Drug treatment in the elderly: an intervention in primary care to enhance prescription quality and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the effect on prescription quality and quality of life after intervention with prescription reviews and promotion of patient participation in primary care. DESIGN: A randomized controlled study with three groups: (A) controls, (B) prescription review sent to physician, and (C) as in B and with a current comprehensive medication record sent to the patient. SETTING: The municipality of Örebro, Sweden (130 000 inhabitants). INTERVENTION: The study focused on the easiest possible intervention to increase prescription quality and thereby increase quality of life. The intervention should be cost-efficient, focus on colleague-to-colleague advice, and be possible to perform in the primary health care centre without additional resources such as a pharmacist. SUBJECTS: 150 patients recently discharged from hospital. Inclusion criteria were: ≥ 75 years, ≥ five drugs and living in ordinary homes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of life (EQ-5D index, EQ VAS) and quality of prescriptions. RESULTS: Extreme polypharmacy was common and persistent in all three groups and this was accompanied by an unchanged frequency of drug-risk indicators. There was a low EQ-5D index and EQ VAS in all three groups throughout the study. No statistically significant differences were found anywhere between the groups. CONCLUSION: The intervention seems to have had no effect on quality of prescriptions or quality of life. This underlines the major challenge of finding new strategies for improving prescription quality to improve patient outcome measures such as quality of life and reduce the known risks of polypharmacy for the elderly.

Medication quality and quality of life in the elderly, a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Modern drugs have made large contributions to better health and quality of life. Increasing proportions of negative side effects due to extensive pharmacological treatment are however observed especially among elderly patients who have multiple health problems. The aim of our study was to see if there is an association between medication quality and quality of life. METHODS: 150 patients discharged from hospital. Inclusion criteria were: living in ordinary homes, ≥ 75 years and ≥ 5 drugs. Home visits were performed to all, including prescription reviews and calculation of medication appropriateness index. The patients were divided into three groups depending on index score and followed for 12 months. The validated and recognized EQ-5D and EQ VAS instruments were used to assess quality of life. RESULTS: A lower medication quality was associated with a lower quality of life. EQ-5D index was statistically significantly different (declining for each group) among the groups (p = 0.001 at study start, p = 0.001 at 6 months and p = 0.013 at 12 months) as was EQ VAS (p = 0.026 at study start, p = 0.003 at 6 months and p = 0.007 at 12 months). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown the validity of the basic principle in prescribing: the more appropriate medication the better quality of life. Since drug quality is related to the patients' quality of life, there is immense reason to continuously evaluate every prescription and treatment. The evaluation and if possible deprescribing should be done as a process where both the patient and physician are involved.

Patient focused drug surveillance of elderly patients in nursing homes.

PURPOSE: To examine whether patient focused drug surveillance was associated with a higher quality of drug treatment at nursing homes. METHODS: An intervention study in four nursing homes in Sweden and four other nursing homes served as controls. At the intervention nursing homes physicians focused on patients' health status as a baseline for further ongoing medication. The outcomes were mortality, health care consumption, and number of drugs, health status and evaluations as parameters for "quality of drug treatment". RESULTS: There were no significant differences in mortality rates. Health care consumption and polypharmacy were extensive in both groups. There was a significant reduction of number of drugs used per patient at the intervention homes during the study (p < 0.05). Monitoring and evaluation of the effects of medications were significantly more frequent at the intervention homes (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention resulted in significant positive results in relation to "quality of drug treatment", a shift in health care utilization with concomitant use of fewer drugs. The study showed an extreme shortage of monitoring of health status and surveillance of the effects of drugs in the elderly.