Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cephalalgia ; 43(4): 3331024231161323, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36924237

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The recognition of venous sinus stenosis as a contributing factor in the majority of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension coupled with increasing cerebral venography and venous sinus stenting experience have dramatically improved our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms driving this disease. There is now a dense, growing body of research in the neurointerventional literature detailing anatomical and physiological mechanisms of disease which has not been widely disseminated among clinicians. METHODS: A literature search was conducted, covering the most recent neurointerventional literature on idiopathic intracranial hypertension, the pathophysiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and management strategies (including venous sinus stenting), and subsequently summarized to provide a comprehensive review of the most recently published studies on idiopathic intracranial hypertension pathophysiology and management. CONCLUSION: Recent studies in the neurointerventional literature have greatly improved our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms causing idiopathic intracranial hypertension and its associated conditions. The ability to make individualized, patient-specific treatment approaches has been made possible by advances in our understanding of how venous sinus stenosis and cerebral venous hypertension fundamentally contribute to idiopathic intracranial hypertension.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Hipertensión Intracraneal , Seudotumor Cerebral , Humanos , Seudotumor Cerebral/terapia , Seudotumor Cerebral/complicaciones , Constricción Patológica/complicaciones , Stents/efectos adversos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión Intracraneal/terapia , Hipertensión Intracraneal/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Headache ; 55(9): 1301-8, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26422648

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the headache patient in the outpatient clinic and emergency department (ED) has different focuses and goals. The focus of this paper is to review the evaluation of patients in both settings with mention of evaluation in the pediatric and pregnant patient population. The patient's history should drive the practitioner's decision and evaluation choices. We review recommendations made by the American Board of Internal Medicine and American Headache Society through the Choosing Wisely Campaign, which has an emphasis on choosing the right imaging modality for the clinical situation and elimination/prevention of medication overuse headache, as well as the US Headache Consortium guidelines for migraine headache. We will also review focusing on ED evaluation of the pediatric patient and pregnant patient presenting with headache. CONCLUSION: At the end of the review we hope to have provided you with a framework to think about the headache patient and what is the appropriate test in the given clinical setting in order to ensure that the patient gets the right diagnosis and is set on a path to the appropriate management plan.


Asunto(s)
Cefalea/diagnóstico , Adulto , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Niño , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo
3.
Headache ; 55(3): 359-80, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25754865

RESUMEN

Migraine and epilepsy are disorders that are common, paroxysmal, and chronic. In many ways they are clearly different diseases, yet there are some pathophysiological overlaps, and overlaps in clinical symptomatology, particularly with regard to visual and other sensory disturbances, pain, and alterations of consciousness. Epidemiological studies have revealed that the two diseases are comorbid in a number of individuals. Both are now recognized as originating from electrical disturbances in the brain, although their wider manifestations involve the recruitment of multiple pathogenic mechanisms. An initial excess of neuronal activity in migraine leads to cortical spreading depression and aura, with the subsequent recruitment of the trigeminal nucleus leading to central sensitization and pain. In epilepsy, neuronal overactivity leads to the recruitment of larger populations of neurons firing in a rhythmic manner that constitutes an epileptic seizure. Migraine aura and headaches may act as a trigger for epileptic seizures. Epilepsy is not infrequently accompanied by preictal, ictal, and postictal headaches that often have migrainous features. Genetic links are also apparent between the two disorders, and are particularly evident in the familial hemiplegic migraine syndromes where different mutations can produce either migraine, epilepsy, or both. Also, various medications are found to be effective for both migraine and epilepsy, again pointing to a commonality and overlap between the two disorders.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Trastornos Migrañosos , Bases de Datos Bibliográficas/estadística & datos numéricos , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Epilepsia/terapia , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia
4.
Neurology ; 103(3): e209660, 2024 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39013127

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Symptomatic macromastia (enlarged breasts) is a syndrome of persistent headache, neck and shoulder pain, thoracic kyphosis, painful shoulder grooving from bra straps, inframammary rash, backache, and upper extremity paresthesias. Up to 89% of the 100,000 US women undergoing breast reduction surgery (reduction mammoplasty) annually report headache preoperatively with many endorsing postoperative headache improvement. Headache is one insurance indication to cover surgical reduction, and peak prevalence of migraine matches the average age of women with macromastia at time of surgery. Little is known about the influence of macromastia on headache. The goal of our narrative review is to understand the evidence for and potential mechanisms underlying macromastia-related headache. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed Medline using concepts "breast hypertrophy," "macromastia," "headache," "migraine," "breast reduction," and "reduction mammoplasty" excluding limits on age, language, publication date, or study type. Supplemental literature searches were performed to provide a comprehensive understanding of potential mechanisms underlying macromastia-related headache. RESULTS: We identified 25 studies describing macromastia-associated headache in the setting of reduction mammoplasty, with 23 original research studies (retrospective, n = 12, prospective, n = 11) totaling 3,799 patients, 1 systematic review, and 1 meta-analysis. Most (24/25) were published in Plastic Surgery, one in Internal Medicine, and none in Neurology. Wide ranges were identified for preoperative headache prevalence (2%-89%) and postoperative headache improvement (34%-100%). Studies described headache as "myofascial" or "tension-type" without detailing headache definitions, chronicity, headache screening method, or neurologic examination. Potential pathophysiologic mechanisms of macromastia-associated headache include structural, mechanical, psychosocial, and hormonal. DISCUSSION: No studies on macromastia-associated headache and reduction mammoplasty are published in Neurology. This important women's health topic remains unexplored in fields outside Plastic Surgery. Many questions remain unanswered that are important for neurologists to understand, including which headache type(s) women with macromastia experience and which headache type(s) respond to surgical intervention.


Asunto(s)
Mama , Hipertrofia , Humanos , Femenino , Mama/anomalías , Mama/cirugía , Cefalea/etiología , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA