Extrapulmonary Small Cell Cancer: A New Insight into a Rare Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Extrapulmonary small-cell cancer (EPSCC) is a relatively rare malignancy. The management of EPSCC is usually extrapolated from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In spite of the morphological similarity of the 2 malignancies, there are many differences in clinical features, prognosis, and recommendations of treatment of these disorders. The data on the correlation of clinical-pathological characteristics of EPSCC and treatment results is scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of 41 consecutively treated patients diagnosed with EPSCC in 2015-2018 was performed in a tertiary medical center. The correlation between the clinical and pathological characteristics and the treatment outcome (response rate, disease-free interval, and overall medial survival) was done using the standard statistics, Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate analyses. The stratification was done on the stage of the disease, Ki-67 proliferative index, the location of the tumor, and smoking. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included with a median age of 66.3 years. The most common primary site was the gastrointestinal tract (28, 68.3%) including the pancreas. The most common distant metastasis site was the liver (23, 56.1%). Only 2 patients (4.9%) had brain metastases. Unlike in SCLC, most patients did not have any history of smoking (23, 56.1%). Nineteen patients with metastatic disease received systemic treatment, mostly cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with a response rate of 57.9%. The results of treatment were significantly better in patients with disseminated EPSCC with Ki-67 <55%, while its role in limited disease was nonsignificant. DISCUSSION: The results of our study show the unique entity of EPSCC. The rarity of brain metastases proves that prophylactic brain irradiation should not be recommended in practice. The provocative idea of prophylactic liver irradiation in limited-stage EPSCC of gastrointestinal origin can be evaluated in future studies. The predictive role of Ki-67 is important in metastatic EPSCC. There is probably no role of smoking in developing EPSCC.

PANCREATIC INCIDENTALOMA: DIFFERENTIATING NONFUNCTIONING PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS FROM INTRAPANCREATIC ACCESSORY SPLEEN.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the preoperative assessment of pancreatic incidentalomas (PIs) by analysis of 1 index case and characterization of the published features of intrapancreatic accessory spleen (IPAS) compared to pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET). METHODS: A search of the literature using the online database MEDLINE. RESULTS: In all, 46 cases of IPAS have been described to date: 17 were "presumed" as IPAS based on technetium-99m (Tc-99m) scanning, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) stain for CD8, or contrast-enhanced sonography; 29 were misdiagnosed as PNET and underwent surgery. The pancreatic lesions were 1) mostly solitary; 2) solid on imaging; 3) well defined; 4) located predominantly at the pancreatic tail; 5) not exceeding 3 cm in the largest diameter; 5) all detected in adults (22-81 years); 6) not related to sex. In subjects referred for surgery, standard imaging studies/imaging protocols did not differentiate between IPAS and PNET. FNA was performed in 5/46 cases, all of which were false-positive for PNET. Immunohistochemical staining for T-cells on FNA material and specific imaging features (characteristic arciform splenic enhancement pattern on dynamic computed tomography [CT]; nuclear scintigraphies with radioisotope specifically trapped by splenic tissue [Tc-99m]) or contrast-enhanced sonography offered valuable clues. Still, distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy was carried out in 72%, and the rest had distal pancreatectomies. CONCLUSION: IPAS should be considered before surgery in patients with PIs. A new practical algorithm is presented for better preoperative evaluation of such lesions; it combines the recognition of early indicators and sequential consideration of cytologic and imaging features to decrease the hazards of unnecessary major surgery. ABBREVIATIONS: CT = computed tomography EUS = endoscopic ultrasound FNA = fine-needle aspiration HDRBC = heat-damaged red blood cells IPAS = intrapancreatic accessory spleen MRI = magnetic resonance tomography NF-PNET = nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor PET = positron emission tomography PNET = pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor PI = pancreatic incidentalomas SPIO = superparamagnetic iron oxide Tc-99m = technetium-99m.

Resection Versus Observation of Small Asymptomatic Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Management of asymptomatic, nonfunctioning small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is controversial because of their overall good prognosis, and the morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatic surgery. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of resection with expectant management of patients with small asymptomatic PNETs. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with nonfunctioning asymptomatic PNETs < 2 cm that underwent resection or expectant management at the Tel-Aviv Medical Center between 2001 and 2018. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with small asymptomatic, biopsy-proven low-grade PNETs with a KI67 proliferative index < 3% were observed for a mean of 52.48 months. Gallium67DOTATOC-PET scan was completed in 32 patients and demonstrated uptake in the pancreatic tumor in 25 (78%). No patient developed systemic metastases. Two patients underwent resection due to tumor growth, and true tumor enlargement was evidenced in final pathology in one of them. Fifty-five patients underwent immediate resection. Significant complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) developed in 10 patients (18%), mostly due to pancreatic leak, and led to one mortality (1.8%). Pathological evaluation revealed lymphovascular invasion in 1 patient, lymph node metastases in none, and a Ki67 index ≥ 3% in 5. No case of tumor recurrence was diagnosed after mean follow-up of 52.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: No patients with asymptomatic low-grade small PNETs treated by expectant management were diagnosed with regional or systemic metastases after a 52.8-month follow-up. Local tumor progression rate was 2.1%. Surgery has excellent long-term outcomes, but it harbors significant morbidity and mortality. Observation can be considered for selected patients with asymptomatic, small, low grade PNETs.