Operating room use for emergency general surgery cases: analysis of the Patterns of Complex Emergency General Surgery in Canada study.

BACKGROUND: Access to the operating room (OR) is variable among emergency general surgery (EGS) services, with some having dedicated EGS ORs, and others only a shared queue. Currently in Canada, only a limited number of acute care surgery services have dedicated daytime operating room (OR) access; hence, we aimed to describe the burden of after-hours EGS operating in Canada and differences associated with OR access. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we used data from a previously conducted study designed to evaluate nonappendiceal, nonbiliary disease across 8 Canadian hospitals. We performed a secondary analysis to describe booking priorities and timing of operative interventions, compare sites with and without access to a dedicated EGS daytime OR, and identify differences in morbidity and mortality based on timing of operative intervention. RESULTS: Among 1244 patients, operations were performed during weekday daytime in 521 cases (41.9%), in the evening in 279 (22.4%), on the weekend in 293 (23.6%) and overnight in 151 (12.1%). Operating room booking priority was more than 2 hours to 8 hours in 657 cases (52.8%), more than 8 hours to 24 hours in 334 (26.9%) and more than 24 hours to 48 hours in 253 (20.3%). Substantial variation in booking priority was observed for the same preoperative diagnoses. Sites with dedicated EGS ORs performed a greater proportion of cases during daytime versus overnight compared to sites without dedicated EGS ORs (198/237 [83.5%] v. 323/435 [74.2%], p = 0.006). No significant differences in outcome were found between cases performed during the daytime, evening and overnight. CONCLUSION: We found considerable variation in OR booking priority within the same preoperative diagnoses among EGS patients in Canada. Sites with dedicated EGS ORs performed more cases during weekday daytime compared to sites without dedicated EGS ORs; however, this study showed no evidence of compromised outcomes based on OR timing.

Failure to rescue in emergency general surgery in Canada.

BACKGROUND: The risk of death after a postoperative complication - known as failure to rescue (FTR) - has been proposed to be superior to traditional benchmarking outcomes, such as complication and mortality rates, as a measure of system quality. The purpose of this study was to identify the current FTR rate in emergency general surgery (EGS) centres across Canada. We hypothesized that substantial variability exists in FTR rates across centres. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we performed a secondary analysis of data from a previous study designed to evaluate operative intervention for nonappendiceal, nonbiliary disease by 6 EGS services across Canada (1 in British Columbia, 1 in Alberta, 3 in Ontario and 1 in Nova Scotia). Patients underwent surgery between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2014. We conducted univariate analyses to compare patients with and without complications. We performed a sensitivity analysis examining the mortality rate after serious complications (Clavien-Dindo score 3 or 4) that required a surgical intervention or specialized care (e.g., admission to intensive care unit). RESULTS: A total of 2595 patients were included in the study cohort. Of the 206 patients who died within 30 days, 145 (70.4%) experienced a complication before their death. Overall, the mortality rate after any surgical complication (i.e., FTR) was 16.0%. Ranking of sites by the traditional outcomes of complication and mortality rates differed from the ranking when FTR rate was included in the assessment. CONCLUSION: There was variability in FTR rates across EGS services in Canada, which suggests that there is opportunity for ongoing quality-improvement efforts. This study provides FTR benchmarking data for Canadian EGS services.

Incidence of Intra-Abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the contemporary prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome in critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and Central databases. STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting on the prevalence of IAH in consecutively admitted critically ill patients using the World Society of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) consensus guidelines for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement. DATA EXTRACTION: Duplicate independent review and data abstraction. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search identified 2428 titles with 6 eligible studies (n = 1965). Reported prevalence ranged from 30% to 49%. Despite abiding by the WSACS guidelines for IAP measurement, studies varied in their definition of IAH, frequency and duration of IAP measurement, and reporting of outcomes. Three of 6 studies reported that IAH, especially at higher grades, was an independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal hypertension is a common finding in critically ill patients and may be associated with increased mortality, especially at higher grades. Further prospective research is required to examine the effect of screening and treatment of IAH on patient outcomes.

Patterns of complex emergency general surgery in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Most of the literature on emergency general surgery (EGS) has investigated appendiceal and biliary disease; however, EGS surgeons manage many other complex conditions. This study aimed to describe the operative burden of these conditions throughout Canada. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective cohort study evaluated EGS patients at 7 centres across Canada in 2014. Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 yr) undergoing nonelective operative interventions for nonbiliary, nonappendiceal diseases were included. Data collected included information on patients' demographic characteristics, diagnosis, procedure details, complications and hospital length of stay. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2595 patients were included, with a median age of 60 years (interquartile range 46-73 yr). The most common principal diagnoses were small bowel obstruction (16%), hernia (15%), malignancy (11%) and perianal disease (9%). The most commonly performed procedures were bowel resection (30%), hernia repair (15%), adhesiolysis (11%) and débridement of skin and soft tissue infections (10%). A total of 47% of cases were completed overnight (between 5 pm and 8 am). The overall inhospital mortality rate was 8%. Thirty-three percent of patients had a complication, with independent predictors including increasing age (p = 0.001), increasing American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p = 0.02) and transfer from another centre (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study characterizes the epidemiology of nonbiliary, nonappendiceal EGS operative interventions across Canada. Canadian surgeons are performing a large volume of EGS, and conditions treated by EGS services are associated with a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality. Results of this study will be used to guide future research efforts and set benchmarks for quality improvement.

CONTEXTE: La plupart des études sur les services de chirurgie générale d'urgence (CGU) s'intéressent seulement aux atteintes de l'appendice et de la vésicule biliaire. Pourtant, les chirurgiens du domaine traitent beaucoup d'autres problèmes complexes. L'objectif de l'étude était de décrire le travail chirurgical associé à ces problèmes dans l'ensemble du Canada. MÉTHODES: Notre étude de cohorte rétrospective multicentrique inclut les patients adultes (≥ 18 ans) qui ont subi en 2014 une opération non planifiée pour une atteinte qui ne touchait ni l'appendice ni la vésicule biliaire dans 1 des 7 centres sélectionnés, répartis un peu partout au pays. Nous avons recueilli les données suivantes : renseignements de base des patients, diagnostic, détails de l'intervention, nature des complications et durée d'hospitalisation. Puis nous avons dégagé les facteurs prédictifs de morbidité et de mortalité en appliquant un modèle de régression logistique. RÉSULTATS: L'échantillon totalisait 2595 patients, pour un âge médian de 60 ans (écart interquartile 46­73 ans). Les diagnostics principaux les plus courants étaient l'occlusion de l'intestin grêle (16 %), la hernie (15 %), la tumeur maligne (11 %) et les lésions périanales (9 %). Les interventions les plus fréquentes étaient la résection de l'intestin (30 %), la réparation d'une hernie (15 %), le débridement (11 %) et le débridement de tissus mous ou cutanés infectés (10 %). L'opération a eu lieu le soir ou la nuit (entre 17 h et 8 h) dans 47 % des cas. Le taux global de mortalité à l'hôpital était de 8 %. Des complications sont survenues chez 33 % des patients, dont les facteurs prédictifs indépendants étaient l'âge avancé (p = 0,001), un score ASA (de l'American Society of Anesthesiologists) élevé (p = 0,02) et le transfert à partir d'un autre centre (p = 0,001). CONCLUSION: Cette étude dresse le profil épidémiologique des interventions effectuées par les services de CGU du Canada en présence d'atteintes autres que celles de l'appendice et de la vésicule biliaire. Les chirurgiens du pays font beaucoup d'interventions générales urgentes, pour traiter des affections associées à un risque élevé de morbidité et de mortalité. Les résultats de l'étude guideront les prochaines recherches et serviront de points de référence en matière d'amélioration de la qualité.

Intra-Abdominal Hypertension Is More Common Than Previously Thought: A Prospective Study in a Mixed Medical-Surgical ICU.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in mixed medical-surgical critically ill patients using modern definitions and measurement techniques. Secondarily to determine variables associated with intra-abdominal hypertension and ICU mortality. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: Single institution trauma, medical and surgical ICU in Canada. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult patients admitted to the ICU (n = 285). INTERVENTION: Intra-abdominal pressure measurements twice a day during admission to the ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In 285 patients who met inclusion criteria, 30% were diagnosed with intra-abdominal hypertension at admission and a further 15% developed intra-abdominal hypertension during admission. The prevalence of abdominal compartment syndrome was 3%. Obesity, sepsis, mechanical ventilation, and 24-hour fluid balance (> 3 L) were all independent predictors for intra-abdominal hypertension. Intra-abdominal hypertension occurred in 28% of nonventilated patients. Admission type (medical vs surgical vs trauma) was not a significant predictor of intra-abdominal hypertension. Overall ICU mortality was 20% and was significantly higher for patients with intra-abdominal hypertension (30%) compared with patients without intra-abdominal hypertension (11%). Intra-abdominal hypertension of any grade was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.46-7.57). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal hypertension is common in both surgical and nonsurgical patients in the intensive care setting and was found to be independently associated with mortality. Despite prior reports to the contrary, intra-abdominal hypertension develops in nonventilated patients and in patients who do not have intra-abdominal hypertension at admission. Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring is inexpensive, provides valuable clinical information, and there may be a role for its routine measurement in the ICU. Future work should evaluate the impact of early interventions for patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.

Carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulphide reduce reperfusion injury in abdominal compartment syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Carbon monoxide (CO)- and hydrogen sulphide-releasing molecules (CORM-3 and GYY4137, respectively) have been shown to be potent antioxidant and antiinflammatory agents at the tissue and systemic level. We hypothesized that both CORM-3 and GYY4137 would reduce the significant organ dysfunction associated with abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized trial was conducted where ACS was maintained for 2 hours in 27 rats using an abdominal plaster cast and intraperitoneal CO2 insufflation at 20 mmHg. Three experimental groups underwent ACS and received an experimental molecule at the time of decompression: inactive CORM-3, active CORM-3, and GYY4137, whereas three groups underwent no ACS to serve as a sham. Sinusoidal perfusion, inflammatory response and cell death were quantified in exteriorized livers. Respiratory, liver, and renal dysfunction was assessed biochemically. RESULTS: Hepatocellular death and the number of activated leukocytes within postsinusoidal venules were significantly increased in rats with ACS (16-fold increase, 17-fold leukocyte activation, respectively, P < 0.05). Administration of CORM-3 or GYY4137 resulted in a significant decrease of both parameters (P = 0.03 and P = 0.009). ACS resulted in an increase in markers of renal and liver injury; CORM-3 or GYY4137 partially restored levels to those seen in sham animals. Myeloperoxidase was significantly elevated in the ACS group in lung, liver, and small intestine (P = 0.0002, P = 0.01, and P = 0.08, respectively). CORM-3 treatment, but not GYY4137, was able to completely block the response (65 ± 11 U/ml and 92 ± 18 U/ml, respectively versus 110 ± 10U/ml in the ACS group, lung tissue). CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the effect of two molecules, CO and hydrogen sulphide, on tempering the reperfusion-associated metabolic and organ derangements in ACS. CORM-3 demonstrated a greater effect than GYY4137 and was able to restore most of the measured parameters to levels comparable to sham.

The impact of delayed critical care outreach team activation on in-hospital mortality and other patient outcomes: a historical cohort study.

PURPOSE: Early warning scores (EWS) and critical care outreach teams (CCOT) have been developed to respond to decompensating patients. Nevertheless, controversy exists around their effectiveness. The primary objective of this study was to determine if a delay of ≥ 60 min between when a patient was identified as meeting EWS criteria and the CCOT was activated impacted in-hospital mortality. METHODS: This was a historical cohort study evaluating all new CCOT activations over a four-year study period (1 June 2007 to 31 August 2011) for inpatients ≥ 18 yr of age at two academic tertiary care hospitals in London, Ontario, Canada. Multivariable logistic regression accounting for repeated measures was used to determine the effect of delayed CCOT activation on in-hospital mortality (primary outcome). Differences in outcomes between medical and surgical patients were also examined. RESULTS: There were 3,133 CCOT activations for 1,684 (53.8%) medical patients and 1,449 (46.2%) surgical patients during the study period. The CCOT was activated < 60 min of a patient meeting EWS criteria in 2,160 (68.9%) cases and ≥ 60 min in 973 (31.1%) cases. Patients with ≥ 60 min delay were more likely be admitted to the intensive care unit (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07 to 1.47) and to suffer in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.56). Irrespective of delay, surgical patients were less likely to experience in-hospital mortality than medical patients (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.55). CONCLUSION: Including the rates of delay in CCOT activation and the admitting service could be an additional step in exploring the conflicting results seen in the current literature assessing the impact of CCOT on patient outcomes.

Beyond just the operating room: characterizing the complete caseload of a tertiary acute care surgery service.

BACKGROUND: Most studies evaluating acute care surgery (ACS) models of care for patients with emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions have focused on patients who undergo surgery while admitted under the care of the ACS service. The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the case mix of admissions and consultations to an ACS service at a tertiary centre to identify the frequency and distribution of both operatively and nonoperatively managed EGS conditions. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated consecutive patients assessed by the ACS team between July 1 and Aug. 31, 2015, at a large Canadian tertiary care centre. This included all consultations and outside hospital transfers. Diagnoses, demographic characteristics, comorbidities, intervention(s), complications, readmission and in-hospital death were captured. RESULTS: The ACS team was involved in the care of 359 patients, 176 (49.0%) of whom were admitted under the direct care of the ACS team. Nonoperative care was indicated in 82 patients (46.6%) admitted to the ACS service and 151 (82.5%) of those admitted to a non-ACS service (p < 0.001). Bowel obstruction (37 patients [21.0%]) was the most common reason for admission, followed by wound/abscess (24 [13.6%), biliary disease (24 [13.6%]) and appendiceal disease (23 [13.1%]). Rates of 30-day return to the emergency department and readmission were 17.0% and 9.1%, respectively, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.7%. CONCLUSION: Acute care surgery teams care for a wide breadth of disease, a considerable amount of which is managed nonoperatively.

CONTEXTE: La plupart des études qui ont évalué les modèles de soins chirurgicaux aigus (SCA) chez des patients souffrant de problèmes de santé nécessitant un traitement de chirurgie générale (TCG) d'urgence ont porté sur des patients ayant subi une intervention lors de leur admission dans un service de SCA. Le but de cette étude était d'analyser de manière prospective la clientèle admise ou vue en consultation dans le service de SCA d'un centre de soins tertiaires pour connaître la fréquence et la distribution des problèmes de santé nécessitant un TCG d'urgence effectivement traités chirurgicalement ou autrement. MÉTHODES: Dans cette étude de cohorte prospective, nous avons évalué des patients consécutifs vus par l'équipe de SCA entre le 1er juillet et le 31 août 2015 dans un grand centre canadien de soins tertiaires. Cela incluait toutes les consultations et les transferts en provenance d'autres hôpitaux. Nous avons noté les diagnostics, les caractéristiques démographiques, les comorbidités, les interventions, les complications, réadmissions et les décès en cours d'hospitalisation. RÉSULTATS: L'équipe de SCA a assuré les soins de 359 patients, dont 176 (49,0 %) avaient été admis directement au service de SCA. Des soins non chirurgicaux étaient indiqués chez 82 patients (46,6 %) admis au service de SCA et chez 151 (82,5 %) patients admis dans d'autres services (p < 0,001). L'obstruction intestinale (37 patients [21,0 %]) a été la raison la plus fréquente des admissions, suivie de blessure ou d'abcès (24 patients [13,6 %), maladie biliaire (24 patients [13,6 %]) et maladie appendiculaire (23 patients [13,1 %]). Les taux de retour aux urgences et de réadmission dans les 30 jours ont été de 17,0 % et de 9,1 %, respectivement, et le taux de mortalité en cours d'hospitalisation a été de 1,7 %. CONCLUSION: Les équipes de soins chirurgicaux aigus prennent en charge un vaste éventail de pathologies, dont une part importante est gérée de manière non chirurgicale.

Association between Prehospital Time and Mortality following Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs) can be lethal, but advances in trauma systems and surgical care have helped reduce mortality. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether time from injury to presentation is associated with mortality following BTAI. METHODS: Using the Ontario Trauma Registry, all patients were identified who were hospitalized with BTAI between 1999 and 2009. Variables including age, sex, Injury Severity Score, Charlson comorbidity index, systolic blood pressure on admission, operative intervention, and time from injury to presentation were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: We identified 264 cases of BTAI that survived until hospital admission. Of these, 220 patients had documented time from injury to presentation to hospital. Most, 68.2% (n = 150), presented within 60 min of injury. On adjusted multivariate analysis, a prehospital time of ≤60 min independently predicted higher mortality (odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.89, P = 0.03). Tight clustering was seen with prehospital time and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than reducing mortality as hypothesized, a shorter time between BTAI and hospital presentation (<60 min) is associated with increased mortality. This may be the result of selection bias with the quicker transport of more severely injured patients.

Predictors of Discharge Home after Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury.

BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) can be a highly lethal injury but in the last decade major advances have been made in diagnostic accuracy, injury grading, and therapy. Traditionally, emphasis has been on studying survival postinjury with a paucity of studies examining the discharge characteristics of patients that survive a BTAI. The purpose of this study is to define the epidemiology and predictors of disposition in patients with BTAI in a provincial database. METHODS: Using the Ontario Trauma Registry, all patients were identified who were hospitalized with a BTAI between 1999 and 2009. Trends in therapy and discharge disposition were determined. RESULTS: We identified 264 cases of BTAI. Of these, 157 were discharged from hospital with 36% (n = 56) going directly home and 64% (n = 101) going to continuing care facilities. There was no difference in disposition in those with BTAI treated operatively or nonoperatively (P = 0.48). In those that had repair of BTAI, there was no difference in discharge home between open and endovascular repair (P = 1.00). Univariate analyses identified younger age, male sex, lower injury severity score (ISS), and lower Charlson comorbidity indices as being predictors of discharge home. On adjusted multivariate regression analysis, lower ISS (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.95; P < 0.001) was the only independent predictors of discharge home. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the only independent predictor for discharge home for patients who survive is the overall severity of all their injuries irrespective of their condition on admission or management of their BTAI.

Very early initiation of chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after blunt solid organ injury is safe.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of initiating low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients who have undergone nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt solid organ injuries (SOIs) remains controversial. We describe the safety of early initiation of chemical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among patients undergoing NOM of blunt SOIs. METHODS: We retrospectively studied severely injured adults who sustained blunt SOI without significant intracranial hemorrhage and underwent an initial NOM at a Canadian lead trauma hospital between 2010 and 2014. Safety was assessed based on failure of NOM, defined as the need for operative intervention, in patients who received early (< 48 h) or late LMWH (≥ 48 h, or early discharge [< 72 h] without LMWH). RESULTS: We included 162 patients in our analysis. Most were men (69%), and the average age was 42 ± 18 years. The median injury severity score was 17, and splenic injuries were most common (97 [60%], median grade 2), followed by liver (57 [35%], median grade 2) and kidney injuries (31 [19%], median grade 1). Combined injuries were present in 14% of patients. A total of 78 (48%) patients received early LMWH, while 84 (52%) received late LMWH. The groups differed only in percent of high-grade splenic injury (14% v. 32%). Overall 2% of patients failed NOM, none after receiving LMWH. Semielective angiography was performed in 23 (14%) patients. The overall rate of confirmed VTE on imaging was 1.9%. CONCLUSION: Early initiation of medical thromboembolic prophylaxis appears safe in select patients with isolated SOI following blunt trauma. A prospective multicentre study is warranted.

The effect of loss to follow-up on treatment of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury.

OBJECTIVE: Loss to follow-up (LTFU) can be a major difficulty for any clinical research study. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the extent of LTFU and its potential effect in studies of adult trauma patients with blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs). METHODS: Studies comparing management of BTAIs were systematically reviewed. Duplicate independent review was used for study selection, data abstraction, and critical appraisals. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included for synthesis, of which 94.1% applied a retrospective cohort design to prospective institutional databases. The mean LTFU at 1 year was 26.5% ± 31.6% for endovascular repair and 20.6% ± 34.2% for open repair groups. Not having a surgical/interventional specialist as a first or senior author was associated with a 39.7% higher LTFU at 1 year (P = .002). Studies with a higher risk of bias, later publication year, or North American origin were associated with a significantly higher risk for LTFU at 1 year (P ≤ .001). Nearly half of included studies assessed in-hospital outcomes exclusively. Only 38.2% explicitly reported LTFU data. Eight studies explicitly described the method of dealing with LTFU: eight used survival analysis and one used a national Social Security Death Index. Sensitivity analyses using plausible worst-case LTFU scenarios resulted in 14% to 17% of studies changing direction of effect. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant LTFU in trauma studies comparing operative methods for BTAIs. LTFU is generally handled and reported suboptimally, and sensitivity analyses suggest that study results are sensitive to differential LTFU. This has implications for the evidence-based choice of the operative method. Some protective factors that may aid in reducing LTFU were identified, one of which was involvement of a surgical or interventional specialist as a key author.

Blunt thoracic trauma: recent advances and outstanding questions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of blunt thoracic injuries is complex and evolving. The aim of this review is to focus on what is new with ventilation for blunt chest trauma as well as an update on the current management strategies for blunt aortic injury and rib fractures. RECENT FINDINGS: Early use of noninvasive ventilation appears to be well tolerated in select hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients. For those patients requiring intubation, airway pressure release ventilation is an excellent mode to decrease the risk of posttraumatic acute lung injury. Endovascular repair of blunt thoracic aortic injuries provides benefit over open repair and, if possible, delayed repair confers a mortality advantage. Despite its increasing use, there continue to be conflicting results about the role of surgical rib fixation for the treatment of flail chest. SUMMARY: Blunt thoracic injuries are commonly treated in the ICU and a solid knowledge of mechanical ventilation strategies (both noninvasive and invasive) is essential. Blunt thoracic aortic injuries require early diagnosis and aggressive blood pressure management. Not all such injuries need operative repair but those that do benefit from an endovascular approach. The management of flail chest includes early aggressive multimodal analgesia, adequate oxygen, and ventilatory support. Surgical rib fixation should be considered in select patients.

Are Surgeons Going to Be Left Holding the Bag? Incisional Hernia Repair and Intra-Peritoneal Non-Absorbable Mesh Implant Complications.

Ventral incisional hernias are common indications for elective repair and frequently complicated by recurrence. Surgical meshes, which may be synthetic, bio-synthetic, or biological, decrease recurrence and, resultingly, their use has become standard. While most patients are greatly benefited, mesh represents a permanently implanted foreign body. Mesh may be implanted within the intra-peritoneal, preperitoneal, retrorectus, inlay, or onlay anatomic positions. Meshes may be associated with complications that may be early or late and range from minor to severe. Long-term complications with intra-peritoneal synthetic mesh (IPSM) in apposition to the viscera are particularly at risk for adhesions and potential enteric fistula formation. The overall rate of such complications is difficult to appreciate due to poor long-term follow-up data, although it behooves surgeons to understand these risks as they are the ones who implant these devices. All surgeons need to be aware that meshes are commercial devices that are delivered into their operating room without scientific evidence of efficacy or even safety due to the unique regulatory practices that distinguish medical devices from medications. Thus, surgeons must continue to advocate for more stringent oversight and improved scientific evaluation to serve our patients properly and protect the patient-surgeon relationship as the only rationale long-term strategy to avoid ongoing complications.

Review of the management of blunt thoracic aortic injuries according to current treatment recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is associated with high mortality. Recent Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines recommend repair of all but SVS grade I injuries. This study's objective was to retrospectively determine guideline adherence at the authors' trauma center, and its impact on mortality. METHODS: A retrospective review of the trauma database at the authors' university-affiliated trauma center identified and graded all BTAIs between 1999 and 2011. Patient demographics, treatment, and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Imaging was available for 52 of 59 (85.2%) patients with BTAI. For these 52 patients, injury distribution was: 14 (27.0%) grade 1; 1 (1.9%) grade 2; 35 (67.3%) grade 3; and 2 (3.8%) grade 4. Nonoperative management was used for 92.8% (13), 100% (1), 34.3% (12), and 0% of grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 injuries, respectively. The operatively managed grade I injury was initially misclassified as grade 3. He was lost to follow-up after discharge. Of the 12 patients with nonoperatively managed grade 3 injuries, 7 (58.3%) died before consideration of endovascular repair and another died early secondary to brain injury. The remaining 4 (11.4%) with nonoperatively managed grade 3 injuries survived to discharge but were lost to follow-up. For grade 3 injuries, endovascular repair was significantly associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.10; 0.02-0.53; P=0.007). Exclusion of those with presentation-day mortality negated this significant association (OR, 0.84; 0.07-9.68; P=1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Minor deviation (9.6%) from guidelines did not result in additional morbidity/mortality. However, a high rate of loss to follow-up limits conclusions. The mortality reduction seen with endovascular repair for grade 3 injury is inflated by patients who die before repair is considered in the nonoperative group. Larger prospective studies with appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria and improved follow-up are needed to determine the consequences of selective nonoperative management of these injuries.

Acute general surgery in Canada: a survey of current handover practices.

BACKGROUND: Today's acute care surgery (ACS) service model requires multiple handovers to incoming attending surgeons and residents. Our objectives were to investigate current handover practices in Canadian hospitals that have an ACS service and assess the quality of handover practices in place. METHODS: We administered an electronic survey among ACS residents in 6 Canadian general surgery programs. RESULTS: Resident handover of patient care occurs frequently and often not under ideal circumstances. Most residents spend less than 5 minutes preparing handovers. Clinical uncertainty owing to inadequate handover is most likely to occur during overnight and weekend coverage. Almost one-third of surveyed residents rate the overall quality of the handovers they received as poor. CONCLUSION: Handover skills must be taught in a systematic fashion. Improved resident communication will likely decrease loss of patient information and therefore improve ACS patient safety.

CONTEXTE: De nos jours, le modèle de service appliqué aux soins intensifs en chirurgie suppose de fréquents transferts de soins entre chirurgiens traitants et résidents. Nous avions pour objectifs d'analyser les pratiques actuelles en matière de transfert des soins dans les hôpitaux canadiens qui disposent de services de soins intensifs chirurgicaux et d'en évaluer la qualité. MÉTHODES: Nous avons administré un questionnaire électronique à des résidents en chirurgie (soins intensifs) inscrits à 6 programmes canadiens de chirurgie générale. RÉSULTANTS: Il y a souvent des transferts de soins entre résidents et dans bien des cas, ces transferts ne se déroulent pas dans des conditions idéales. La plupart des résidents consacrent moins de 5 minutes à préparer les transferts de soins. L'incertitude clinique associée à des transferts de soins inadéquats risque davantage de s'observer la nuit et la fin de semaine. Près du tiers des résidents interrogés ont déclaré que la qualité globale des transferts qu'ils recevaient était médiocre. CONCLUSIONS: Il faut adopter une approche systématique à l'enseignement des compétences nécessaires pour des transferts de soins cohérents. En améliorant la communication chez les résidents, on réduira probablement la perte de renseignements importants au sujet des patients et on améliorera par conséquent la sécurité des patients qui reçoivent des soins d'urgence en chirurgie.

The unrestricted global effort to complete the COOL trial.

BACKGROUND: Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has an increasing incidence with mortality rates over 80% in some settings. Mortality typically results from disruption of the gastrointestinal tract, progressive and self-perpetuating bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. A further therapeutic option may be open abdomen (OA) management with negative peritoneal pressure therapy (NPPT) to remove inflammatory ascites and attenuate the systemic damage from SCIAS, although there are definite risks of leaving the abdomen open whenever it might possibly be closed. This potential therapeutic paradigm is the rationale being assessed in the Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL trial) ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ). Initially, the COOL trial received Industry sponsorship; however, this funding mandated the use of a specific trademarked and expensive NPPT device in half of the patients allocated to the intervention (open) arm. In August 2022, the 3 M/Acelity Corporation without consultation but within the terms of the contract canceled the financial support of the trial. Although creating financial difficulty, there is now no restriction on specific NPPT devices and removing a cost-prohibitive intervention creates an opportunity to expand the COOL trial to a truly global basis. This document describes the evolution of the COOL trial, with a focus on future opportunities for global growth of the study. METHODS: The COOL trial is the largest prospective randomized controlled trial examining the random allocation of SCIAS patients intra-operatively to either formal closure of the fascia or the use of the OA with an application of an NPPT dressing. Patients are eligible if they have free uncontained intraperitoneal contamination and physiologic derangements exemplified by septic shock OR severely adverse predicted clinical outcomes. The primary outcome is intended to definitively inform global practice by conclusively evaluating 90-day survival. Initial recruitment has been lower than hoped but satisfactory, and the COOL steering committee and trial investigators intend with increased global support to continue enrollment until recruitment ensures a definitive answer. DISCUSSION: OA is mandated in many cases of SCIAS such as the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome associated with closure, or a planned second look as for example part of "damage control"; however, improved source control (locally and systemically) is the most uncertain indication for an OA. The COOL trial seeks to expand potential sites and proceed with the evaluation of NPPT agnostic to device, to properly examine the hypothesis that this treatment attenuates systemic damage and improves survival. This approach will not affect internal validity and should improve the external validity of any observed results of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: National Institutes of Health ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ).

Stopping extremity hemorrhage: More than just a tourniquet.

Major extremity hemorrhage is a surgical emergency, and the physical examination is essential to help dictate appropriate clinical decision making. Hard signs that require immediate surgical intervention include ongoing bleeding, expanding hematoma, ischemic limb, as well as partial/complete amputation. Packing, compression, balloon tamponade, and tourniquets are very helpful to temporize major hemorrhage. Mangled extremities are very challenging to manage and require a multidisciplinary approach. Temporary vascular shunts are excellent tools for vascular/orthopedic damage control and for temporary stabilization prior to transport for definitive care.

Management of vascular trauma across Canada: A cohort study with implications for practice.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide a description of vascular trauma and its management at trauma centers across Canada. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients from 8 Canadian level 1 trauma centers (2011-2015). Medical records were queried to identify adult patients who survived to hospital with major vascular injury. Major vascular injury was defined as injury to named arterial or venous vessels in the legs, arms torso, and neck. Data collected included patient demographics, injury mechanism, injury details, management and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1330 patients were included. Patients were 76% male with a mean age of 43 (SD 18.8). Reported injuries were 63% blunt, 36% penetrating, and the remainder mixed. The most common specific mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle collision (36%), stabbing (26%), and falls (16%), with gunshot injuries accounting for <5%. Pre-hospital tourniquets were applied in 27 patients (2%). The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 24 (SD 14.5). We identified injuries to named vessels of the neck (32%), thorax (23%), abdomen and pelvis (27%), upper extremity (14%) and lower extremity (10%). Specific vascular injuries included transection (50%), complete occlusion (11%), partial occlusion (39%), and pseudoaneurysm formation (11%). Injuries were managed non-operatively in 32%, with definitive open surgical management (24%), endovascular management (9%) and with damage control techniques in the operating room (3%). Amputation occurred in 10% of lower extremity and 5% of upper extremity injuries. Responsibility for vascular injury management was undertaken by a wide variety of specialists (n = 17). Overall, in-hospital mortality was 13%, and 2% of patients underwent amputation. CONCLUSION: This study describes the nature and management of vascular injuries across Canada. The variability in injury mechanisms, management strategies, specialty responsible for management, and outcomes have important implications for practice change and knowledge translation.