Is Precision Surgery Applicable to Colorectal Liver Metastases? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies that Investigate the Association of Surgical Technique with Outcomes in the Context of Distinct Tumor Biology.

BACKGROUND: Although some data suggest that patients with mutRAS colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may benefit from anatomic hepatectomy, this topic remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether RAS mutation status was associated with prognosis relative to surgical technique [anatomic resection (AR) vs. nonanatomic resection (NAR)] among patients with CRLM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies were performed to investigate the association of AR versus NAR with overall and liver-specific disease-free survival (DFS and liver-specific DFS, respectively) in the context of RAS mutation status. RESULTS: Overall, 2018 patients (831 mutRAS vs. 1187 wtRAS) were included from five eligible studies. AR was associated with a 40% improvement in liver-specific DFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.81, p = 0.01] and a 28% improvement in overall DFS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.95, p = 0.02) among patients with mutRAS tumors; in contrast, AR was not associated with any improvement in liver-specific DFS or overall DFS among wtRAS patients. These differences may have been mediated by the 40% decreased incidence in R1 resection among patients with mutRAS tumors who underwent AR versus NAR [relative risk (RR): 0.6, 95% CI 0.40-0.91, p = 0.02]. In contrast, the probability of an R1 resection was not decreased among wtRAS patients who underwent AR versus NAR (RR: 0.93, 95% CI 0.69-1.25, p = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that precision surgery may be relevant to CRLM. Specifically, rather than a parenchymal sparing dogma for all patients, AR may have a role in individuals with mutRAS tumors.

Colocutaneous Fistula Formation Following Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Case Series.

Mesh placement remains the standard of care for inguinal hernioplasty, whether through the classic open approach or the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach. Though both techniques are generally safe, they can occasionally result in visceral injuries, albeit infrequently. Mesh migration into the intestines is a morbid situation requiring emergency treatment. We present two male patients who developed mesh-enterocutaneous fistula several years after inguinal hernia repair. The first patient with a history of a bilateral TAPP hernia repair was admitted to the emergency department and underwent bilateral complete mesh removal, limited right colectomy, and wedge resection of the sigmoid colon, due to mesh erosion. The second patient, with a history of a left inguinal hernia treated by open mesh repair, presented to the emergency department complaining of intense pain in his left inguinal area. Erosion of the prosthetic mesh into the sigmoid and a colo-cutaneous fistula was identified, with sigmoidectomy and en bloc excision of the adherent mesh and end-colostomy being performed. Mesh erosion into the intestinal tract is a rare but serious condition. In patients presenting with a subcutaneous abscess in the inguinal region, clinicians should maintain a high level of suspicion for intrabdominal inflammation arising from mesh erosion into adjacent viscera. Surgical management becomes necessary in symptomatic cases or instances of fistulization.

Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Evidence Quality Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a locally effective therapeutic approach for liver oligometastases from tumors of various origin is well established. We investigated the role of robotic SBRT (rSBRT) treatment on oligometastatic patients with liver lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The PubMed and Scopus databases were accessed by two independent investigators concerning robotic rSBRT for liver metastases, up to 3 October 2023. RESULTS: In total, 15 studies, including 646 patients with 847 lesions that underwent rSBRT, were included in our systematic review. Complete response (CR) after rSBRT was achieved in 40.5% (95% CI, 36.66-44.46%), partial response (PR) in 19.01% (95% CI, 16.07-22.33%), whereas stable disease (SD) was recorded in 14.38% (95% CI, 11.8-17.41%) and progressive disease (PD) in 13.22% (95% CI, 10.74-16.17%) of patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 12 and 24 months were estimated at 61.49% (95% CI, 57.01-65.78%) and 32.55% (95% CI, 28.47-36.92%), respectively, while the overall survival (OS) rates at 12 and 24 months were estimated at 58.59% (95% CI, 53.67-63.33%) and 44.19% (95% CI, 39.38-49.12%), respectively. Grade 1 toxicity was reported in 13.81% (95% CI, 11.01-17.18%), Grade 2 toxicity in 5.57% (95% CI, 3.82-8.01%), and Grade 3 toxicity in 2.27% (955 CI, 1.22-4.07%) of included patients. CONCLUSIONS: rSBRT represents a promising method achieving local control with minimal toxicity in a significant proportion of patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of rSBRT in the management of metastatic liver lesions.

Contemporary Role of Open Left Thoracoabdominal Approach in Esophageal Malignancy Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the widespread use of minimally invasive techniques, open left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (LTE) can offer excellent visualization and adaptability. The current study aimed to present and evaluate the outcomes related to an open LTE in esophageal malignancy treatment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of data collected from two institutions was performed, including patients with distal esophageal or junctional tumors who underwent open LTE between November 2018 and December 2023. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included (16 males; mean age 62.8 years). Postoperative complications occurred in eight patients (36%), with pulmonary complications being the most prevalent (seven patients; 32%). One patient experienced a clinical anastomotic leak. No reoperations or escalation to a higher level of care were required. In-hospital and 30-day mortality were zero. Tumor cells were found at the surgical margins in six patients (27%). The mean lymph node yield was 27. During the follow-up period, there were nine deaths and 11 cases of disease recurrence. Isolated locoregional recurrence was seen in five patients (23%). The one-year and two-year overall survival rates were 79% and 47%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In selected cases, open LTE remains a valid and safe operation with acceptable morbidity and oncological efficacy.

The 2023 WSES guidelines on the management of trauma in elderly and frail patients.

BACKGROUND: The trauma mortality rate is higher in the elderly compared with younger patients. Ageing is associated with physiological changes in multiple systems and correlated with frailty. Frailty is a risk factor for mortality in elderly trauma patients. We aim to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of geriatric trauma patients to improve it and reduce futile procedures. METHODS: Six working groups of expert acute care and trauma surgeons reviewed extensively the literature according to the topic and the PICO question assigned. Statements and recommendations were assessed according to the GRADE methodology and approved by a consensus of experts in the field at the 10th international congress of the WSES in 2023. RESULTS: The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage, including drug history, frailty assessment, nutritional status, and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Acute trauma pain in the elderly has to be managed in a multimodal analgesic approach, to avoid side effects of opioid use. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in penetrating (abdominal, thoracic) trauma, in severely burned and in open fractures elderly patients to decrease septic complications. Antibiotics are not recommended in blunt trauma in the absence of signs of sepsis and septic shock. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with LMWH or UFH should be administrated as soon as possible in high and moderate-risk elderly trauma patients according to the renal function, weight of the patient and bleeding risk. A palliative care team should be involved as soon as possible to discuss the end of life in a multidisciplinary approach considering the patient's directives, family feelings and representatives' desires, and all decisions should be shared. CONCLUSIONS: The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage based on assessing frailty and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Geriatric Intensive Care Units are needed to care for elderly and frail trauma patients in a multidisciplinary approach to decrease mortality and improve outcomes.