Uneven vectorial projection is the best explanation for QRS dispersion, not the asynchronic ventricular activation.

BACKGROUND: It is believed that QRS dispersion (QRSd) is caused by asynchrony of ventricular activation, but there are no studies that prove it. OBJECTIVES: To determine the mechanism that best explains QRSd in surface electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 95 consecutive patients (median age: 31.0 years [25-52], female sex: 66.3%) with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. All 12 ECG leads were recorded at once, simultaneously with the intracardiac recordings. QRSd was quantified as the difference between maximum (QRSmax) and minimum QRS duration (QRSmin). QRS was measured firstly at a calibration of 20 mm/mV and a sweep speed of 50 mm/s, enhancement 10× (basic measurement [BM]), and after at sweep speed of 150 mm/s, enhancement 80 - 160×. The interventricular dyssynchrony (IVD) was also quantified. RESULTS: QRSmax increased from BM (98 ms [91-103]) to 80× (102 ms [99-108]; p = 0.029) and 160× (104 ms [101.5-110]; p = 0.027). QRSmin, almost equaled the duration of QRSmax at 160× (103 ms [100-108]). With BM, QRSd was 26 ms [22-35] and was reduced 26-fold (p < 0.001) by magnifying the QRS at 160× (1 ms [0-3]). IVD was weakly correlated with QRSd (r = 0.234, p = 0.023), but strongly with the total QRS at 160× (r = 0.676, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: When QRS complex is narrow, the best explanation for the origin of QRSd on the surface ECG is the unequal projection of the ventricular depolarization vector in the different axis of the leads.

Vectorial theory surpasses the local theory in explaining the origin of P-wave dispersion.

BACKGROUND: Local theory and the vectorial theory are used to explain the origin of P-wave dispersion (PWD). There are no previous studies that analyze both at the same time. OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine the implication of local and vectorial theories in the origin of PWD. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 153 randomly selected patients aged 18-70 years, undergoing electrophysiological study. Inhomogeneous atrial conduction was evaluated by atrial electrogram dispersion in terms of duration (EGMdurdis) and morphology (EGMmorph dis). P-distal coronary sinus interval (P-DCS) was also measured. P-wave was measured twice, firstly at a calibration of 20 mm/mV and a sweep speed of 50 mm/s, enhancement 10× (basic measurement [BM]), and second time at sweep speed of 150 mm/s, enhancement 80-160× (high precision measurement [HPM]). RESULTS: PWD with BM was 48 ms [36-54 ms] while with HPM it was 4 ms [0-10 ms], p < 0.001. With BM, maximum and minimum P- wave duration presented a moderate correlation (r = 0.342; p < 0.001), using HPM it becomes strong (r = 0.750; p < 0.001). In cases with P-DCS < 80 ms (r = 0.965; p < 0.001), but not with P-DCS ≥ 80 ms (r = 0.649; p < 0.001), the previous correlation became almost perfect with HPM. EGMdurdis and EGMmorphdis were weak but significantly correlated with PWD. This correlation became moderate in patients with P-DCS ≥ 80 ms and disappeared in those with P-DCS, using BM and HPM. CONCLUSION: Vectorial theory explains almost entirely the PWD phenomenon. Inhomogeneous conduction could be an additional mechanism to explain PWD, but its contribution is small.

New Parameter of the Second Half of the P-Wave, P-Wave Duration, and Atrial Conduction Times Predict Atrial Fibrillation during Electrophysiological Studies.

OBJECTIVE: Several P-wave parameters reflect atrial conduction characteristics and have been used to predict atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between maximum P-wave duration (PMax) and new P-wave parameters, with atrial conduction times (CT), and to assess their predictive value of AF during electrophysiological studies (AF-EPS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study in 153 randomly selected patients aged 18-70 years, undergoing EPS. The patients were divided into 2 groups designated as no AF-EPS and AF-EPS, depending on whether AF occurred during EPS or not. Different P-wave parameters and atrial CT were compared for both study groups. Subsequently, the predictive value of the P-wave parameters and the atrial CT for AF-EPS was evaluated. RESULTS: The values of CT, PMax, and maximum Ppeak-Pend interval (Pp-eMax) were significantly higher in patients with AF-EPS. Almost all P-wave parameters were correlated with the left CT. PMax, Pp-eMax, and CT were univariate and multivariate predictors of AF-EPS. The largest ROC area was presented by interatrial CT (0.852; p < 0.001; cutoff value: ≥82.5 ms; sensitivity: 91.1%; specificity: 81.1%). Pp-eMax showed greater sensitivity (79.5%) to discriminate AF-EPS than PMax (72.7%), but the latter had better specificity (60.4% vs. 41.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial CT were directly and significantly correlated with PMax and almost all the parameters of the second half of the P-wave. CT, PMax, and Pp-eMax (new parameter) were good predictors of AF-EPS, although CT did more robustly.

Atrial conduction explains the occurrence of the P-wave dispersion phenomenon, but weakly.

BACKGROUND: P-wave dispersion (PWD) is believed to be caused by inhomogeneous atrial conduction. This statement, however, is based on limited little solid evidence. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between atrial conduction and PWD by means of invasive electrophysiological studies. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 153 patients with accessory pathways and atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) undergoing an electrophysiological study. Different atrial conduction times were measured and correlated with PWD. RESULTS: Only the interatrial (P-DCS) and left intra-atrial conduction times (ΔDCS-PCS) showed a significant correlation with PWD, but this correlation was weak. Multivariate linear regression analysis determined that both P-DCS (ß = 0.242; P = .008) and ΔDCS-PCS (ß = 0.295; P < .001) are independent predictors of PWD. Performing the multivariate analysis for arrhythmic substrates, it is observed that only ΔDCS-PCS continued to be an independent predictor of PWD. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves showed that regardless of the types of arrhythmic substrates, PWD discriminates significantly, but moderately, to patients with P-DCS and ΔDCS-PCS ≥75 percentile. CONCLUSIONS: Interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times were directly and significantly correlated with PWD, but only weakly, and were independent predictors of PWD. In general, PWD correctly discriminates patients with high values in interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times, but moderately. This is maintained in cases with accessory pathways; however, in patients with AVNRT it only does so for intraleft atrial conduction times. Interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times weakly explains PWD.

Duración de la onda P en las 12 derivaciones del electrocardiograma y su relación con el tiempo de conducción interauricular en pacientes con taquicardias paroxísticas supraventriculares / P wave duration in the 12 leads of the electrocardiogram and its relationship with interatrial conduction time in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias

RESUMEN Introducción: Existen algunos estudios que relacionan parámetros de la onda P con diferentes tiempos de conducción auricular, pero no se han realizado teniendo en cuenta a cada derivación del electrocardiograma. Objetivo: Determinar la duración de la onda P (Pdur) en las 12 derivaciones y relacionarlas con el tiempo de conducción interauricular. Método: Estudio de corte transversal en 153 pacientes adultos con diagnóstico confirmado de taquicardia por reentrada intranodal (TRIN) o vías accesorias mediante estudio electrofisiológico invasivo. Resultados: Al comparar la Pdur entre sustratos arrítmicos por cada derivación, no existieron diferencias significativas, excepto en V6. En las derivaciones DII, DIII, aVR, aVF, V1 y de V3-V6 la Pdur se correlacionó con el tiempo de conducción interauricular en ambos sustratos arrítmicos. En el análisis multivariado, la Pdur constituyó un predictor independiente de tiempos de conducción interauricular ≥ 95 percentil, en las derivaciones de cara inferior y en V3, V5 y V6. Se observaron altos valores del área bajo la curva de la Característica Operativa del Receptor en las derivaciones DII (0,950; p<0,001), DIII (0,850; p<0,001) y V5 (0,891; p<0,001). Conclusiones: No existen diferencias por derivación en la Pdur al comparar casos con TRIN y vías accesorias, excepto en V6. La mayoría de las derivaciones se correlacionaron con el tiempo de conducción interauricular. La Pdur fue un predictor independiente de tiempos de conducción interauricular ≥ 95 percentil. La derivación DII presenta la mayor capacidad discriminativa para encontrar valores prolongados del tiempo de conducción interauricular.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Although some studies relate P wave parameters to different atrial conduction times, they do not consider each electrocardiogram lead separately. Objective: To determine the duration of P wave (Pdur) in the 12 leads of the electrocardiogram and relate it to the interatrial conduction time. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 153 adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) or accessory pathways by invasive electrophysiological study. Results: When comparing the Pdur between arrhythmic substrates by each lead, no significant differences were found, except for V6. In leads II, III, aVR, aVF, V1 and V3-V6, Pdur was correlated with the interatrial conduction time in both arrhythmic substrates. In our multivariate analysis, the Pdur was an independent predictor of interatrial conduction times ≥ 95 percentile in inferior wall leads and in V3, V5 and V6. High values of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were observed in II (0.950; p<0.001), III (0.850; p<0.001) and V5 (0.891; p<0.001) leads. Conclusions: The Pdur showed no difference by leads when comparing cases with AVNRT and accessory pathways, except for V6. Most of the leads were correlated with the interatrial conduction time; Pdur was an independent predictor of interatrial conduction times ≥ 95 percentile. Lead II has the greatest discriminatory ability to find prolonged values of interatrial conduction time.

Mapeo y ablación exitosa, desde el interior de la vena cardíaca magna, de extrasístoles ventriculares originados en el techo (summit) del ventrículo izquierdo / Mapping and successful ablation, from within the great cardiac vein, of premature ventricular contractions originating from the summit of the left ventricle

RESUMEN Se presenta el caso de una paciente de 43 años, con antecedentes de salud aparente, hasta varias semanas previas a su ingreso, cuando comenzó a presentar síncopes precedidos de palpitaciones. Se realizó estudio electrofisiológico y se demostró precocidad en la porción distal del electrodo de registro de seno coronario, que corresponde a la vena cardíaca magna (interventricular anterior) y techo (summit) del ventrículo izquierdo. A pesar del excelente registro precoz se estudiaron estructuras vecinas como el tracto de salida del ventrículo izquierdo en la cúspide coronaria izquierda, aquí el mapeo eléctrico (pace mapping) no fue concordante total. En el sitio de la precocidad obtenida dentro del sistema venoso cardíaco se realizó mapeo concordante 100%, con una precocidad del catéter de ablación de -30 milisegundos. Se decidió ablación con incrementos progresivos de temperatura y potencia con corte de impedancia (termomapping) y se logró el éxito de la ablación sin reproducibilidad de la arritmia y excelente evolución posterior.

ABSTRACT The case of a 43-year-old female patient is presented, with an apparent history of good health, up to several weeks prior to admission, when she began to present syncopes preceded by palpitations. An electrophysiological study was performed and prematurity in the distal portion of the coronary sinus recording electrode was demonstrated, which corresponds to the great cardiac vein (anterior interventricular vein) and summit of the left ventricle. Despite the excellent early registration, neighboring structures were studied, such as the left ventricular outflow tract in the left coronary cusp, here the pace mapping was not totally concordant. At the site of the precocity obtained within the cardiac venous system, a 100% concordant mapping was achieved, with an ablation catheter's precocity of -30 milliseconds. The ablation was decided with progressive increases in temperature and power with thermomapping and the success of the ablation was achieved without reproducibility of the arrhythmia and excellent subsequent evolution.

Análisis de los intervalos QT, JT y Tpico-Tfinal y sus dispersiones en practicantes femeninas de polo acuático de élite / Analysis and Dispersion of QT, JT and Tpeak-Tend Intervals in Elite Female Water Polo Players / Analysis and Dispersion of QT, JT and Tpeak-Tend Intervals in Elite Female Water Polo Players

Introducción La fisiología del polo acuático ha resultado difícil de estudiar debido a sus características en el campo de juego y la electrofisiología cardíaca de estos deportistas se conoce poco, menos aún en las mujeres. La electrocardiografía del polo acuático femenino de élite se ha estudiado escasamente. Objetivos Analizar la repolarización ventricular en mujeres practicantes de polo acuático de la Preselección Nacional de Cuba. Material y métodos Estudio transversal en una muestra conformada por dos grupos de mujeres: uno de 20 deportistas y otro de 20 personas sanas no deportistas, que se compararon respecto de parámetros electrocardiográficos de repolarización ventricular. Resultados La media de edad fue de 22,45 ± 5,30 años vs. 22,45 ± 5,30 años; p > 0,05. El peso fue mayor en las deportistas (69,63 ± 7,73 kg vs. 51,20 ± 6,63 kg; p < 0,001). La media de edad deportiva fue de 13,5 años. No existieron diferencias significativas del QTc y el JTc en la derivación DII entre ambos grupos, pero fueron mayores en las deportistas en la derivación V5 (QTc: 405 ms vs. 424 ms; p < 0,05 - JTc: 307 ms vs. 329 ms; p < 0,05). La dispersión del intervalo QT fue mayor en las deportistas que en las controles (74 ms vs. 43 ms; p < 0,001), el intervalo Tpico-Tfinal (Tpeak-Tend) alcanzó valores superiores en las deportistas en las derivaciones V1 (64 ms vs. 81 ms; p < 0,05), V3 (78 ms vs. 92 ms; p < 0,05), V4 (72 ms vs. 83 ms; p < 0,05) y V5 (63 ms vs. 80 ms; p < 0,05). Conclusiones Los intervalos QTc y JTc y la dispersión del QT fueron significativamente mayores en las deportistas. El intervalo Tpico-Tfinal fue significativamente mayor en las derivaciones V1, V3, V4 y V5 en las deportistas; la dispersión del intervalo Tpico-Tfinal fue superior en las deportistas, pero no estadísticamente significativo.

Background The physiology of water polo has been difficult to study due to the characteristics of the game in the field of play. Little is known about cardiac electrophysiology in these athletes, particularly in women. The electrocardiographic variables in elite water polo athletes have been rarely studied. Objectives To analyze ventricular repolarization in female water polo players from the National Pre-selection Team of Cuba Methods A cross-sectional study was performed in two groups of women, one with 20 athletes and another with 20 healthy nonathletes. The electrocardiographic parameters of ventricular repolarization were compared between both groups. Results Mean age was 22.45±5.30 years vs. 22.45±5.30 years; p >0.05. Weight was greater in athletes compared to nonathletes (69.63±7.73 kg vs. 51.20±6.63 kg; p <0.001). Mean duration of sporting practice was 13.5 years. There were no significant differences in QTc and JTc intervals in lead DII between both groups, yet the intervals measured in lead V5 were longer in athletes (QTc: 405 ms vs. 424 ms; p <0.05 - JTc: 307 ms vs. 329 ms; p <0.05). QT interval dispersion was greater in athletes compared to non-athletes (74 ms vs. 43 ms; p <0.001). Tpeak-Tend interval was greater in athletes in leads V1 (64 ms vs. 81 ms; p <0.05), V3 (78 ms vs. 92 ms; p< 0.05), V4 (72 ms vs. 83 ms; p <0.05) and V5 (63 ms vs. 80 ms; p <0.05). Conclusions QTc and JTc intervals and QT interval dispersion were significantly greater in water polo athletes. Tpeak-Tend interval was significantly longer in leads V1, V3, V4 and V5 in the athlete group. Finally, although this group showed greater Tpeak- Tend interval dispersion, it was not statistically significant.