Effects of food-based interventions in the management of chemoradiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Cancer treatment-related nausea and vomiting continue to be common and distressing symptoms for patients, despite improvements in antiemetics. Dietary modifications could potentially improve this symptom experience. Clinicians frequently provide dietary advice to patients, although the evidence base of such suggestions or recommendations is not clear. PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to examine the current literature on food interventions associated with improvements in cancer treatment-related nausea and vomiting. METHODS: Eight electronic databases were searched with a specific search term strategy covering trials without time or language limitations. Eligible studies focused on a food substance, defined as any nutritious substance that people eat or drink to maintain life and well-being. Trials in children and adults during chemotherapy or radiotherapy were included. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess trial quality and GRADE was used to assess the certainty in the effect of each outcome. RESULTS: Seventeen trials were included, 3 focusing on children and 14 on adults. Two trials included patients receiving radiation. Ten out of 17 trials (59%) had a high risk of bias. Strongest evidence with highest certainty was found for dietary counseling to meet macronutrient requirements in reducing incidence of radiotherapy-related nausea and vomiting in adults (n=2 studies; n=124 participants; GRADE level: moderate). There was also moderate certainty in the beneficial effect of protein supplementation on nausea and vomiting incidence in adults during radiotherapy (n=2 studies; n=124 participants; GRADE level: moderate). A significant positive effect on CINV incidence and/or severity in adults was also found for dietary counseling to meet macronutrient requirements during chemotherapy, a peppermint drink, scaly wood mushroom, chamomile, protein with ginger, and a colorless odorless diet (GRADE level: low to very low). CONCLUSIONS: The review identified food-based approaches that could improve the nausea and vomiting experience in patients with cancer and provide guidance to clinicians. However, confidence in these findings was low and studies were heterogeneous and mostly of low quality, requiring further investigation before stronger recommendations can be made. Future research is needed to confirm efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022341154.

Oral THC:CBD cannabis extract for refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: This multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase II/III trial aimed to evaluate an oral THC:CBD (tetrahydrocannabinol:cannabidiol) cannabis extract for prevention of refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Here we report the phase II component results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients experienced CINV during moderate-to-high emetogenic intravenous chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetic prophylaxis. Study treatment consisted of one cycle of 1-4 self-titrated capsules of oral THC 2.5 mg/CBD 2.5 mg (TN-TC11M) three times daily, from days -1 to 5, and 1 cycle of matching placebo in a crossover design, then blinded patient preference for a third cycle. The primary end point was the proportion of participants with complete response during 0-120 h from chemotherapy. A total of 80 participants provided 80% power to detect a 20% absolute improvement with a two-sided P value of 0.1. RESULTS: A total of 81 participants were randomised; 72 completing two cycles were included in the efficacy analyses and 78 not withdrawing consent were included in safety analyses. Median age was 55 years (range 29-80 years); 78% were female. Complete response was improved with THC:CBD from 14% to 25% (relative risk 1.77, 90% confidence interval 1.12-2.79, P = 0.041), with similar effects on absence of emesis, use of rescue medications, absence of significant nausea, and summary scores for the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE). Thirty-one percent experienced moderate or severe cannabinoid-related adverse events such as sedation, dizziness, or disorientation, but 83% of participants preferred cannabis to placebo. No serious adverse events were attributed to THC:CBD. CONCLUSION: The addition of oral THC:CBD to standard antiemetics was associated with less nausea and vomiting but additional side-effects. Most participants preferred THC:CBD to placebo. Based on these promising results, we plan to recruit an additional 170 participants to complete accrual for the definitive, phase III, parallel group analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001036404; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370473&isReview=true.

Bowel cancer screening for women at midlife.

In Australia one in 15 women will be diagnosed with colorectal cancer in their lifetime because of the high incidences of lifestyle risk factors. The risk could be reduced by taking aspirin. Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer produced by Cancer Council Australia and approved by the National Health and Medical Research Council recommended that 'population screening in Australia, directed at those at average risk of colorectal cancer and without relevant symptoms, is immunochemical fecal occult blood testing every 2 years, starting at age 50 years and continuing to age 74 years.' Women at high risk because of family history will need more intense screening. At the current 40% participation rate, it is estimated that biennial screening with fecal immunohistochemical tests (FIT) reduces colorectal cancer incidence by 23% and mortality by 36%. The major adverse effects of screening are the psychological impact of a positive FIT that does not prove to be cancer, or adenomas on colonoscopy (47.7%), and the rare side-effects of colonoscopy of hemorrhage, bleeding or even death. A range of factors that could increase a woman's participation rate includes advice to screen from her general practitioner and more information about the nature of the screening tests.

Cancer control-A global perspective.

Disparities in cancer control exist in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Many countries do not have cancer registries to record incidence, mortality and prevalence and are reliant on Globocan estimates of their cancer burden. Poorer cancer control within and between countries occurs in those living remotely from urban centres, those in a low socioeconomic group and some ethnic groups who have lifestyle and belief systems which impact on cancer control. High-income countries generally have population screening programmes for cervix, breast and bowel cancer. However, simpler forms of screening for cancer of the cervix like visual inspection with acetic acid have been shown to be feasible in developing nations. The widespread use of vaccines to prevent cancer has been achieved with the Hepatitis B vaccine but the human papilloma virus vaccine to prevent cancer of the cervix is largely only available in high-income countries. Access to and training of oncological surgeons in LMICs is limited, while 70% of patients in these countries cannot access radiotherapy. The World Health Organization has developed a list of essential medicines although access remains poor in LMICs. The United Nations has set targets for the control of non-communicable diseases to improve global cancer control.

The consumer-driven development and acceptability testing of a website designed to connect rural cancer patients and their families, carers and health professionals with appropriate information and psychosocial support.

Websites offer new opportunities to provide health-related information to rural communities. However, how acceptable they are to this population is unknown. This paper describes the consumer-led development of a website that provides rural-specific information on psychosocial care for rural South Australians affected by cancer, and examines its acceptability to users. The Country Cancer Support website was developed with people affected by cancer living in rural South Australia (N = 11), using a Participatory Action Research Framework and evidence-based behaviour change strategies. There were 32,389 visits in the first 3 years. An online survey (N = 111) revealed that users found the website easy to use, helpful and relevant. Most rural cancer patients and supporters (98.11%) believed it had been written by people who understood what they were going through. Patients and supporters for whom it was relevant, reported feeling more motivated and confident in accessing psychosocial support services in their rural area (66.67%) and/or capital city (67.65%) and/or in travelling for medical treatment (75.86%). Many also felt less isolated (73.33%) and/or distressed (53.57%). All health professionals reported gaining new knowledge. This study shows that carefully designed websites can successfully address rural populations' health information needs and increase intentions to access psychosocial support.

e-TC: Development and pilot testing of a web-based intervention to reduce anxiety and depression in survivors of testicular cancer.

e-TC is an online intervention designed to address common psychosocial concerns of testicular cancer survivors. It aims to reduce anxiety, depression and fear of cancer recurrence by providing evidence-based information and psychological intervention. This paper details the development and pilot testing of e-TC. During pilot testing, 25 men (with varying psychological profiles) who had completed treatment for testicular cancer, 6 months to 5 years ago (which had not recurred), used e-TC over a 10-week period and provided quantitative and qualitative feedback on the feasibility and acceptability of the programme. Six men also completed a qualitative interview to provide detailed feedback on their experiences using e-TC. Fourteen men (56%) completed at least 80% of the programme. Participants reported a high level of satisfaction with the programme. Men's limited time was a barrier to programme use and completion, and participants suggested that men with a more recent diagnosis and a higher level of distress may be more likely to engage with the programme. e-TC appears to be a feasible and acceptable online intervention for survivors of testicular cancer. Findings from this study are currently being used to refine e-TC and guide the design of a larger efficacy study.

Testosterone deficiency and quality of life in Australasian testicular cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study.

This is the first prospective study in a contemporary Australian/New Zealand population to determine the prevalence of testosterone deficiency in testicular cancer survivors at 12 months from treatment, and any association with poorer quality of life. Hormone assays from 54 evaluable patients in a prospective cohort study revealed biochemical hypogonadism in 18 patients (33%) and low-normal testosterone in 13 patients (24%). We found no association between testosterone levels and quality of life (all P > 0.05). Hypogonadal patients should be considered for testosterone replacement to prevent long-term morbidity.

Results of a 7-day aprepitant schedule for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in 5-day cisplatin-based germ cell tumor chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of adding a 7-day aprepitant schedule to a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone for patients with germ cell tumors receiving first-line 5-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In a single-arm, open-label, multi-center, phase 2 trial, chemo-naive patients received aprepitant 125 mg PO (per oral) on day 1 and 80 mg PO on days 2 to 7, a 5HT3 receptor antagonist on days 1 to 5, and dexamethasone 8 mg on days 1 to 8. The primary endpoint was no emesis (vomiting or dry retching) during days 1 to 7 of cycle 1. RESULTS: Fifty patients were recruited. For cycle 1, proportions reporting no emesis on day 1, no emesis on days 1 to 7, no nausea on day 1, and no nausea on days 1 to 7 were 96, 82, 71, and 27%, respectively. The efficacy was maintained in all cycles with over 80% of patients reporting no emesis on any given day of any given cycle. Emesis was more common on days 4 to 7 (68% episodes) than on days 1 to 3 (32% episodes). Over any 24-h period, 49% of patients with emesis reported no more than two episodes, and 62% of patients with nausea reported intensity as 3 or less on a scale from 0 to 10. There were no unexpected or serious adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: Adding 7 days of aprepitant to a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone effectively controlled acute and delayed emesis with 5-day cisplatin regimens. Days of nausea were more common than days of vomiting.

Prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by men in Australian cancer outpatient services.

BACKGROUND: Although studies have shown that complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is common in cancer patients, no survey has assessed CAM use in men with a variety of cancers. In Australia, no data exist about male cancer patients' use of CAM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 403 men attending four cancer outpatient services in Metropolitan Adelaide. Data were analyzed using Pearson's χ(2) tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: CAMs were currently used by 52.9%, or used at some point by 61.5%, of respondents. The most popular CAM treatments were dietary supplements (36.1%), prayer (25.9%), herbs and botanicals (21.4%), and relaxation techniques/meditation (15.2%). CAM use was directed by a cancer specialist in 9.9% of respondents. Independent predictors of CAM use were metastatic cancer (P = 0.022), actively practicing religion (P = 0.008), and tertiary education (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: CAM use in males is equally common across all cancer diagnoses, namely prostate, hematological malignancies, colorectal, lung, and other cancers. Oncologists should be aware that one-third of male patients modify their diet and/or search for spiritual guidance, particularly when diagnosed with metastatic cancer.

Improving cancer treatment by addressing legislative and regulatory issues.

OBJECTIVES: To explore legislative and legal barriers to improving cancer treatment. METHODS: The advocacy agenda of Cancer Council Australia was examined for key issues, and examples drawn from Australian law were presented at a conference entitled 'Legislate, regulate and litigate: legal perspectives on cancer prevention and treatment' at the University of Sydney. RESULTS: The introduction of electronic medical records and linkage of data sets from registries can produce very useful public health information, but could be a threat to individual privacy. The balance between these must underpin legislation and regulation. The new drug approval process must keep pace with developments such as targeted therapies, where tests to identify the presence of the target must also be approved simultaneously. The regulation of complementary and alternative medicines in cancer is challenging given their widespread use. In cancer research, it is vital that the important ethics and governance review process does not become a barrier to the ability to complete research in a reasonable time frame. A specific issue for future treatments and diagnostic tests that are to be targeted at genes and their products is to clarify gene patenting laws so that invention is rewarded, not mere discovery. The nature of the workforce will need to change to meet the treatment needs of an increasing incidence of cancer in an aging population, but regulation will need to ensure the maintenance of safety and quality standards. CONCLUSION: The flexibility of legislation and regulation to meet a rapidly changing environment is key to ensuring the timely adoption of new cancer treatments to improve cancer outcomes.

Are guidelines on use of colony-stimulating factors in solid cancers flawed?

In cancer care in Australia, we are very reliant on an array of expensive pharmaceuticals. Our use of these treatments is often based on multinational or foreign clinical studies. Oncologists are, to varying degrees, reliant on how the studies are interpreted by the writers of journal editorials, clinical guidelines and opinion pieces. Therefore it is important that these guidelines are balanced and evidence based. We have examined in detail one of the most influential and wide ranging clinical guidelines used in oncology, The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2006 Update of Recommendations for the use of White Blood Cell Factors: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. We have discussed in detail some of the controversial recommendations in this guideline and have exposed what we believe are some flaws in these recommendations. We would urge that we continue to be rigorous in our oversight of international research agendas and international clinical guidelines in the future.

A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer.

To evaluate the tumour response to lomeguatrib and temozolomide (TMZ) administered for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Patients with stage IV metastatic colorectal carcinoma received lomeguatrib (40 mg) and TMZ (50-200 mg m(-2)) orally for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Response was determined every two cycles. Pharmacokinetics of lomeguatrib and TMZ as well as their pharmacodynamic effects in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were determined. Nineteen patients received 49 cycles of treatments. Despite consistent depletion of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in PBMC, none of the patients responded to treatment. Three patients had stable disease, one for the duration of the study, and no fall in carcinoembryonic antigen was observed in any patient. Median time to progression was 50 days. The commonest adverse effects were gastrointestinal and haematological and these were comparable to those of TMZ when given alone. This combination of lomeguatrib and TMZ is not efficacious in metastatic colorectal cancer. If further studies are to be performed, emerging data suggest that higher daily doses of lomeguatrib and a dosing period beyond that of TMZ should be evaluated.

Phase II study of IV vinflunine in patients with chemotherapy naive metastatic malignant melanoma.

This phase II study evaluated vinflunine in chemotherapy naive patients with metastatic melanoma. Vinflunine was administered at 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, but after 9 patients this was reduced to 320 mg/m(2) based on interim analyses of all phase II trials. A partial response was observed in 1 of the first 9 patients (11.1%) treated at 350 mg/m(2), which gives a 3.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08-15.8] response rate in 33 patients. No change was the best response in 13 patients (39.4%) with progressive disease in 16 (48.5%) and 3 were not evaluable for response. The time to response was 1.4 months and duration was 6 months. At 350 mg/m(2) grade 4 neutropaenia occurred in 3 patients (33.3%) and grade 3 in 2 patients (22.2%) while at 320 mg/m(2) grade 4 neutropaenia occurred in 6 patients (25%) and grade 3 in 3 patients (12.5%) with 2 episodes of grade 3 febrile neutropaenia. Two patients (8.3%) had grade 3 anaemia. These results do not show activity at this dose and schedule for vinflunine in patients with chemotherapy naive metastatic melanoma.

Why we will need to learn new skills to control cancer.

As a society and as specialists involved in the diagnosis and management of cancer, we must begin to find new cost-effective ways to provide equitable access to the innovative, effective and expensive drugs that may begin to make cancer a chronic rather than rapidly lethal disease. Drugs such as trastuzumab and gefitinib are safer 'targeted therapies' that only attract government subsidies after the pathologist identifies the target present in a minor subset of patients. Nonetheless, funding for pathological identification of these targets remains a challenge. To illustrate, gefitinib may produce 'Lazarus' responses and prolonged survival among patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Many such examples will enter the clinical domain in the coming years. As we enter this era of personalized medicine, we argue that the use of expensive targeted therapies should be limited to pathologically proven indications because truly effective drugs are best applied to those individuals who would most benefit. It follows that medical oncologists should be trained properly to use targeted therapies. Then a new generation of oncologists would be empowered to participate in the iterative cycles of research between bench and bedside that are necessary for optimal use of biotherapies and their integration into multimodality cancer treatment programmes. We propose that cancer pathology be made available as a training option in the postgraduate education of medical oncologists. Oncologists and pathologists may jointly administer and mutually accredit the training module, which may also contribute towards the award of a higher degree.

Scheduling cisplatin and radiotherapy in the treatment of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: a modelling approach.

The aim of the present work was to implement the kinetics of cisplatin into a previously developed tumour growth model and to simulate the combined cisplatin-radiotherapy treatment with the emphasis on time sequencing and scheduling of drug and radiation. An investigation into whether the effect of cisplatin-radiation is determined by independent cell kill or by cisplatin-produced radiosensitization was also undertaken. It was shown that cisplatin administered before radiation conferred similar tumour control to the post-radiation sequencing of the drug. The killing effect of the combined modality treatment on tumour increased with the increase in cell recruitment. Furthermore, the individual cell kill produced by the two cytotoxins led to an additive only tumour response when the treatments were given concurrently, suggesting that for a synergistic effect, cisplatin must potentiate the effect of radiation, through the radiosensitizing mechanisms addressed in the literature. It was concluded that the optimal timing of cisplatin should be close to radiation. The model showed that daily administration of cisplatin led to a 35% improvement of tumour control as compared to radiation alone, while weekly cisplatin has improved radiotherapy by only 6%.

Pharmacokinetics of trimetrexate administered by five-day continuous infusion to patients with advanced cancer.

The disposition of the methotrexate analogue trimetrexate (TMTX, NSC 352122; 2,4-diammino-5-methyl-6-[(3,4,5-trimethoxyanilino)methyl]qui nazoline) was determined in a Phase I study in 16 patients with refractory or relapsing cancer. The drug was administered by continuous 5-day infusion at doses of 5 to 60 mg/m2/120 h (1-12 mg/m2 daily for 5 days). Plasma and urine collections were made during and after infusion and TMTX levels were quantitated by a specific and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. Estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters were similar when determined by either compartmental or noncompartmental methods. There were no significant differences in parameters between the first and second courses of treatment to 10 of the patients. Significant linear relations between TMTX dose and the area under curve of plasma TMTX (r2 = 0.858, P = 0.0001) and the steady-state TMTX plasma level (r2 = 0.764, P = 0.0001) were established. Total TMTX clearance was 30.4 +/- 7.6 (SD) ml/min/m2, renal clearance 7.80 +/- 3.9 ml/min/m2, nonrenal clearance 23.2 +/- 7.1 ml/min/m2, volume of distribution 32.8 +/- 16.6 liters/m2, and terminal half-life 13.4 +/- 7.0 h. The percentage of the trimetrexate dose excreted unchanged in urine ranged from 8.4 to 40.7% (mean, 24.9 +/- 9.2%) and was related to creatinine clearance (r2 = 0.312, P = 0.010). Trimetrexate renal clearance was also related to urine flow (r2 = 0.330, P = 0.008). Trimetrexate pharmacokinetics was linear over the dose range 5 to 60 mg/m2 when given by 5-day continuous infusion to patients but there was evidence of urine flow-dependent renal clearance which requires further examination.

A prospective study of topical dimethyl sulfoxide for treating anthracycline extravasation.

Twenty patients with extravasation of anthracyclines were treated on a single-arm pilot study with topical 99% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and observed for 3 months with regular examinations and photographs. DMSO was applied to approximately twice the area affected by the extravasation and allowed to air dry. This was repeated every six hours for 14 days. The initial signs of extravasation included swelling in 17 patients, erythema in 15, and pain in 12. The median area of damage was 8.25 cm2 and a median of 25 minutes elapsed between extravasation and application of DMSO with one patient not treated until seven days postextravasation. Sixteen patients were observed for 3 months, two died of disease earlier after receiving 2 weeks of DMSO and three days of DMSO, respectively, and two were lost to follow-up having received one day and five days of DMSO. In no patient did extravasation progress to ulceration or require surgical intervention, suggesting with 95% confidence a true ulceration rate of between 1% and 17%. At 3 months there was no sign of residual damage in six patients, while a pigmented indurated area remained in ten. Two patients had a recall reaction with increased pain at the extravasation site when further intravenous (IV) doxorubicin was administered. The only toxicities of DMSO included a burning feeling on application subsequently associated with itch, erythema, and mild scaling. Blisters occurred in four patients. Six patients reported a characteristic breath odor associated with DMSO. Topical DMSO appears to be a safe and effective treatment for anthracycline extravasation.

Phase II multicenter study of brief single-agent methotrexate followed by irradiation in primary CNS lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To assess, in a multi-institutional setting, the impact on relapse, survival, and toxicity of adding two cycles of intravenous methotrexate to cranial irradiation for immunocompetent patients with primary CNS lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with a median age of 58 years and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 3 were entered onto this phase II study. The protocol consisted of methotrexate 1 g/m(2) on days 1 and 8 followed by cranial irradiation on day 15. A whole-brain dose of 45 Gy was followed by a boost of 5.4 Gy. Intrathecal chemotherapy and spinal irradiation were given only to patients for whom cytologic examination of CSF was positive for CNS lymphoma. The median follow-up time was 36 months, with a minimum potential follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: Median survival was 33 months, with 2-year probability of survival 62% +/- 15% (95% confidence interval). Twenty patients have relapsed. The predominant site of relapse was the brain. Neither performance status nor age was found to influence survival. Six patients developed a dementing illness at a median of 16 months after treatment, and three of these died as a consequence. CONCLUSION: A brief course of intravenous methotrexate before cranial irradiation is associated with 2-year and median survival rates superior to those reported for radiotherapy alone and similar to more intensive combined-modality regimens. Neurotoxicity remains an important competing risk for these patients.