Verification, implementation and harmonization of automated chemiluminescent immunoassays for MPO- and PR3-ANCA detection.

OBJECTIVES: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) testing assists clinicians diagnose ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). We aimed to verify and harmonize chemiluminescent immunoassays for the detection of myeloperoxidase (MPO)- and proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA. METHODS: An in-house ELISA, a capture ELISA, and a chemiluminescent assay QUANTA Flash on a BIO-FLASH analyzer were used to detect MPO- and PR3-ANCA in sera from 39 patients with AAV, 55 patients with various non-AAV, and 66 patients with connective tissue diseases. The results of the assays were evaluated, and their clinical performance was assessed. The precision and linearity of the QUANTA Flash assays were determined, and likelihood ratios (LRs) for AAV at diagnosis were calculated. RESULTS: The precision and linearity of the QUANTA Flash assays were confirmed. Overall agreement between 97.5 and 98.8 % and Cohen's kappa coefficients between 0.861 and 0.947 were observed for the results of the QUANTA Flash assays and ELISAs. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and ROC analysis of the assays for AAV were statistically similar (in-house ELISA 89.7 %, 95.0 %, and 0.937; capture ELISA 92.3 %, 98.3 %, and 0.939; and QUANTA Flash 89.7 %, 95.9 %, and 0.972). For the QUANTA Flash assay results, the interval-specific LRs for AAV at diagnosis were: 0-8 CU had LR 0.08, 8-29 CU had LR 1.03, 29-121 CU had LR 7.76, 121-191 CU had LR 12.4, and >191 CU had LR ∞. CONCLUSIONS: The QUANTA Flash MPO and PR3 assays provide precise and consistent results and have comparable clinical utility for AAV. The calculated LRs were consistent with published LRs, confirming the utility of LRs for harmonization of ANCA results.

Establishment of ELISA-comparable moderate and high thresholds for anticardiolipin and anti-ß2 glycoprotein I chemiluminescent immunoassays according to the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria and evaluation of their diagnostic performance.

OBJECTIVES: Recently published 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria emphasize the importance of quantifying single-, double-, and triple-antiphospholipid antibody positivity, distinguishing between IgG and IgM isotypes, and delineating moderate/high levels of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-ß2 glycoprotein I (anti-ß2GPI) antibodies. We aimed to establish clinically important moderate/high thresholds for aCL and anti-ß2GPI IgG/IgM chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIA), in particular QUANTA Flash, comparable to our in-house ELISAs used for over two decades, and to evaluate their diagnostic performance. METHODS: QUANTA Flash CLIA and in-house ELISAs were used to measure aCL and anti-ß2GPI IgG/IgM. Moderate thresholds for QUANTA Flash CLIA were determined using a non-parametric approach, calculating a 99th percentile on serum samples from 139 blood donors, and by mirroring the diagnostic performance of in-house ELISA on 159 patient samples. RESULTS: Thresholds for QUANTA Flash CLIA achieving diagnostic performance equivalent to in-house ELISAs were 40 CU for moderate and 80 CU for high levels for aCL and anti-ß2GPI IgG and IgM. The assays showed good qualitative agreement, ranging from 76.10 to 91.19 %. When considering in-house ELISA results, 14 out of 80 (17.5 %) patients did not fulfill the new ACR/EULAR laboratory classification criteria, while 27 out of 80 (33.8 %) did not when considering QUANTA Flash CLIA results. CONCLUSIONS: We determined moderate and high thresholds for aCL and anti-ß2GPI IgG and IgM detected with QUANTA Flash CLIA, aligning with long-established in-house ELISA thresholds. These thresholds are crucial for seamlessly integrating of the new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria into future observational clinical studies and trials.

Longitudinal Analysis of Antiphospholipid Antibody Dynamics after Infection with SARS-CoV-2 or Vaccination with BNT162b2.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) comprise a group of autoantibodies that reflect prothrombotic risk in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) but may also be present in a small proportion of healthy individuals. They are often transiently elevated in infections, including SARS-CoV-2, and may also be associated with vaccine-induced autoimmunity. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the dynamics of aPL in COVID-19 patients and in individuals (healthcare professionals-HCPs) after receiving BNT162b2 vaccine and to compare aPL levels and positivity with those found in APS patients. We measured solid-phase identifiable aPL, including anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-ß2 glycoprotein I (anti-ß2GPI), and anti-prothrombin/phosphatidylserine (aPS/PT) antibodies in 58 HCPs before and after vaccination (at 3 weeks, 3, 6, and 9 months after the second dose, and 3 weeks after the third booster dose), in 45 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the ICU, in 89 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the non-ICU (at admission, at hospital discharge, and at follow-up), and in 52 patients with APS. The most frequently induced aPL in COVID-19 patients (hospitalized in non-ICU) were aCL (50.6% of patients had positive levels at at least one time point), followed by anti-ß2GPI (21.3% of patients had positive levels at at least one time point). In 9/89 COVID-19 patients, positive aPL levels persisted for three months. One HCP developed aCL IgG after vaccination but the persistence could not be confirmed, and two HCPs developed persistent anti-ß2GPI IgG after vaccination with no increase during a 1-year follow-up period. Solid-phase aPL were detected in 84.6% of APS patients, in 49.4% of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the non-ICU, in 33.3% of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the ICU, and in only 17.2% of vaccinated HCPs. aPL levels and multiple positivity were significantly lower in both infected groups and in vaccinated individuals compared with APS patients. In conclusion, BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine may have induced aPL in a few individuals, whereas SARS-CoV-2 infection itself results in a higher percentage of aPL induction, but the levels, persistence, and multiple positivity of aPL do not follow the pattern observed in APS.

Insights into the immunological description of cryoglobulins with regard to detection and characterization in Slovenian rheumatological patients.

The detection of cryoglobulins (CG) used to diagnose cryoglobulinemic vasculitis requires strict adherence to protocol, with emphasis on the preanalytical part. Our main objectives were to introduce a more sensitive and specific protocol for the detection of CG and to characterize CG in Slovenian patients diagnosed with cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, other vasculitides, connective tissue diseases or non-rheumatic diseases examined at the Department of Rheumatology (University Medical Centre Ljubljana). Samples were routinely analyzed for the presence of CG with the protocol using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. In the newly introduced protocol, the type of CG was determined by immunofixation on visually observed positive samples and the concentration of CG in the cryoprecipitate and rheumatoid factor (RF) activity were measured by nephelometry. RF, C3c and C4 were measured in patients` serum and a decision tree analysis was performed using all results. The agreement between negative and positive results between the two protocols was 86%. Of the 258 patient samples tested, we found 56 patients (21.7%) with positive CG (37.5% - type II, 62.5% - type III). The RF activity was observed in 21.4% of CG positive subjects. The median concentration of type II CG was significantly higher than that of type III CG (67.4 mg/L vs. 45.0 mg/L, p = 0.037). Patients with type II had lower C4 concentrations and higher RF compared to patients with type III CG. In the decision tree, C4 was the strongest predictor of cryoglobulinemia in patients. With the newly implemented protocol, we were able to improve the detection and quantification of CG in the samples of our rheumatology patients and report the results to adequately support clinicians.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Vascular Thrombosis in Patients with Severe Forms of COVID-19.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) are a laboratory criterion for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and are known to cause clinical symptoms such as vascular thrombosis or obstetric complications. It is suggested that aPLA may be associated with thromboembolism in severe COVID-19 cases. Therefore, we aimed to combine clinical data with laboratory findings of aPLA at four time points (admission, worsening, discharge, and 3-month follow-up) in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. In 111 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, current and past history of thrombosis and pregnancy complications were recorded. Nine types of aPLA were determined at four time points: anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti- ß2GPI), and antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) of the IgM, IgG, or IgA isotypes. During hospitalization, seven patients died, three of them due to pulmonary artery thromboembolism (none were aPLA positive). Only one of the five who developed pulmonary artery thrombosis was aPLA positive. Out of 9/101 patients with a history of thrombosis, five had arterial thrombosis and none were aPLA positive at admission and follow-up; four had venous thrombosis, and one was aPLA positive at all time points (newly diagnosed APS). Of these 9/101 patients, 55.6% were transiently aPLA positive at discharge only, compared to 26.1% without a history of thrombosis (p = 0.041). Patients with severe forms of COVID-19 and positive aPLA should receive the same dose and anticoagulant medication regimen as those with negative aPLA because those antibodies are mostly transiently positive and not linked to thrombosis and fatal outcomes.

Differences in SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibody Responses After the First, Second, and Third Doses of BNT162b2 in Naïve and Previously Infected Individuals: A 1-Year Observational Study in Healthcare Professionals.

Background: Safe and effective vaccines against COVID-19 are critical for preventing the spread of SARS-CoV-2, but little is known about the humoral immune response more than 9 months after vaccination. We aimed to assess the humoral immune response after the first, second, and third (booster) doses of BNT162b2 vaccine in SARS-CoV-2 naïve and previously infected healthcare professionals (HCP) and the humoral immune response after infection in vaccinated HCP. Methods: We measured anti-spike (anti-S) and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies at different time points up to 12 months in the sera of 300 HCP who had received two or three doses of BNT162b2 vaccine. Mixed-model analyses were used to assess anti-S antibody dynamics and to determine their predictors (age, sex, BMI, and previous infection). Results: Naïve individuals had statistically lower anti-S antibody concentrations after the first dose (median 253 BAU/ml) than previously infected individuals (median 3648 BAU/ml). After the second dose, anti-S antibody concentrations increased in naïve individuals (median 3216 BAU/ml), whereas the second dose did not significantly increase concentrations in previously infected individuals (median 4503 BAU/ml). The third dose resulted in an additional increase in concentrations (median 4844 BAU/ml in naïve and median 5845 BAU/ml in previously infected individuals). Anti-S antibody concentrations steadily decreased after the second dose and after the third dose in naïve and previously infected individuals. In addition, we found that age had an effect on the humoral immune response. Younger individuals had higher anti-S antibody concentrations after the first and second doses. After infection with the new variant Omicron, a further increase in anti-S antibody concentrations to a median value of 4794 BAU/ml was observed in three times vaccinated HCP whose anti-S antibody concentrations were relatively high before infection (median 2141 BAU/ml). Our study also showed that individuals with systemic adverse events achieved higher anti-S antibody concentrations. Conclusion: In this study, significant differences in humoral immune responses to BNT162b2 vaccine were observed between naïve and previously infected individuals, with age playing an important role, suggesting that a modified vaccination schedule should be practiced in previously infected individuals. In addition, we showed that the high anti-S antibodies were not protective against new variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Clinically important neutralizing anti-drug antibodies detected with an in-house competitive ELISA.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of TNF-alpha inhibitors is crucial for evaluating patients with inflammatory diseases on a personalized level. It has been clinically observed that many patients receiving TNF-alpha inhibitors, with negative drug and anti-drug antibody results from bridging ELISA (bELISA), lose their drug response over time, despite dose optimization. Our aims were to develop innovative in-house competitive ELISAs (cELISAs) for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against infliximab and adalimumab and compare their results to reporter gene assay (RGA) and in-house bELISA. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate patient anti-drug antibody results in regard to their clinical records and potential benefits of therapeutic drug monitoring with the novel cELISAs. Sera of patients treated with infliximab (n = 46) or adalimumab (n = 31), having undetectable drug levels, were tested with our in-house cELISA. Briefly, samples were incubated with a fixed amount of drug and the neutralizing capacity of the samples was determined. The cELISA results were compared to RGA and bELISA results using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Additionally, patient clinical data were evaluated in line with the results of cELISA, bELISA, and RGA using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Log Rank test. Both anti-infliximab and anti-adalimumab cELISAs showed very good correlation to RGA (r = 0.932, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.947, p < 0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, a positive result in anti-infliximab cELISA can predict treatment failure in 100% of patients with negative bELISA, while a positive result in anti-adalimumab cELISA can predict treatment failure in 80% of patients with negative bELISA. Taken together, we developed innovative cELISAs enabling quantification of functional and neutralizing anti-drug antibodies, comparable to RGA. The association between cELISA results and loss of drug response in patients identified clinically important anti-drug antibodies, as measured by cELISA.

Neutralizing effects of anti-infliximab antibodies on synergistically-stimulated human coronary artery endothelial cells.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with rheumatic diseases have an increased risk of atherosclerosis with up-regulated serum amyloid A (SAA), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), which were reported to activate human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAEC). We aimed to investigate the effects of TNF-α inhibitor infliximab and anti-infliximab antibodies on the TNF-α/IL-1ß/SAA activated HCAEC. METHODS: HCAEC were incubated with TNF-α, IL-1ß, SAA, infliximab, anti-infliximab antibodies and their combinations. The protein levels of pro- and anti-atherogenic analytes were measured in supernatants using ELISA and multiplex assays, while mRNA expression was determined by RT-PCR. Anti-infliximab antibodies were purified from sera samples by affinity chromatography. RESULTS: IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF and GRO-α were synergistically up-regulated in triple stimulation with TNF-α, IL-1ß and SAA, while their levels in solely SAA- or TNF-α-stimulated HCAEC did not increase. IL-1Ra, IL-1α, VCAM-1, MCP-1, IL-10 and IL-17A were increased, but no synergistic responses were observed in triple stimulation. Infliximab was effective in lowering the synergistic effect of IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF and GRO-α in triple stimulation, while anti-infliximab antibodies restored the levels. The changes were confirmed at the mRNA expression level for IL-6, IL-8 and GM-CSF. CONCLUSIONS: Triple stimulation with TNF-α, IL-1ß and SAA synergistically elevated IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF and GRO-α release in supernatants of HCAEC, with infliximab substantially inhibiting their levels. An isolated, enriched fraction of polyclonal anti-infliximab antibodies was capable of neutralizing infliximab, in the presence of TNF-α/IL-1ß/SAA. The long-term presence of anti-infliximab antibodies in the circulation of patients with chronic rheumatic diseases is potentially important for promoting the atherosclerotic process.

Routinely utilized in-house assays for infliximab, adalimumab and their anti-drug antibody levels.

By monitoring serum concentrations of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) and levels of their antibodies in patients with inflammatory diseases, clinicians can adjust dose and increase safety and effectiveness of treatment. The aim was to develop and validate in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for IFX and ADL, together with anti-IFX and anti-ADL ELISAs for routine detection and further analysis with acid dissociation of immune complexes. Furthermore, the objectives were to compare in-house assays with commercial ELISAs and reporter gene assays (RGAs) and to determine cross-reactivity between original Remicade®/Remsima™ and their antibodies. In-house ELISAs were validated (imprecision, accuracy among other criteria) and compared with commercial apDia ELISAs and RGAs. Correlation coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients, agreement, and bias were calculated. All in-house ELISAs gave precise and repeatable results. The immune complexes between IFX and anti-IFX were found in 3% of samples, while complexes between ADL and anti-ADL were found in 14% of samples. Significant correlations were found between in-house and apDia ELISAs and RGA for IFX, ADL, anti-IFX, and anti-ADL results. Remicade®, Remsima™, and their antibodies could be accurately measured with either apDia or in-house IFX and anti-IFX ELISAs. Accurate and precise in-house ELISAs, highly comparable with commercial ELISAs and RGAs, were developed and validated for routine analysis of samples of patients treated with IFX (Remicade® or Remsima™) or ADL providing substantial cost benefit. Complex dissociation identified samples with anti-IFX-IFX (3%) and anti-ADL-ADL (14%) complexes indicating the benefit of adding acid dissociation to therapeutic drug monitoring of IFX and ADL.

Detection of adalimumab and anti-adalimumab antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive overview of methodology pitfalls and benefits.

About a third of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab may develop anti-adalimumab antibodies. Anti-adalimumab antibodies are associated with reduced drug levels, loss of drug efficacy, clinical non-response and an increased risk of adverse effects. In case of suspected drug failure and in order to better define clinical efficacy, adalimumab as well as anti-adalimumab antibodies levels should be monitored. Sandwich or indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay is most commonly used for determining adalimumab, while bridging ELISA and antigen-binding test are most useful for determining anti-adalimumab antibodies. Most current assays cannot detect antibodies complexed with the adalimumab; however, methods for dissociation of the complexes using acid/temperature have been developed. The aim of this review is to report on the latest methodology for detecting adalimumab and anti-ADL antibodies, benefits of their detections in clinical practice, as well as expose problematic issues, such as different analytical sensitivity and specificity, standardization and validation. The main problem in measuring adalimumab or anti-ADL antibodies is high drug sensitivity, which can result in false-negative anti-ADL antibodies. Therefore, drug-tolerant assays have been developed. Cell-based assays, such as the reporter gene assay, are recommended for detection of functionally active adalimumab and their neutralizing anti-ADL antibodies.