Frequency of Short- vs Long-Term Reporting of Bariatric Surgery Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity. Though both short- and long-term outcomes have been reported, most of the published literature reports on short-term outcomes. Identification of post-operative weight regain and re-emergence of comorbidities requires medium- and long-term follow-up. We aimed to identify the distribution of follow-up times within the literature. METHODS: We screened through 1807 articles from 9 PubMed Indexed bariatric surgery journals published between January to June of 2015 and 2021 and selected articles reporting weight loss as a main outcome. Follow-up intervals were defined as per American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) guidelines. RESULTS: Fifty-three and sixty-three articles were identified in 2015 and 2021 respectively. Reported follow-up lengths in 2015 were 60% short-, 26% medium-, and 14% long-term; while in 2021, there were 65% short-, 10% medium-, and 25% long-term articles. Of the articles reporting long-term outcomes in 2015 and 2021, 48%, and 70% of the included patients respectively had > 5 years follow-up. CONCLUSION: Though reporting of long-term outcomes increased, most published outcomes remain short-term. The UK National Bariatric Surgery Registry is helping to mitigate this. An increased effort and emphasis on reporting long-term outcomes is needed.

Reporting of weight loss outcomes in bariatric surgery following introduction of 2015 ASMBS guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity in reporting weight loss (WL) outcomes within the bariatric surgery literature limits synthesis and meta-analysis. In 2015, the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) published reporting guidelines to achieve consistency in the literature. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the effect of the ASMBS guidelines in the bariatric surgery literature. METHODS: Nine PubMed-indexed bariatric surgery journals were screened for articles published in the first 6 months of 2015 and 2021. Of 1807 articles, 105 and 158 articles in 2015 and 2021, respectively, reported primarily on WL outcomes following surgery. RESULTS: Overall ASMBS compliance increased from 5% to 20%, P < .05. Initial weight and body mass index (BMI) was reported in all studies, but specification of this as the immediate preoperative weight reduced from 15% to 6%, P < .05. The percent total WL (%TWL) increased from 17% to 61%, P < .05. Change in the BMI (DBMI) remained 41%. The percent excess BMI or WL (%EBMIL or %EWL) did not significantly change from 76% to 69%, P = .203. In 2021, 2 of the 9 journals gave guidance on reporting WL in their instructions to authors. Thirty percent (42/142) of articles did not comply with the journals' WL reporting guidance. The number of unique WL outcomes used increased from 45 to 54. CONCLUSIONS: Significant heterogeneity in reporting WL outcomes remains, hindering robust meta-analysis of articles. Use of referral weight instead of preoperative weight can inflate WL in those with mandated preoperative WL, clarifying initial weight is needed. Use of nonstandard measures of WL remains high.

IgG4-Related Sclerosing Disease of the Temporal Bone: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) involving the temporal bone is an uncommon and underrecognized pathology often mistaken for malignancy. This systematic review is the first that aims to thoroughly analyze IgG4-RD of the temporal bone. DATABASES REVIEWED: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. METHODS: We used the following search keywords: "lgG4-RD," "skull," "skull base," "cranial," "temporal bone," "inner ear." We additionally manually searched the bibliographies of relevant articles. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports and Case Series was used to assess the risk of bias; because of the scarcity of the reports, data were available through limited case series and reports; thus, data synthesis was not possible. RESULTS: We identified 17 studies with 22 cases with temporal bone involvement. The most common presenting symptoms were hearing loss, otalgia, and headache. The mastoid and petrous bone were the most affected anatomical areas. Both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used. Biopsies showed the characteristic lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate in all cases, with histopathology being the diagnostic modality that set the diagnosis. Most patients were treated with corticosteroids ± surgery or a combination of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants with 95.5% symptomatic response and disease control. CONCLUSION: IgG4-RD of the temporal bone radiologically manifests as space-occupying, lytic lesions; clinically, it presents with vague otological symptoms. Diagnosis involves a thorough workup, with histopathology being crucial in setting a definite diagnosis. IgG4-RD tends to respond well to systemic corticosteroids, whereas surgery is mostly required for diagnostic purposes.