A single-centre experience of 29 total ankle replacement in haemophiliac patients: Therapeutic management, factor consumption and cost.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with haemophilia, repeated bleeding in large joints leads to chronic haemophilic arthropathy, a rare disease that can be managed surgically with ankle arthrodesis or with total ankle replacement (TAR). TAR has been reported to provide good surgical results in the medium/long-term and allow preservation of joint mobility but the medical therapeutic management of the patients has not been described. AIM: To describe the medical therapeutic management of TAR. METHODS: All patients with haemophilia A/B, with haemophilic ankle arthropathy, and who underwent TAR between April 2006 and October 2019 were retrospectively included. Factor consumption, perioperative and early complications, volume of blood lost, and orthopaedic data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients underwent 29 TAR (mean age was 44.7 years [range: 26-65]). In the 17 patients with HA without history of anti-FVIII inhibitor, the mean ± SD consumption the day of surgery was 116 ± 16 UI/kg when clotting factors were administered by continuous infusion, 106 ± 13 UI/kg when SHL factors were administered by bolus infusion, and 75 ± 22 UI/kg when EHL factors were administered by bolus infusion. During hospitalisation, the mean factor cost was €38,073 (83.7% of the total cost of surgery). Mean blood loss was significantly lower in patients treated with tranexamic acid (164 mL, range: 40-300) than in those not (300 mL, range: 70-800; p = .01). Six patients had haematoma. The 10-year survival free of any prosthesis removal/arthrodesis was estimated to be 92.2% (95% CI [83; 100]). CONCLUSION: The medical therapeutic management of TAR is complex, carried out by a multidisciplinary team but effective in avoiding the occurrence of complications.

[SARS-COV-2 pandemic: Involvement of the hospital pharmacist in securing patient care]. / Pandémie à SARS-COV-2 : implication du pharmacien hospitalier dans la sécurisation de la prise en charge des patients.

OBJECTIVES: In the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, hospital pharmacists supported the implementation of recommendations and ensured the safety of patient medication management. The aim of this study is to establish the interest of the involvement of the hospital pharmacist in this context by describing and comparing the activities carried out with patients with COVID-19 and those without. METHODS: During the study period, data on clinical pharmacy activities with hospitalized patients were collected and analyzed: pharmaceutical analysis of prescriptions, participation in multi-professional consultation meetings (RCP) dedicated to COVID-19, and monitoring of adverse events. RESULTS: The activities concerned 1483 patients, including 444 with COVID-19, resulting in 575 pharmaceutical interventions (PI). The main problems identified were overdoses, untreated indications, and drug-drug interactions (DDI). AMIs were significantly more common in patients with COVID-19, with 73.3% involving disease-specific therapies. Eleven PIs had a life-threatening impact, 189 a major impact. During the PCRs, 36 PIs were performed for 59% of the patients presented. A pharmacovigilance report was performed for a quarter of patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and 33% of patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the value of involving hospital pharmacists in the drug management of patients with COVID-19, particularly with the evolution of available therapies and the implementation of vaccination, in order to reduce the spread of SARS-COV2 and limit the appearance of resistance.

Compliance with sedation analgesia protocols: Do clinical pharmacists have an impact?

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: The agreement between prescribed sedation objectives and sedation pump syringe rate adaptation is not optimal. Delays in adjustment of sedation doses are associated with an increased patient length of stay in the intensive care unit. Our objectives were to assess compliance with the approved sedation protocol and to evaluate the impact of a clinical pharmacist daily controlling sedation and analgesia scores and pump syringe rates on patients' outcomes in a critical care unit. METHODS: Prospective before/after study involving 60 adult patients divided into two groups (non-intervention and intervention groups) who received mechanical ventilation and continuous infusions of sedative and analgesic drugs in an intensive care unit. In both groups, data were collected daily in 30 mechanically ventilated patients receiving a sedation/analgesia regimen during a 3-month period according to a standardized protocol. A pharmacist was in charge of intervening with physicians when the local sedation analgesia protocol was not followed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics except a higher proportion of men in the intervention group (70% vs 40%, P = .019). In the control group, sedation and analgesia objectives were not prescribed in more than half the cases. Pharmacist intervention reduced sedation duration (5 [2-11] vs 2 [1-5.5] days, P = .019). The cumulative delay in adaptation of the sedation analgesia electric syringe pump was significantly decreased in the intervention group (8 [0-29.5] vs 28.5 hours [11.1-68.4], P = .034). Total doses of sedatives (midazolam, propofol) and analgesics (sufentanil, remifentanil) per patient were decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group (respectively, P = .24, P = .0009, P = .0013 and P = .0007). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist intervention can decrease the sedation duration and the total dose of sedation medications and reinforce adherence to sedation/analgesia guidelines.

Drug incompatibilities in intravenous therapy: evaluation and proposition of preventive tools in intensive care and hematology units.

PURPOSE: Physicochemical incompatibility (PCI) between drugs infused together is frequent, but under-recognized. PCI can lead to drug inactivity, catheter occlusion, embolism or inflammatory reactions. The aims of this work were to identify most frequent and relevant drug incompatibilities and to review and develop strategies for their prevention. METHOD: This was an observational prospective survey conducted between January and March 2015 in an intensive care unit (ICU) and in September 2014 in a hematology sterile unit (HSU). Drugs administered to patients were recorded and their compatibility assessed based on published compatibility data. RESULTS: Drug incompatibilities accounted for 12% (23/189) and 17% (116/686) of drug pairs infused in the ICU and the HSU, respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequent drug implied in PCI. Regarding drug classes, anti-infective agents and gastrointestinal drugs were the most frequently implied. Among the incompatible pairs, 78% and 61% implicated a drug with extreme pH in the ICU and HSU, respectively. The tools proposed to reduce the frequency of PCI included: compatibility cross-tables, labeling of drugs with extreme pH and optimized administration schedules. CONCLUSIONS: Given the frequency and the potential for severe consequences of PCI, pharmacists have a role to play in raising awareness of nurses and practitioners, and proposing adequate tools and solutions to reduce their incidence.

Prevention of nonsteroidal inflammatory drug-induced urticaria and/or angioedema.

BACKGROUND: Urticaria and/or angioedema (U/AE) are the most frequent and less severe forms of nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Management of NSAID-induced U/AE includes (1) the avoidance of the culprit drug and of cyclooxygenase (COX) 1 inhibitors, (2) the use of weak COX-2 inhibitors, and/or (3) desensitization to aspirin. Because these possibilities may have drawbacks, we tested the possibility of preventing NSAID-induced U/AE by the administration of antihistamines and/or a combination of antihistamines and leukotriene antagonists. OBJECTIVE: To test the preventive effect of antihistamines and/or leukotriene antagonists on the development of U/AE in patients with a history of NSAID hypersensitivity confirmed by a positive challenge result. METHODS: A single, placebo-controlled, oral challenge using the culprit NSAID was applied to 65 patients with a history of NSAID-induced U/AE. In the case of recurrence of the symptoms, another oral challenge was performed under premedication with antihistamines alone or combined antihistamines and leukotriene antagonists. RESULTS: A total of 59 of 65 patients (90%) tolerated a normal dose of NSAID, confirming previous data on the poor reproducibility of nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs on challenge. Of the 6 patients who experienced recurrence of the U/AE on NSAID challenge, antihistamines and combined antihistamines and leukotriene antagonists prevented the hypersensitivity reactions in 2 and 3 of them, respectively. Only 1 patient still developed a moderate NSAID-induced urticaria despite the double premedication. CONCLUSION: Treatment with NSAIDs at normal doses is possible and well tolerated in patients who have experienced NSAID-induced U/AE, which could be prevented by the concomitant use of antihistamines and leukotriene antagonists.

Multitasking in postanesthesia care unit following nurse interruptions, an analysis of the causes and consequences using classification tree: an observational prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU) is an environment associated with an important workload which is susceptible to lead to task interruption (TI), leading to task-switching or concurrent multitasking. The objective of the study was to determine the predictors of the reaction of the nurses facing TI and assess those who lead to an alteration of the initial task. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study into the PACU of a university hospital during February 2017. Among 18 nurses, a selected one was observed each day, documenting for each TI the reaction of the nurse (task switching or concurrent multitasking), and the characteristics associated with the TI. We performed classification tree analyses using C5.0 algorithm in order to select the main predictors of the type of multitasking performed and the alteration of the initial task. RESULTS: We observed 1119 TI during 132 hours (8.5 TI/hour). The main reaction was concurrent multitasking (805 TI, 72%). The short duration of the task interruption (one minute or less) was the most important predictor leading to concurrent multitasking. Other predictors of response to TI were the identity of the task interrupter and the number of nurses present. Regarding the consequences of the task switching, long interruption (more than five minutes) was the most important predictor of the alteration of the initial task. CONCLUSIONS: By analysing the predictors of the type of multitasking in front of TI, we propose a novel approach to understanding TI, offering new perspective for prevention strategies.

Chemotherapeutic errors in hospitalised cancer patients: attributable damage and extra costs.

BACKGROUND: In spite of increasing efforts to enhance patient safety, medication errors in hospitalised patients are still relatively common, but with potentially severe consequences. This study aimed to assess antineoplastic medication errors in both affected patients and intercepted cases in terms of frequency, severity for patients, and costs. METHODS: A 1-year prospective study was conducted in order to identify the medication errors that occurred during chemotherapy treatment of cancer patients at a French university hospital. The severity and potential consequences of intercepted errors were independently assessed by two physicians. A cost analysis was performed using a simulation of potential hospital stays, with estimations based on the costs of diagnosis-related groups. RESULTS: Among the 6, 607 antineoplastic prescriptions, 341 (5.2%) contained at least one error, corresponding to a total of 449 medication errors. However, most errors (n = 436) were intercepted before medication was administered to the patients. Prescription errors represented 91% of errors, followed by pharmaceutical (8%) and administration errors (1%). According to an independent estimation, 13.4% of avoided errors would have resulted in temporary injury and 2.6% in permanent damage, while 2.6% would have compromised the vital prognosis of the patient, with four to eight deaths thus being avoided. Overall, 13 medication errors reached the patient without causing damage, although two patients required enhanced monitoring. If the intercepted errors had not been discovered, they would have resulted in 216 additional days of hospitalisation and cost an estimated annual total of 92,907€, comprising 69,248€ (74%) in hospital stays and 23,658€ (26%) in additional drugs. CONCLUSION: Our findings point to the very small number of chemotherapy errors that actually reach patients, although problems in the chemotherapy ordering process are frequent, with the potential for being dangerous and costly.

Assessing the management of major bleeding events in patients treated by direct oral anticoagulant in an emergency department.

Since direct oral anticoagulants have been marketed, the management of major bleeding in emergency departments has become more challenging. In 2013 and 2016, the Working Group in Perioperative Haemostasis made several proposals for this. The objective of the present study was to evaluate conformity with these proposals in daily clinical practice. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study addressing the management of major bleeding in patients treated by direct oral anticoagulant in an emergency department. Patients were included between January 1, 2015 and November 30, 2017. Among 3,365 patients admitted to the emergency department for bleeding, a total of 191 were treated by direct oral anticoagulant and 55 (28.8%) with major bleeding were included in the present study. The majority of patients received rivaroxaban (n = 44, 80.0%) and were treated for atrial fibrillation (n = 47, 85.0%). Bleeding concerned gastrointestinal (n = 30, 54.6%) and (n = 14, 25.5%) intracranial location. Twenty-one patients (38.2%) were treated by prothrombin complex concentrate, and 31 patients (56.4%) were transfused. Intervention for hemostatic control was performed for 30 patients (54.6%). Thirty-three patients (60.0%) presented a deviation from protocol. There is no significant difference for mortality at 3 months according to whether or not there was a deviation from protocol. Nearly two-thirds of patients with major bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulant administration had protocol deviation, but there was no effect on mortality.

Economic impact of clinical pharmaceutical activities in hospital wards: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The positive impact of clinical pharmacy services (CPS) in improving clinical outcomes such as reduction of drug related problems is well demonstrated. Despite these results, the deployment of these activities is not systematically observed in the hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review first aimed to describe existing evidence regarding economic evaluation of ward-based CPS focusing on the entire treatment of a patient in a hospital setting. Secondly, the quality of economic evaluations of existing evidence was assessed. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Science Direct and the NHS Economic Evaluation databases from January 2000 to March 2019. English or French language articles describing an economic evaluation of ward-based CPS on inpatients in hospital settings were included. Articles not describing a single study, dealing with a CPS not considering the entire medication regimen of the patient or presenting both inpatient and outpatient CPS were excluded. Selected articles were analyzed according to Drummond's check-list for assessing economic evaluations. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included. About one third were American publications. CPS implemented in ICU represented about half of the selected articles. Pharmacist-to-bed ratios varied according to countries and care unit type with the most favorable ratios in ICU and in American studies. Cost-avoidance was mostly used to express economic impact and ranged from €1579 to €3,089 328. Studies yielding the greater economic impact were conducted in the USA with implementation of full-time equivalents pharmacists or establishing of collaborative practice agreements. Only 6 articles dealt correctly with at least 7 of the 10 Drummond's checklist assessment criteria. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that the existing evidence is not sufficient to conclude to a positive economic impact of CPS conducted according to clinical pharmacy guidelines. Funding resources, remuneration of clinical pharmacy activities and provision of standardized national clinical and economic databases appear to be essential evolutions to improve CPS development.

How a Patient Personalised Clinical Pharmacy Programme Can Secure Therapeutic Care in an Orthogeriatric Care Pathway (5P Project)?

BACKGROUND: A new model was developed for integrating a personalised clinical pharmacy programme (5P project) into the orthogeriatric care pathway. OBJECTIVE: To secure the therapeutic care of orthogeriatric patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective descriptive study in a multisite teaching hospital from June 2019 to January 2020. SUBJECTS: Patients aged ≥75 years admitted for hip fracture. METHODS: A prescription review was performed for all patients at inclusion. Other clinical pharmacy activities (additional prescription review, pharmaceutical interviews, medication reconciliation) were dedicated to "high-risk" patients. Potential medication errors (ME), either pharmaceutical interventions (PI) or unintentional discrepancies (UID), were recorded. The potential clinical impact of PI was evaluated by a pluriprofessional expert panel using a validated tool. RESULTS: In the 455 patients included, 955 potential ME were detected, that is ≥1 potential ME for 324/455 (71%) patients. In acute care, 561 PI were formulated during prescription review for 440/455 (97%) patients and 348/561 (62%) were accepted by physicians. Medication reconciliation was performed for 213 patients, 316 UID were identified. In rehabilitation units, a second prescription review was performed for 112/122 (92%) "high-risk" patients, leading to 61 PI. The clinical impact was evaluated for 519/622 (83%) PI. A consensus was obtained for 310/519 (60%) PI: 147/310 (47%) were rated as having minor clinical impact, 138/310 (45%) moderate, 22/310 (7%) major, 2/310 (0.6%) vital, and 1/310 (0.3%) null. CONCLUSION: The 5P project secured the orthogeriatric care pathway by detecting a great number of potential ME, including PI mostly considered as having a significant clinical impact.

Human-simulation-based learning to prevent medication error: A systematic review.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: In the past 2 decades, there has been an increasing interest in simulation-based learning programs to prevent medication error (ME). To improve knowledge, skills, and attitudes in prescribers, nurses, and pharmaceutical staff, these methods enable training without directly involving patients. However, best practices for simulation for healthcare providers are as yet undefined. By analysing the current state of experience in the field, the present review aims to assess whether human simulation in healthcare helps to reduce ME. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on Medline from 2000 to June 2015, associating the terms "Patient Simulation," "Medication Errors," and "Simulation Healthcare." Reports of technology-based simulation were excluded, to focus exclusively on human simulation in nontechnical skills learning. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies assessing simulation-based learning programs were selected, focusing on pharmacy, medicine or nursing students, or concerning programs aimed at reducing administration or preparation errors, managing crises, or learning communication skills for healthcare professionals. The studies varied in design, methodology, and assessment criteria. Few demonstrated that simulation was more effective than didactic learning in reducing ME. This review highlights a lack of long-term assessment and real-life extrapolation, with limited scenarios and participant samples. These various experiences, however, help in identifying the key elements required for an effective human simulation-based learning program for ME prevention: ie, scenario design, debriefing, and perception assessment. The performance of these programs depends on their ability to reflect reality and on professional guidance. CONCLUSION: Properly regulated simulation is a good way to train staff in events that happen only exceptionally, as well as in standard daily activities. By integrating human factors, simulation seems to be effective in preventing iatrogenic risk related to ME, if the program is well designed.

Multitasking in postanesthesia care unit following nurse interruptions, an analysis of the causes and consequences using classification tree: an observational prospective study

Abstract Background: Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU) is an environment associated with an important workload which is susceptible to lead to task interruption (TI), leading to task-switching or concurrent multitasking. The objective of the study was to determine the predictors of the reaction of the nurses facing TI and assess those who lead to an alteration of the initial task. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study into the PACU of a university hospital during February 2017. Among 18 nurses, a selected one was observed each day, documenting for each TI the reaction of the nurse (task switching or concurrent multitasking), and the characteristics associated with the TI. We performed classification tree analyses using C5.0 algorithm in order to select the main predictors of the type of multitasking performed and the alteration of the initial task. Results: We observed 1119 TI during 132 hours (8.5 TI/hour). The main reaction was concurrent multitasking (805 TI, 72%). The short duration of the task interruption (one minute or less) was the most important predictor leading to concurrent multitasking. Other predictors of response to TI were the identity of the task interrupter and the number of nurses present. Regarding the consequences of the task switching, long interruption (more than five minutes) was the most important predictor of the alteration of the initial task. Conclusions: By analysing the predictors of the type of multitasking in front of TI, we propose a novel approach to understanding TI, offering new perspective for prevention strategies.