Salivary Antioxidant Profile in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis and Periodontitis.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare periodontal status and antioxidant profile in unstimulated saliva of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with periodontitis and systemically healthy periodontitis patients. Design: Twenty patients with established diagnoses of systemic sclerosis and periodontitis (SSc group) and 20 systemically healthy individuals with periodontitis (P group) were enrolled in the study. Clinical periodontal parameters (clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), periodontal probing depth (PPD), and gingival index (GI)) and concentration of uric acid (UA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) in unstimulated saliva samples were assessed. Results: There were significantly higher mean values of CAL (4.8 ± 0.21 mm versus 3.18 ± 0.17 mm; p ≤ 0.001) and GR (1.66 ± 0.90 mm versus 0.46 ± 0.54 mm; p ≤ 0.001) in the SSc group when compared to the P group. Significantly higher level of GPX (p ≤ 0.001) and SOD (p ≤ 0.001) in unstimulated saliva was detected in the SSc group in comparison with the P group. The specific activity of UA did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.083). Conclusion: The results may indicate higher periodontal destruction and antioxidant perturbations in unstimulated saliva of SSc patients with periodontitis compared to systemically healthy periodontitis patients.

The use of collagen porcine dermal matrix and connective tissue graft with modified coronally advanced tunnel technique in the treatment of multiple adjacent type I gingival recessions: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy and esthetic outcome of porcine-derived dermal collagen matrix in comparison with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions (MAGR), 6 and 12 months after the surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with bilateral type I MAGR were treated randomly with porcine-derived dermal collagen matrix (test site) or connective tissue graft (control site) in combination with a modified coronally advanced tunnel technique. The primary objectives were to evaluate the mean and complete root coverage. The secondary objectives were to assess keratinized tissue width, gingival thickness gain, and root coverage esthetic score. RESULTS: Six and 12 months postoperatively, both groups achieved significant improvements in all clinical parameters compared to baseline, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. Mean root coverage change (Δ12m - 6 m) was statistically significant between the groups in favor of connective tissue graft, and twice as many patients exhibited a complete coverage of all recessions in the control group than the test group. CONCLUSION: The porcine-derived dermal collagen matrix combined with a modified coronally advanced tunnel technique resulted in satisfactory clinical and esthetic outcomes, which were similar to connective tissue graft. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Porcine-derived dermal collagen matrix (XDM) may be proposed as a substitute for connective tissue graft in multiple adjacent recession treatment due to successful root coverage, a significant increase of gingival thickness, and high esthetic outcomes. The clinical benefits for the use of XDM could be: (a) second surgical wound avoidance, (b) patient discomfort decrease, and (c) lower complications' rate.

Clinical and CBCT-based diagnosis of furcation involvement in patients with severe periodontitis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the use of periodontal probing and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in the diagnosis of furcation involvement (FI) in patients with chronic generalized severe periodontitis. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients with chronic generalized severe periodontitis were included in this study. In total, 174 furcation sites (all in molar teeth) were analyzed. FI was assessed at three sites (buccal, mesiopalatal, and distopalatal) of maxillary molars, and at two sites (buccal and oral) of mandibular molars. FI was assessed both clinically (periodontal probing) and on CBCT images, using a dichotomous scale (present/absent). The agreement between clinical and CBCT-based findings was calculated. RESULTS: FI were more often detected by means of CBCT than by means of clinical examination. Agreement between the evaluation methods was present in 46.9% of cases (63.3% in maxilla, 45.0% in mandible). FI detected clinically was confirmed by means of CBCT in 24% of the evaluated sites. The largest agreement (73.7%) in FI detection was found in the distopalatal maxillary sites between CBCT and clinical probing. The smallest agreement (36.6%) was found in the buccal sites of the mandibular molars, in which 63.3% of FI were detected using CBCT only, but not clinically. CONCLUSION: The number of FI detected by means of CBCT was larger than by means of periodontal probing. In those cases in which chronic generalized severe periodontitis is clinically diagnosed, and surgical treatment is necessary, CBCT may be suggested as an adjunct tool for FI assessment.