Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Asunto principal
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Lab ; 67(12)2021 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34910424

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The pathogen detection rate of traditional ink staining procedure (TISP) is low. METHODS: A modified ink staining procedure (MISP) was created to accumulate pathogen by using cell slide centrifuge. Items of RBC, WBC, and cryptococcus were observed. RESULTS: There were 79.98 ± 54.94 RBC and 126.98 ± 36.39 WBC in one MISP microscopic field whereas there were only 3.35 ± 2.41 RBC and 6.15 ± 1.85 WBC in one TISP microscopic field in the same sample (*200). There was statistical difference between those two methods (p = 0.000). There were 40.78 ± 13.23 mL cryptococcus in CSF processed by MISP whereas there were only 2.10 ± 1.10 mL cryptococcus in the same CSF processed by TISP. There was statistical difference between those two methods. CONCLUSIONS: The modified ink staining procedure contributes to the separation of cells and pathogens (such as cryptococcus).


Asunto(s)
Cryptococcus , Centrifugación , Líquido Cefalorraquídeo , Tinta , Coloración y Etiquetado
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA