Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Heart Fail Rep ; 17(4): 153-160, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32488502

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although the utilization of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices is increasing, ethical dilemmas regarding device deactivation and dying process persist, potentially complicating delivery of optimal and compassionate care at end-of-life (EOL). This review aims to study EOL challenges, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as a nuanced life support treatment, legal history in the US impacting EOL care, and suggestions to improve EOL care for patients on MCS support. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have demonstrated challenging aspects of EOL care for patients on LVAD support: low use of advanced directives, high rates of surrogate decision-making due to lack of patient capacity, difficult decision-making involving LVAD deactivation even with cooperating patients, and high rates of death in the hospital and ICU settings. Recent studies also suggest lack of consensus even among clinicians in approaching LVAD deactivation as beliefs equating LVAD deactivation with physician-assisted suicide and/or euthanasia remain. Optimal care at EOL will likely require collaborative efforts among multiple specialties, caregivers, and patients. In light of the complex medical, logistical, and ethical challenges in EOL care for LVAD patients, there is room for improvement by multidisciplinary efforts to reach consensus about LVAD deactivation and best practices for EOL care, development and implementation of LVAD-specific advance planning, and protocols for LVAD deactivation. Programmatic involvement of hospice and palliative care in the continuum of care of LVAD patients has the potential to increase and improve advance care planning, support surrogate decision-making, improve EOL compassionate care, and to support caregivers.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar/ética , Cuidados Paliativos/ética , Cuidado Terminal/ética , Humanos
2.
Curr Heart Fail Rep ; 16(6): 220-228, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31792699

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with heart failure (HF) have an increased symptom burden and complex psychosocial and decision-making needs that necessitate the integration of palliative care. However, in the current era, palliative care is frequently evoked for these patients only at the end-of-life or in the inpatient setting; rarely is palliative care proactively utilized in outpatients with HF. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current state of palliative care and heart failure and to provide a roadmap for the integration of palliative care into outpatient HF care. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies, including PAL-HF, CASA, and SWAP-HF, have demonstrated that structured palliative care interventions may improve quality of life, depression, anxiety, understanding of prognosis, and well-being in HF. HF is associated with high mortality risk, significant symptom burden, and impaired quality of life. Palliative care can meet many of these needs; however, in the current era, palliative care consultations in HF occur late in the disease course and too often in the inpatient setting. Primary palliative care should be provided to all outpatients with heart failure based on their needs, with referral to secondary palliative care provided based on certain triggers and milestones.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/organización & administración , Planificación Anticipada de Atención , Enfermedad Crónica , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades/organización & administración , Calidad de Vida
3.
J Palliat Med ; 24(10): 1561-1567, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34283924

RESUMEN

Specialty palliative care (PC) clinicians are frequently asked to discuss prognosis with patients and their families. When conveying information about prognosis, PC clinicians need also to discuss the likelihood of prolonged hospitalization, cognitive and functional disabilities, and death. As PC moves further and further upstream, it is crucial that PC providers have a broad understanding of curative and palliative treatments for serious diseases and can collaborate in prognostication with specialists. In this article, we present 10 tips for PC clinicians to consider when caring and discussing prognosis for the seriously ill patients along with their caregivers and care teams. This is the second in a three-part series around prognostication in adult and pediatric PC.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Hepatopatías , Adulto , Niño , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Riñón , Cuidados Paliativos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA