RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Omicron is rapidly spreading as a new SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern (VOC). The question whether this new variant has an impact on SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test (RAT) performance is of utmost importance. To obtain an initial estimate regarding differences of RATs in detecting omicron and delta, seven commonly used SARS-CoV-2 RATs from different manufacturers were analysed using cell culture supernatants and clinical specimens. METHODS: For this purpose, cell culture-expanded omicron and delta preparations were serially diluted in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) and the Limit of Detection (LoD) for both VOCs was determined. Additionally, clinical specimens stored in viral transport media or saline (n = 51) were investigated to complement in vitro results with cell culture supernatants. Ct values and RNA concentrations were determined via quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). RESULTS: The in vitro determination of the LoD showed no obvious differences in detection of omicron and delta for the RATs examined. The LoD in this study was at a dilution level of 1:1,000 (corresponding to 3.0-5.6 × 106 RNA copies/mL) for tests I-V and at a dilution level of 1:100 (corresponding to 3.7-4.9 × 107 RNA copies/mL) for tests VI and VII. Based on clinical specimens, no obvious differences were observed between RAT positivity rates when comparing omicron to delta in this study setting. Overall positivity rates varied between manufacturers with 30-81% for omicron and 42-71% for delta. Test VII was only conducted in vitro with cell culture supernatants for feasibility reasons. In the range of Ct < 23, positivity rates were 50-100% for omicron and 67-93% for delta. CONCLUSION: In this study, RATs from various manufacturers were investigated, which displayed no obvious differences in terms of analytical LoD in vitro and RAT positivity rates based on clinical samples comparing the VOCs omicron and delta. However, differences between tests produced by various manufacturers were detected. In terms of clinical samples, a focus of this study was on specimens with high virus concentrations. Further systematic, clinical and laboratory studies utilizing large datasets are urgently needed to confirm reliable performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity for all individual RATs and SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula , ARNRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Five SARS-CoV-2 variants are currently considered as variants of concern (VOC). Omicron was declared a VOC at the end of November 2021. Based on different diagnostic methods, the occurrence of Omicron was reported by 52 countries worldwide on December 7 2021. First notified by South Africa with alarming reports on increasing infection rates, this new variant was soon suspected to replace the currently pre-dominating Delta variant leading to further infection waves worldwide. METHODS: Using VOC PCR screening and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis of selected samples, we investigated the circulation of Omicron in the German federal state Bavaria. For this, we analyzed SARS-CoV-2 surveillance data from our laboratory generated from calendar week (CW) 01 to 49/2021. RESULTS: So far, we have detected 69 Omicron cases in our laboratory from CW 47-49/2021 using RT-qPCR followed by melting curve analysis. The first 16 cases were analyzed by NGS and all were confirmed as Omicron. CONCLUSION: Our data strongly support no circulation of the new Omicron variant before CW 47/2021.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , SARS-CoV-2/genéticaRESUMEN
Members of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) species complex are known to cause human Lyme borreliosis. Because of longevity of some reservoir hosts and the Ixodes tick vectors' life cycle, long-term studies are required to better understand species and population dynamics of these bacteria in their natural habitats. Ticks were collected between 1999 and 2010 in three ecologically different habitats in Latvia. We used multilocus sequence typing utilizing eight chromosomally located housekeeping genes to obtain information about species and population fluctuations and/or stability of B. burgdorferi s.l. in these habitats. The average prevalence over all years was 18.9%. From initial high-infection prevalences of 25.5%, 33.1% and 31.8%, from 2002 onwards the infection rates steadily decreased to 7.3%. Borrelia afzelii and Borrelia garinii were the most commonly found genospecies but striking local differences were obvious. In one habitat, a significant shift from rodent-associated to bird-associated Borrelia species was noted whilst in the other habitats, Borrelia species composition was relatively stable over time. Sequence types (STs) showed a random spatial and temporal distribution. These results demonstrated that there are temporal regional changes and extrapolations from one habitat to the next are not possible.
Asunto(s)
Grupo Borrelia Burgdorferi/aislamiento & purificación , Borrelia burgdorferi/aislamiento & purificación , Ixodes/microbiología , Enfermedad de Lyme/epidemiología , Animales , Borrelia burgdorferi/genética , Grupo Borrelia Burgdorferi/genética , Ecosistema , Humanos , Letonia/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Enfermedad de Lyme/microbiología , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
Borrelia turcica, a member of the reptile-associated Borrelia clade, is vectored by Hyalomma aegyptium. The only suggested reservoir hosts of B. turcica are tortoises of the genus Testudo. Borrelia turcica has been described to occur in several Southeastern European countries including Turkey, Romania, Bulgaria and Greece but so far nothing is known about the relationship of these populations and whether or how they are structured. Using multilocus sequence typing (MLST) on eight chromosomally located housekeeping loci (clpA, clpX, nifS, pepX, pyrG, recG, rplB and uvrA) we analyzed 43 B. turcica isolates from Serres, Greece (nâ¯=â¯15) collected in 2017 and Izmir, Turkey (nâ¯=â¯28) collected in 2018. To understand their relationship a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree and goeBURST analysis were done based on MLST sequence data and allelic profiles, respectively. The data we generated confirmed that the samples of B. turcica investigated here were divergent from Lyme disease (LD) and relapsing fever (RF) species. Within the B. turcica clade, samples of different geographic origin (Greece, Turkey) clustered together in terminal branches; no obvious differences between the Greek and Turkish samples were noticeable. A goeBURST analysis using triple-locus variants revealed very few clonal complexes with the majority of samples appearing as singletons. Minor clonal complexes (consisting of two sequence types) comprised only Greek isolates, only Turkish isolates or both, so no pattern of clustering of isolates from the two geographical regions was observed. Interestingly, very little population structure was discerned in our study. This was surprising in view of the large geographic distance between collection sites of B. turcica and raises questions about the evolution or spatial spread of this species.
Asunto(s)
Borrelia/clasificación , Genes Esenciales , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus/métodos , Garrapatas/microbiología , Tortugas/parasitología , Animales , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Borrelia/genética , Borrelia/aislamiento & purificación , Análisis por Conglomerados , Femenino , Grecia , Insectos Vectores/microbiología , Enfermedad de Lyme/microbiología , Enfermedad de Lyme/veterinaria , Masculino , Filogenia , Fiebre Recurrente/microbiología , Fiebre Recurrente/veterinaria , Turquía , Tortugas/microbiologíaRESUMEN
DNA purification is a critical step in the processing of samples for molecular diagnosis and/ or identification of pathogens via polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Especially when handling vectors like ticks, purifying the DNA always poses a challenge. In this study, we compared factors that may have an influence on DNA extraction namely commercially available DNA extraction kits vs alkaline hydrolysis for DNA extraction. The methods were applied to questing Ixodes (I.) ricinus ticks and Borrelia cultures of defined cell concentrations. A total of 69 questing I. ricinus ticks were collected. From 34 ticks, total DNA was extracted using a commercial DNA extraction kit. Thirty-five ticks were treated with 1.25% ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH). Six ticks from each batch were placed in 70% ethanol (EtOH) for one week prior to DNA extraction to see the effect of EtOH preservation on total DNA yield. DNA yield was estimated in field-collected ticks using conventional PCR targeting the Ixodes Cytochrome C oxidase (coi) gene and in cultured Borrelia isolates using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting the FlaB encoding gene of Borrelia. Column DNA extraction yielded slightly better results than NH4OH treatment when tested in a PCR targeting a tick-specific coi gene (96% PCR-positive vs 86% PCR-positive results, respectively). EtOH preservation had a slightly negative effect on DNA yield and - again - slightly stronger PCR products were observed by commercial kit extraction. A Shapiro-Wilk test conducted revealed a significance-level of 90% for both the methods, indicating a normal distribution of the values generated by BioNumerics quantification. A two-sided t-test conducted revealed a significant (p < 0.01) mean difference between the methods. Similarly, qPCR on cultured specimen DNA of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto (B. burgdorferi s.s.) (B31) with different concentrations revealed a better yield for kit extraction in comparison to NH4OH treatment; a difference of approximately 3 Ct-values was ascertained between extraction methods. A one-sided t-test showed a significant difference between the methods at lower concentration of Borrelia i.e. better extraction with a commercial kit at lower borrelial DNA concentration, while at higher concentration (106 cells per ml) the difference was not significant.
Asunto(s)
Borrelia/genética , ADN/aislamiento & purificación , Ixodes/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Animales , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Ixodes/crecimiento & desarrollo , Masculino , Ninfa/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/economía , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/economía , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodosRESUMEN
Borrelia turcica is a reptile-associated Borrelia species that is vectored by the hard tick Hyalomma aegyptium. Tortoises of the genus Testudo represent the principal host of adult H. aegyptium, while immature stages are less host-specific and can be found on various vertebrates and even on humans. Borrelia turcica isolates were already successfully obtained from exotic tortoises suggesting that they are putative hosts. To the best of our knowledge, no further investigations on additional host association of B. turcica were conducted. Since many but not all adult Hyalomma ticks collected from tortoises are infected, questions arise about the direction of transmission between tick and tortoises for this Borrelia species. In addition, there is no information on the potential pathogenicity of B. turcica for humans. For other Borrelia species it has been shown that resistance or sensitivity to complement-active serum can be indicative of host species association(s). In this study, we explored for the first time the in vitro survival of B. turcica isolates from Turkey (IST7) and Greece (171601G) in the presence of 50% complement-active serum of different species (tortoise, turtle, human and bird). Both isolates showed resistance to tortoise serum, partial resistance to turtle serum but did not survive human and bird serum. These data suggest that indeed tortoises are reservoir host species for B. turcica while birds or humans are not. By implication these data suggest that B. turcica is not human pathogenic. Whether or not other reptile species, such as lizards, are also potential hosts, requires further investigation. However, as the life cycle of Borrelia is closely linked to that of their hosts and vectors, in vitro studies can only give clues about the actual in vivo behavior.