Hospitalized patients' attitudes towards participating in a randomized control trial in case of a cardiac arrest.

Background: No previous study has evaluated patients attitudes towards inclusion in an ongoing cardiac arrest clinical trial. The aim of this study was to assess patients willingness and motives to participate in the ongoing randomized controlled drug trial "Vasopressin and Steroids in addition to Adrenaline in cardiac arrest" (VAST-A trial) in case of an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). Objectives: Hospitalized patients, men ≥ 18 and women ≥ 50 years, were asked for informed consent for inclusion in the VAST-A trial in case of an IHCA, the reason for approving or declining inclusion in the trial and baseline characteristics. Methods: Patients admitted to hospital were asked to give informed consent of inclusion in VAST-A in case of an IHCA during their hospital stay. Patients were also asked why they approved or declined inclusion as well as baseline characteristics questions. Results: 1,064 patients were asked about willingness to participate in the VAST-A trial, of these 902 (84.8%) patients approved inclusion. A subgroup of 411 patients were, except willingness, also asked about motives to participate or not and basic characteristics. The main reason for approving inclusion was to contribute to research (n = 328, 83.9%). The main reason for declining inclusion was concerns regarding testing the drug treatment (n = 6, 30%). Conclusion: Among hospitalized patients the vast majority gave informed consent to inclusion in an ongoing randomized cardiac arrest drug trial. The main reason for approving inclusion was to contribute to research.

Patients' motivation to undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement. A phenomenological hermeneutic study.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular disease, and its prevalence is increasing due to the ageing population. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the recommended method when treating frail, older patients. Knowledge of what motivates older patients to undergo TAVR is important, in order to meet patients' expectations. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to explore the meaning of older patients' motivation to undergo TAVR. DESIGN AND METHODS: The design was a qualitative study, analysed using a phenomenological hermeneutic approach. In-depth, semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions were conducted. Participants were selected from a specialist cardiology clinic in Sweden. Eighteen patients, six women and twelve men, aged 66-92, were recruited. RESULTS: The analysis showed that patients who had agreed to undergo TAVR were deeply affected by their body's failure. Before the TAVR procedure, the participants were limited in their daily activities and experienced that their life was on hold. They experienced that they were barely existing. They were aware of their life-threatening condition and were forced to confront death. Yet despite an advanced age, they still had considerable zest for life. It was very important to them to remain independent in everyday life, and fear of becoming dependent had a strong impact on their motivations for undergoing TAVR. CONCLUSION: Older patients' motivations to undergo TAVR are strongly influenced by their fear of being dependent on others and their zest for life. Health care professionals need to support these patients in setting realistic and personalised goals. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Person-centered care actions could facilitate patients' involvement in the decision about TAVR and strenghten patients' beliefs in their own capabilities, before and after TAVR.

The impact of general usage of stents on short- and long-term health care costs following percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The general usage of stents during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces the need for subsequent repeated revascularizations when compared with balloon dilatation. The aim was to evaluate the impact of stenting on short- and long-term in-hospital care costs after PCI. METHOD AND RESULTS: Patients who underwent PCI from July 1992 to June 1993 (group A, n = 166; 4.2% stents) and from July 1996 to June 1997 (group B, n = 233; 61.4% stents) were included. The clinical outcome and all in-hospital care costs during 2.5 years following the procedures were analyzed. During the study period the number of deaths and acute myocardial infarctions was similar in the groups, but repeated revascularization occurred more often in group A than in group B (53.6 vs. 39.5%; p = 0.007). The initial procedural cost per patient was higher in group B than in group A (EUR 7,653 +/- 5,071 vs. EUR 6,048 +/- 3,242; p = 0.002), but after 2.5 years the costs were similar in the 2 groups (not significant). CONCLUSION: General usage of stents increases immediate health care cost compared with balloon dilatation, but despite reduction in subsequent revascularization, there is no reduction in long-term in-hospital costs.

Patients expectations and fulfilment of expectations before and after treatment for suspected coronary artery disease assessed with a newly developed questionnaire in combination with established health-related quality of life questionnaires.

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision-making is often based on evidence of outcome after a specific treatment. Healthcare providers and patients may, however, have different perceptions and expectations of what to achieve from a certain healthcare measure. AIMS: To evaluate patients' expectations, perceptions and health related quality of life (HRQoL) before a care process including coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease and to evaluate the fulfilment of these expectations in relation to established patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) 6 months later. Furthermore, an aim was to try to define meaningful patient reported experience measures (PREMs) in this population. METHODS: 544 patients planned for coronary angiography completed a newly developed questionnaire to assess expectations and perceptions of treatment, the expectation questionnaire (ExpQ) and two established HRQoL questionnaires together with the established generic Short-Form 36 (SF36) and the disease specific Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). RESULTS: Patients had before the intervention, in general, high expectations of improvement after investigation and treatment and there was a positive attitude towards life style changes, medication and participation in decision-making regarding their own treatment. Only, 56.4% of the patients, however, reported fulfilment of treatment expectations. Fulfilment of treatment expectations correlated strongly with improvement in HRQoL after the care process. CONCLUSIONS: To measure patients ´ expectations and fulfilments of these may offer simple and meaningful outcomes to evaluate a healthcare process from a patient ´s perspective. To approach patients' expectations may also strengthen patient involvement in the care process with the possibilities of both higher patient satisfaction and medical results of the treatment.

One-year outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention for stable and unstable angina pectoris with or without application of general usage of stents in unselected European patient groups.

The outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of all patients treated for stable and unstable angina pectoris from July 1992 to June 1993 (group A [n = 590], of whom 3.7% received stents) was compared with the outcome in patients treated from July 1996 to June 1997 (group B [n = 768], of whom 64.7% received stents). All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. PCI was performed due to unstable angina in 34.1% and 33.5% of patients in groups A and B, respectively. More patients in group B than in group A had systemic hypertension, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, and PCI. Within 1 year, 42.2% of patients in group A versus 27.2% in group B (p <0.001) either died, had a nonfatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or underwent a new revascularization procedure. The difference between the groups persisted after correction for differences in baseline characteristics. No difference was seen in the subgroup that had previously undergone PCI. Mortality (2.0% vs 1.4%, p = NS) and the composite of death plus AMI (6.6% vs 6.1%, p = NS) was similar in groups A and B. The diagnoses of unstable angina and systemic hypertension at the time of the procedure were also predictors of adverse outcome. Thus, in a cohort of patients treated after the general acceptance of stenting, the composite of death, AMI, and/or revascularization procedures was significantly less than that in the cohort treated before this increase in stenting. However, this did not result in a reduced frequency of death or AMI.

Switch from abciximab to eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduce ischemic complications and improve outcome. Of the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors abciximab is better documented than eptifibatide, but the former is more expensive. The aim of this study was to monitor a switch from abciximab to eptifibatide with respect to clinical outcome up to six months after PCI. METHODS: All consecutive patients that six months before and six months after a switch from abciximab to eptifibatide received GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors during and after de novo PCIs were followed for six months with respect to clinical outcome. RESULTS: 310 patients received abciximab and 350 eptifibatide. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. 55% of the patients underwent PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and 41% for unstable coronary artery disease. There were trends for lower mortality among abciximab-treated than among the eptifibatide-treated patients during in-hospital stay (0.6% vs 2.0%:NS) as well as during the six month follow up (2.3% vs 3.7%:NS). The combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeated revascularisation and serious bleeding occurred in 14.9% in the abciximab group vs 16.8% in the eptifibatide group (NS). CONCLUSION: The study could not demonstrate any significant deterioration of clinical results after a switch from abciximab to eptifibatide as routine GPIIb/IIIa inhibition during PCI. With respect to the limited number of patients a clinical significant difference between the two GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors cannot, however, be excluded.

Restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): experiences from the patients' perspective.

BACKGROUND: PCI has been established as an effective treatment for coronary artery disease. Restenosis is a recurrence of a significant narrowing in the treated vessel. Although a part of the investigative and research funding is invested in the prevention and resolving the restenosis problem, little is known about its clinical significance apart from further revascularisation. AIM: The intention of this study was to clarify the patients perspective of what it means to suffer from documented restenosis after PCI. METHOD: Patients interviewed had undergone PCI. Data collection and analysis was done simultaneously according to Grounded Theory methodology and continued until new interviews provided no additional information. RESULTS: "Living with uncertainty" was identified as the core category, and the central focus in the data explains what it means to patients' to suffer from restenosis. The core category was further illuminated in four additional categories labelled "fighting for access to care", "moderating health threats", "trying to understand" and "controlling relatives anxiety". CONCLUSION: Patients' perceptions of illness and illness-related events, such as symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis, are considerably affected by uncertainty. This infiltrates their struggle to acquire the care needed, their endeavour to comprehend and moderate health threats, and caring for their family.