RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Fracture risk assessment is recommended at three months after glucocorticoid (GC) therapy initiation. This study aimed to assess whether GC exposure in the initial 90 days of GC therapy is associated with subsequent hip and clinical vertebral fracture risk using the nationwide health insurance claims database of Japan (NDBJ). METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 50 years who were prescribed GC (≥ 70 mg prednisolone or equivalent; PSL) in the initial 90 days of GC therapy and were followed for hip and clinical vertebral fracture incidences for the subsequent 1080 days were selected from NDBJ. Associations of GC exposure with hip or clinical vertebral fracture risk were evaluated by Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: We selected 316,396 women and 299,871 men for the GC-exposed group and 43,164 women and 33,702 men for the reference group. Higher GC doses and longer prescription days in the initial 90 days of GC therapy were significantly and dose-dependently associated with increased fracture risk relative to the reference group. Patients receiving GC ≥ 5 mg PSL/day had a significantly increased fracture risk in the stratum of 30-59 days of GC prescription. In addition, female patients who received GC (≥ 1 and < 2.5 mg PSL/day) for 90 days in the initial 90 days of GC therapy had a significantly increased fracture risk. CONCLUSIONS: GC exposure in the initial 90 days of GC therapy was dose-dependently associated with hip and clinical vertebral fracture risk. GC may increase fracture risk with lower doses for shorter durations than previously reported. Fracture risk assessment three months after glucocorticoid (GC) therapy initiation is recommended. We found that GC exposure in the initial 90 days of GC therapy at lower daily doses for shorter durations than previously reported were significantly and dose-dependently associated with fracture risk using a nationwide health insurance claims database.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Fracturas de Cadera , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Japón/epidemiología , Seguro de Salud , Fracturas de Cadera/inducido químicamente , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Increased fracture risk due to oral glucocorticoids (GCs) rapidly decreases with GC discontinuation. However, evidence for this is limited. We found that fracture risk decreased rapidly in the first year after GC discontinuation, while hip fracture risk remained higher than reference levels for about two years after GC discontinuation. PURPOSE: We investigated changes in fracture risk following discontinuation of long-term oral glucocorticoids (GCs) using Japan's nationwide health insurance claims database (NDBJ). METHODS: We identified patients aged ≥ 50 years who initiated GC therapy in 2012-2019. Those receiving ≥ 5 mg (prednisolone or equivalent, PSL)/day for ≥ 72 days in the initial 90 days of GC therapy were classified as the GC-exposure group, and those receiving < 5 mg PSL/day for < 30 days were classified as the reference group. Patients discontinuing GC after 90 days of GC therapy were classified as the GC-discontinuation group; all others were classified as the GC-continuation group. We tracked the incidence rates of hip and clinical vertebral fractures for up to 990 days, and assessed fracture risk after GC discontinuation by hazard ratios (HR) adjusted by inverse probability weighting using propensity scores for GC discontinuation. RESULTS: There was a total of 52,179 GC-discontinuation, 91,969 GC-continuation, and 43,138 reference group women, and 57,560, 93,736, and 33,696 men in the corresponding groups, respectively. According to adjusted HRs, incidence rates of fractures were significantly lower in the GC-discontinuation group than in the GC-continuation group in the initial 90 days after GC discontinuation and remained significant for 360 days, except for hip fracture in men. HRs for hip fractures remained significantly higher in the GC-discontinuation group compared to the reference group for 720 days post-discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Fracture risk declines rapidly in the first year after GC discontinuation, but vigilance is necessary as the increased risk persists for two years post-discontinuation.
RESUMEN
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a lifestyle-related disease that develops in middle-aged and older adults, often due to smoking habits, and has been noted to cause bone fragility. COPD is a risk factor for osteoporosis and fragility fracture, and a high prevalence of osteoporosis and incidence of vertebral fractures have been shown in patients with COPD. Findings of lung tissue analysis in patients with COPD are primarily emphysema with a loss of alveolar septal walls, and the severity of pulmonary emphysema is negatively correlated with thoracic spine bone mineral density (BMD). On the other hand, epidemiological studies on COPD and fracture risk have reported a BMD-independent increase in fracture risk; however, verification in animal models and human bone biopsy samples has been slow, and the essential pathogenesis has not been elucidated. The detailed pathological/molecular mechanisms of musculoskeletal complications in patients with COPD are unknown, and basic research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms. This paper discusses the impacts of COPD on bone strength, focusing on findings in animal models in terms of bone microstructure, bone metabolic dynamics, and material properties.
Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea , Huesos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/patología , Humanos , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Animales , Huesos/patología , Huesos/fisiopatología , Osteoporosis/fisiopatología , Osteoporosis/patología , Fracturas Óseas/patología , Fracturas Óseas/fisiopatología , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare treatment satisfaction with two dosing regimens (two teriparatide [TPTD] self-injection systems) in osteoporosis patients at high risk of fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this open-label crossover randomized trial comparing self-injected once-daily (1/D)-TPTD with self-injected twice-weekly (2/W)-TPTD, three satisfaction variables were evaluated by questionnaire for 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall satisfaction and secondary endpoints were satisfaction with treatment effectiveness and with utility of the self-injection device. Changes in quality of life (QOL) assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension, pain assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), and anthropometric parameters were also analyzed. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups consisted of 180 (75.9 ± 7.3 years) and 179 (age: 75.5 ± 6.9 years) patients, respectively. After 26 weeks of treatment, no significant between-group difference in the persistence rate (79.4% vs 72.6% in the 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups, respectively), distributions of overall satisfaction scores, and satisfaction with treatment (p > 0.05) were observed. However, several items of satisfaction with the utility of the injection device were significantly higher in the 2/W-TPTD group (p < 0.05). Statistical improvements from baseline values were observed in QOL and pain VAS in both groups (p < 0.05). No serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: The between-group similarity of overall treatment satisfaction and effectiveness scores and between-group difference in satisfaction with the utility of the self-injection device was useful information for real-world treatment of osteoporosis. Both medication regimens were well tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Osteoporosis , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Teriparatido , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Estudios Cruzados , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Japón , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Teriparatido/uso terapéutico , Teriparatido/administración & dosificación , Teriparatido/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There is limited knowledge about early-onset dementia (EOD) on fracture risk. METHODS: Individuals ages 50 to 64 were identified from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (2012 to 2019). The association between EOD and fractures and the association between cholinesterase inhibitors for EOD and fractures were evaluated using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: We identified 13,614 EOD patients and 9,144,560 cognitively healthy individuals. The analysis revealed that EOD was associated with an increased risk of hip fractures (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 8.79, 7.37-10.48), vertebral fractures (1.73, 1.48-2.01), and major osteoporotic fractures (2.05, 1.83-2.30) over 3 years. The use of cholinesterase inhibitors was significantly associated with a reduction in hip fractures among EOD patients (0.28, 0.11-0.69). DISCUSSION: EOD patients have a higher risk of osteoporotic fractures than cognitively healthy individuals. The use of cholinesterase inhibitors may reduce the risk of hip fracture among EOD patients. HIGHLIGHTS: It is unknown whether early-onset dementia (EOD) increases the risk of fractures. We identified 13,614 individuals with EOD using a nationwide administrative database. Patients with EOD have a higher risk of hip, vertebral, and major osteoporotic fractures. The use of cholinesterase inhibitors may reduce hip fracture among patients with EOD.
Asunto(s)
Demencia , Fracturas de Cadera , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Demencia/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Japón/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Edad de Inicio , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
We investigated the incidence/trend of osteonecrosis of the jaw by antiresorptive agent dose over a 5-year period in Kure city, Japan. The incidence was 24 times higher among osteoporosis patients with low-dose agents and 421 times higher among cancer patients with high-dose agents than in the population without agents. PURPOSE: We launched the registry system of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) cases in 2015 to investigate the trend in ONJ incidence. The purpose of our study was to estimate the ONJ incidence among patients with antiresorptive agent use by dosage and people without antiresorptive agent use in Kure and its trend from 2016 to 2020. METHODS: From 2016 to 2021, 98 eligible ONJ patients were enrolled. Medication-related ONJ (MRONJ) was diagnosed based on the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons criteria. The annual number of those with and without antiresorptive agents was obtained from the claims database. Antiresorptive agents used for cancer and osteoporosis patients were defined as high- and low-dose medications, respectively. RESULTS: The annual incidence of high-dose MRONJ was 2305.8 per 100,000 and that of low-dose MRONJ was 132.5 per 100,000, while the ONJ incidence among people without antiresorptive agents was 5.1 per 100,000. The incidence ratio was 23.6 (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.3-41.8) among osteoporosis patients who used low-dose antiresorptive agents and 420.6 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 220.8-801.4) among cancer patients who used high-dose agents compared with people who did not use these agents. MRONJ incidence increased from 2016 to 2020, but the incidence of high-dose MRONJ decreased, although this was nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the incidence and trend of ONJ by antiresorptive agent dose over a 5-year period in Kure after launching the multiprofession study. This collaborative study for the early detection and prevention of ONJ will continue.
Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Neoplasias , Osteonecrosis , Osteoporosis , Humanos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/epidemiología , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/etiología , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/prevención & control , Japón/epidemiología , Incidencia , Osteonecrosis/inducido químicamente , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the association between pharmacotherapy and secondary hip fracture incidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The correlation between secondary hip fracture incidence and the presence, type, and medication possession ratio (MPR) of pharmacotherapy was investigated using medical insurance data acquired from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. RESULTS: Data collected from female patients (n = 1,435,347) were analyzed. The 2-year secondary hip fracture incidence was 3.48% (n = 49,921). Secondary hip fracture was significantly more common in patients without medications (3.80%) than in those with medications (3.00%). Patients receiving selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) had the lowest average age. The crude incidence of secondary hip fracture was the lowest in patients receiving SERMs (n = 2088 [2.52%]), followed by those taking bisphosphonates (n = 11,355 [2.88%]), denosumab (n = 1118 [2.90%]), no medications (n = 32,747 [3.80%]), and parathyroid hormone (PTH: n = 2163 [4.55%]), whereas the age-adjusted incidence was the lowest in patients administered denosumab (2.27%), followed by those taking bisphosphonates (2.47%), SERMs (2.55%), PTH (3.67%), and no medications (3.80%). The mean MPR was the highest in patients taking denosumab (64.9%), followed by those receiving bisphosphonates (58.7%), SERMs (58.2%), and PTH (40.6%) in the no hip fracture group. CONCLUSION: Secondary hip fractures were less likely to occur with medication versus no medication. Differences in the crude incidence of secondary hip fracture based on medications usage might be attributed to background characteristics.
Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Fracturas de Cadera , Osteoporosis , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Humanos , Femenino , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Denosumab/uso terapéutico , Moduladores Selectivos de los Receptores de Estrógeno/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de Cadera/complicaciones , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to clarify the risks of initiating antidiabetic drugs for fractures using a nationwide health insurance claims database (NDBJ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 65 years initiating antidiabetic drugs at the outpatient department were enrolled after a 180-day period without prescribed antidiabetic drugs and followed with during 2012-2018 using NDBJ. The adjusted hazard risks (HRs) of each antidiabetic drug (thiazolidine, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [DPP-4] inhibitor, sulfonylurea, glinide, and insulin) for fractures compared with biguanide were obtained adjusting for age, gender, polypharmacy, dementia, and the other antidiabetic drugs. RESULTS: The DPP-4 inhibitor was the most often prescribed antidiabetic drug followed by biguanide with prescribed proportions of 71.7% and 12.9%. A total of 4,304 hip fractures and 9,388 vertebral fractures were identified among the 966,700 outpatient participants. Compared with biguanide, insulin, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, and DPP-4 inhibitor were related to increased hip fracture risks. Vertebral fracture risk was higher in outpatients prescribed with insulin, thiazolidine, and DPP-4 inhibitor compared with biguanide. Patients prescribed insulin for hip and vertebral fractures' adjusted HRs were 2.17 (95% CI 1.77-2.66) and 1.45 (95% CI 1.24-1.70), respectively. Those prescribed DPP-4 inhibitor for hip and vertebral fractures' adjusted HRs were 1.27 (95% CI 1.15-1.40) and 1.20 (95% CI 1.12-1.28), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating insulin increased the risk of not only hip fractures but also vertebral fractures. Patients initiating antidiabetic drugs had increased risks of hip and vertebral fractures compared with those initiating biguanide independently for age, gender, polypharmacy, and dementia in the Japanese elderly.
Asunto(s)
Demencia , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV , Fracturas de Cadera , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Anciano , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Glicósido Hidrolasas , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Tiazolidinas , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/inducido químicamente , Biguanidas/efectos adversos , Insulina , Demencia/inducido químicamente , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Only a few large-scale studies have examined the care gap in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the persistence of and adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The rates of continuation (persistence) of and adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy were investigated using medical insurance data, issued from July 2013 to December 2018, from the medical care system for elderly individuals in Hokkaido, Japan. RESULTS: The study included 7918 male and 52,585 female patients. Persistence rates were 62.1% in the first year and 45.3% in the second year. There were 33,096 patients who discontinued medication; 8296 patients resumed medication during the observation period of 730 days. The median time to the discontinuation of medication for all the patients was 702 days. The 2-year medication possession ratio (MPR) was 63.8%; 30,989 patients (51.2%) had an MPR ≥ 80% and 20,788 (34.4%) had an MPR < 50%. Both the persistence and adherence were better in females than in males and worsened with increasing age. Comparisons of fracture history showed that persistence and MPR were higher in the no hip or vertebral fracture group, followed by hip fracture, vertebral fracture, and hip and vertebral fracture groups. Meanwhile, more patients in the hip fracture group had an MPR ≥ 80%. CONCLUSION: Persistence of and adherence to osteoporotic pharmacotherapy are not very high in Japan. To bridge the care gap following osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, improvements are required for males, the elderly, and those with a history of vertebral fracture.
Asunto(s)
Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Huesos Pélvicos , Caracteres SexualesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Only a few large-scale studies have examined the care gap in Japan. The present study aims to examine the care gap for secondary fracture prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Changes in the rates of bone mineral density testing (test rate) and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy administration (treatment rate) before and after hip and vertebral fracture registration were examined based on medical insurance data from the medical care system for elderly individuals in Hokkaido, Japan, issued from July 2013 to December 2018. RESULTS: The hip fracture group comprised 18,258 women and 4162 men, whereas the vertebral fracture group comprised 34,907 women and 9958 men. Test rates were 0.2% and 1.4% prior to fracture registration (pre-registration) and 19.9% and 40.5% after fracture registration (post-registration) in the hip and vertebral fracture groups, respectively. Moreover, pre-registration treatment rates were 18.3% and 28.2% and post-registration rates were 32.7% and 61.0% in the hip and vertebral fracture groups, respectively. The vertebral fracture group had a significantly higher post-registration test and treatment rates than the hip fracture group. Moreover, the post-registration test and treatment rates in the hip fracture group tended to increase over the years. Both fracture groups showed a tendency for decreased post-registration test and treatment rates as age increased, with lower rates observed among men. CONCLUSIONS: Test and treatment rates after hip fracture registration remain lower compared with those after vertebral fracture registration. To bridge the care gap following fractures, medical professionals need better awareness regarding osteoporosis treatment for hip fractures among elderly individuals and males.
Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Fracturas de Cadera/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas de Cadera/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/complicaciones , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Rapid descent in bone mineral density (BMD) and ascent in bone turnover marker (BTM) occur within the short period following denosumab (Dmab) discontinuation. In addition, the incidence of vertebral fracture also rises within the short period. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of sequential therapy using zoledronic acid (ZOL) on any adverse events after Dmab discontinuation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a multicenter retrospective observational study, and the subjects were osteoporosis patients who visited our institutions between 2013 and 2018. We performed sequential therapy using ZOL for 30 patients who had difficulty continuing Dmab, due to physical or social reasons, and investigated the fracture incidence and BMD/BTM changes at 4 time points (at the start of Dmab, the start of ZOL, 6 months after ZOL and 12 months after ZOL). RESULTS: No new vertebral/nonvertebral fractures were observed at each time point after switching from Dmab to ZOL in any of the 30 patients. The BMD/BTM changes were evaluated in 18 of the 30 cases, since all data of lumbar/femoral neck BMDs and TRACP-5b at 4 time points was only available in 18 cases. BMDs significantly increased at each time point compared with that at the start of Dmab. Serum TRACP-5b significantly decreased at each time point compared with that at the start of Dmab. CONCLUSION: It was suggested that sequential therapy using ZOL could suppress the decrease of BMD, and increase of BTM, if the period of Dmab administration was less than 3 years.
Asunto(s)
Denosumab/uso terapéutico , Privación de Tratamiento , Ácido Zoledrónico/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Remodelación Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Denosumab/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/sangre , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fosfatasa Ácida Tartratorresistente/sangre , Ácido Zoledrónico/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Zoledronic acid infusion is used to treat osteoporosis but patients, especially Japanese patients, often experience acute-phase reactions (APRs). In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study, we examined the efficacy of the most commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug loxoprofen in Japan in reducing the incidence rate of zoledronic acid-induced APRs and body temperature, and investigated risk/protective factors for APRs in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 60 years with primary osteoporosis (n = 368) were allocated randomly to zoledronic acid plus loxoprofen (ZOL + LOX) or zoledronic acid alone (ZOL). All patients received 5-mg zoledronic acid infusion on day 1, and patients in the ZOL + LOX group also received 120 mg and 180 mg of oral loxoprofen on days 1 and 2, respectively. Adverse events and body temperature were recorded during the 7-day observation period. RESULTS: The incidence rates of APRs were 34.4% (64/186 patients) and 47.8% (87/182 patients) in the ZOL + LOX and ZOL groups, respectively (P = 0.0109). The proportions of patients with increased body temperature (≥ 1 °C and ≥ 37.5 °C) were similar in both groups (P = 0.1186). Past bisphosphonate users had a significantly lower incidence rate of APRs than treatment-naïve patients (odds ratio 0.444, 95% confidence interval 0.285-0.692, P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid-induced APRs appeared to be suppressed by loxoprofen. Known risk/protective factors, including prior osteoporosis treatment, were applicable to Japanese patients.
Asunto(s)
Reacción de Fase Aguda/inducido químicamente , Reacción de Fase Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Pueblo Asiatico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Ácido Zoledrónico/efectos adversos , Reacción de Fase Aguda/epidemiología , Anciano , Temperatura Corporal , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ácido Zoledrónico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that ceramic bipolar shows less impingement between stem neck and outer head compared to metal bipolar, because of its low coefficient of friction with the acetabulum cartilage. In this paper, a three dimensional (3D) postoperative motion analysis has been used to assess the different motion characteristics of metal and ceramic bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty systems. METHODS: This study was conducted on 40 patients divided in two matched cohorts: 20 patients with metal bipolar and 20 patients with the ceramic bipolar. We obtained motion pictures from standing position to maximum abduction in flexion by fluoroscopy then analyzed by 2D-3D image matching method. The motion range of the "Outer head angle", "Stem neck angle" and the "Stem neck and outer head angle" was compared between the metal bipolar group and the ceramic bipolar group. RESULTS: The metal bipolar group's inner head's range of movement was greater than the ceramic bipolar group. Impingement between stem neck and outer head occurred in 30% of metal group patients. There were no impingement cases for the ceramic bipolar group. CONCLUSIONS: The ceramic bipolar shows less impingement between stem neck and outer head compared to the metal bipolar. Ceramic bipolar may reduce the typical bipolar related complication and exert less effect on the acetabular cartilage due to less surface coefficient of friction.
Asunto(s)
Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Prótesis de Cadera , Imagenología Tridimensional , Diseño de Prótesis/métodos , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Cerámica , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Hemiartroplastia/instrumentación , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Metales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Postura , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
AIM: This retrospective cohort study assessed the association between the incidence of secondary vertebral fracture managed with a brace (SVF) and pharmacotherapy. METHODS: The association between the incidence of SVF and the presence, type, and medication possession ratio (MPR) of pharmacotherapy was investigated using medical insurance data acquired from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. RESULTS: The data of female patients (n = 637 303) were analyzed. The 2-year incidence of SVF was 73.5 per 10 000 patients (n = 4687). Approximately 0.73% of patients without medications and 0.74% with medications had SVF. Patients taking bisphosphonates (0.87), denosumab (0.77), and selective estrogen receptor modulators (0.88) had significantly lower standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) than patients not taking medications after the occurrence of primary fracture; meanwhile, patients taking parathyroid hormone medications had considerably higher SIRs than those not taking medications. The non-SVF group (59.1%) had a significantly higher mean MPR than the SVF group (55.5%). Patients taking denosumab in the non-SVF group (68.2%) had the highest mean MPR. The proportion of patients taking denosumab with an MPR of ≥80% in the non-SVF group was significantly higher than that in the SVF group. CONCLUSION: Patients taking medications were at a lower risk of developing SVF than those not taking medications. Although this study did not compare the medications' SVF prevention effects, patients taking denosumab had a 0.77 SIR of SVF in Japan. The effect of pharmacotherapy on SVF prevention might be affected by the MPR of each medication. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 390-397.
Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Osteoporosis , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Femenino , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Denosumab/uso terapéutico , Japón/epidemiología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Trends toward more favorable improvement of the cortical bone parameters by once-weekly (56.5 µg once a week) and twice-weekly teriparatide (28.2 µg twice a week), and that of the trabecular bone parameters by once-daily (1/D) teriparatide (20 µg/day once a day) were shown. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of differences in the amount of teriparatide (TPTD) per administration and its dosing frequency on the bone structure in the proximal femur by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based 3D-modeling (3D-SHAPER software). METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Patients aged 50 years or older with primary osteoporosis who continuously received once-/twice-weekly (1ã»2/W, n = 60) or 1/D TPTD (n = 14) administration for at least one year were included in the study. Measurement regions included the femoral neck (FN), trochanter (TR), femoral shaft (FS), and total proximal hip (TH). Concurrently, the bone mineral density (BMD) and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) were measured. RESULTS: The cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, and section modulus in the FS were significantly improved in the 1ã»2/W TPTD group, as compared to the 1/D TPTD group. However, significant improvement of the cortical thickness and buckling ratio in the FN was observed in the 1/D TPTD group, as compared to the 1ã»2/W TPTD group. Trabecular BMD values in the FS and TH were significantly increased in the 1/D TPTD group, as compared to the 1ã»2/W TPTD group, while the cortical BMD values in the TR, FS, and TH were significantly increased in the 1ã»2/W TPTD group, as compared to the 1/D TPTD group. CONCLUSION: Trends toward more favorable improvement of the cortical bone by 1ã»2/W TPTD and that of the trabecular bones by 1/D TPTD were observed.
Asunto(s)
Absorciometría de Fotón , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Densidad Ósea , Fémur , Imagenología Tridimensional , Teriparatido , Humanos , Teriparatido/administración & dosificación , Teriparatido/farmacología , Femenino , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/farmacología , Fémur/efectos de los fármacos , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Esquema de Medicación , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a DrogaRESUMEN
This short-term survey examined the effect of body part pain on subjective and objective handball performance in Japanese male national handball athletes. Fourteen athletes participated in this study. Assessments of pain in 10 body parts and subjective performance (concentration and satisfaction with body movement) were performed using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 over four consecutive training days. Monitoring of heart rate and body acceleration during training was also performed to quantify the objective performance. Path analysis and linear mixed modeling were employed to assess the relationship between body pain scores and subjective/objective handball performance. Over the four days of the study period, the body part in which most athletes reported pain was the dominant shoulder (6 of 14 athletes), followed by the dominant knee, the dominant elbow, the dominant ankle joint, and the non-dominant ankle joint (3 of 14 athletes). The path analysis revealed that pain in the dominant elbow negatively correlated with concentration (standardized path coefficient = -0.644, p = 0.00), which was associated with satisfaction with body movement (standardized path coefficient = 0.704, p = 0.00). No significant effect of body pain on objective performance (heart rate and body acceleration) was found among the athletes in this study. The results suggested that the elite athletes were practicing with pain. Even if pain does not physically affect athletes' objective performance, pain in the upper extremities, associated with the primary handball movement of throwing, may reduce the quality of practice by lowering athletes' subjective performance.
RESUMEN
AIM: Patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are at a high risk for falls and fractures. Although cholinesterase inhibitors reportedly are effective in suppressing the progression of cognitive symptoms in DLB patients, their effects on fracture risk remain unclarified. This study aimed to evaluate the association between donepezil use and hip fracture risk in older patients with DLB. METHODS: Using the Japanese insurance claim database, we collected the data of patients aged ≥65 years with DLB from April 2012 to March 2019. After propensity score matching, we compared the fracture rate over 3 years between DLB patients receiving donepezil and those not receiving antidementia drugs. RESULTS: Altogether, 24 022 239 individuals aged ≥65 years were newly registered from April 2012 to March 2016 and had verifiable information from 6 months before to 3 years after the registration. We identified 6634 pure-DLB patients and analyzed the data of 1182 propensity score-matched pairs. The characteristics, including age, sex, fracture history, osteoporosis, and bone mineral density test rate, of the two groups were well balanced by propensity score matching. The incidence rate of hip fracture was significantly lower in DLB patients receiving donepezil than in those not receiving antidementia drugs (0.60 vs. 1.44/100 person-years, P < 0.001), whereas that of vertebral fractures was the same. CONCLUSIONS: Donepezil administration in Japanese people aged ≥65 years with DLB was significantly associated with a decreased risk of hip fracture. Donepezil may provide new benefits to DLB patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 782-788.
Asunto(s)
Donepezilo , Fracturas de Cadera , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy , Puntaje de Propensión , Humanos , Donepezilo/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Japón/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Incidencia , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Nootrópicos/uso terapéutico , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
The purpose of the present study was to precisely compare both the efficacy and abdominal symptom-related quality of life after treatment with daily minodronate and weekly alendronate in patients with primary postmenopausal osteoporosis. The efficacy of the two drugs was assessed based on improvements in a bone turnover marker, back pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms that impair quality of life, which was assessed using the Izumo scale questionnaire. In the minodronate group, there were no significant changes during the treatment period in the specific scores for heartburn, epigastralgia and epigastric fullness, whereas all of the scores were significantly elevated at some time point after drug administration in the alendronate group. Urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTX), a bone resorption marker, and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, a bone formation marker, significantly decreased in both groups, but decreases in uNTX in the minodronate group was observed significantly earlier compared with those in the alendronate group. The back pain scores, which were obtained using a visual analog scale, were significantly reduced in both groups. However, analgesic effects were detected earlier in the minodronate group. In conclusion, compared with weekly alendronate, daily minodronate improved bone turnover and back pain more promptly without causing upper gastrointestinal symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Alendronato/efectos adversos , Alendronato/uso terapéutico , Dolor de Espalda/tratamiento farmacológico , Resorción Ósea/tratamiento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Tracto Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Alendronato/administración & dosificación , Dolor de Espalda/complicaciones , Dolor de Espalda/fisiopatología , Dolor de Espalda/orina , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Remodelación Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Resorción Ósea/complicaciones , Resorción Ósea/fisiopatología , Resorción Ósea/orina , Colágeno Tipo I/orina , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Tracto Gastrointestinal/patología , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/complicaciones , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/fisiopatología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/orina , Dimensión del Dolor , Péptidos/orina , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In vivo three-dimensional (3D) motion under weight-bearing conditions was analyzed postoperatively in medial pivot cruciate-substituting (CS) knee systems with fixed and mobile inserts. METHODS: Tibiofemoral knee kinematics during squatting were captured with X-ray fluoroscopy for 4 patients in each cohort. The 3D motion of implants was analyzed with KneeMotion motion analysis software (LEXI Corporation; Tokyo, Japan). In addition, anterior-posterior (AP) movement of the distal-most points and the angle of axial rotation of the femoral component on the tibial component were assessed in both cohorts. RESULTS: Mean AP movement of the femoral component on the tibial component was 3.8±0.5 mm on the medial side and 9.5±0.5 mm on the lateral side in the cohort with fixed prostheses and 5.9±2.1 mm on the medial side and 10.0±2.5 mm on the lateral side in the cohort with mobile prostheses. The mean angle of axial rotation of the femoral component on the tibial component was 14.4±1.1 degrees and 8.2±2.7 degrees of external rotation for fixed knees and mobile knees, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative motion analysis confirmed that fixed and mobile CS implants, which have a similar design, guided medial pivot motion under weight-bearing conditions. However, motion differed between these implant types after mid-flexion: bicondylar rollback after medial pivot motion was noted in the mobile cohort.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Diseño de Prótesis , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Soporte de Peso , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Fenómenos BiomecánicosRESUMEN
Daily subcutaneous injection of 80 µg abaloparatide increased bone mineral density in Japanese patients with osteoporosis at high fracture risk in the ACTIVE-J trial. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based hip structural analysis from ACTIVE-J data showed improved hip geometry and biomechanical properties with abaloparatide compared with placebo. PURPOSE: Abaloparatide (ABL) increased bone mineral density (BMD) in Japanese patients with osteoporosis at high fracture risk in the ACTIVE-J trial. To evaluate the effect of ABL on hip geometry and biomechanical properties, hip structural analysis (HSA) was performed using ACTIVE-J trial data. METHODS: Hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from postmenopausal women and men (ABL, n = 128; placebo, n = 65) at baseline and up to week 78 were analyzed to extract bone geometric parameters at the narrow neck (NN), intertrochanteric region (IT), and proximal femoral shaft (FS). Computed tomography (CT)-based BMD and HSA indices were compared between baseline and week 78. RESULTS: ABL treatment showed increased mean percent change from baseline to week 78 in cortical thickness at the NN (5.3%), IT (5.3%), and FS (2.9%); cross-sectional area at the NN (5.0%), IT (5.0%), and FS (2.6%); cross-sectional moment of inertia at the NN (7.6%), IT (5.1%), and FS (2.5%); section modulus at the NN (7.4%), IT (5.4%), and FS (2.4%); and decreased mean percent change in buckling ratio (BR) at the IT (- 5.0%). ABL treatment showed increased mean percent change in total volumetric BMD (vBMD; 2.7%) and trabecular vBMD (3.2%) at the total hip and decreased mean percent change in BR at femoral neck (- 4.1%) at week 78 vs baseline. All the changes noted here were significant vs placebo (P < 0.050 using t-test). CONCLUSION: A 78-week treatment with ABL showed improvement in HSA parameters associated with hip geometry and biomechanical properties vs placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: JAPIC CTI-173575.