Intestinal ischemia in patients with incarcerated groin hernia: proposal and validation of a score.

PURPOSE: Intestinal ischemia (II) is the most critical factor to determine in patients with incarcerated groin hernia (IGH) because II could be reversible, and it is considered as a "time sensitive condition." Although predictive factors of II were identified in several previous studies, preoperative diagnosis of II cannot be reliably made or excluded by any known parameter. The aims of this study were: to devise and to validate a clinic-biologic score, with a strong discriminatory power, for predicting the risk of II in patients with IGH. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective bicentric study including 335 patients with IGH. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictive factors of II. We assigned points for the score according to the regression coefficient. The area under the curve (AUC) was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The scoring system was then prospectively validated on a second independent population of 45 patients admitted for IGH in the same departments (internal validation). RESULTS: Four independent predictive factors of II were identified: heart rate, duration of symptoms before admission, prothrombin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). A predictive score of II was established based on these independent predictive factors. Sensitivity was 94.50%; specificity was 92.70%. The AUC of this score was 0.97. The AUC was 0.96 when the score was applied on the second population of patients. CONCLUSIONS: We performed a score to predict the risk of intestinal II with a good accuracy (the AUC of our score was 0.97). This score is reliable and reproducible, so it can help a surgeon to prioritize patients with II for surgery (especially at this time of COVID-19 pandemic), because ischemia could be reversible, avoiding thus intestinal necrosis.

A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mini-invasive colorectal cancer surgery was adopted widely in recent years. This meta-analysis aimed to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with open right hemicolectomy (OS) for malignant disease. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines with random effects model were adopted using Review Manager Version 5.3 for pooled estimates. RESULTS: Seven studies that involved 506 patients were included. Compared to OS, HALS improved results in terms of blood loss (MD = 53.67, 95% CI 10.67 to 96.67, p = 0.01), time to first flatus (MD = 21.11, 95% CI 14.99 to 27.23, p < 0.00001), postoperative pain score, and overall hospital stay (MD = 3.47, 95% CI 2.12 to 4.82, p < 0.00001). There was no difference as concerns post-operative mortality, morbidity (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.7, p = 0.12), wound infection (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.76, p = 0.32), operative time (MD = - 16.10, 95% CI [- 36.57 to 4.36], p = 0.12), harvested lymph nodes (MD = 0.59, 95% CI - 0.18 to 1.36, p = 0.13), and recurrence (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.15, p = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: HALS is an efficient alternative to OS in right colectomy which combines the advantages of OS with the mini-invasive surgery.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Complete Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic complete mesocolon excision (LCME) for right colonic cancer improves oncological outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare intraoperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes after LCME and open total mesocolon excision (OCME) for right-sided colonic cancers. METHODS: Literature searches of electronic databases and manual searches up to January 31, 2019, were performed. Random-effects meta-analysis model was used. Review Manager Version 5.3 was used for pooled estimates. RESULTS: After screening 1334 articles, 10 articles with a total of 2778 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared to OCME, LCME improves results in terms of overall morbidity (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.80, p = 0.0001), blood loss (MD = 56.56, 95% CI 19.05 to 94.06, p = 0.003), hospital stay (MD = 2.18 day, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.83, p = 0.009), and local (OR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.12, p = 0.03) and distant recurrence (OR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.23-2.16, p = 0.0008). There was no significant difference regarding mortality, anastomosis leakage, number of harvested lymph nodes, and 3-year disease-free survival. Open approach was significantly better than laparoscopy in terms of operative time (MD = - 34.76 min, 95% CI - 46.01 to - 23.50, p < 0.00001) and chyle leakage (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that LCME in right colon cancer surgery is superior to OCME in terms of overall morbidity, blood loss, hospital stay, and local and distant recurrence with a moderate grade of recommendation due to the retrospective nature of the included studies.

Atypical form of peritoneal tuberculosis.

It was a 48-year-old woman with a right flank mass. On examination there was a hard and painful mass of the right side, centered by a fistula orifice with a diameter of 5 mm. Abdominal computed tomography showed an intraperitoneal tissue structure in relation to the parietal peritoneum in the left hypochondria. A scanno-guided biopsy was performed. Pathological examination revealed non-specific inflammatory lesions. The evolution was marked by the appearance of a purulent fistula in the puncture site. A biopsy of the margins of the fistulous orifice of the left hypochondria was performed. Pathological examination found a granular infiltrate with caseous necrosis confirming the diagnosis of tuberculosis. The patient was put under anti-tuberculosis treatment with a good clinical and radiological evolution.

Predictive factors for major amputation of lower limb in diabetic foot: about 430 patients.

BACKGROUND: Major amputation of the lower limb is defined by a leg or thigh amputation. The aim of our work was identifying predictive factors for lower limb major amputation in patients with diabetes admitted on for foot lesions through using an administrative data base. METHODS: It was a retrospective study ranging from June 1st, 2008 to December 31st, 2011, which included all the patients admitted on for an infected diabetic foot to the surgery unit B of Charles Nicolle hospital in Tunis. The main judgement criterion was the major amputation of the lower limb. We have done a descriptive and a comparative study, with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We have enrolled 319 men and 111 women. The average age was 60.5 ± 12 years. Ninety five patients (24%) had a major amputation. Former inpatient, patient readmitted within one month post-operatively, stay in intensive care, admission in intensive care within 48hours after admission, age ≥ 65 years, presence of kidney problem, preoperative stay and length of intervention were identified as predictive factors of major amputation in the univariate analysis. Age was the only independent variable predictive for major amputation which appeared from the multivariate analysis (p=0.004).  The age cut-off ≥ 65 years has a specificity of 69 % and a sensitivity of 47% [p=0.004, OR=1.971, IC 95% : 1.239-3.132]. CONCLUSIONS: Age was the only independent predictive factor for major amputation of the lower limb in the diabetic foot with a threshold value higher or equal to 65 years. Patients aged more than 65 had 1.9 time more risk to undergo major amputation of the lower limb.

Pseudo papillary and solid tumor of the pancreas: a rare tumor and a difficult diagnosis.

The pseudopapillary and solid tumor of the pancreas is a rare disease that accounts for 2% of pancreatic tumors. It affects mainly young, female adults. The clinical features are not specific, hence the diagnostic difficulty and the importance of imaging. The diagnosis is based on pathological examination coupled with immunohistochemistry. The aim of our work was to report the difficulty of the diagnostic procedure in a patient with a pancreatic cystic tumor.

Prognostic factors in rectal cancer: where is the evidence?

BACKGROUND: In rectal cancer, the 5 years survival is about 53 % for all stages: it remains low in spite of the progress of diagnostic and therapeutic tools. The aim of this work was to provide evidence based answers to the following question: what are the pre, intra and post operative prognostic factors in rectal cancer? METHODS: We have carried out a search in the following data bases: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus. The key words used were: « rectal cancer ¼, « adenocarcinoma ¼, « overall survival ¼, « disease-free survival ¼, « prognosis ¼ and « evidence-based medicine ¼. The overall 5 years survival rate has been retained as primary outcome measure. Recurrence-free survival has been retained as secondary endpoint. Were included meta-analyses and systematic reviews of clinical trials dating back to less than six years. RESULTS:   We retrieved 270 publications, 27 articles only met the above-mentioned eligibility criteria and thereof have been retained in this work. A high operating volume, a specialized surgeon in colorectal surgery, a total mesorectal excision, an adjuvant chemotherapy given within no more than 8 weeks following the curative resection improve prognosis in rectal cancer with level I of evidence. Anastomotic leak and diabetes worsen prognosis in rectal cancer with level I of evidence. Margin of surgical resection must be RO to improve prognosis in rectal cancer with level I of evidence. CONCLUSION: The main prognostic factors found in literature which we should keep in mind are those on which surgeons can  act:  neoadjuvant treatment,  high operating volume of the surgeon,  high tie of the inferior mesenteric  artery,  mesorectal excision , RO resection,  improvement of the techniques of intersphincteric resection and techniques of anastomosis   and adjuvant chemotherapy within less than 8 weeks when appropriate.

Alkalin phosphatase is a predictive factor of unresecability in ampullary and periampullary tumors.

BACKGROUND: Patients with malignant obstructive jaundice should undergo surgery on the basis of results of preoperative imaging. However, about half of patients are found to be unsuitable forresection during surgical exploration. Our study aimed to determine the clinicobiologicalcharacteristics that predict the resecability of ampullary and periampullary tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 49 patients (45% men and 55% women) who had malignant obstructive jaundice collected in the Department B of generalsurgery, Charles Nicolle hospital between July 1, 2008 and December 31, 2013. Predictivevariables of unresecability in malignant obstructive jaundice were identified using univariate andmultivariate analysis. RESULTS: 49 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 66,3±12,9 years. Twenty patients underwent surgery. Radical resection was performed in 12 patients and surgical palliation by biliary bypass was performed in 8 patients. Twenty-nine patients unfit for surgery underwent endoscopic stenting and chemotherapy. At univariate analysis, age (p=0,016), body mass index (p=0,033), worse general health status (p=0,037), locally advanced disease (p<0,001), serum conjugated bilirubin level (p=0,055), and serum level alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (p=0,014) were associated with unresectableampullary and periampullary tumors. At multivariate analysis serum level ALP was identify as an independent factor of unresecability in malignant obstructive jaundice [OR=0,996; IC à 95% (0,992-1,000) ;p=0,048]. The area under the ROC curve was 0,745 (p=0,016). CONCLUSION: Serum level of ALP can predict resecability in malignant obstructive jaundice. Further studies are needed to identify other factors predicting resecability and prognosis of ampullary and periampullary tumors.

Prevalence and risk factors of pressure ulcers in a Tunisian hospital.

BACKGROUND: the aim of thisstudywas to investigate the prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients at the Charles Nicolle Hospital in Tunis, measure the risk of their occurrence, analyzepreventive and curative measuresundertaken and evaluatefactorspredisposing to pressure ulcers. METHODS: A one-day survey was performed in all hospitalized patients. Emergency services, neonatology and pediatrics were excluded. The Braden scale was used to measure the patient's risk for the development of pressure ulcers. Analysis of risk factors was performed using SPSS version 19 software. RESULTS: A total of 473 patients was included. The mean age was 52.26 years. Nearly 10% of patients had a moderate or a high risk of developing pressure ulcers with a Braden score less than 18. The prevalence of patients with pressure ulcers was 5.3% with a prevalence of 4.7% of nosocomial pressure ulcer. There was no significant difference in prevalence between medical and surgical services. The prevalence was relatively more important in intensive care and general surgery. The most frequent sites were sacrum and heels. Stages 3 (46.4%) and 2 (37.5%) were the mainly stages descriped. Evaluation of management of bedsores formed revealed that half was treated with modern wound dressings. Statistical analysis revealed that a Braden score <18 is correlated with pressure ulcers ( 96% of patients with bedsores. Patients transferred from other services, patients recently operated or those with probably inadequate diet seem to be more at risk of developing pressure ulcers. In contrast, age and sex were not identified as significant risk factors. CONCLUSION: pressure ulcer remains a significant problem in hospital.  This problem is preventable when applying adequate prevention but its management requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Predictive factors of failure and mortality after CT-Guided percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis.

BACKGROUND: The traditional approach to the drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is open necrosectomy. As an alternative to open necrosectomy, percutaneous drainage is the first-line treatment of IPN. This study is aimed to identify predictive factor of failure after CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) of IPN. METHODS: Between June 1st 1988 and October 31th 2011, 26 patients with IPN were treated by PCD. The outcome measures were the failure of the PCD and/or death. A descriptive analysis was performed followed by a comparative analysis of alive versus deceased patients and success group versus failure group. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine predictive factors of failure after percutaneous drainage or death. RESULTS: The failure and mortality rates were respectively 38% and 34%. The size of catheter inferior to 10 French was the only variable associated with the percutaneous drainage failure (OR=27, CI95% [2.5-284.6], p=0.006]. The collection number on CT scan was associated with mortality (OR=2.2, IC95% [1-5.1], p=0.050). CONCLUSION: PCD with catheter size equal or greater than 10 French is efficient tool for the treatment of IPN. Collection number on CT scan is an independent predictive factor of mortality.

Prognostic Nutritional Index score is useful to predict post-operative mortality and morbidity in gastric cancer.

Background - The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) score is based on the level of lymphocytes and albuminemia. The aim of this study was to validate the pre-operative PNI score for predicting post-operative mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for gastric cancer. Methods - This retrospective study collected data from patients operated on for a gastric cancer at the surgical unit B of Charles Nicolle's hospital in Tunis between January 1st, 2008 and December 31, 2012. The main outcome measure was post-operative death within 30 days. The secondary outcome was post-operative morbidity (within 30 days). We have performed a descriptive analysis, a univariate and multivariate analysis with logistic regression and a ROC curve analysis. Results - 14 women and 26 men were enrolled, with a sex ratio of 1,85. The mean age was 63 ± 15. Post-operative mortality and morbidity rate were respectively 18% and 28%. The ROC curve allowed us to validate the PNI for predicting post-operative mortality in gastric cancer with a threshold level of 38 with sensitivity 100% and specificity 64%. PNI was also validated for post-operative morbidity with a threshold level of 38 with sensitivity 82% and specificity 66%. Conclusion - PNI was validated for predicting post-operative mortality and post-operative morbidity in gastric cancer.

Bacteriological and therapeutic profile of diabetic foot infection: a prospective study of 100 patients.

BACKGROUND: Identifying the infecting bacterial flora is one of the main rules to be followed to ensure the success of antibiotherapy in the treatment of the infected diabetic foot. The aim of the work was to define the bacteriological profile of the bacteria causing the infection of the diabetic foot at the surgery unit B of Charles Nicolle's hospital in Tunis and determine the prognostic factors of this condition. METHODS: It was an open prospective study. It concerned 100 diabetic patients operated on for diabetic foot infection. All patients had bacteriological samples taken through deep scraping and swabing carried out in the operating room. RESULTS: The average age of patients was 59,5 ±11 years, with a sex-ratio of 2,4. The foot infection was represented in 82 % of cases by a wet gangrene. The enterobacteria were the most frequently isolated bacteria (73%), followed by streptococcus (10%), Staphylococcus aureus (9%). The rate of multidrug-resistant bacteria was of 9,5%. The empiric antibiotic therapy used (fusidic acid +amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid) was inactiveon 44,1% of the isolated bacteria. When we compared the group of patients with unfavourable development (who have been reoperated) and the group of patients with favourable development, we have found two poor prognosis factors : arteritis  (p=0,018 ; OR=23,7) and presence of multidrug-resistant bacteria (p=0,027 ; OR=5,8). CONCLUSION: The enterobacteria were the main bacteria causing the infection of diabetic foot. The prognostic factors found, arteritis and isolation of multidrug-resistant bacteria, outpoint the importance of multidisciplinary care.

Treatment of inguinal hernia by lichtenstein technique: an open prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of inguinal hernia is still a challenge for the surgeon. The multitude of surgical techniques attests of the difficulty of choosing the best procedure. In the surgical B department of the Charles Nicolle Hospital we have chosen the Lichtenstein technique since 2008. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate and long-term results of this technique and to identify the predictive factors of recurrence. METHODS: This open prospective study included all patients who underwent an elective inguinal hernia repair in the surgical B department of the Charles Nicolle Hospital between June 1st 2008 and December 31st 2009. These patients were regularly followed for at least three years. Hernia's recurrence was the primary study endpoint. Postoperative pain, wound complications, urinary complications were secondary endpoints.  An univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictive factor of hernia recurrence. RESULTS: 256 men and eight women were involved in this study with a sex ratio to 32. The average age was 54 years, ranging from 18 to 85 years. we identified seven cases of recurrent hernia (2,6%) with a risk of recurrence at five years equal to 4.9%, 95%CI[4,5 - 5,3].Wound complications were present in 90 patients (34%), dominated by serums seen in 12.1% of cases. The scrotal edema was found in 32 patients (12%). Eight patients kept a postoperative pain after three years of follow-up (3%). The presence of coagulation disorders in pre-operative check-up ( OR 32.25, 95% CI [3.33- 333.3], p = 0.003) and the persistence of pain after one year of intervention ( OR 16.12,95% CI [2.68 -100], p = 0.01) were two predictive factors of hernia recurrence. CONCLUSION: The Lichtenstein technique remains the gold standard technique in the treatment of inguinal hernias by open surgery. It is a safe, simple, reproducible procedure with a low recurrence rate.

Predictive factors of recurrence after surgical treatment for liver hydatid cyst.

BACKGROUND: Hydatid recurrence after surgery is about 10 %. It still constitutes a problem both in terms of pathophysiology and management of recurrence. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the management of abdominal hydatid recurrence after surgical treatment for liver hydatid cyst and to identify the predictive factors of recurrence. METHODS: We retrospectively included all the patients operated on between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2012, in the Department "B" of Charles Nicolle Hospital (Tunisia), for abdominal hydatid recurrence. Sixteen men and 33 women, with a median age of 45 years, were included. For all patients, clinical variables and morphological and intra-operative characteristics concerning both the hydatid cysts previously treated and the recurrent cysts were collected. Surgical procedures were recorded as well as the immediate and long-term outcomes. Comparative studies were performed: "extrahepatic recurrence versus No," "peritoneal recurrence versus No," and "open approach versus laparoscopic approach." A univariate analysis followed by a multivariate analysis was carried out to determine predictive factors of hydatid recurrence. RESULTS: Comparative analysis showed that laparoscopic approach, segments II and III localization, and postoperative complications during the first intervention were associated with a greater number of both peritoneal and extrahepatic hydatid recurrence. Multivariate analysis retained the laparoscopic approach as a predictive factor of both peritoneal recurrence (OR 5.5; 95 % CI 1.56; p = 0.008) and abdominal extrahepatic recurrence (OR 3.54; 95 % CI 1.08; p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic approach for the treatment of liver hydatid cysts was associated with a higher rate of extrahepatic and peritoneal recurrence than open.

«Gastric bypass¼ or «sleeve gastrectomy¼ for morbid obesity : a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery represents an efficient treatment of morbid obesity allowing not only weight loss but also the control of comorbidities related to obesity. Although the sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass are currently the two most common procedures, the superiority of one over another and the indications remain imprecise. AIM: The aim of this work was to provide an evidence based answer to the following questions: What is the most efficient surgical procedure: gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy regarding weight loss, postoperative morbidity and remission of comorbidities related to obesity? METHODS: A literature search has been conducted in the data bases of Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Scopus during the period between January 2008 to March 2015, with the keywords "Gastric Bypass" and "Sleeve Gastrectomy". RESULTS: the results of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass regarding weight loss and remission of comorbidities are comparable in the short and medium terms. Gastric Bypass is associated with a longer duration of surgery, a slightly higher early morbidity and more frequent deficiencies in vitamins D and B12 but it allows a better control of a pre-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease. CONCLUSION: Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass are equivalent in terms of loss of weight and control of comorbidities but longer term studies are needed to refine the indications depending on the characteristics of the patient.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy decreases extra surgical site morbidity compared with open cholecystectomy: A propensity matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The ideal way to show treatment effectiveness is through randomized controlled trials the 'gold standard' in evidence-based surgery. Indeed, not all surgical studies can be designed as randomized trials, sometimes for ethical and otherwise, for practical reasons. This article aimed to compare laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy, according to data from an administrative database, managed by a propensity matched analysis. METHODS: Were included all patients with cholelithiasis admitted in Department B between June 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2009. In this study, the propensity score represented the probability that a patient would be treated by a procedure based on variables that were known or suspected to influence group assignment and was developed using multivariable logistic regression used here to match patients who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy to a control patient who had open cholecystectomy. The main outcome measure was morbidity. This was expressed as the number of patients with 1 or more complications occurring during the hospital stay or within 30 days following discharge. RESULTS: According to intention to treat, 535 patients had a laparoscopic approach (LC group) and 60 patients had a traditional open approach (OC group) regarding associated cardiac disease, previous laparotomy or when choledocholithiasis was suspected, however intra operative cholangiography showed that there was no choledocolithiasis. According to the propensity score, 28 patients in OC were matched with 58 in LC. Comparison between OC and LC before and after propensity matched analysis showed that OC was associated with a higher rate of Extra Surgical Site morbidity (p= 0.010), a longer median duration of intervention, post-operative stay and overall hospital stay (p= 0. 0001). CONCLUSION: LC should be considered as first-line therapy to treat cholelithiasis surgically even if it becomes necessary to convert to OC because of intra operative findings.

Abdominal foreign body migration causing cardiac tamponade: A case report.

Chronic asymptomatic retention of an intragastric foreign body can pose a life-threatening scenario. In the event of migration, it may result in perforation, as shown in our unique case of pericardial perforation through the fundus. Beyond illustrating a rare condition, this case prompts us to engage in a debate about whether to retain or remove asymptomatic foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract. It is a 28-year-old male patient, a prisoner, with a history of recurrent foreign body ingestion leading to five previous interventions, presented a year ago to our emergency department after ingesting four metal rods. Despite recommendations, the patient refused the intervention. After 1 year, he presented to our emergency department for respiratory distress. On examination, he had tachycardia, cardiac auscultation revealed a high-pitched sound signing a pericardial knock and abdominal palpation revealed epigastric tenderness. An abdominal X-ray revealed the presence of metallic foreign bodies located in the gastric area. An electrocardiogram showed a low voltage. Given these findings, there was a strong suspicion of rod migration from the stomach to the thoracic cavity with a cardiac tamponade. An emergency CT scan revealed that the rod had pierced through the stomach and pericardium, causing pericardial effusion. The patient was promptly transported to the operating room to discover the tip of the rod out of the stomach and penetrating the left diaphragm and the pericardial layer. The foreign body was removed.

Omentopexy versus no omentopexy in sleeve gastrectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with omentopexy (O-LSG) has been compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with no-omentopexy (NO-LSG) in terms of postoperative outcomes and one-year anthropometric results. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare the utility of omentopexy in sleeve gastrectomy. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis according to PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2 guidelines. We included studies that systematically searched electronic databases and compared the O-LSG with the NO-LSG conducted through 1st March 2023. The bibliographic research yielded 13 eligible studies. These studies included 5514 patients. The O-LSG is associated with lower leakage (OR = 0.22; 95% CI [0.08, 0.55], p = 0.001), bleeding (OR = 0.33; 95% CI [0.19, 0.57], p < 0.0001), vomiting (OR = 0.50; 95% CI [0.28, 0.89], p = 0.02), twist (OR = 0.09; 95% CI [0.02, 0.39], p = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (MD = - 0.33; 95% CI [- 0.61, - 0.05], p = 0.02) compared with NO-LSG. The O-LSG is associated with longer operative time (MD = 8.15; 95% CI [3.65, 12.64], p = 0.0004) than the NO-LSG. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative GERD (OR = 0.53; 95% CI [0.27, 1.02], p = 0.06), readmission (OR = 0.60; 95% CI [0.27, 1.37], p = 0.23), and one-year total weight loss (MD = 2.06; 95% CI [- 1.53, 5.65], p = 0.26). In the subgroup analysis including only RCTs, postoperative GERD was lower in the O-LSG (OR = 0.26; 95% CI [0.11, 0.63], p = 0.003). Our systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that omentopexy in sleeve gastrectomy is feasible and safe It reduced leakage, bleeding, and twist. It probably increased the operative time. It may reduce vomiting, GERD, and hospital stay. We don't know if it led to an additional readmission rate or one-year total weight loss.Registration The protocol was registered in PROSPERO with the ID CRD42022336790.

Predictive factors of major low anterior resection syndrome after surgery for rectal tumors.

AIM: To describe the epidemiological and clinical data of impaired functional outcome secondary to anterior resection of the rectum and to identify the predictive factors of major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) Methods: This retrospective study considered patients operated on for rectal tumors in surgical department in our hospital, between January 1st,2009 and December 31st, 2021. The primary outcome measure was the development of a major LARS immediately or after stoma closure. In order to identify independent predictors of major LARS, patients were divided into two groups: the "Major LARS" group and the "No Major LARS" group, and then we carried out a descriptive study, followed by an analytical study with logistic regression. RESULTS: We enrolled 42 patients operated for rectal tumor and had an anterior resection. Half of our patients developed LARS of which 14 developed major LARS. The median time to onset of LARS symptoms was 9 [2 -24] months. At the end of this study, 2 factors were retained: age (OR=2.48; CI95% [1.2- 5.10], p=0.012) and pT3T4 stage (OR=5.95; CI95% [1.07- 33.33], p=0.041) as independent predictive factors of a major LARS. Neoadjuvant therapy was also a risk factor for major LARS in our study with a statistically significant difference (p=0.025) between the two groups "Major LARS" and "No major LARS". CONCLUSION: LARS should be appropriately considered in the management of rectal cancer. Based on our results and data from the literature, age and mesorectal invasion were found to be independent predictors of major LARS.

Contribution of specific anti-hydatid IgG subclasses in the diagnosis of echinococcosis primary infection and relapses.

BACKGROUND: Serological diagnosis of hydatid disease still faces problems of sensitivity, limiting its use to either diagnosis or post-surgical monitoring. The use of IgG subclasses seems to overcome these difficulties. The contribution of IgG subclasses was evaluated in the diagnosis of primary infested and hydatid cyst relapse patients. METHODS: A group of patients (n = 34) diagnosed for the first time with liver cystic echinococcosis (CE) and a group of patients with CE surgical recurrence were included. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay anti-hydatid antigens (HA) specific IgG1, 2, 3, and 4 subclasses were analyzed by ROC curves. RESULTS: ROC curve analyses demonstrated that IgG4 had the ability to discriminate between primary infested and relapsed groups whereas IgG2 was not discriminatory. The sensitivity of IgG4 was statistically higher in the relapsed cases group (97.1% versus 70.6%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: anti-HA specific IgG2 was the best marker of primary infestation whereas IgG4 was the best marker of relapse.