American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Annual Meeting All-in-person Attendance Results in Immense Carbon Expenditure.

BACKGROUND: Professional society conferences are integral to the medical profession. However, airline travel is a major contributor to greenhouse gas production, and the environmental impact of in-person attendance at an orthopaedic conference has yet to be described. With growing concern about the climate crisis, we sought to quantify the carbon footprint of in-person attendance to help potential attendees more consciously consider in-person attendance, inform strategies to minimize greenhouse gas emissions during travel to annual meetings, and increase awareness about and momentum for efforts in orthopaedic surgery to reduce the carbon footprint of society conferences. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What was the magnitude of greenhouse gas production resulting from all-in-person 2019 American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) annual meeting attendance in Chicago, IL, USA? (2) What was the magnitude of greenhouse gas production resulting from the all-virtual 2020 AOFAS annual meeting, and how does it compare with the 2019 AOFAS annual meeting carbon footprint? (3) To what extent could an alternative in-person meeting model with four or seven hubs decrease greenhouse gas production resulting from round-trip air travel compared with the 2019 AOFAS annual meeting? METHODS: A list of the postal codes and countries of all 1271 registered participants attending the four-day 2019 AOFAS annual meeting in Chicago, IL, USA, was obtained from AOFAS headquarters. The 2019 conference was chosen because it was the last pre-COVID meeting and thus attendance was more likely to resemble that at prepandemic in-person conferences than more recent meetings because of pandemic travel restrictions. We estimated carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO 2 e) production from round-trip air travel using a publicly available internet-based calculator (Myclimate: https://co2.myclimate.org/en/flight_calculators/new ). Emissions produced by the conference venue, car travel, and hotel stays were estimated using published Environmental Protection Agency emission factors. To estimate emissions produced by the all-virtual 2020 AOFAS annual meeting (assuming an equal number of attendees as in 2019), we used the framework published by Faber and summed estimated network data transfer emissions, personal computer and monitor emissions, and server-related emissions. Using the 2019 registrant list, we modeled four-hub and seven-hub in-person meeting alternatives to determine potential decreased round-trip air travel greenhouse gas production. Meeting hub locations were selected by visualizing the geographic distribution of the 2019 registrants and selecting reasonable meeting locations that would minimize air travel for the greatest number of attendees. Registrants were assigned to the nearest hub location. Myclimate was again used to estimate CO 2 e production for round-trip air travel for the hub meeting models. RESULTS: The total estimated emissions of the all-in-person 2019 AOFAS annual meeting (when accounting for travel, conference space, and hotel stays) was 1565 tons CO 2 e (median 0.61 tons per attendee, range 0.02 to 7.7 tons). The total estimated emissions of the all-virtual 2020 meeting (when accounting for network data transfer emissions, personal computer and monitor emissions, and server-related emissions) was 34 tons CO 2 e (median 0.03 tons per attendee). This corresponds to a 97.8% decrease in CO 2 e emissions compared with the in-person conference. The model of a four-hub in-person meeting alternative with meetings in Chicago, Santiago, London, and Tokyo predicted an estimated 54% decrease in CO 2 e emissions from round-trip air travel. The seven-hub meeting model with meetings in Chicago; Washington, DC; Dallas; Los Angeles; Santiago; London; and Tokyo was predicted to diminish the CO 2 e emissions of round-trip air travel by an estimated 71%. CONCLUSION: The 2019 AOFAS annual meeting had an enormous carbon footprint and resulted in many individuals exceeding their annual allotted carbon budget (2.5 tons) according to the Paris Agreement. Hosting the meeting virtually greatly reduced the annual meeting carbon footprint, and our hub-based meeting models identified potential in-person alternatives for reducing the carbon footprint of conference attendance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Professional societies must consider our responsibility to decarbonizing the healthcare sector by considering innovative approaches-perhaps such as our multihub proposals-to decarbonize carbon-intensive annual meetings without stalling academic progress.

Differences in Baseline Physical Function and Mental Health PROM Scores in Patients With Foot and Ankle Conditions.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to establish normative values for baseline physical and mental health by foot and ankle diagnosis using validated PROMIS scores and to compare the correlation between these 2 outcomes across common diagnoses. Additionally, it investigated the effects associated with chronic vs acute conditions and specific diagnoses on mental health. METHODS: We reviewed baseline PROMIS Physical Function 10a (PF10a) and PROMIS Global-Mental (PGM) scores of 14,245 patients with one of the 10 most common foot and ankle diagnoses seen at our institution between 2016 and 2021. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between PF10a and PGM by diagnosis. A multivariable regression model including age, sex, language, race, ethnicity, education level, income, and Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to determine the associated effect of diagnosis on PGM score. RESULTS: On unadjusted analysis, patients diagnosed with an ankle fracture had the lowest mean physical function, whereas patients with hallux valgus had the highest (PF10a = 33.9 vs 46.7, P < .001). Patients with foot/ankle osteoarthritis had the lowest mean self-reported mental health, whereas patients with hallux rigidus had the highest (PGM = 49.9 vs 53.4, P < .001). PF10a and PGM scores were significantly positively correlated for all diagnoses; the correlation was strongest in patients diagnosed with foot/ankle osteoarthritis or hammertoes (r = 0.511) and weakest in patients with ankle fractures (r = 0.232) or sprains (r = 0.280). Chronic conditions, including hammertoes (ß = -5.1, 95% CI [-5.8, -4.3], P < .001), foot/ankle osteoarthritis (ß = -5.0, 95% CI [-5.7, -4.3], P < .001), and hallux valgus (ß = -4.8, 95% CI [-5.5, -4.1], P < .001) were associated with the largest negative effects on patients' mental health. CONCLUSION: Self-reported physical function and mental health varied across common foot and ankle diagnoses and were more tightly correlated in chronic conditions. The associations between diagnosis and mental health scores appear larger for more chronic diagnoses, including those that are generally associated with relatively unimpaired physical function.

Carbon Footprint of Minor Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Climate change poses a substantial threat to human health, and operating rooms (ORs) have an outsized environmental impact. The Program for Research in Sustainable Medicine (PRiSM) designed a protocol for minor foot and ankle surgery intended to reduce waste, streamline instrument trays, and minimize laundry. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the carbon footprint of procedures performed using the PRiSM protocol vs a traditional protocol. Methods: Forty adult patients undergoing foreign body removal, hammertoe correction, toe amputation, hardware removal, mass excision, or gastrocnemius recession were randomized to the PRiSM or our "Traditional" protocol. The PRiSM protocol used a smaller instrument tray, fewer drapes and towels, and minimal positioning blankets. No changes were made to surgical site preparation or operative techniques. Environmental impact was estimated using the carbon footprint, measured in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). Emissions associated with OR waste, instrument processing, and laundry were calculated. Results: On average, PRiSM cases had a smaller carbon footprint than Traditional cases (17.3 kg CO2e [SD = 3.2] vs 20.6 kg CO2e [SD = 2.0], P < .001). Waste-associated emissions from PRiSM cases were reduced (16.0 kg CO2e [SD = 2.7] vs 18.4 kg CO2e [SD = 1.8], P = .002), as were modeled instrument processing-related emissions (0.34 vs 0.91 kg CO2e). One superficial surgical site infection occurred in each group. Conclusion: We found a small but statistically significant reduction in the environmental impact of minor foot and ankle surgery when using the PRiSM vs Traditional protocol. The environmental impact of these cases was dominated by plastic waste-related emissions. Orthopaedic surgeons should think critically about what components of their surgical setup are truly necessary for patient care, as minor changes in product utilization can have significant impacts on waste and greenhouse gas emissions. Level of Evidence: Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Association of Pharmacologic Treatment of Depression/Anxiety With Initial Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Depression and anxiety are common comorbidities that may exacerbate osteoarthritis (OA)-related pain. We aim to evaluate the effect of pharmacologic treatment of depression/anxiety on hip and knee patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: A multi-institutional PROMs database was queried for patients with depression or anxiety and hip or knee OA who completed a PROMs questionnaire at an initial orthopaedic visit between January 2015 and March 2023. Data on demographics, comorbidities, and duration of pharmacologic treatment of depression/anxiety were obtained. Patients were stratified into three cohorts based on treatment duration. PROMs were compared across cohorts. RESULTS: Two thousand nine hundred sixty patients who completed PROMs at their initial orthopaedic visit had both OA and depression/anxiety. One hundred thirty-four (4.5%) received pharmacologic treatment of depression/anxiety for < 1 year, versus 196 (6.6%) for more than 1 year. In unadjusted analyses, patients with pharmacologic treatment had significantly lower Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical (39.8 [IQR 34.9, 44.9] vs 42.3 [37.4, 47.7], P < 0.001) and PROMIS-Mental (43.5 [36.3, 50.8] vs 48.3 [41.1, 53.3], P < 0.001) scores than those without treatment. After adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, only differences in PROMIS-Mental scores remained statistically significant, with pharmacologic treatment associated with lower scores (ß = -2.26, 95% CI, [-3.29, -1.24], P < 0.001). On secondary analysis including duration of pharmacologic treatment, < 1 year of treatment was associated with significantly lower PROMIS-Mental scores than those not treated (ß = -4.20, 95% CI [-5.77, -2.62], P < 0.001) while scores of patients with more than 1 year of treatment did not differ significantly from those without treatment. CONCLUSION: :Our results indicate that pharmacologic treatment of depression/anxiety is associated with improved psychological health but not with improved physical symptoms related to OA. We observed a nonsignificant trend that patients with depression/anxiety who warrant pharmacologic treatment tend to have worse physical symptoms than those who do not; however, unadjusted analyses suggest this is a complex relationship beyond the isolated effect of pharmacologic treatment.

Isolated Gastrocnemius Recession for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

INTRODUCTION: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is frequently associated with a gastrocnemius contracture. Surgical treatment of PCFD often includes a gastrocnemius recession in addition to other corrective procedures, which typically requires a period of restricted weight bearing postoperatively. Isolated gastrocnemius recession may allow passive correction of the deformity, improve orthotic fit, and obviate the need for full reconstruction and restricted weight bearing. The goal of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes after an isolated gastrocnemius recession for flexible PCFD in patients anticipated to have difficulty with postoperative restricted weight bearing. METHODS: A total of 47 patients met the inclusion criteria: isolated gastrocnemius recession for flexible PCFD, no previous ipsilateral surgery, and more than 6 months of follow-up. Of 47 eligible patients, 29 (31 feet) participated. Available preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes were gathered, including the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living, visual analog scale, and the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 10a. In addition, patients were asked about satisfaction, willingness to undergo the procedure again, and whether orthotics provided better relief. RESULTS: At a mean of 5.1 (range, 0.6 to 9.0) years postoperatively, median Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living was 82.1, mean Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 10a was 44.2, and median visual analog scale was 10 (of 100). Sixty-nine percent of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied, 69% would undergo the procedure again, and 62% reported improved relief with use of orthotics postoperatively. Among the 47 eligible patients, there were 5 (11%) subsequent flatfoot reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated gastrocnemius recession for the management of flexible PCFD can be effective as this procedure demonstrated good outcomes scores with high procedural satisfaction and 11% of patients proceeding to subsequent flatfoot reconstruction. This alternative approach may be of particular value for patients anticipated to have difficulty with postoperative weight-bearing restrictions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: :IV.

The Fate of Delayed Unions After Isolated Ankle Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Nonunion remains the most common major complication of ankle arthrodesis. Although previous studies have reported delayed union or nonunion rates, few have elaborated on the clinical course of patients experiencing delayed union. In this retrospective cohort study, we sought to understand the trajectory of patients with delayed union by determining the rate of clinical success and failure and whether the extent of fusion on computed tomography scan (CT) was associated with outcomes. METHODS: Delayed union was defined as incomplete (<75%) fusion on CT between 2 and 6 months postoperatively. Thirty-six patients met the inclusion criterion: isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis with delayed union. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained including patient satisfaction with their fusion. Success was defined as patients who were not revised and reported satisfaction. Failure was defined as patients who required revision or reported being not satisfied. Fusion was assessed by measuring the percentage of osseous bridging across the joint on CT. The extent of fusion was categorized as absent (0%-24%), minimal (25%-49%), or moderate (50%-74%). RESULTS: We determined the clinical outcome of 28 (78%) patients with mean follow-up of 5.6 years (range, 1.3-10.2). The majority (71%) of patients failed. On average, CT scans were obtained 4 months after attempted ankle fusion. Patients with minimal or moderate fusion were more likely to succeed clinically than those with "absent" fusion (P = .040). Of those with absent fusion, 11 of 12 (92%) failed. In patients with minimal or moderate fusion, 9 of 16 (56%) failed. CONCLUSION: We found that 71% of patients with a delayed union at roughly 4 months after ankle fusion required revision or were not satisfied. Patients with less than 25% fusion on CT had an even lower rate of clinical success. These findings may help surgeons in counseling and managing patients experiencing a delayed union after ankle fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

The Effects of Sociodemographic Factors on Baseline Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Foot and Ankle Conditions.

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic care disparities persist within orthopaedics in the United States. This study aimed to deepen our understanding of which sociodemographic factors most impact patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) score variation and may explain racial and ethnic disparities in PROM scores. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed baseline PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Global-Physical (PGP) and PROMIS Global-Mental (PGM) scores of 23,171 foot and ankle patients who completed the instrument from 2016 to 2021. A series of regression models was used to evaluate scores by race and ethnicity after adjusting in a stepwise fashion for household income, education level, primary language, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), sex, and age. Full models were utilized to compare independent effects of predictors. RESULTS: For the PGP and PGM, adjusting for income, education level, and CCI reduced racial disparity by 61% and 54%, respectively, and adjusting for education level, language, and income reduced ethnic disparity by 67% and 65%, respectively. Full models revealed that an education level of high school or less and a severe CCI had the largest negative effects on scores. CONCLUSIONS: Education level, primary language, income, and CCI explained the majority (but not all) of the racial and ethnic disparities in our cohort. Among the explored factors, education level and CCI were predominant drivers of PROM score variation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intraarticular Injections in the Foot and Ankle: Medication Selection Patterns and Perceived Risk Of Chondrotoxicity.

Background: Intraarticular corticosteroid injections (ICIs) are widely used to treat foot and ankle conditions. Although laboratory studies indicate certain corticosteroids and local anesthetics used in ICIs are associated with chondrotoxic effects, and selected agents such as ropivacaine and triamcinolone may have less of these features, clinical evidence is lacking. We aimed to identify the patterns of drug selection, perceptions of injectate chondrotoxicity, and rationale for medication choice among surgeons in the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS). Methods: An e-survey including demographics, practice patterns, and rationale was disseminated to 2011 AOFAS members. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for demographic data, anesthetic and steroid choice, rationale for injectate choice, and perception of chondrotoxicity. Bivariate analysis was used to identify practice patterns significantly associated with perceptions of injectate risk and rationale. Results: In total, 387 surveys were completed. Lidocaine and triamcinolone were the most common anesthetic and corticosteroid used (51.2% and 39.3%, respectively). Less than half of respondents felt corticosteroids or local anesthetics bear risk of chondrotoxicity. Respondents agreeing that corticosteroids are chondrotoxic were more likely to use triamcinolone (P = .037). Respondents agreeing local anesthetics risk chondrotoxicity were less likely to use lidocaine (P = .023). Respondents choosing a local anesthetic based on literature were more likely to use ropivacaine (P < .001). Conclusion: Corticosteroid and local anesthetic use in ICIs varied greatly. Rationale for ICI formulation was also variable, as the clinical implications are largely unknown. Those who recognized potential chondrotoxicity and who chose based on literature were more likely to choose ropivacaine and triamcinolone, as reflected in the basic science literature. Further clinical studies are needed to establish guidelines that shape foot and ankle ICI practices based on scientific evidence and reduce the variation identified by this study. Level of Evidence: Level IV, cross-sectional survey study.

Efficiency and perceived safety of foot and ankle procedures performed on the preoperative stretcher versus operating room table.

BACKGROUND: Foot and ankle surgeons often perform minor surgeries on the preoperative stretcher instead of the operating room table. We examined whether stretcher-based and operating room table-based procedures differed with respect to operating room efficiency and staff perceptions. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients undergoing minor foot and ankle surgery at an ambulatory surgery centre. We collected 'time to start', the duration between patient arrival in the operating room and incision time, and 'time to exit', the duration between procedure end time and patient exit from the operating room. Staff were surveyed regarding their perceptions of stretcher-based and operating room table-based procedures. RESULTS: 'Time to start' was significantly shorter for stretcher-based procedures, but 'time to exit' was not. Seventeen (81%) staff members thought stretcher-based procedures increased operating room efficiency. Thirteen (62%) thought stretcher-based procedures bettered staff safety. Nineteen (91%) thought stretcher-based procedures were equivalent to or better than operating room table-based procedures for patient safety. Most (67%) would recommend stretcher-based procedures. CONCLUSION: We found small but significant time savings associated with stretcher-based procedures. Without adapting surgical scheduling practices, the impact of stretcher-based procedures on overall operating room efficiency is questionable. Nevertheless, the majority of OR staff think stretcher-based procedures increase OR efficiency and are safer for staff. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Retrospective case series.