Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 35(12): 966-971, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29746373

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Akathisia, a distressing movement disorder induced by butyrophenones, has been described with low doses of droperidol used for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis, but the incidence remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of akathisia after PONV prophylaxis with two doses of droperidol in comparison with ondansetron, in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. We hypothesised that the incidence of akathisia is higher with droperidol than that with ondansetron. DESIGN: Randomised controlled double blind trial. SETTING: Two University Hospital Centres and two private Clinics from January to September 2014. PATIENTS: Patients (n=297) undergoing general anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery were randomly allocated to receive PONV prophylaxis with droperidol (0.625 or 1.25 mg) or ondansetron 4 mg; patients of the three groups also received 4 mg of dexamethasone. Exclusion criteria were contraindication to droperidol and ondansetron, use of psychotropic medications or benzodiazepines or history of psychotic illness. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received droperidol (0.625 or 1.25 mg) or ondansetron 4 mg during general anaesthesia. After discharge from the postanaesthesia care unit presence and severity of akathisia were assessed using the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale at 4 h postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Score of the Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia of Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale. RESULTS: The number of akathisia observed was 1/118 (0.8%) in the ondansetron group, 1/84 (1.2%) in droperidol 0.625 mg group, and 3/87 (3.4%) in droperidol 1.25 mg group. The akathisia rate difference among the three groups was not significant (P = 0.52). We could not demonstrate significant differences in the incidence of akathisia between the two doses of droperidol. The only case of marked akathisia treated with benzodiazepines was observed after droperidol 1.25 mg. CONCLUSION: The use of droperidol or ondansetron for PONV prophylaxis is associated to a low incidence of akathisia (0.8 to 3.4%) after general anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01942343.


Asunto(s)
Acatisia Inducida por Medicamentos/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Droperidol/efectos adversos , Ondansetrón/efectos adversos , Profilaxis Posexposición , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/epidemiología , Adulto , Acatisia Inducida por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/tendencias , Antieméticos/administración & dosificación , Antieméticos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Droperidol/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ondansetrón/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Posexposición/tendencias , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/diagnóstico , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/prevención & control
2.
J Pain ; 16(11): 1136-46, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26299436

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: This French multicenter prospective cohort study recruited 391 patients to investigate the risk factors for persistent pain after elective cesarean delivery, focusing on psychosocial aspects adjusted for other known medical factors. Perioperative data were collected and specialized questionnaires were completed to assess reports of pain at the site of surgery. Three dependent outcomes were considered: pain at the third month after surgery (M3, n = 268; risk = 28%), pain at the sixth month after surgery (M6, n = 239; risk = 19%), and the cumulative incidence (up to M6) of neuropathic pain, as assessed using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (n = 218; risk = 24.5%). The neuropathic aspect of reported pain changed over time in more than 60% of cases, pain being more intense if associated with neuropathic features. Whatever the dependent outcome, a high mental component of quality of life (SF-36) was protective. Pain at M3 was also predicted by pain reported during current pregnancy and a history of miscarriage. Pain at M6 was also predicted by report of a postoperative complication. Incident neuropathic pain was predicted by pain reported during current pregnancy, a previous history of a peripheral neuropathic event, and preoperative anxiety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00812734. PERSPECTIVE: Persistent pain after cesarean delivery has a relatively frequent neuropathic aspect but this is less stable than that after other surgeries. When comparing the risk factor analyses with published data for hysterectomy, the influence of preoperative psychological factors seems less important, possibly because of the different context and environment.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/efectos adversos , Cesárea/psicología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Neuralgia/psicología , Dolor Postoperatorio/psicología , Adulto , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Neuralgia/epidemiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA