PENTAZOCINE VERSUS PENTAZOCINE WITH RECTAL DICLOFENAC FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF AFTER CESAREAN SECTION- A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED PLACEBO CONTROLLED TRIAL IN A LOW RESOURCE AREA.

BACKGROUND: The unimodal approach of using pentazocine as post-cesarean section pain relief is inadequate, hence the need for a safer, easily available and more effective multimodal approach. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of rectal diclofenac combined with intramuscular pentazocine for postoperative pain following cesarean section. METHODS: In this double blind clinical trial, 130 pregnant women scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A received 100mg diclofenac suppository and group B received placebo suppository immediately following surgery, 12 and 24h later. Both groups also received intramuscular pentazocine 30mg immediately following surgery and 6 hourly postoperatively in the first 24 h. Postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue scale at end of surgery and 2, 12 and 24 h after surgery. Patient satisfaction scores were also assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen patients completed the study. Combining diclofenac and pentazocine had statistically significant reduction in pain intensity at 2, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively compared to pentazocine alone (p <0.05). No significant side effects were noted in both groups. The combined group also had significantly better patient satisfaction scores. CONCLUSION: The addition of diclofenac suppository to intramuscular pentazocine provides better pain relief after cesarean section and increased patient satisfaction.

Propofol versus traditional sedative methods for colonoscopy in a low-resource setting.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine the safety and efficacy of the use of three sedative regimens, namely propofol alone, propofol with benzodiazepine and/or opioids and benzodiazepine with opioids in Nigerian patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy at a Nigerian tertiary hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were assigned prospectively to one of the three treatment regimens. Patients in Group A (n = 40) received propofol alone (PRO), Group B (n = 40) received propofol with midazolam and/or fentanyl and Group C (n = 40) received opioids and midazolam (fentanyl and midazolam - conscious sedation). Study outcome measures include the level of sedation, length of the procedure, sedation/recovery time, patient satisfaction and adverse events. RESULTS: Patients receiving PRO alone received higher doses of PRO compared with PRO and additives (P = 0.043). The overall procedure and sedation duration were similar in both PRO containing groups but statistically significantly shorter than the conscious sedation group (P < 0.0001, P < 0.006). The recovery time was statistically shorter in the PRO additives group compared to the other two groups (P < 0.0001). While the drop in blood pressure was similar in all the groups (P = 0.227), the occurrence of hypoxaemia was higher in the PRO containing groups (P < 0.0001). Overall physicians and patients pain assessment scores were statistically different in the three groups (both P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that PRO sedation is safe when used for outpatient diagnostic colonoscopy in low-resource settings with better patients and physician satisfaction. The synergistic sedative effect of midazolam and/or opioids combined with PRO help reducing the dose of PRO used with better recovery.

ASSESSMENT OF PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE ANXIETY AMONG ELECTIVE MAJOR SURGERY PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN NIGERIA.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety is an unpleasant emotional experience that involves feelings of tension, apprehension, nervousness and high autonomic activity. Few studies have been conducted in Nigeria on anxiety levels among patient undergoing surgical operation. The aim of this study is to assess preoperative and postoperative anxiety level of patients and identify factors that may influence patient's preoperative anxiety level. METHODS: Fifty one adult patients scheduled for elective surgery in a tertiary public hospital in Nigeria were assessed a day before and after their surgery using a questionnaire with socio-demographic and clinical details. Anxiety was assessed with the state portion of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and different factors responsible for their anxiety were selected from a list. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 17. RESULT: Twenty-six patients (51.0%) had significant preoperative anxiety while 8 (15.7%) had significant postoperative anxiety. The patients preoperative mean anxiety score of STAI (42.72 ± 9.84) was statistically significantly higher than their postoperative mean anxiety score (37.73 ± 8.44; p = .001). In 10 items of STAI, there were significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative mean STAI scores. Fear of complications and result of operation were the most common factors responsible for preoperative anxiety while few patients were anxious about nil per mouth, getting stuck with needle and harm from doctor/nurse mistake. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of preoperative anxiety is high in Nigerian surgical patients. Psychological preparation and provision of correct information that addresses identified factors may help in reducing preoperative anxiety.