Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Brain Inj ; 35(10): 1267-1274, 2021 08 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34488497

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the predicting demographic, clinical and radiological factors for neurosurgical intervention in complicated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients. METHODS: Design: retrospective multicenter cohort study. Participants: patients aged ≥16 presenting to all level-I trauma centers in Quebec between 09/2016 and 12/2017 with mTBI(GCS 13-15) and complication on initial head CT (intracranial hemorrhage/skull fracture). Procedure: Consecutive medical records were reviewed and separated into two groups: no neurosurgical intervention and neurosurgical intervention (NSI). Main outcome: neurosurgical intervention. Analysis: multiple logistic regression model. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy-eight patients were included and 40 underwent NSI. One patient had radiological deterioration but no clinical deterioration prior to surgery. Subdural hemorrhage ≥4 mm width (OR:3.755 [95% CI:1.290-10.928]) and midline shift (OR:7.507 [95% CI: 3.317-16.989]) increased the risk of NSI. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was associated with a lower risk of NSI (OR:0.312 [95% CI: 0.136-0.713]). All other intracranial hemorrhages were not associated with NSI. CONCLUSION: Radiological deterioration was not associated with the incidence of NSI. Subdural hemorrhage and midline shift should be predicting factors for neurosurgery. Some patients with isolated findings such as subarachnoid hemorrhage could be safely managed in their original center without being transferred to a level-I trauma center.


Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Conmoción Encefálica/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Hematoma Subdural/diagnóstico por imagen , Hematoma Subdural/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Can J Diabetes ; 47(7): 603-610, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37352972

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2D), but T2D screening tests are not well validated in this population. In this study, we assessed performance of glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in glucose dysmetabolism screening and aimed to optimize detection thresholds for individuals with NAFLD. METHODS: We retrospectively included oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) from consecutive patients undergoing a specialized clinic for NAFLD, if A1C and/or fasting glucose was available within 3 months of OGTT. We compared performances of A1C and fasting glucose with the "gold standard" of OGTT using thresholds from the 2018 Diabetes Canada guidelines. A1C and FPG thresholds were optimized for detection of glucose dysmetabolism using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: We included 63 OGTTs from individuals with NAFLD (52% female, age 48 [interquartile range 35 to 63] years, body mass index 34 [interquartile range 29 to 40] kg/m2). A1C had 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6% to 38%) sensitivity (Se) and 97% (95% CI 85% to 100%) specificity (Sp) for T2D detection, and 45% (95% CI 30% to 62%) Se and 100% (95% CI 83% to 100%) Sp for abnormal blood glucose detection. FPG had 67% (95% CI 45% to 83%) Se and 100% (95% CI 92% to 100%) Sp for T2D detection, and 74% (95% CI 59% to 85%) Se and 92% (95% CI 74% to 99%) Sp for abnormal blood glucose detection. Optimal A1C and FPG thresholds were 5.6% and 6.3 mmol/L for T2D detection, which are lower than current recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: A1C is less sensitive than FPG and is suboptimal for T2D detection, suggesting that OGTT may be obtained if A1C is ≥5.6% or FPG is ≥6.3 mmol/L in individuals with NAFLD, to avoid underdiagnosis and treatment inertia.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Estado Prediabético , Humanos , Adulto , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Hemoglobina Glucada , Estado Prediabético/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Glucemia , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Glucosa , Ayuno , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología
3.
J Neurosurg ; : 1-7, 2022 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35078154

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 10% of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have intracranial bleeding (complicated mTBI) and 3.5% eventually require neurosurgical intervention, which is mostly available at centers with a higher level of trauma care designation and often requires interhospital transfer. In 2018, the Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) were updated in the United States to guide emergency department care and patient disposition for complicated mild to moderate TBI. The aim of this study was to validate the sensitivity and specificity of the updated BIG (uBIG) for predicting the need for interhospital transfer in Canadian patients with complicated mTBI. METHODS: This study took place at three level I trauma centers. Consecutive medical records of patients with complicated mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score 13-15) who were aged ≥ 16 years and presented between September 2016 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a penetrating trauma and those who had a documented cerebral tumor or aneurysm were excluded. The primary outcome was a combination of neurosurgical intervention and/or mTBI-related death. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 477 patients were included, of whom 8.4% received neurosurgical intervention and 3% died as a result of their mTBI. Forty patients (8%) were classified as uBIG-1, 168 (35%) as uBIG-2, and 269 (56%) as uBIG-3. No patients in uBIG-1 underwent neurosurgical intervention or died as a result of their injury. This translates into a sensitivity for predicting the need for a transfer of 100% (95% CI 93.2%-100%) and a specificity of 9.4% (95% CI 6.8%-12.6%). Using the uBIG could potentially reduce the number of transfers by 6% to 25%. CONCLUSIONS: The patients in uBIG-1 could be safely managed at their initial center without the need for transfer to a center with a higher level of neurotrauma care. Although the uBIG could decrease the number of transfers, further refinement of the criteria could improve its specificity.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA