Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 112(11): 1736-1746, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29016565

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is preventable through screening, with colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing comprising the two most commonly used screening tests. Given the differences in complexity, risk, and cost, it is important to understand these tests' comparative effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN: The CONFIRM Study is a large, pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, parallel group trial to compare screening with colonoscopy vs. the annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in 50,000 average risk individuals. CONFIRM examines whether screening colonoscopy will be superior to a FIT-based screening program in the prevention of CRC mortality measured over 10 years. Eligible individuals 50-75 years of age and due for CRC screening are recruited from 46 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. Participants are randomized to either colonoscopy or annual FIT. Results of colonoscopy are managed as per usual care and study participants are assessed for complications. Participants testing FIT positive are referred for colonoscopy. Participants are surveyed annually to determine if they have undergone colonoscopy or been diagnosed with CRC. The primary endpoint is CRC mortality. The secondary endpoints are (1) CRC incidence (2) complications of screening colonoscopy, and (3) the association between colonoscopists' characteristics and neoplasia detection, complications and post-colonoscopy CRC. CONFIRM leverages several key characteristics of the VA's integrated healthcare system, including a shared medical record with national databases, electronic CRC screening reminders, and a robust national research infrastructure with experience in conducting large-scale clinical trials. When completed, CONFIRM will be the largest intervention trial conducted within the VA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01239082).


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Heces/química , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Inmunoquímica , Sangre Oculta , Anciano , Carcinoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
3.
N Engl J Med ; 369(20): 1892-903, 2013 Nov 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24206457

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) decreases proteinuria; however, its safety and effect on the progression of kidney disease are uncertain. Methods We provided losartan (at a dose of 100 mg per day) to patients with type 2 diabetes, a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (with albumin measured in milligrams and creatinine measured in grams) of at least 300, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 30.0 to 89.9 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area and then randomly assigned them to receive lisinopril (at a dose of 10 to 40 mg per day) or placebo. The primary end point was the first occurrence of a change in the estimated GFR (a decline of ≥ 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) if the initial estimated GFR was ≥ 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) or a decline of ≥ 50% if the initial estimated GFR was <60 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2)), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or death. The secondary renal end point was the first occurrence of a decline in the estimated GFR or ESRD. Safety outcomes included mortality, hyperkalemia, and acute kidney injury. Results The study was stopped early owing to safety concerns. Among 1448 randomly assigned patients with a median follow-up of 2.2 years, there were 152 primary end-point events in the monotherapy group and 132 in the combination-therapy group (hazard ratio with combination therapy, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.12; P=0.30). A trend toward a benefit from combination therapy with respect to the secondary end point (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.05; P=0.10) decreased with time (P=0.02 for nonproportionality). There was no benefit with respect to mortality (hazard ratio for death, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.49; P=0.75) or cardiovascular events. Combination therapy increased the risk of hyperkalemia (6.3 events per 100 person-years, vs. 2.6 events per 100 person-years with monotherapy; P<0.001) and acute kidney injury (12.2 vs. 6.7 events per 100 person-years, P<0.001). Conclusions Combination therapy with an ACE inhibitor and an ARB was associated with an increased risk of adverse events among patients with diabetic nephropathy. (Funded by the Cooperative Studies Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development; VA NEPHRON-D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00555217.).


Asunto(s)
Bloqueadores del Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Nefropatías Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Lisinopril/uso terapéutico , Losartán/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Bloqueadores del Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Nefropatías Diabéticas/complicaciones , Nefropatías Diabéticas/mortalidad , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Lisinopril/efectos adversos , Losartán/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
N Engl J Med ; 359(1): 7-20, 2008 Jul 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18492867

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal intensity of renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury is controversial. METHODS: We randomly assigned critically ill patients with acute kidney injury and failure of at least one nonrenal organ or sepsis to receive intensive or less intensive renal-replacement therapy. The primary end point was death from any cause by day 60. In both study groups, hemodynamically stable patients underwent intermittent hemodialysis, and hemodynamically unstable patients underwent continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration or sustained low-efficiency dialysis. Patients receiving the intensive treatment strategy underwent intermittent hemodialysis and sustained low-efficiency dialysis six times per week and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration at 35 ml per kilogram of body weight per hour; for patients receiving the less-intensive treatment strategy, the corresponding treatments were provided thrice weekly and at 20 ml per kilogram per hour. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the 1124 patients in the two groups were similar. The rate of death from any cause by day 60 was 53.6% with intensive therapy and 51.5% with less-intensive therapy (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.40; P=0.47). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the duration of renal-replacement therapy or the rate of recovery of kidney function or nonrenal organ failure. Hypotension during intermittent dialysis occurred in more patients randomly assigned to receive intensive therapy, although the frequency of hemodialysis sessions complicated by hypotension was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury did not decrease mortality, improve recovery of kidney function, or reduce the rate of nonrenal organ failure as compared with less-intensive therapy involving a defined dose of intermittent hemodialysis three times per week and continuous renal-replacement therapy at 20 ml per kilogram per hour. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00076219.)


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Hemodiafiltración/métodos , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Lesión Renal Aguda/complicaciones , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Hemodiafiltración/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/etiología , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 6(4): e437, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34345750

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Checklists aid in ensuring consistency and completeness in medical care delivery. However, using an improvement and safety checklist during rounds was variable in our neonatology intensive care unit (NICU), and completion was not tracked sustainably. This quality improvement (QI) initiative's primary aim was to increase compliance with checklist completion from 31% to >75% within 1 year. METHODS: A multidisciplinary QI team identified barriers to checklist completion and implemented a human factors-focused low-technology intervention (redesign of a hard-copy checklist) and later a high-technology clinical decision support tool within the electronic health record. The primary outcome measure was percent compliance with the use of the checklist. Process metrics included the duration of checklist completion. Balancing measures included staff perceptions of work burden and question relevance. RESULTS: Major barriers to checklist utilization were inability to remember, rounding interruptions, and perceived lack of question relevance to patients. Average biweekly checklist compliance improved from 31% before interventions to 80% after interventions. Average checklist completion time decreased from 46 to 11 seconds. Follow-up surveys demonstrated more respondents found questions "completely relevant" (34% pre versus 43% post) but perceived increased work burden (26% pre versus 31% post). CONCLUSIONS: Using QI methodology, human factors-based interventions, and a novel clinical decision support tool, we significantly improved efficiency and checklist compliance and created an automated, sustainable method for monitoring completion and responses. This foundational project provides an infrastructure broadly applicable to QI work in other healthcare settings.

6.
Crit Care ; 13(4): 310, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19678919

RESUMEN

Determination of the optimal dose of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury has been controversial. Questions have recently been raised regarding the design and execution of the US Department of Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Failure Trial Network (ATN) Study, which demonstrated no improvement in 60-day all-cause mortality with more intensive management of renal replacement therapy. In the present article we present our rationale for these aspects of the design and conduct of the study, including our use of both intermittent and continuous modalities of renal support, our approach to initiation of study therapy and the volume management during study therapy. In addition, the article presents data on hypotension during therapy and recovery of kidney function in the perspective of other studies of renal support in acute kidney injury. Finally, we address the implications of the ATN Study results for clinical practice from the perspective of the study investigators.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Humanos , Hipotensión/etiología , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
7.
Chest ; 130(4): 1109-16, 2006 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17035445

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We assessed the effects of an influenza season on patients with COPD. Data from 2,215 veterans in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind influenza vaccine efficacy study were analyzed for changes in spirometric and functional status, comparing patients with laboratory-documented influenza (LDI)-caused illness, non-LDI-caused respiratory illness, or no illness, and for association with influenza vaccination. METHODS: Patients received either IM trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine (TIV) plus intranasal trivalent, live attenuated, cold-adapted influenza virus vaccine (TC) or TIV plus intranasal placebo (TP). We performed spirometry, measured the chronic lung disease severity index (CLDSI) score to assess functional status and well-being, and tested for influenza virus infection. RESULTS: Worsening in FEV(1), percentage of predicted FEV(1), and CLDSI score (p < 0.001) was associated with acute respiratory illness in 585 illnesses including 94 LDI-caused illnesses. LDI-caused illness was more likely to be associated with worsening in FEV(1) and CLDSI score acutely than non-LDI-caused illness (p < 0.01). Logistic regression showed acute respiratory illness (odds ratio [OR], 1.78; 95% confidence limit [CL], 1.40 to 2.26) to be associated with worsening in CLDSI score, and receipt of TC (OR, 1.39; 95% CL, 1.10 to 1.74) and no illness (OR, 0.70; 95% CL, 0.53 to 0.91 for acute respiratory illness) to be associated with better CLDSI score at the end of the study. Hospitalization was more frequent in patients with acute respiratory illness (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Acute respiratory illness was associated with increased health-care utilization and obstruction to airflow, and worse functional status and well-being. At the end of the study, receipt of TC was associated with improvement and acute respiratory illness was associated with worsening in functional status and well-being.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Virus de la Influenza B/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/prevención & control , Estaciones del Año , Veteranos , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/inmunología , Calidad de Vida , Capacidad Vital/efectos de los fármacos
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 36(2): 169-74, 2003 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12522748

RESUMEN

A substudy analysis was conducted to determine the clinical characteristics associated with symptomatic, laboratory-documented influenza (LDI) among 2215 veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who participated in Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study 448 and who received trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine with or without intranasal live-attenuated, cold-adapted influenza vaccine. Of 585 evaluable first occurrences of acute respiratory illnesses, 94 (16%) were LDI. Respiratory symptoms of cough, sputum production, and dyspnea occurred in >90% of patients with LDI; 68% had documented or subjective fever, and 81% had myalgias. Stepwise logistic regression identified only fever and myalgia as being statistically associated with LDI. During the influenza outbreak period, the positive predictive value of fever and myalgia was 41%. Clinical criteria were poor predictors of LDI in these older, vaccinated patients with chronic lung disease. Additional studies are warranted to define optimal methods for the diagnosis of influenza among older persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/prevención & control
9.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 8(10): 1679-84, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23813558

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: AKI affects approximately 2%-7% of hospitalized patients and >35% of critically ill patients. Survival after AKI may be described as having an acute phase (including an initial hyperacute component) followed by a convalescent phase, which may itself have early and late components. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data from the Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Failure Trial Network (ATN) study was used to model mortality risk among patients with dialysis-requiring AKI. This study assumed that the mortality hazard can be described by a piecewise log-linear function with change points. Using an average likelihood method, the authors tested for the number of change points in a piecewise log-linear hazard model. The maximum likelihood approach to locate the change point(s) was then adopted, and associated parameters and standard errors were estimated. RESULTS: There were 1124 ATN participants with follow-up to 1 year. The mortality hazard of AKI decreased over time with inflections in the rate of decrease at days 4, 42, and 148, with the sharpest change at day 42. The daily rate of decline in the log of the hazard for death was 0.220 over the first 4 days, 0.046 between day 4 and day 42, 0.017 between day 42 and day 148, and 0.003 between day 148 and day 365. CONCLUSIONS: There appear to be two major phases of mortality risk after AKI: an early phase extending over the first 6 weeks and a late phase from 6 weeks to 1 year. Within the first 42 days, this can be further divided into hyperacute (days 1-4) and acute (days 4-42) phases. After 42 days, there appear to be early (days 42-148) and late (after day 148) convalescent phases. These findings may help to inform the design of AKI clinical trials and assist critical care physicians in prognostic stratification.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
10.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 7(7): 1063-70, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22595826

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between health-related quality of life and subsequent mortality among AKI survivors treated with renal replacement therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the associations between Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and ambulation, emotion, cognition, and pain scores at 60 days and all-cause mortality at 1 year in 60-day AKI survivors (n=439 with evaluable HUI3 assessments) from a randomized multicenter study comparing less- with more-intensive renal replacement therapies. RESULTS: The median 60-day HUI3 index score was 0.32. Patients with evaluable HUI3 data who died between 60 days and 1 year (n=99) were more likely to have lower 60-day median HUI3 scores, higher comorbidity scores, and longer initial hospital stays, and they were more likely to be dialysis-dependent. A 0.1 higher HUI3 index score was associated with a 17% decrease (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.89) in all-cause mortality after controlling for clinical risk factors. Similar associations were observed for HUI3 ambulation, emotion, cognition, and pain attribute scores. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related quality of life measured by HUI3 is an independent predictor of mortality among survivors of AKI after adjusting for clinical risk variables. Poor ambulation and other health-related quality of life attributes are also associated with increased risk of death. Health-related quality of life may provide clinicians with additional information to help identify patients at high risk of mortality after AKI that required renal replacement therapy.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sobrevivientes
11.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 6(9): 2114-20, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21896828

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring dialysis is associated with high mortality. Most prognostic tools used to describe case complexity and to project patient outcome lack predictive accuracy when applied in patients with AKI. In this study, we developed an AKI-specific predictive model for 60-day mortality and compared the model to the performance of two generic (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II [APACHE II]) scores, and a disease specific (Cleveland Clinic [CCF]) score. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data from 1122 subjects enrolled in the Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Failure Trial Network study; a multicenter randomized trial of intensive versus less intensive renal support in critically ill patients with AKI conducted between November 2003 and July 2007 at 27 VA- and university-affiliated centers. RESULTS: The 60-day mortality was 53%. Twenty-one independent predictors of 60-day mortality were identified. The logistic regression model exhibited good discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.85 (0.83 to 0.88), and a derived integer risk score yielded a value of 0.80 (0.77 to 0.83). Existing scoring systems, including APACHE II, SOFA, and CCF, when applied to our cohort, showed relatively poor discrimination, reflected by areas under the ROC curve of 0.68 (0.64 to 0.71), 0.69 (0.66 to 0.73), and 0.65 (0.62 to 0.69), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our new risk model outperformed existing generic and disease-specific scoring systems in predicting 60-day mortality in critically ill patients with AKI. The current model requires external validation before it can be applied to other patient populations.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Curva ROC
12.
Am J Med ; 123(12 Suppl 1): e8-15, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21184867

RESUMEN

The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program has been conducting comparative effectiveness clinical trials for nearly 4 decades in many disease areas, including cardiovascular disease/surgery, diabetes mellitus, mental health, neurologic disorders, cancer, infectious diseases, and rheumatoid arthritis. The features that have made this program advantageous for conducting comparative effectiveness clinical trials are described along with methodological considerations for future trials based on lessons learned from its experience conducting these types of studies. Some of the lessons learned involve managing risk factors, clinical equipoise, patient preferences, evolving technology, the use of usual care as a comparator and pharmaceutical issues related to study drug blinding. These issues are not unique to the VA but can play an important role in enabling valid comparisons between treatments that may have differences in delivery or mechanisms of action and could affect the execution and feasibility of conducting a clinical trial with a comparative effectiveness aim. We also outline some future directions for comparative effectiveness clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Sujetos de Investigación , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Conducta de Elección , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa/normas , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto/métodos , Investigadores , Estados Unidos
13.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 5(8): 1366-72, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20507953

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after acute kidney injury (AKI) is an area of great importance to patients. It was hypothesized that HRQOL after AKI would relate to intensity of dialysis during AKI and dialysis dependence at follow-up. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial of intensive versus less intensive renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with AKI. Of 1124 participants, 415 survived at least 60 days and completed the Health Utilities Index (HUI), which measures 8 health attributes and calculates an overall HRQOL score, also called a utility score. How strongly pre-intensive care unit (ICU) health, severity of illness, hospital course, intensity of dialysis, and outcome were associated with 60-day HUI scores was assessed, after adjustment for demographics. RESULTS: The overall HUI score was 0.40 +/- 0.37, indicating severely compromised health utility and was associated with only admission from home and hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS). Ambulation was better among those with a shorter hospital and ICU LOS. Better cognition was associated with dialysis independence and with fewer comorbid chronic illnesses. Emotion was associated with only hospital LOS. Pain was associated with ICU LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Health utility was low in this cohort of patients after AKI, and intensity of dialysis did not affect subsequent health utility. The effects of a lengthy hospitalization generally outweighed the effects of delayed recovery of kidney function on HRQOL after AKI.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Indicadores de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/métodos , Sobrevivientes , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Lesión Renal Aguda/fisiopatología , Lesión Renal Aguda/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Cognición , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad Crítica , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Dolor/etiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Caminata
14.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 17(12): 1875-80, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20943876

RESUMEN

Little is known about the prevalence of mucosal antibodies induced by infection with human coronaviruses (HCoV), including HCoV-229E and -OC43 and recently described strains (HCoV-NL63 and -HKU1). By enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, we measured anti-HCoV IgG antibodies in serum and IgA antibodies in nasal wash specimens collected at seven U.S. sites from 105 adults aged 50 years and older (mean age, 67 ± 9 years) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Most patients (95 [90%]) had at least one more chronic disease. More patients had serum antibody to each HCoV strain (104 [99%] had antibody to HCoV-229E, 105 [100%] had antibody to HCoV-OC43, 103 [98%] had antibody to HCoV-NL63, and 96 [91%] had antibody to HCoV-HKU1) than had antibody to each HCoV strain in nasal wash specimens (12 [11%] had antibody to HCoV-229E, 22 [22%] had antibody to HCoV-OC43, 8 [8%] had antibody to HCoV-NL63, and 31 [31%] had antibody to HCoV-HKU1), respectively (P < 0.0001). The proportions of subjects with IgA antibodies in nasal wash specimens and the geometric mean IgA antibody titers were statistically higher for HCoV-OC43 and -HKU1 than for HCoV-229E and -NL63. A higher proportion of patients with heart disease than not had IgA antibodies to HCoV-NL63 (6 [16%] versus 2 [3%]; P = 0.014). Correlations were highest for serum antibody titers between group I strains (HCoV-229E and -NL63 [r = 0.443; P < 0.0001]) and between group II strains (HCoV-OC43 and -HKU1 [r = 0.603; P < 0.0001]) and not statistically significant between HCoV-NL63 and -OC43 and between HCoV-NL63 and -HKU1. Patients likely had experienced infections with more than one HCoV strain, and IgG antibodies to these HCoV strains in serum were more likely to be detected than IgA antibodies to these HCoV strains in nasal wash specimens.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/análisis , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Secreciones Corporales/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Coronavirus/inmunología , Mucosa Nasal/inmunología , Suero/inmunología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina A/análisis , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/virología , Estados Unidos
15.
J Infect Dis ; 199(6): 847-57, 2009 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19239338

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The clinical features and incidence of human coronavirus (HCoV) infections in chronically ill older adults need better definition. METHODS: HCoV infection was determined on the basis of a 4-fold increase in serum antibody and the detection of HCoV by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Laboratory-documented influenza (LDI) was detected by serologic assay and culture. HCoV illnesses were compared with other acute respiratory illnesses identified by active surveillance, during the 1998-99 winter respiratory-virus season, of 2215 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who were > or = 50 years old and who received influenza vaccines. RESULTS: HCoV-229E and HCoV-OC43 were associated with 90 (14%) of 665 illnesses (HCoV-229E in 22, HCoV-OC43 in 67, and both in 1), LDI with 107 (16%) of 678 illnesses. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, myalgia was less likely with HCoV infection than with LDI (OR, 0.27 [95% confidence limit, 0.13-0.58]). A majority of these HCoV and LDI illnesses exhibited each of 11 symptoms and signs of acute respiratory illness. Spirometric results worsened most often with LDI, and many acute respiratory illnesses, regardless of etiology, were associated with hospitalization. A total of 8 illnesses were associated with HCoV-NL63, 1 with HCoV-HKU1. CONCLUSIONS: The frequencies of HCoV and LDI illnesses were similar. HCoV illness was less severe than LDI illness, was accompanied by multiple respiratory and systemic symptoms, and was associated with hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedades Respiratorias/epidemiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Coronavirus/genética , Coronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/virología , Enfermedades Respiratorias/diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Estaciones del Año , Espirometría
16.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 4(2): 361-8, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19118120

RESUMEN

Both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) can slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Even with ACEI or ARB treatment, the proportion of patients who progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains high. Interventions that achieve more complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, such as combination ACEI and ARB, might be beneficial. This approach may decrease progression of nondiabetic kidney disease. In diabetic nephropathy, combination therapy decreases proteinuria, but its effect in slowing progression is unknown. In addition, the potential for hyperkalemia may limit the utility of combined therapy in this population. VA NEPHRON-D is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial to assess the effect of combination losartan and lisinopril, compared with losartan alone, on the progression of kidney disease in 1850 patients with diabetes and overt proteinuria. The primary endpoints are time to (1) reduction in estimated GFR (eGFR) of > 50% (if baseline < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)); (2) reduction in eGFR of 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (if baseline > or = 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)); (3) progression to ESRD (need for dialysis, renal transplant, or eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m(2)); or (4) death. The secondary endpoint is time to change in eGFR or ESRD. Tertiary endpoints are cardiovascular events, slope of change in eGFR, and change in albuminuria at 1 yr. Specific safety endpoints are serious hyperkalemia (potassium > 6 mEq/L, requiring admission, emergency room visit, or dialysis), all-cause mortality, and other serious adverse events. This paper discusses the design and key methodological issues that arose during the planning of the study.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueadores del Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Nefropatías Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fallo Renal Crónico/prevención & control , Lisinopril/uso terapéutico , Losartán/uso terapéutico , Proteinuria/tratamiento farmacológico , Bloqueadores del Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/etiología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/mortalidad , Nefropatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hiperpotasemia/inducido químicamente , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Riñón , Lisinopril/efectos adversos , Losartán/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteinuria/etiología , Proteinuria/mortalidad , Proteinuria/fisiopatología , Diálisis Renal , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
17.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 3(4): 955-61, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18385390

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Design elements of clinical trials can introduce recruitment bias and reduce study efficiency. Trials involving the critically ill may be particularly prone to design-related inefficiencies. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Enrollment into the Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study was systematically monitored. Reasons for nonenrollment into this study comparing strategies of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury were categorized as modifiable or nonmodifiable. RESULTS: 4339 patients were screened; 2744 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Of these, 1034 were ineligible by exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 1710 patients, 1124 (65.7%) enrolled. Impediments to informed consent excluded 21.4% of potentially eligible patients. Delayed identification of potential patients, physician refusal, and involvement in competing trials accounted for 4.4, 2.7, and 2.3% of exclusions. Comfort measures only status, chronic illness, chronic kidney disease, and obesity excluded 11.8, 7.8, 7.6, and 5.9% of potential patients. Modification of an enrollment window reduced the loss of patients from 6.6 to 2.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study's enrollment efficiency compared favorably with previous intensive care unit intervention trials and supports the representativeness of its enrolled population. Impediments to informed consent highlight the need for nontraditional acquisition methods. Restrictive enrollment windows may hamper recruitment but can be effectively modified. The low rate of physician refusal acknowledges clinical equipoise in the study design. Underlying comorbidities are important design considerations for future trials that involve the critically ill with acute kidney injury.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Hemodiafiltración , Selección de Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Diálisis Renal , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Sesgo , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Proyectos de Investigación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
18.
J Nurses Staff Dev ; 23(6): 283-8, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18043337

RESUMEN

Self-learning modules (SLMs) provide an educational format that is easily portable and can be incorporated into the nurse's day at the nurse's convenience. Self-learning modules are a flexible teaching modality than can enhance not only nurse's knowledge and skill but also the unit's educational programs. Incorporating the bedside nurses in the development of SLMs has provided an opportunity for staff to work on writing skills, produce a professional product, and receive contact hours. The use of author guidelines, content expert and peer review is described in detail.


Asunto(s)
Educación Continua en Enfermería/organización & administración , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Revisión por Pares/métodos , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Instrucciones Programadas como Asunto/normas , Escritura , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Docentes de Enfermería , Guías como Asunto , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Educacionales , Evaluación de Necesidades , Rol de la Enfermera/psicología , Investigación en Educación de Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Grupo Paritario , Proyectos Piloto , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Instrucciones Programadas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicología Educacional , Desarrollo de Personal/organización & administración , Escritura/normas
19.
J Rehabil Res Dev ; 43(1): 35-44, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16847770

RESUMEN

Our objective was to compare self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for U.S. veterans with multiple sclerosis (MS) on disease-modifying agents with provider reports of HRQOL from standard disability measures. We conducted a 3-year prospective observational study of 204 subjects who used interferon beta or glatiramer acetate and compared subjects' responses on the Veterans Short-Form 36 (VSF-36) (36-item short-form functional status assessment for veterans) with the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the Functional System (FS) scales, which are standard MS disability scales. EDSS and FS scores were significantly correlated with some VSF-36 domains (physical function [r = -0.57], role physical [r = -0.37], and physical component summary [r = -0.40]) and weakly correlated with other domains. HRQOL scores did not predict disability or compliance with therapy. We observed decrements in HRQOL at relatively low disability levels. HRQOL measures directly associated with physical function were correlated with standard MS disability scales. Researchers need to clarify the role of HRQOL in clinical outcomes assessment, as shown by the lack of outcome sensitivity and predictive value of the VSF-36.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Acetato de Glatiramer , Humanos , Interferón beta/administración & dosificación , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Péptidos/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos
20.
Clin Trials ; 2(5): 423-35, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16317811

RESUMEN

The optimal management of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in acute renal failure (ARF) is uncertain. The VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trail Network Study (ATN Study) tests the hypothesis that a strategy of intensive RRT will decrease 60-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with ARF. Dose separation between the two treatment arms is achieved by increasing the frequency of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) treatments from three times per week to six times per week, and by increasing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) effluent volume from 20 mL/kg/hr to 35 mL/kg/hr. In both treatment arms, subjects convert between IHD and CVVHDF or SLED as hemodynamic status changes over time. This strategy attempts to replicate the conversion between modalities of RRT that occurs in clinical practice. However, in order to implement this strategy, flexible criteria needed to be developed to provide a balance between the need for uniformity of treatment between groups and practitioner discretion regarding modality of RRT to maintain patient safety. In order to address safety and ethical issues similar to those raised by the Office of Human Research Protections in its review of the ARDS Network studies, a survey of practitioner practices was performed and observational data on the management of RRT in comparable critically ill patients with ARF managed outside of the research context is being collected prospectively. These data will help inform the study's DSMB and site IRB's of the relationship between the study's treatment arms and concurrent clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Recuperación de la Función , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA