Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 74: 281-286, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33549776

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The transaxillary approach to resection of the first rib is one of several operative techniques for treating thoracic outlet syndrome. Unfortunately, moderate to severe postoperative pain is anticipated for patients undergoing this particular operation. While opioids can be used for analgesia, they have well-described side effects that has led investigators to search for clinically relevant alternative analgesic modalities. We hypothesized that a regional analgesic procedure, commonly called a pectoral nerve (PECS II) block, which anesthetizes the second through sixth intercostal nerves as well as the long thoracic nerve and the medial and lateral pectoral nerves, would improve postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing a transaxillary first rib resection. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study by reviewing the charts of all patients that had undergone a transaxillary first rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome during the defined study period. Patients that received a PECS II block were compared to those that did not. The primary outcome was a comparison of numeric rating scale pain scores during the first 24 hours following the operation. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opioid consumption during the same time period. RESULTS: Pain scores during the first 24 hours following the operation were not statistically different between groups (Block Group: 3.9 [2.1-5.3] [median (IQR 25-75%)] versus Non-block Group: 3.6 [2.4-4.1]; P = 0.40. In addition, opioid use through the first 24 hours after the operation was not significantly different (43.5 [22.0-81.0] [median morphine equivalents in mg's] versus 42.0 [12.5-75.0]; P = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: An ultrasound-guided PECS II nerve block did not reduce postoperative pain scores or opioid consumption for patients undergoing a transaxillary first rib resection. However, a prospective, randomized, study with improved power would be beneficial to further explore the potential utility of a PECS II block for patients presenting for this surgical procedure.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso , Osteotomía , Manejo del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Costillas/cirugía , Nervios Torácicos , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/efectos adversos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adulto Joven
2.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 14: 2891-2903, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34703242

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a multidisciplinary early activation mechanism and bundle of care (eHIP) to improve adherence to ACSQHC standards in a regional trauma centre. METHODS: Barriers to implementation were categorised using the Theoretical Domains Framework, then linked to specific strategies guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel and Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy (BCTT). The resulting implementation strategies were assessed using Affordable, Practical, Effective, Acceptable, had Side-effects (APEASE) criteria. RESULTS: Eighty-three barriers to implementation of the hip fracture care bundle were identified. The behaviour change wheel process resulted in the identification of 41 techniques to address these barriers. The predominant mechanisms to achieve this were development and implementation of 1) formal policy that outlines eHIP roles; 2) video promotion; 3) pager group; 4) fascia iliaca block enabling; 5) eMR modifications; 6) face-to-face reinforcement and modelling; 7) communication and prompts; 8) environmental restructuring. CONCLUSION: We applied behaviour change theory through a pragmatic evidence-based process. This resulted in a codesigned strategy to overcome staff and organisational barriers to the implementation of a multidisciplinary early activation mechanism and bundle of care (eHIP). Future work will include evaluation of the uptake and clinical impact of the care bundle.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA