Outcomes of LGBTQ culturally sensitive training among civilian and military healthcare personnel.

BACKGROUND: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ) military servicemembers are at higher risk of developing health problems compared to heterosexual peers. To improve outcomes and address negative attitudes, previous literature has recommended education of healthcare personnel. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the knowledge and skill outcomes of an LGBTQ cultural sensitivity training program. METHODS: We used a pretest/posttest design. Participants completed the Ally Identity Measure (AIM) to assess three subscales: knowledge and skills, openness and support, and oppression awareness. Participants included both military and civilian healthcare personnel from multiple disciplines. Descriptive statistics and pairwise analyses were used. RESULTS: A total of 101 participants answered both pretest and posttest. Across all AIM subscales, posttest scores demonstrated statistically significant (P < 0.001) increases from mean pretest scores. Completion rates for the pretest and posttest were 99% and 93%, respectively. The majority of participants were female (75%) and non-Hispanic (87%), composed of Caucasians (39%) and Asians (33%). Over one-third (39%) of participants were aged 30-39. Fifty percent were active-duty military and more than half (58%) of all participants did not have prior training in LGBTQ patient care. Statistically significant differences were found between the pretest and posttest scores for the knowledge and skills subscale (M = 2.64-3.70). The most significant increases were observed in Item 12 and Item 15 (M = 2.72-3.70) regarding awareness of theories and skill development to provide proper support, respectively. CONCLUSION: These significant findings contribute to the currently limited research exploring LGBTQ cultural sensitivity training in both civilian and military settings. To our knowledge, this is the first time a cultural sensitivity training of this depth has been provided to active-duty servicemembers. Further research and development of similar educational programs integrating interactive participation can potentially aid in the delivery of improved care and military readiness for all servicemembers.

Continuing the legacy of a military women's health research interest group.

The Military Women's Health Research Interest Group (MWHRIG) was established in 2010. The purpose of the MWHRIG is to support military clinicians and leaders in determining research priorities, and making evidence-based practice and policy decisions relevant to sex- and gender-appropriate healthcare. This article highlights the history of the MWHRIG, and current activities inclusive of research, mentorship, and collaboration. Future activities for the MWHRIG will focus on continued use of a theoretical framework for military women's health research, inclusivity of gender sexual diversity (GSD), and metrics for future success.

Effect of Short-Term Separation on the Behavioral Health of Military Wives.

In the current prospective observational study, the impact of short-term separation on female spouses of male military officers who were scheduled to participate in a resident training program was evaluated. Using pre- and post-survey designs, participants were assessed 2 weeks prior to separation and 2 weeks prior to their husbands' returns. Participants completed the following scales: the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, Relationship Assessment Scale, and Beck Depression Inventory II Scale. No significant differences were found in perceived social support, resilience, perceived stress, relationship satisfaction, or depression scores pre- and post-separation. As predicted, depression scores were positively correlated with perceived stress scores and negatively correlated with resiliency and relationship satisfaction scores. Women with higher levels of resilience experienced lower levels of post-separation stress. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 54(6), 45-51.].

Impact of Hydrocolloid Dressing and Moisturizing Cream as Facial Skin Protectants Among Health Care Workers.

INTRODUCTION: During the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, health care workers experienced facial problems from prolonged use of N95 masks, including skin irritation, pigmentation changes, and contact dermatitis. We assessed the use of hydrocolloid dressing versus dimethicone cream to prevent skin breakdown among military health care workers while wearing an N95. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling in this nonblinded, randomized, cross-over study with 2 active treatments, hydrocolloid dressing and dimethicone cream, across 3 time points. The skin was assessed using photographs and subepidermal moisture scanner (SEM). N95 seal integrity was assessed using qualitative fit test. Institutional review board approval was obtained from the Madigan Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: Among the 73 participants, wearing an N95 alone versus with dimethicone cream or hydrocolloid dressing caused more adverse skin reactions. There were no significant differences in qualitative fit test failure rate between groups. Participants experienced minimal to no dizziness, loss of energy/tiredness/fatigue, claustrophobia, shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, and dry or itchy eyes. For all interventions, wearing an N95 did not interfere with participants' concentration, verbal communication, hearing, vision, and, importantly, delivery of care. CONCLUSIONS: Using a skin protectant with an N95 may prevent adverse skin reactions while preserving health care workers' ability to safely and competently care for patients in routine and pandemic conditions.

Looking Back, a View to the Future of the Health and Readiness of Gender and Sexual Diverse U.S. Service Members.

The objective is to provide a brief overview of the history of gender and sexual diverse service members, health utilization rates, outcomes, and disparities, as well as perceived challenges accessing health care and gaps in the evidence base underpinning sex- and gender-appropriate care. The article also provides strategies going forward to address these issues and optimize health care delivery.

Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender and Queer Health-Care Experiences in a Military Population.

ABTRACTThis study aimed to understand the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer of former military service members. Data for this analysis was collected from the two open-ended survey questions as part of a larger online survey. The analysis was performed using the web-based data analysis application Dedoose. Eighty-eight qualitative responses were used. Analysis of the responses revealed five main themes: (1) identity, (2) negative experiences, (3) impact of experiences, (4) policy, and (5) positive experiences. These findings can influence future military research by focusing on the effects of the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy, negative and positive experiences, and the impact of those experiences.

Evaluation of Clinical Nurse Transition Program at US Army Hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this evaluation was to determine the effectiveness of the clinical nurse transition program (CNTP) for newly commissioned Army nurses. This is one of the first evaluations conducted to document the outcomes of the Army Nurse Corps (ANC) transition-to practice residency program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This project was a prospective pre-test/post-test design evaluation of newly licensed registered nurses (RNs) entering the military health system from Fall 2017 to Fall 2018 using Casey-Fink Readiness for Practice Survey and the New Graduate RN Transition Program Competency Assessment Tool. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4. All tests were two-tailed as applicable and p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Missing data were treated as missing for individual items; their values were not imputed. No participant was excluded due to missing items. This evaluation was determined to be exempt from human subject protection regulations by the Human Protections Administrator at Womack Army Medical Center. RESULTS: A total of 92 pre-test surveys were sent to the nine CNTP training sites which actively trained RNs during the study timeframe. Due to a shipping error, 6 of the 92 completed pre-test surveys from one CNTP site were not received, for an overall response rate of 93.4% (86/92), from eight CNTP sites. Of the 86 participants from whom pre-tests were received, all 86 successfully returned their post-test survey, for a 100% response rate pre- to post- survey. The participants were predominately white (73.3%) and female (70.9%) with a median age of 23 years (IQR: 22-24 years) and an undergraduate GPA of 3.5 (IQR: 3.4-3.7, Table II). Quantitative data analysis revealed that after the training, all participants reported a significant improvement in providing safe (p < 0.0001) and quality care (p < 0.0001) for an average workload of in-patient patients. It also showed a significant improvement in team leading (p < 0.0001), effective decision making (p < 0.0001), incorporating evidence into practice (p < 0.0001), and demonstrated professionalism (p < 0.0001). The overall clinical competence and readiness to practice (p < 0.0001) also improved. Data shows that participants perceive significant improvement in all the objectives set by the ANC for the transition program. CONCLUSION: The results of this program evaluation provide evidence that the CNTP has been a success in meeting the intended objectives. Participants showed a significant improvement in their perceived readiness and level of competency in clinical, technical, and leadership skills performance at the end of the program, as well as improved communication and teamwork. The CNTP experience provides an effective means to facilitate the development of newly licensed Army nurses' clinical competence and confidence in practice. The study limitation includes the Casey-Fink Readiness for Practice Survey had relatively low reliability, but it was chosen as it was better aligned to the specified CNTP objectives. And also, with any self-reported evaluation, there is potential bias regarding the accuracy of participants' self-perception. Follow-up study may include examining the demographics of the incoming nurses, such as their source of commission. To determine if and how the comfort and confidence self-reported by the new graduate nurses is reflective of actual ability, nurse preceptors may be asked to complete skills assessments or simulations with objective measurements may be used.