Correction of the pelvic incidence using a bilateral extending pelvic osteotomy: a proof of concept study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this proof of concept human cadaver study was to quantify the effect of a bilateral extending pelvic osteotomy (BEPO) on pelvic incidence (PI) as a potential alternative for a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in patients with severe spinal sagittal malalignment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 fresh frozen human cadavers were treated with the BEPO technique. CT images were made before and after the osteotomy and pure sagittal images were created on which PI was measured. RESULTS: The mean pre-osteotomy PI was 47.9° (range 36.4-63.9) and the mean post-osteotomy PI was 36.5° (range 22.1-54.4). The mean correction was - 10.4° with a range of - 8.4° to - 17.3° (p = 0.03), which resulted in a mean decrease of 23% in the PI (range 16-42). CONCLUSIONS: There was a feasible and effective correction of PI using the BEPO technique on the os ilium. This was a preliminary cadaveric study. No conclusions could be made on global sagittal alignment. We postulate that an extending osteotomy of the ilium could be a potential alternative for a PSO reducing the complexity of spine surgery in patients with severe spinal sagittal malalignment.

Surgical techniques in restoration lumbar lordosis: a biomechanical human cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: Degenerative changes of the lumbar spine lead in general to decrease of lumbar lordosis (LL). This change affects the overall balance of the spine, and when surgery is deemed, necessary restoration of the LL is considered. How this restoration can be achieved is a matter of controversy. The main purpose of this cadaveric study was to investigate the different steps of common posterior surgical techniques to understand the contribution of each successive step in restoring LL. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen human lumbar spine specimens were used to perform a sequential correction and instrumentation with a pedicle screw construct. RESULTS: The mean LL angle measured at L3-L4 in intact condition was 12.9°; after screw insertion and compression, this increased to 13.8° (+ 7%, p = 0.04), after bilateral facetectomy to 16.3° (+ 20%, p = 0.005), after discectomy and insertion of interbody cage to 18.0º (+ 9%, p = 0.012), after resection of the lamina and the processes spinosus to 19.8° (+ 10%, p = 0.017), and after resection of the anterior longitudinal ligament to 25.4° (+ 22%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Each step contributed statistically significant to restoration of segmental lordosis with bilateral facetectomy contributing the most in terms of percentage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Surgical Restoration of Sagittal Alignment of the Spine: Correlation with Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The sagittal-plane curvatures of the human spine are the consequence of evolution from quadrupedalism to bipedalism and are needed to maintain the center of mass of the body within the base of support in the bipedal position. Lumbar degenerative disorders can lead to a decrease in lumbar lordosis and thereby affect overall alignment of the spine. However, there is not yet enough direct evidence that surgical restoration of spinal malalignment would lead to a better clinical outcome. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the correlation between patient-reported outcomes and actual obtained spinal sagittal alignment in adult patients with lumbar degenerative disorders who underwent surgical treatment. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase). The last search was in November 2018. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. A meta-regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of 2,024 unique articles in the original search, 34 articles with 973 patients were included. All studies were either retrospective or prospective cohort studies; no randomized controlled trials were available. A total of 54 relations between preoperative-to-postoperative improvement in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiographic spinopelvic parameters were found, of which 20 were eligible for meta-regression analysis. Of these, 2 correlations were significant: pelvic tilt (PT) versus Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (p = 0.009) and PT versus visual analog scale (VAS) pain (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the current literature, lower PT was significantly correlated with improved ODI and VAS pain in patients with sagittal malalignment caused by lumbar degenerative disorders that were treated with surgical correction of the sagittal balance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.