RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is considered the most common inherited renal disease. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and patient experience in ADPKD are difficult to quantify and have not been well studied, particularly in the early stages of the disease. There is evidence to suggest that early-stage ADPKD patients have a lower Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) than the general population due to the signs and symptoms of early-stage ADPKD. However, no research has been carried out on the HRQoL of early-stage ADPKD patients using validated ADPKD-specific PRO measures. Additionally, a new disease progression delaying treatment option has recently emerged for ADPKD. Patient preference for this treatment and unmet treatment needs have not yet been investigated. METHODS: The ACQUIRE study is a prospective, observational study investigating the influence of early-stage ADPKD-related symptoms and treatments on PROs. It aims to collect real-world data on patient demographics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and PROs such as HRQoL, treatment satisfaction and treatment preference in early-stage ADPKD. Adult ADPKD patients in stages 1-3 of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with evidence of rapidly progressing disease are being recruited from seven European countries. At baseline and every 3 months, for a follow-up period of 18 months, general and disease-specific questionnaires are completed remotely to capture patients' own assessment of their overall and ADPKD-related HRQoL. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) is also used to investigate the value patients place on different attributes of hypothetical treatment options (e.g. treatment outcomes, side effects) and the role each attribute plays in determining overall patient treatment preference. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will highlight the real-world effects of ADPKD-related challenges on PROs including HRQoL, treatment experience and satisfaction; and help physicians gain greater insight into likely disease outcomes based on early-stage patient symptoms and patients' experience with treatment. Data captured by the DCE may inform ADPKD treatment decision-making from a patient perspective. The DCE will also provide insights into which patients are more likely to perceive benefit from treatments based on the value and trade-offs they place on specific treatment attributes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02848521 . Protocol Number/Version: 156-303-00096/Final.
Asunto(s)
Prioridad del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/fisiopatología , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/complicaciones , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/etiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The short-term efficacy of tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) has been demonstrated across several phase 3 trials, while the ADPKD Outcomes Model (ADPKD-OM) represents a validated approach to predict natural disease progression over a lifetime horizon. This study describes the implementation of a tolvaptan treatment effect within the ADPKD-OM and explores the potential long-term benefits of tolvaptan therapy in ADPKD. METHODS: The effect of tolvaptan on ADPKD progression was modelled by applying a constant treatment effect to the rate of renal function decline, consistent with that observed in the Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and Its Outcomes trial (TEMPO 3:4; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00428948 ). Predictions generated by the ADPKD-OM were compared against aggregated data from a subsequent extension trial (TEMPO 4:4; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01214421 ) and the Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function an Investigation of Tolvaptan Safety Efficacy in ADPKD trial (REPRISE; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02160145 ). Following validation, an application of the ADPKD-OM sought to estimate the benefit of tolvaptan therapy on time to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), in a range of ADPKD populations. RESULTS: Model validation against TEMPO 4:4 and REPRISE demonstrated the accuracy and generalisability of the tolvaptan treatment effect applied within the ADPKD-OM. In simulated patients matched to the overall TEMPO 3:4 trial population at baseline, tolvaptan therapy was predicted to delay the mean age of ESRD onset by five years, compared to natural disease progression (57 years versus 52 years, respectively). In subgroup and sensitivity analyses, the estimated delay to ESRD was greatest among patients with CKD stage 1 at baseline (6.6 years), compared to CKD 2 and 3 subgroups (4.7 and 2.7 years, respectively); and ADPKD patients in Mayo subclasses 1C-1E. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the potential for tolvaptan therapy to delay time to ESRD, particularly among patients with early-stage CKD and evidence of rapidly progressing disease. Data arising from this study highlight the value to be gained by early intervention and long-term treatment with tolvaptan, which may alleviate the economic and societal costs of providing care to patients who progress to ESRD.
Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/efectos de los fármacos , Fallo Renal Crónico , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante , Tolvaptán/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antagonistas de los Receptores de Hormonas Antidiuréticas/uso terapéutico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Masculino , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/diagnóstico , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/tratamiento farmacológico , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the leading inheritable cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD); however, the natural course of disease progression is heterogeneous between patients. This study aimed to develop a natural history model of ADPKD that predicted progression rates and long-term outcomes in patients with differing baseline characteristics. METHODS: The ADPKD Outcomes Model (ADPKD-OM) was developed using available patient-level data from the placebo arm of the Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of ADPKD and its Outcomes Study (TEMPO 3:4; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00428948). Multivariable regression equations estimating annual rates of ADPKD progression, in terms of total kidney volume (TKV) and estimated glomerular filtration rate, formed the basis of the lifetime patient-level simulation model. Outputs of the ADPKD-OM were compared against external data sources to validate model accuracy and generalisability to other ADPKD patient populations, then used to predict long-term outcomes in a cohort matched to the overall TEMPO 3:4 study population. RESULTS: A cohort with baseline patient characteristics consistent with TEMPO 3:4 was predicted to reach ESRD at a mean age of 52 years. Most patients (85%) were predicted to reach ESRD by the age of 65 years, with many progressing to ESRD earlier in life (18, 36 and 56% by the age of 45, 50 and 55 years, respectively). Consistent with previous research and clinical opinion, analyses supported the selection of baseline TKV as a prognostic factor for ADPKD progression, and demonstrated its value as a strong predictor of future ESRD risk. Validation exercises and illustrative analyses confirmed the ability of the ADPKD-OM to accurately predict disease progression towards ESRD across a range of clinically-relevant patient profiles. CONCLUSIONS: The ADPKD-OM represents a robust tool to predict natural disease progression and long-term outcomes in ADPKD patients, based on readily available and/or measurable clinical characteristics. In conjunction with clinical judgement, it has the potential to support decision-making in research and clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Modelos Teóricos , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/diagnóstico , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antagonistas de los Receptores de Hormonas Antidiuréticas/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/tratamiento farmacológico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Tolvaptán/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
International and national guidelines on the treatment of chronic nonhypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia differ; therefore, we have undertaken this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of interventions for the treatment of chronic nonhypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia. Following registration of the review protocol with PROSPERO, systematic literature searches were conducted to identify randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials assessing any degree of fluid restriction or any drug treatment with the aim of increasing serum sodium concentration in patients with chronic nonhypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia. Where appropriate, outcome data were synthesized in a meta-analysis. A total of 45 716 bibliographic records were identified from the searches and 18 trials (assessing conivaptan, lixivaptan, tolvaptan and satavaptan) met the eligibility criteria. Results suggest that all four vasopressin receptor agonists ("vaptans") significantly improve serum sodium concentration. Lixivaptan, satavaptan and tolvaptan were associated with greater rates of response versus placebo. There was no evidence of a difference between each of the vaptans compared with placebo for mortality, discontinuation and rates of hypernatraemia. No RCT evidence of treatments other than the vaptans for hyponatraemia such as oral urea, salt tablets, mannitol, loop diuretics demeclocycline or lithium was identified. Vaptans demonstrated superiority over placebo for outcomes relating to serum sodium correction. Few trials documented the potential benefit of vaptans on change in health-related quality of life as a result of treatment. There was also a lack of high-quality RCT evidence on the comparative efficacy of the vaptans and other treatment strategies for the treatment of chronic nonhypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de los Receptores de Hormonas Antidiuréticas/uso terapéutico , Hiponatremia/terapia , Receptores de Vasopresinas/agonistas , Benzamidas , Benzazepinas , Humanos , Morfolinas , Presión Osmótica/efectos de los fármacos , Pirroles , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Compuestos de Espiro , TolvaptánRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tolvaptan is the only vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist licensed by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of hyponatraemia (HN) secondary to the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). We have investigated the cost-effectiveness of tolvaptan versus no active treatment (NAT) in adult patients within the licensed indication who have either failed to respond to fluid restriction or for whom the use of fluid restriction is not suitable, from the societal perspective in Sweden. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis, considering a 'general SIADH' population and two subpopulations of patients (small-cell lung cancer [SCLC] and pneumonia) to broadly represent the complex clinical pathway of SIADH, was performed. A discrete event simulation was developed to model the progression of individuals through inpatient admissions over a 30-day time horizon (180 days for the SCLC cohort). Clinical data were derived from tolvaptan trials and observational data sources. All costs are given in Swedish kronor (SEK). RESULTS: In the 'general SIADH' population, tolvaptan was associated with reduced costs (SEK 5,779 per patient [624]) and increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (0.0019) compared with NAT and was therefore the dominant treatment strategy. Tolvaptan was also associated with reduced costs and increased QALYs in the SCLC and pneumonia subpopulations. The most influential variables in our analysis were reduction in hospital length of stay, duration of treatment and long term treatment with tolvaptan in SCLC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tolvaptan represents a cost-effective treatment option in Sweden for hospitalised patients with HN secondary to SIADH who have either failed to respond to or are unsuitable for fluid restriction.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de los Receptores de Hormonas Antidiuréticas/uso terapéutico , Benzazepinas/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Hiponatremia/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH/complicaciones , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Hiponatremia/etiología , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Masculino , Neumonía/complicaciones , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Suecia , TolvaptánRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a genetic disorder characterised by progressive renal cyst formation leading to renal failure in the majority of patients. The likelihood and rate of ADPKD progression is difficult to predict and there is a clear need to identify prognostic indicators that could be used to anticipate ADPKD progression, to aid the management of patients in clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify publications detailing the natural history of ADPKD, including diagnosis, prognosis and progression. Publications were identified and filtered, and data were extracted, based on a predefined research protocol. RESULTS: The review identified 2799 journal articles and 444 conference abstracts; 254 articles, including observational studies, clinical trials and reviews, proceeded to data extraction. Disease progression was associated with a variety of prognostic indicators, most commonly age and total kidney volume (TKV). In the identified clinical trials, the absence of a consistent measure of disease progression led to variation in the primary endpoints used. Consequently, there was difficulty in consistently and effectively demonstrating and comparing the efficacy of investigational treatments across studies. More consistency was found in the observational studies, where disease progression was most frequently measured by TKV and glomerular filtration rate. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identified age and TKV as the most commonly cited prognostic indicators in the published ADPKD literature. It is envisaged that this review may inform future research, trial design and predictive models of ADPKD natural history, helping to optimise patient care.
Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Fallo Renal Crónico , Riñón/patología , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante , Factores de Edad , Presión Arterial , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Tamaño de los Órganos , Pronóstico , Proteinuria , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) affects more than 80,000 people worldwide, having a considerable impact on the quality of life of patients and their caregivers, who assist patients with time-consuming treatment regimens. Despite this, a review of the available evidence has not been previously undertaken. This systematic literature review aimed to identify the humanistic and economic burdens of CF on caregivers. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Publications reporting outcomes for the caregivers of people with CF, including utility data, health status, and occupational impact, were reviewed. Sources searched were Embase (OvidSP), Medline (PubMed), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Epistemonikos database, from 2010 to March 2020. A subsequent search with updated terms identified articles up to April 2020. Electronic searches were supplemented by hand searches to capture all relevant literature. RESULTS: A total of 889 articles reporting humanistic burden and 310 reporting economic burden were identified. Following full-text screening by two independent reviewers, 72 articles were included in the review, of which 65 and 17 reported data on humanistic and economic burdens, respectively, with 10 reporting on both. The reviewed literature covered several outcomes and identified multiple key findings: greater disease severity is associated with the reporting of greater caregiver burden and lower utility scores of quality of life; reduced patient lung function is associated with increased caregiver depression and anxiety; and caregiving causes significant occupational impact, with pulmonary exacerbations decreasing caregiver productivity by up to a third compared with the patient being in a 'well' state. CONCLUSION: Findings from this systematic literature review highlight the substantial humanistic and economic burdens borne by the caregivers of people with CF. Future research would help to further inform on the link between disease severity and caregiver burden.
Asunto(s)
Carga del Cuidador , Fibrosis Quística , Ansiedad , Cuidadores , Fibrosis Quística/terapia , Humanos , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rare hematologic malignancy largely affecting older adults. Comorbidities may compromise fitness and eligibility for high-intensity chemotherapy (HIC). This study presents the results of two systematic reviews (SRs) assessing (1) the impact of AML and current treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and (2) the economic burden and cost drivers of AML in patients who are ineligible for HIC. METHODS: Electronic searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, Cochrane library) were supplemented with manual searching of conference, utility, and HTA databases. All studies reporting HRQoL or economic data for patients with AML who were ineligible for HIC were included. RESULTS: The HRQoL SR included ten studies. Patients with AML have lower baseline HRQoL than other cancer patients or the general population, and those receiving lower intensity treatment have lower HRQoL than those eligible for HIC. Low baseline HRQoL predicts poor outcomes, and treatment had variable effects on HRQoL. The economic burden SR included nine studies. Medical costs varied widely, reflecting the heterogeneity of AML. Hospitalization is a key cost driver in AML treatment but was largely not considered in cost studies. Medical resource utilization comprised drug acquisition, drug administration, disease monitoring tests, transfusions, adverse event management, supportive care/monitoring costs and terminal care. CONCLUSION: As new drugs emerge that extend survival, assessment of HRQoL will be important to evaluate the quality of that survival. Cost data, driven by transfusions and hospitalization, will be important to evaluate the economic value of new treatments.