Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Immunol ; 202(6): 1845-1858, 2019 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30745463

RESUMEN

Asthma exacerbations are triggered by rhinovirus infections. We employed a systems biology approach to delineate upper-airway gene network patterns underlying asthma exacerbation phenotypes in children. Cluster analysis unveiled distinct IRF7hi versus IRF7lo molecular phenotypes, the former exhibiting robust upregulation of Th1/type I IFN responses and the latter an alternative signature marked by upregulation of cytokine and growth factor signaling and downregulation of IFN-γ. The two phenotypes also produced distinct clinical phenotypes. For IRF7lo children, symptom duration prior to hospital presentation was more than twice as long from initial symptoms (p = 0.011) and nearly three times as long for cough (p < 0.001), the odds ratio of admission to hospital was increased more than 4-fold (p = 0.018), and time to recurrence was shorter (p = 0.015). In summary, our findings demonstrate that asthma exacerbations in children can be divided into IRF7hi versus IRF7lo phenotypes with associated differences in clinical phenotypes.


Asunto(s)
Asma/genética , Factor 7 Regulador del Interferón/genética , Ruidos Respiratorios/genética , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Adolescente , Asma/inmunología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis por Conglomerados , Femenino , Redes Reguladoras de Genes , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Fenotipo , Ruidos Respiratorios/inmunología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/complicaciones , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/genética , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/inmunología , Transcriptoma
2.
Aust Fam Physician ; 44(6): 360-4, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26209984

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Wheezing is a common presentation in young children. Diagnosis and treatment of these children can be challenging, as arriving at a final diagnosis often requires a process of elimination. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to provide an algorithm for managing a young child with wheeze in the primary care setting. We will aim to address key questions of some controversy that relate to this algorithm: 1. Does the child actually have wheeze ­ how accurate is the parents' description? 2. Do antibiotics have a role? The emergence of protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB) 3. Is it asthma or viral wheeze, and which children outgrow this phenomenon? DISCUSSION: The exact cause of wheezing can be unclear in children, particularly those under pre-school age (<6 years). An algorithmic approach based on history and response to treatment often helps to distinguish between the differential diagnoses. We present one such algorithmic approach and introduce the diagnosis of persistent bacterial bronchitis in line with current thinking from the past 10 years.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Ruidos Respiratorios/etiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Asma/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Bronquitis/diagnóstico , Bronquitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Preescolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Ruidos Respiratorios/diagnóstico , Virosis/diagnóstico
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(10): 873-879, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34321447

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute wheezing is one of the most common hospital presentations for young children. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and rhinovirus (RV) species A, B and the more recently described species C are implicated in the majority of these presentations. However, the relative importance and age-specificities of these viruses have not been defined. Hence, this study aimed to establish these relationships in a large cohort of prospectively recruited hospitalized children. METHODS: The study cohort was 390 children 0-16 years of age presenting with acute wheezing to a children's emergency department, 96.4% being admitted. A nonwheezing control population of 190 was also recruited. Nasal samples were analyzed for viruses. RESULTS: For the first 6 months of life, RSV was the dominant virus associated with wheezing (P < 0.001). From 6 months to 2 years, RSV, RV-A and RV-C were all common but none predominated. From 2 to 6 years, RV-C was the dominant virus detected (50-60% of cases), 2-3 times more common than RV-A and RSV, RSV decreasing to be absent from 4 to 7 years. RV-B was rare at all ages. RV-C was no longer dominant in children more than 10 years of age. Overall, RV-C was associated with lower mean oxygen saturation than any other virus (P < 0.001). Controls had no clear age distribution of viruses. CONCLUSION: This study establishes a clear profile of age specificity of virus infections causing moderate to severe wheezing in children: RSV as the dominant cause in the first 6 months and RV-C in preschool-age children.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Ruidos Respiratorios/etiología , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/patogenicidad , Rhinovirus/patogenicidad , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Nariz/virología , Saturación de Oxígeno , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/complicaciones , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/virología , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/complicaciones , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/virología
4.
BMJ Open ; 10(3): e032877, 2020 03 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32209622

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Severe asthma imposes a significant burden on individuals, families and the healthcare system. New treatment and management approaches are emerging as effective options for severe asthma. Translating new knowledge to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals is a priority. We developed 'The Severe Asthma Toolkit' (https://toolkit.severeasthma.org.au) to increase awareness of severe asthma, provide evidence-based resources and support decisionmaking by healthcare providers. SETTING: Roundtable discussions and a survey of Australians clinicians were conducted to determine clinician preferences, format and content for a severe asthma resource. PARTICIPANTS: A reference group from stakeholder and consumer bodies and severe asthma experts provided advice and feedback. A multidisciplinary team of international experts was engaged to develop content. Written content was based on up-to-date literature. Peer and editorial review were performed to finalise content and inform web design. Website design focused on user experience, navigation, engagement, interactivity and tailoring of content for a clinical audience. RESULTS: A web-based resource was developed. Roundtable discussions and a needs assessment survey identified the need for dedicated severe asthma management resources to support skills training. The end-product, which launched 26 March 2018, includes an overview of severe asthma, diagnosis and assessment, management, medications, comorbidities, living with severe asthma, establishing a clinic, paediatrics/adolescents and clinical resources. Analytics indicate access by users worldwide (32 169 users from 169 countries). User survey results (n=394) confirm access by the target audience (72% health professionals), who agreed the toolkit increased their knowledge (73%) and confidence in managing severe asthma (66%), and 75% are likely to use the resource in clinic. CONCLUSIONS: The Severe Asthma Toolkit is a unique, evidence-based internet resource to support healthcare professionals providing optimal care for people with severe asthma. It is a comprehensive, accessible and independent resource developed by leading severe asthma experts to improve clinician knowledge and skills in severe asthma management.


Asunto(s)
Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Programas Informáticos , Humanos , Internet , Evaluación de Necesidades , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
5.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0223990, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31622414

RESUMEN

Acute viral wheeze in children is a major cause of hospitalisation and a major risk factor for the development of asthma. However, the role of the respiratory tract microbiome in the development of acute wheeze is unclear. To investigate whether severe wheezing episodes in children are associated with bacterial dysbiosis in the respiratory tract, oropharyngeal swabs were collected from 109 children with acute wheezing attending the only tertiary paediatric hospital in Perth, Australia. The bacterial community from these samples was explored using next generation sequencing and compared to samples from 75 non-wheezing controls. No significant difference in bacterial diversity was observed between samples from those with wheeze and healthy controls. Within the wheezing group, attendance at kindergarten or preschool was however, associated with increased bacterial diversity. Rhinovirus (RV) infection did not have a significant effect on bacterial community composition. A significant difference in bacterial richness was observed between children with RV-A and RV-C infection, however this is likely due to the differences in age group between the patient cohorts. The bacterial community within the oropharynx was found to be diverse and heterogeneous. Age and attendance at day care or kindergarten were important factors in driving bacterial diversity. However, wheeze and viral infection were not found to significantly relate to the bacterial community. Bacterial airway microbiome is highly variable in early life and its role in wheeze remains less clear than viral influences.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/clasificación , Disbiosis/diagnóstico , Orofaringe/microbiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Virosis/complicaciones , Adolescente , Australia , Bacterias/genética , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Ruidos Respiratorios , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/complicaciones , Centros de Atención Terciaria
6.
Viral Immunol ; 31(4): 299-305, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29446705

RESUMEN

To assess if the difference in species-specific immune response to RV-C correlates with a higher frequency of reinfection, shorter time to reinfection, or different symptom severity than infections with RV-A or RV-B. Forty-three patients were enrolled of which 34 were successfully tracked longitudinally over 3 months, with nasal swabs and symptom questionnaires provided every 2 weeks to identify rhinovirus (RV) strains and the concurrent symptomatology. No difference was found in the time to reinfection with an RV species between RV-C and RV-A or RV-B (p = 0.866). There was a trend toward more rapid reinfection with the same species in RV-C than RV-A (55.1 days vs. 67.9 days), but this failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.105). RV infections were generally associated with only minor symptoms, with rhinorrhea being the only significantly associated symptom (p = 0.01). RV-C was shown to have higher levels of lethargy and wheeze than other RV species. Time to reinfection with subsequent RV is not influenced by the species of the preceding RV.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Picornaviridae/virología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Rhinovirus/clasificación , Adolescente , Australia , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/inmunología , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/patología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Ruidos Respiratorios/fisiopatología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/inmunología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/patología , Rhinovirus/inmunología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Especificidad de la Especie
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA