharmacokinetic data were combined from eight pediatric clinical trials (Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group [PACTG] studies 245, 356, 366, 377, 403, 1056, and 1069 and Children with HIV in Africa Pharmacokinetics and Adherence of Simple Antiretroviral Regimens [CHAPAS]) representing subjects from multiple continents and across the pediatric age continuum. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to characterize developmental changes in NVP disposition, identify potential sources of NVP pharmacokinetic variability, and assess various pediatric dosing strategies and their impact on NVP exposure. Age, CYP2B6 genotype, and ritonavir were independent predictors of oral NVP clearance. The Triomune fixed-dose tablet was an independent predictor of bioavailability compared to the liquid and other tablet formulations. Monte Carlo simulations of the final model were used to assess WHO weight band dosing recommendations. The final pharmacokinetic model indicated that WHO weight band dosing is likely to result in a percentage of children with NVP exposure within the target range similar to that obtained with FDA dosing. Weight band dosing of NVP proposed by the WHO has the potential to provide a simple and effective dosing strategy for resource limited settings.

Cetuximab in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Alterations.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion alterations represent 4%-10% of all EGFR mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and result in resistance to standard EGFR-directed therapies. EGFR exon 20 insertions restrict the size of the kinase pocket, prohibiting the entry of approved EGFR kinase inhibitor drugs. Structural In Silico modeling also predicts that EGFR exon 20 insertion anomalies increase attractive electrostatic dimerization, hence stabilizing the activating dimer configuration. EGFR antibodies such as cetuximab that interfere with dimerization may lead to responses. We identified three non-smoking patients with NSCLC and EGFR exon 20 insertions treated with cetuximab-based therapy. All three patients demonstrated clinical benefit. A 58-year-old woman achieved prolonged stable disease lasting 9 months, while a 76-year-old woman and 38-year-old man maintained a partial response with progression-free survivals of 13 months and 32 months, respectively. In conclusion, cetuximab merits further investigation as it appears to be an additional promising therapy for overcoming EGFR exon 20 insertion-related resistance.

Combination high-dose interleukin-2 and nivolumab for programmed cell death-1 refractory metastatic melanoma: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options are needed for metastatic melanoma refractory to therapies directed against programmed cell death-1. High-dose interleukin-2 has the potential to overcome programmed cell death-1 resistance. CASE PRESENTATION: We report three consecutive Caucasian patients, two female (60 and 55 years old) and one male (56 years old), refractory to anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy who were treated with concurrent nivolumab and standard-dosing bolus high-dose interleukin-2. We did not see any unexpected toxicities with overlapping treatments as compared with either high-dose interleukin-2 or nivolumab alone. CONCLUSIONS: The tolerance and disease control observed among the three patients in this limited series support formal exploration of this combination.

Liquid biopsy: current technology and clinical applications.

Liquid biopsies are increasingly used for cancer molecular profiling that enables a precision oncology approach. Circulating extracellular nucleic acids (cell-free DNA; cfDNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be isolated from the blood and other body fluids. This review will focus on current technologies and clinical applications for liquid biopsies. ctDNA/cfDNA has been isolated and analyzed using many techniques, e.g., droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics (BEAMing), tagged-amplicon deep sequencing (TAm-Seq), cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing (CAPP-Seq), whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS-Seq), whole exome sequencing (WES), and whole genome sequencing (WGS). CTCs have been isolated using biomarker-based cell capture, and positive or negative enrichment based on biophysical and other properties. ctDNA/cfDNA and CTCs are being exploited in a variety of clinical applications: differentiating unique immune checkpoint blockade response patterns using serial samples; predicting immune checkpoint blockade response based on baseline liquid biopsy characteristics; predicting response and resistance to targeted therapy and chemotherapy as well as immunotherapy, including CAR-T cells, based on serial sampling; assessing shed DNA from multiple metastatic sites; assessing potentially actionable alterations; analyzing prognosis and tumor burden, including after surgery; interrogating difficult-to biopsy tumors; and detecting cancer at early stages. The latter can be limited by the small amounts of tumor-derived components shed into the circulation; furthermore, cfDNA assessment in all cancers can be confounded by clonal hematopoeisis of indeterminate potential, especially in the elderly. CTCs can be technically more difficult to isolate that cfDNA, but permit functional assays, as well as evaluation of CTC-derived DNA, RNA and proteins, including single-cell analysis. Blood biopsies are less invasive than tissue biopsies and hence amenable to serial collection, which can provide critical molecular information in real time. In conclusion, liquid biopsy is a powerful tool, and remarkable advances in this technology have impacted multiple aspects of precision oncology, from early diagnosis to management of refractory metastatic disease. Future research may focus on fluids beyond blood, such as ascites, effusions, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid, as well as methylation patterns and elements such as exosomes.

Optimizing Dolutegravir Initiation in Neonates Using Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation.

BACKGROUND: A knowledge gap exists for dolutegravir (DTG) pharmacokinetics and safety during the first 4 weeks of life, preventing safe and effective DTG use in neonates. SETTING: Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation were used to assess newborn DTG dosing requirements during the first few days of life as a function of maternal DTG dosing history before delivery. METHODS: DTG PK data were obtained from pregnant women and infants enrolled in the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network P1026S study. Maternal and neonate population pharmacokinetic models were separately developed. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to simulate neonatal concentrations after 2 doses of DTG after birth for infants born to mothers either receiving or not receiving DTG before delivery. RESULTS: In DTG-naïve infants, a 5-mg DTG dose at birth with a second dose after 48 hours maintained median concentrations above the lower bound of the target range (0.77 µg/mL) and below the upper bound of the target range (7.34 µg/mL representing 2-fold above the adult Cmax value). In DTG-exposed infants, a 5-mg DTG dose at 24 hours after birth with a second dose after 48 hours maintained median concentrations within or nearly within the target range, even if the last maternal DTG dose was taken as soon as 6 hours or as long as 24 hours before delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Newborn DTG dosing requirements during the first few days of life depend on maternal DTG dosing history before delivery. These results may help the design of future clinical studies of DTG in the neonatal population.