RESUMEN
The quest for an effective regional anaesthesia technique in breast surgery has always been eluded by its apparent complexity. Various techniques had been described as anaesthetic techniques for breast cancer surgeries. Fascial plane blocks had been used as analgesic techniques for this procedure. We describe a case series of 12 patients who were given a combination of erector spinae plane block (ESP), Pectoralis I (Pecs I) and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block as sole anaesthetic technique with high risk surgical morbidity. Two patients had discomfort during retraction of axillary apex towards the end of surgery, and one patient had discomfort during medial parasternal incision, which needed a single bolus of low dose ketamine injection. Combined fascial plane blocks could be effectively utilized as a sole regional anesthesia modality for breast cancer surgeries with mild sedation.
RESUMEN
Background and Aims: Passage of double-lumen tubes (DLT) can be challenging in patients with limited glottis view. This study aims to determine the usefulness of McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope (VL) in cases with limited glottis view on direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh blade. Material and Methods: After study approval and registration of trial, consent was sought from all adult patients planned for elective DLT insertion for lung isolation during the course of general anesthesia. Patients not consenting, less than 18 years, with anticipated difficult mask ventilation or need for rapid sequence induction were excluded. Following routine anesthetic induction, laryngoscopy was attempted by an experienced anesthesiologist using Macintosh scope. If the view obtained was Cormack and Lehane (CL) view IIB and above or the attempt at intubation using DLT failed despite a CL I/IIA view, the patient was included in the trial. The laryngoscope was removed and after ensuring adequate oxygenation and depth of anesthesia, intubation was attempted using McGrath® MAC VL. The percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score was noted for both the scopes. Results: DLT insertion was attempted in 76 patients in the study period. Eight patients were included in the trial on account of limited glottis view/failure with Macintosh scope. Insertion of DLT with McGrath MAC was tried only in six patients, in two patients, the VL was not available for use. The mean (standard deviation) POGO score with Macintosh scope was 9 (±20), which significantly improved with the use of VL to 71 (±24), P = 0.01. Conclusion: McGrath MAC is helpful in inserting DLT in patients with limited glottis view with Macintosh scope.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In a day care setting, communication of preprocedure instructions prior to general anesthesia (GA) is critical. Verbal information may be inadequate at times leading to unnecessary rescheduling. The aim of the study is to evaluate the use of patient information leaflet (PIL) and its impact on rescheduling and patients' satisfaction levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult ASA I-III patients scheduled for elective day care Head Neck procedures such as direct laryngoscopy, examination under anesthesia, and biopsy under GA were recruited. In the outpatient department (OPD), the attending surgeons verbally instructed the patients as well as handed them the PIL. The process was streamlined over a month and thereafter patients' satisfaction levels and rescheduling rates were captured over 2 months. This was compared to the data from the pre-PIL phase. RESULT: Prior to PIL, 12% cases were rescheduled due to avoidable causes. After introducing of the PIL, only 8% case were rescheduled (P = 0.02). There was a significant improvement seen in patient satisfaction with 89% patients reporting that the PIL was good or better while 77% were willing to recommend it to the others. CONCLUSION: PIL is an effective way of imparting perioperative instructions to patients which will improve not only satisfaction but also reduce patient rescheduling. The institution is in the process of implementing PIL to provide instructions to patient posted for day care procedures.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency laparotomies present a challenge in pain management given sick patients, odd timings and poor outcomes. Current recommendations favour multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia following elective laparotomies. No recommendation exists for emergency surgeries. METHODOLOGY: After approval and registration of the trial, adult patients posted for emergency laparotomy in the hospital (tertiary centre for cancer care) starting August 2015, for 6 months, were included in this prospective study. Patients' details including indication for emergency surgery, preoperative haemodynamic parameters, baseline coagulation status were captured. Patients were followed for pain scores, satisfaction with pain management and outcome. The number of anaesthesiologists present and their experience concerning regional techniques were noted. RESULTS: Intestinal obstruction was the commonest cause of emergency laparotomy. Most patients belonged to the ASA IE/IIE class (91%). Intraoperatively, opioids were the mainstay of pain management with an epidural catheter inserted in only 9% of cases even though most cases were conducted by anaesthesiologists confident/expert in thoracic epidural insertion. There was no correlation of choice of pain management technique with the time of surgery (P = 0.22), ASA grading (P = 0.28), predicted mortality by p-Possum scores (P = 0.24). Pain at movement was moderate-severe in more than 50% of patients within the first 24 h. The regional group had better satisfaction when compared to opioid and non-opioid based management. (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Regional techniques for pain management in emergency laparotomies are less preferred, therefore, opioids are the mainstay. Lack of experience is essentially not the primary reason for regional techniques not gaining popularity. Pain management in this group needs a thorough re-evaluation.