Red blood cell transfusion practice in a single institution in Poland in 2018-2019 - Is there room for improvement?

INTRODUCTION: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (RBCT) is one of the most frequently performed procedures in inpatients within modern hospital systems. However transfusion practices may vary by an institution or even by a prescribing physician. In order to assess the current RBCT practice in our institution, we performed a detailed analysis of RBCTs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all RBCTs in our institution between January 2018 and December 2019. The data collected included: age, sex, type of RBC, number of single and multiple unit RBCTs in bleeding and nonbleeding patients, number of multiple unit RBCTs in non-bleeding patients with and without hemoglobin (Hb) concentration determination after each RBC, primary indication for RBCT, pre-post RBCT Hb concentration in non-bleeding patients, lactate concentration pre-post RBCT in non-bleeding patients. RESULTS: The indications for RBCT were anemia (2244, 56.2 % RBC) and bleeding (1463, 36.6 % RBC). The most frequently used types of RBCs were RBCs without buffy coat (75.1 %) and leucodepleted RBCs (20.9 %). In non-bleeding patients 45.7 % were multiple unit RBCTs, only 3% were performed with Hb determination following the first unit of RBC, 508 (20.2 %) RBCT were performed with pre-post RBCT lactate concentration determination. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the local RBCT practice showed significant room for improvement. Areas of concern were type of RBC ordered, multiple unit transfusions in non-bleeding patients, lack of laboratory control of oxygenation pre-post transfusion or not taking it into account in RBCT decision making. Deficiencies are planned to be addressed by a comprehensive blood utilization review programme.

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Hospitalized Cancer Patients-Study from Silesia, Poland.

BACKGROUND: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common amongst cancer patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the use of CAM, beliefs about CAM and the purpose of using it amongst Polish cancer patients. METHODS: The study included 864 cancer patients (median 63 years old), who were individually interviewed. The questionnaire was designed specifically for this study. RESULTS: Amongst 732 patients who declared that they heard about CAM, 342 patients (46.7%) had used CAM; 91% of these patients had used it as a complementary therapy and 9% had used it as an alternative therapy. Patients younger in age, highly educated, professionally active, with longer medical history, and at more advanced cancer stages have, statistically, used CAM more often; 66% of participants could not state what the health effect of CAM is. Patients received information about CAM from the internet, friends, family and other patients. Only 18% of patients discussed using CAM with a doctor. CONCLUSIONS: CAM was popular amongst Polish cancer patients, especially in younger, educated and professionally active patients with longer cancer history at advanced stage. Patients used CAM as a complementary therapy for strengthening immune system, improving morphological and biochemical test parameters, reducing the side effects of conventional therapy and improving their well-being.