Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Postgrad Med ; Spec No: 53-62, 2003 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12785132

RESUMEN

Diabetes care relies on patient/physician-initiated programs of periodic evaluation, monitoring, and treatment interventions. Clinical practice guidelines can assist clinicians in diabetes care. To improve outcomes, these methods must be designed and implemented in a way that promotes change in physician behavior. When guidelines are corrected to real-time reminder protocols (at the time the physician is making clinical decisions with the patient), compliance with recommended tests and procedures is increased. Follow-up analysis of performance and comparison with peers assists physicians in making the necessary clinical interventions that improve the management of these conditions and reduce complications. Integrated electronic medical records are a key initial component for motivating physicians and initiating effective diabetes management plans.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Adhesión a Directriz , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados , Sistemas Recordatorios , Estados Unidos , Virginia
2.
Postgrad Med ; Spec No: 63-72, 2003 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12785133

RESUMEN

With the understanding of type 2 diabetes mellitus constantly evolving, and with the introduction of many new agents during the past few years, it is often difficult to keep up to date with the management of type 2 diabetes. This article reviews the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes, oral pharmacologic treatment, and proposed diabetes treatment algorithms, which aim to guide clinicians in the use of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) earlier in the course of diabetes. This is important because studies indicate that sulfonylureas, biguanides, and insulin do not protect the beta cell and cannot provide sustainable glycemic control. The basis for TZD use earlier in diabetes is 2-fold: to preserve beta-cell function while maintaining appropriate glycemic control for a longer duration than is usually attained through monotherapy with a secretagogue or biguanide, and to prevent or reverse the insulin resistance phenomenon of reduced insulin utilization that appears even prior to the clinical diagnosis of diabetes. Notably, decreasing insulin resistance also may reduce the incidence of adverse atherosclerotic consequences.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Tiazolidinedionas , Administración Oral , Algoritmos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Humanos , Pioglitazona , Rosiglitazona
3.
BJU Int ; 100(4): 813-9, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17822462

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the design and baseline cohort characteristics of the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Registry and Patient Survey, an ongoing, prospective, observational, disease registry documenting management practices and patient outcomes in men in the USA with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with BPH (LUTS/BPH) in actual clinical practice settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with LUTS/BPH who were either untreated or treated with alpha(1)-adrenergic blockers (ABs), 5alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs), a combination of these medications, or anticholinergics, and who met selection criteria, were enrolled at sites throughout the USA. At each visit, standardized forms and validated questionnaires were completed to assess the physicians' management practices and patients' clinical characteristics, sexual function, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: At the close of recruitment (February 2005), 6909 men (mean age 66.0 years) were enrolled at 402 sites by urologists and primary-care physicians. Before enrolment, 49% of the men were managed with watchful waiting (WW), 21% with uroselective AB monotherapy, 11% with non-uroselective AB monotherapy, 6% with 5ARI monotherapy, 11% with AB + 5ARI, and 2% with anticholinergics. After enrolment, 42% were on WW and 26% were on selective AB monotherapy; changes in other management groups were minimal. Overall, 33% of the men had mild, 52% had moderate and 15% had severe LUTS. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (53%), high cholesterol (45%) and sexual dysfunction (36%). CONCLUSION: The BPH Registry and Patient Survey will provide information on physician management practices and outcomes of men with LUTS/BPH, while examining the effects of demographics, socio-economics, comorbidities, and medical therapies.


Asunto(s)
Práctica Profesional , Hiperplasia Prostática/epidemiología , Prostatismo/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Prostatismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Prostatismo/etiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA