Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 62(3): 453-456, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35362563

RESUMEN

The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing. One in three women require insulin to achieve glycaemic targets in GDM. However, it is unclear whether insulin therapy alone is the most effective treatment for all women in achieving glycaemic control and preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although no oral hypoglycaemic agents are approved for pregnancy in Australia, recent research indicates that metformin is effective in preventing adverse perinatal outcomes and may even have possible benefits in the long term. Furthermore, there appears to be a specific role for both metformin and insulin among the GDM population. Metformin provides an option to offer an individualised approach to treat GDM.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional , Metformina , Glucemia , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Gestacional/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Embarazo
2.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 60(5): 671-674, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32662072

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiple professional bodies have temporarily revised recommendations for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) testing during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce person-to-person contact. The current Australian temporary criteria advise that if the fasting glucose is ≤4.6 mmol/L, then no glucose tolerance test (GTT) is required. AIMS: The aim of this study is to examine the extent of underdiagnosis of GDM using a fasting glucose ≤4.6 mmol/L as a cut-off to determine that a GTT is not necessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: De-identified data from pregnant women having a GTT test in the Illawarra area during a six-year period was used to determine the number of women with GDM and the proportion of positive cases that would be missed for different fasting glucose values. RESULTS: There were 16 522 results identified and GDM was diagnosed in 12.2%. The majority of women were more than 30 years of age (85.2%) and diagnosed at ≥20 weeks gestation (81.1%). Of those diagnosed with GDM, 29% had a fasting glucose of ≤4.6 mmol/L and would have been missed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that using a fasting glucose of 4.6 mmol/L or less would miss nearly a third of women who would otherwise be diagnosed with GDM.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Resultado del Embarazo , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/prevención & control , Adulto , Australia , Glucemia/análisis , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Aislamiento de Pacientes/métodos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA