Current outcomes following upper and lower extremity arterial trauma from the National Trauma Data Bank.

OBJECTIVE: The modern treatments of trauma have changed in recent years. We aim to evaluate the factors associated with limb salvage and mortality after extremity arterial trauma, especially with respect to the type of conduit used in revascularization. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried to identify patients with upper and lower extremity (UE and LE) arterial injuries between 2016 and 2020. The patients were stratified by the types of arterial repair. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: 8780 patients were found with 5054 (58%) UE and 3726 (42%) LE injuries. Eighty-three percent were men, and the mean age was 34 ± 15 years. Penetrating mechanism was the predominant mode of injury in both UEs and LEs (73% and 67%, respectively) with a mean injury severity score of 14 ± 8. For UEs, the majority underwent primary repair (67%, P < .001), whereas the remainder received either a bypass (20%) or interposition graft (12%). However, LEs were more likely to receive a bypass (52%, P < .00001) than primary repair or interposition graft (34% and 14%, respectively). Compared with the extremely low rates of amputation and mortality among UE patients (2% for both), LE injuries were more likely to result in both amputation (10%, P < .001) and death (6%, P < .001). Notably, compared with primary repair, the use of a prosthetic conduit was associated with a 6.7-fold increase in the risk of amputation in UE and a 2.4-fold increase in LE (P < .0001 for both). Synthetic bypasses were associated with a nearly 3-fold increase in return to the operating room (OR) in UE bypasses (P < .05) and a 2.4-fold increase in return to the OR in LE bypasses (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, most extremity vascular trauma was due to penetrating injury with a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality. However, both limb salvage rates and survival rates have remained high. Overall, LE injuries more often led to amputation and mortality than UE injuries. The most frequently used bypass conduit was vein, which was associated with less risk of unplanned return to the OR and limb loss, corroborating current practice guidelines for extremity arterial trauma.

Five-year outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms based on aneurysm extent.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms stratified by the aneurysm extent. METHODS: Patients with the diagnosis of complex aortic aneurysm, who underwent F/BEVAR at a single center were included in this study and retrospectively analyzed. The cohort was divided according to the aneurysm extent, comparing group 1 (types I-III thoracoabdominal aneurysms [TAAAs]), group 2 (type IV TAAAs), and group 3 (juxtarenal [JRAAs], pararenal [PRAAs], or paravisceral [PVAAs] aortic aneurysms). The primary endpoints were 30-day and 5-year survival. The secondary endpoints were technical success, occurrence of spinal cord ischemia, primary patency of the visceral arteries, freedom from target vessel instability, and secondary interventions. RESULTS: Of 436 patients who underwent F/BEVAR between July 2012 and May 2023, 131 presented with types I to III TAAAs, 69 with type IV TAAAs, and 236 with JRAAs, PRAAs, or PVAAs. All cases were treated under a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption protocol with a patient-specific company-manufactured or off-the-shelf device. Group 1 had significantly younger patients than group 2 or 3 respectively (69.6 ± 8.7 vs 72.4 ± 7.1 vs 73.2 ± 7.3 years; P < .001) and had a higher percentage of females (50.4% vs 21.7% vs 17.8%; P < .001). Prior history of aortic dissection was significantly more common among patients in group 1 (26% vs 1.4% vs 0.9%; P < .001), and mean aneurysm diameter was larger in group 1 (64.5 vs 60.7 vs 63.2 mm; P = .033). Comorbidities were similar between groups, except for coronary artery disease (P < .001) and tobacco use (P = .003), which were less prevalent in group 1. Technical success was similar in the three groups (98.5% vs 98.6% vs 98.7%; P > .99). The 30-day mortality was 4.5%, 1.4%, and 0.4%, in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and was significantly higher in group 1 when compared with group 3 (P = .01). The incidence of spinal cord ischemia was significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 3 (5.3% vs 4.3% vs 0.4%; P = .004). The 5-year survival was significantly higher in group 3 when compared with group 1 (P = .01). Freedom from secondary intervention was significantly higher in group 3 when compared with group 1 (P = .003). At 5 years, there was no significant difference in freedom from target vessel instability between groups or primary patency in the 1652 target vessels examined. CONCLUSIONS: Larger aneurysm extent was associated with lower 5-year survival, higher 30-day mortality, incidence of secondary interventions, and spinal cord ischemia. The prevalence of secondary interventions in all groups makes meticulous follow-up paramount in patients with complex aortic aneurysm treated with F/BEVAR.

Gender disparities in patients with aortoiliac disease requiring open operative intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Peripheral artery disease is known to affect males and females in different proportions. Disparate surgical outcomes have been quantified after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, arteriovenous fistula creation, and treatment of critical limb ischemia. The aim of this study is to objectively quantify the sex differences in outcomes in patients undergoing open surgical intervention for aortoiliac occlusive disease. METHODS: Patients were identified in the aortoiliac occlusive disease Vascular Quality Initiative database who underwent aorto-bifemoral bypass or aortic thromboendarterectomy as determined by Current Procedural Terminology codes between 2012 and 2019. Patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Risk differences (RDs) by sex were calculated using a binomial regression model in 30-day and 1-year incidence of mortality and limb salvage. Additionally, incidence of surgical complications including prolonged length of stay (>10 days), reoperation, and change in renal function (>0.5 mg/dl rise from baseline), were recorded. Inverse probability weighting was used to standardize demographic and medical history characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to conduct analyses of the before mentioned clinical outcomes, controlling for known confounders. RESULTS: Of 16,218 eligible patients from the VQI data during the study period, 6538 (40.3%) were female. The mean age, body mass index, and race were not statistically different between sexes. Although there was no statistically significant difference detected in mortality between males and females at 30 days postoperatively, females had an increased crude 1-year mortality with an RD of 0.014 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.02; P value < .001. Males had a higher rate of a postoperative change in renal function with an RD of -0.02 (95% confidence interval, -0.03 to -0.01; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no sex-based mortality difference at 30 days, there was a statistically significant increase in mortality in females after open aortoiliac intervention at 1 year based on our weighted model. Male patients are statistically significantly more likely to have a decline in renal function after their procedures when compared with females. Postoperative complications including prolonged hospital stay, reoperation, and wound disruption were similar among the sexes, as was limb preservation rates at 1 year. Further studies should focus on elucidating the underlying factors contributing to sex-based differences in clinical outcomes following aortoiliac interventions.

Preferred Feedback Styles Among Different Groups in an Academic Medical Center.

INTRODUCTION: Feedback is an essential component in complex work environments. Different generations have been shown to have different sets of values, derived from societal and cultural changes. We hypothesize that generational differences may be associated with preferred feedback patterns among medical trainees and faculty in a large academic institution. METHODS: A survey was distributed to all students, residents/fellows, and faculty at a large academic medical institution from April 2020 through June 2020. Survey questions evaluated feedback methods for six domains: preparedness, performance, attitude, technical procedures, inpatient, and outpatient care. Participants selected a preferred feedback method for each category. Patient demographics and survey responses were described using frequency statistics. We compared differences in feedback preferences based on generation and field of practice. RESULTS: A total of 871 participants completed the survey. Preferred feedback patterns in the medical field do not seem to align with sociologic theories of generational gaps. Most participants preferred to receive direct feedback after an activity away from their team, irrespective of their age or medical specialty. Individuals preferred direct feedback during an activity in front of their team only for technical procedures. Compared to nonsurgeons, surgeons were more likely to prefer direct feedback in front of team members for preparedness, performance, and attitude. CONCLUSIONS: Generational membership is not significantly associated with preferred feedback patterns in this complex medical academic environment. Variations in feedback preferences are associated with field of practice that may be due to specialty-specific differences in culture and personality traits present within certain medical specialties, particularly surgery.

Trends and Outcomes in Management of Thoracic Aortic Injury in Children, Adolescent, and Mature Pediatric Patients Using Data from the National Trauma Data Bank.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic aortic injury (TAI) is rare in the pediatric population. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the recommended standard of care for treatment in the adult population given its association with lower rates of mortality and morbidity than traditional open repairs for treatment of TAI. However, there are unique anatomic challenges in treating pediatric patients with TEVAR which may impact the outcomes and pediatric guidelines. We aimed to compare current management trends and outcomes between different pediatric age groups using data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). METHODS: We analyzed the NTDB from 2007 to 2019 using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and -10 codes to identify patients with a TAI. We excluded patients older than 21 years and any patients who died in the emergency department. The pediatric patients were stratified by age group: children (1-11 years), adolescent (12-17 years), and mature (18-21 years) patients. Patient characteristics compared included injury mechanism and severity, TAI intervention, and outcomes between the 3 groups using bivariate analysis (analysis of variance for parametric and Kruskal-Wallis for nonparametric variables). These characteristics and outcomes were also compared by TAI intervention and injury mechanism. ICD-9 and -10 procedural codes were used to identify patients who underwent TEVAR, open aortic repair (OAR), or both. The modified Poisson regression was performed with relative risk (RR) to evaluate our primary outcome measure-mortality during the trauma admission. RESULTS: A total of 2,431 pediatric TAI were identified in the NTDB that met the inclusion criteria. This included 134 children (5.5%), 733 adolescent (30.2%), and 1,564 mature (64.3%) patients. Children had significantly lower median Injury Severity Scores (34.1) than the adolescent (38) or mature population (36.1) (P = 0.001). The mechanism of injury differed between age groups. Children had higher rates of blunt trauma (90.3% children, 89.6% adolescent, and 86.8% mature patients) and mature patients had higher rates of penetrating trauma (6% children, 10.1% adolescent, and 12.5% mature patients) (P < 0.001). TAI management also differed significantly between pediatric age groups. Mature patients had significantly higher rates of TEVAR (3% children, 25.2% adolescent, and 29.2% mature patients) and children were most likely to be treated with nonoperative management (NOM) (94% children, 67.9% adolescent, and 64.8% mature patients) (P < 0.001). Patients who were treated with TEVAR were discharge home most frequently (31.8% NOM, 54.1% TEVAR, 44.3% OAR, 22.2% both TEVAR and OAR). Upon modified Poisson regression analysis, patient age was not associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Intervention with TEVAR (RR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.15-0.33, P < 0.001) and OAR (RR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.93, P = 0.024) were associated with a lower risk of mortality than NOM. CONCLUSIONS: TAI is less prevalent in children compared to adults. TEVAR for TAI is associated with lower risk of in-hospital mortality compared to both NOM and OAR without differences between pediatric subgroups. Further studies should be completed to determine the most appropriate management guidelines.

Outcome Analysis Comparing Asymptomatic Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysms Treated with Custom-Manufactured Fenestrated-Branched Devices and the "Off-The-Shelf" Zenith p-Branch Device.

BACKGROUND: Numerous endovascular options have been used for the repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (JRAAs) over the last 15 years. This study aims to compare the performance between the Zenith p-branch device and custom-manufactured fenestrated-branched devices (CMD) for the treatment of asymptomatic JRAA. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Patients with a diagnosis of JRAA submitted to endovascular repair between July 2012 and November 2021 were included in the study, being divided into 2 groups: CMD and Zenith p-branch. The following variables were analyzed: preoperative information: demographics, comorbidities, and maximum aneurysm diameter; procedural data: contrast volume, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, estimated blood loss, and technical success; and postoperative data: 30-day mortality, duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay, major adverse events, secondary interventions, target vessel instability, and long-term survival. RESULTS: From a total of 373 physician-sponsored investigational device exemption (Cook Medical devices) cases performed at our institution, 102 patients presented the diagnosis of JRAA. Of these, 14 patients were treated with the p-branch device (13.7%) and 88 (86.3%) with a CMD. Both groups presented similar demographic composition and maximum aneurysm diameter. All devices were successfully deployed, with no type I or III endoleaks observed at procedure completion. The contrast volume (P = 0.023) and radiation dose (P = 0.001) were significantly higher in the p-branch group. No significant difference was observed between the groups for the remaining intraoperative data. No paraplegia or ischemic colitis has been observed during the first 30 days after the surgical procedures. There was no 30-day mortality in either group. One major cardiac adverse event was registered in the CMD group. Early outcomes were similar in both groups. No significant difference was found between the groups with respect to the presence of type I or III endoleaks during the follow-up. From a total of 313 target vessels stented in the CMD group (mean of 3.55 per patient) and 56 in the p-branch group (mean of 4 per patient), 4.79% and 5.35% presented instability, respectively, with no difference observed between the groups (P = 0.743). Secondary interventions were required in 36.4% of the CMD cases and 50% of the p-branch group, but this was not statistically different (P = 0.382). In the p-branch cohort, 2 of 7 reinterventions (28.5%) were target vessel-related and in the CMD group, 10 of 32 secondary interventions (31.2%) were target vessel-related. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable perioperative outcomes were obtained when appropriately selected patients were treated with either the off-the-shelf p-branch or CMD for JRAA. The long-term target vessel instability does not appear impacted by the presence of pivot fenestrations in comparison to other target vessel configurations. Given these outcomes, delay in CMD production time should be considered when treating patients with large juxtarenal aneurysms.

Analysis of wound healing time and wound-free period in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia treated with and without revascularization.

BACKGROUND: The traditionally reported outcomes for patients with ischemic wounds have centered on amputation-free survival. However, that discounts the importance of other patient-centered outcomes such as the wound healing time (WHT) and wound-free period (WFP). We evaluated the long-term wound outcomes of patients treated for chronic limb-threatening ischemia at our institution. METHODS: From 2014 to 2017, we identified all patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and ischemic wounds using symptomatic and hemodynamic criteria. The primary data included the wound size, wound location, WIfI (wound, ischemia, foot infection) grade, WHT, WFP, minor and major amputation, and death. Wounds were not considered healed if the patient had required a major amputation or had died before wound healing. The WHT was calculated as the interval in days between the diagnosis and determination of a healed wound. The WFP was calculated as the interval in days between a healed wound and wound recurrence, major amputation, death, or the end of the study period. A comparison of the wound healing parameters stratified by revascularization status was performed using the Student t test. A generalized linear model adjusted for age, sex, initial wound size, and WIfI grade was used to evaluate the risk of wound healing with and without revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients had presented with 372 wounds. Of the 256 patients, 48% had undergone revascularization. During the study period, 97 minor amputations and 100 major amputations had been required, and 132 patients had died. The average wound size was 13.9 ± 52.0 cm2; however, for the 155 wounds that had healed, the average size was only 4.0 ± 9.6 cm2 (P = .002). No differences were found in the wound size when stratified by revascularization status (P = .727). Adjusted for the initial wound size, the risk of wound healing was not different when stratified by revascularization (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.87; P = .354). For those whose wounds had healed, the average WHT and WFP were 173 ± 169 days and 775 ± 317 days, respectively. The WHT was not faster for the revascularized group (155 days vs 188 days; P = .221). When stratified by revascularization status, the rate of wound recurrence was 4.6 vs 8.9 wounds per 100 person-years for the revascularized and nonrevascularized groups, respectively (P = .125). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we found that, except for patients who presented with severe ischemia, revascularization was not associated with improved rates of wound healing. Among the wounds that healed, regardless of the initial ischemia grade, revascularization was not associated with a faster WHT or longer WFPs.

Gender Disparities in Aortoiliac Revascularization in Patients with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: Gender disparities have been previously reported in aortic aneurysm and critical limb ischemia outcomes; however, limited info is known about disparities in aortoiliac occlusive disease. We sought to characterize potential disparities in this specific population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent aortobifemoral bypass and aortic thromboendarterectomy (Current Procedural Terminology codes 35646 and 35331) between 2012 and 2019 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. A binomial regression model was used to estimate gender differences in 30-day morbidity and mortality. Inverse probability weighting was used to standardize demographic and surgical characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 1,869 patients, of which 39.8% were female and the median age was 61 years. Age, body composition, and other baseline characteristics were overall similar between genders; however, racial data were missing for 26.1% of patients. Females had a higher prevalence of preexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (20.9% vs. 14.7%, prevalence difference 6.1%, P < 0.01), diabetes mellitus (25.4% vs. 19.4%, prevalence difference 6.0%, P < 0.01), and high-risk anatomical features (39.4% vs. 33.7%, prevalence difference 5.8%, P = 0.01). Preprocedural medications included a statin in only 68.2% of patients and antiplatelet agent in 76.7% of patients. Females also had a higher incidence of bleeding events when compared to males (25.2% vs. 17.5%, standardized risk difference 7.2%, P < 0.01), but were less likely to have a prolonged hospitalization greater than 10 days (18.2% vs. 20.9%, standardized risk difference -5.0%, P = 0.01). The 30-day mortality rate was not significantly different between genders (4.7% vs. 3.6%, standardized risk difference 1.2%, P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Female patients treated with aortobifemoral bypass or aortic thromboendarterectomy are more likely to have preexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and high-risk anatomical features. Regardless of a patient's gender, there is poor adherence to preoperative medical optimization with both statins and antiplatelet agents. Female patients are more likely to have postoperative bleeding complications while males are more likely to have a prolonged hospital stay greater than 10 days. Future work could attempt to further delineate disparities using databases with longer follow-up data and seek to create protocols for reducing these observed disparities.

Sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression: From current state to solutions for the support of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning patients and colleagues.

Many of the systemic practices in medicine that have alienated lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQ) individuals persist today, undermining the optimal care for these patients and isolating LGBTQ medical providers from their colleagues. The 2020 Task Force on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Report recently published by the Society for Vascular Surgery marked the first publication advocating for the inclusion of sexual orientation and sexual identity in the development of initiatives promoting and protecting diversity across vascular surgery. Vascular providers should be aware that it is crucial to cultivate an environment that is inclusive for LGBTQ patients because a large proportion of these patients have reported not self-disclosing their status to medical providers, either out of concern over potential personal repercussions or failing to recognize the potential relevance of LGBTQ status to their medical care. Safe Zone training has provided a standard resource for providers and staff that can be integrated into onboarding and routine training. Clarifying the current terminology for sexual orientation and identity will ensure that vascular providers will recognize patients who could benefit from screening for additional vascular risk factors relevant to this population related to sexual health, social behavior, physical health, and medical therapies. The adoption of gender neutral language on intake forms and general correspondence with colleagues is key to reducing the unintended exclusion of those with LGBTQ identities in both inpatient and outpatient environments. In many locales across the United States, the professional and personal repercussions for openly reporting LGBTQ status persist, complicating efforts toward quantifying, recognizing, and supporting these patients, practitioners, and trainees. Contributing to an inclusive environment for patients and peers and acting as a professional ally are congruent with the ethos in vascular surgery to treat all patients and colleagues with respect and optimize the healthcare of every vascular patient.

Performance of Viabahn balloon-expandable stent compared with self-expandable covered stents for branched endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the performance between the Viabahn balloon-expandable stent (VBX; Viabahn [W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz]) and a covered self-expandable stent (SES; Fluency [Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, Ariz]) used as bridging stents for directional branches during fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair of complex aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (type I-IV) or pararenal aortic aneurysms either at high risk for open repair or unsuitable for endovascular repair with commercially available devices were prospectively enrolled in a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption trial. Descriptive statistics of the cohort included demographics, risk factors, and anatomic and device characteristics. Individual branches were grouped as either VBX or SES and had data analyzed for primary patency, branch-related type I or type III endoleaks, branch instability, branch-related secondary intervention, and branch-related aortic rupture or death. Categorical variables were expressed as total and percentage, and continuous variables were expressed as median (interquartile range). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate long-term results. Groups were compared with the log-rank test. P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: During the period from July 2012 through June 2019, there were 263 patients treated for complex aortic aneurysm (thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm) with fenestrated or branched endografts. The devices used were either custom-manufactured devices or off-the-shelf p-Branch or t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) devices. The median age was 71 years (interquartile range, 66-79 years); 70% were male, and 81% were white. The most common cardiac risk factors were smoking (92%), hypertension (91%), hyperlipidemia (78%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (52%). The total number of vessels incorporated into the repair was 977, with branches representing 18.4% (179 branches). Among these 179 branches, the celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, right renal artery, and left renal artery received 54 (30%), 56 (31%), 38 (21%), and 31 (18%) branches, respectively. VBX and SES groups represented 96 (54%) and 81 (46%) of the branches implanted. The celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, right renal artery, and left renal artery received VBX as a bridging stent in 40%, 46.7%, 33.8%, and 32.2% respectively. The overall cohort survival rate was 78.5% at 24 months. There was no branch-related rupture or mortality. Primary patency at 24 months (VBX, 98.1%; SES, 98.6%; log-rank, P = .95), freedom from endoleak (VBX, 95.6%; SES, 98.6%; log-rank, P = .66), freedom from secondary intervention (VBX, 94.7%; SES, 98.1%; log-rank, P = .33), and freedom from branch instability (VBX, 95.6%; SES, 97.2%; log-rank, P = .77) were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience with VBX stents demonstrated excellent primary patency and similarly low rates of branch-related complications and endoleaks, with no branch-related aortic rupture or death. Our results demonstrate that in a high-volume, experienced aortic center, the VBX stent is a safe and effective bridging stent option during branched endovascular aortic repair. Multicenter studies with a larger cohort and longer follow-up are necessary to validate these findings.

Ensuring equity, diversity, and inclusion in the Society for Vascular Surgery: A report of the Society for Vascular Surgery Task Force on Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion represent interconnected goals meant to ensure that all individuals, regardless of their innate identity characteristics, feel welcomed and valued among their peers. Equity is achieved when all individuals have equal access to leadership and career advancement opportunities as well as fair compensation for their work. It is well-known that the unique backgrounds and perspectives contributed by a diverse workforce strengthen and improve medical organizations overall. The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) is committed to supporting the highest quality leadership, patient care, surgical education, and societal recommendations through promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion within the SVS. The overarching goal of this document is to provide specific context and guidance for enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion within the SVS as well as setting the tone for conduct and processes beyond the SVS, within other national and regional vascular surgery organizations and practice settings.

Multidisciplinary Management of an Aorto-esophageal Injury Caused by Foreign Body Ingestion.

A 37-year-old incarcerated male ingested a complex "X-shaped" foreign body that resulted in a penetrating aorto-esophageal injury. A primary esophagotomy with retrieval of the foreign body and muscle flap closure was performed simultaneously with thoracic endovascular aortic repair. This multidisciplinary surgical approach controls for both immediate exsanguination and postoperative complications to improve patient outcome.

Poor glycemic control is associated with significant increase in major limb amputation and adverse events in the 30-day postoperative period after infrainguinal bypass.

OBJECTIVE: Understanding modifiable risk factors to improve surgical outcomes is increasingly important in value-based health care. There is an established association between peripheral artery disease (PAD), diabetes, and limb loss, but less is known about expected outcomes after revascularization relative to the degree of glycemic control. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) management in diabetics and surgical outcomes after open infrainguinal bypass. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative infrainguinal bypass module was used to identify adult patients (≥18 years) with a history of diabetes who underwent bypass for PAD between 2011 and 2018. Exclusion criteria included missing or illogical HbA1c values and if the indication for the limb treated was not PAD. Patients were categorized by preoperative HbA1c levels as low severity/controlled (<7.0%), high severity (7.0%-10.0%), and very high severity (>10.0%). Primary outcomes were 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), major adverse limb events (MALEs), ipsilateral amputation, and 1-year all-cause mortality. Thirty-day outcomes were calculated using multivariable regression to compute odds ratios; hazard ratios were calculated for all-cause mortality. All analyses were adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The final sample included 30,813 operations (27,988 unique patients): 17,517 (57%) nondiabetic patients, 5194 patients with low-severity/controlled diabetes, and 8102 (26%) patients with poorly controlled diabetes, including 5531 (70%) treated with insulin. There were 6439 (21%) patients with high-severity HbA1c values and 1663 (5%) patients with very-high-severity HbA1c values. Those with a very high HbA1c level were more likely to be nonwhite, insulin dependent, and active smokers. Compared with nondiabetics, patients with very-high-severity HbA1c had an 81% increase in MACEs and 31% increase in MALEs, whereas patients with high-severity HbA1c only had a 49% increase in MACEs and a 12% increase in MALEs. Each one-step increase in severity category (eg, low to high to very high) was associated with an average 29% increase in the odds of MACEs and an 8% increase in the odds of MALEs. CONCLUSIONS: Uncontrolled diabetes with an HbA1c value >10.0% was associated with significantly worse 30-day surgical outcomes. Patients with incrementally better glycemic control (HbA1c level of 7.0%-10.0%) did not suffer the same rate of complications, suggesting that preoperative attempts at improving diabetes management even slightly could lead to improved surgical outcomes in open infrainguinal bypass patients.

Stenting of superior mesenteric and celiac arteries does not increase complication rates after fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared complications in patients undergoing fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR) without and with stenting of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or celiac artery (CA), with particular attention to the length of coverage above the CA. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a prospectively maintained database of patients treated with F-BEVAR for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms between July 2012 and May 2017. Data included demographics, risk factors, comorbidities, preoperative aneurysm characteristics, procedural data, and outcomes. Patients were grouped as follows: group 1, no SMA or CA stent; group 2, SMA or CA stent and <5 cm of coverage above the CA; and group 3, SMA or CA stent and ≥5 cm of coverage above the CA. Complications measured included death, myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack, paraplegia, acute kidney injury, mesenteric ischemia, and vascular complications. Individual and composite complications were compared between groups. RESULTS: There were 223 patients who had data analyzed (group 1, 53 [24%]; group 2, 101 [45%]; and group 3, 69 [31%]). Mean age was 72 years (76% male). There was no difference in patients' characteristics between groups, except for hypertension (less common in group 2) and history of previous aortic surgery (more common in group 3). Group 2 (15%) and group 3 (90%) had higher spinal drain use than group 1 (2%; P < .0001). Mean operative time was longer in groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1 (group 1, 224 minutes; group 2, 253 minutes; and group 3, 313 minutes; P < .0001). Group 1 had more intraoperative complications, without difference in the technical success and mortality rates. Failure to deliver a bridging stent occurred in only 3 of 695 vessels (0.4%) intended, without difference between groups (P = .79). The incidence of major complications (individually and composite analysis) was similar between groups. On 30-day computed tomography angiography, there was no difference in type I or type III endoleaks (2%, 3%, and 6%) and branch patency (98%, 99%, and 99%) for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. At 3 years of follow-up, there was no difference in survival, stent patency, and branch instability. Group 3 had a higher reintervention rate compared with groups 1 and 2 (P < .0001); however, there was no difference between groups 1 and 2 (P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who needed SMA or CA incorporation with stents during F-BEVAR for aortic repair had more complex procedures, as assessed by operative time, brachial access, number of vessels incorporated, and spinal drain use. However, the extension of the repair did not affect the outcomes, demonstrated by similar mortality and morbidity rates between groups.

A systematic review of enhanced recovery after surgery for vascular operations.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing vascular operations face high rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications and delayed return to baseline. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), with its aim of delivering high-quality perioperative care and accelerating recovery, appears well suited to address the needs of this population. METHODS: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we performed a systematic review to characterize the use and effectiveness of ERAS in all types of vascular and endovascular operations. We queried MEDLINE (through PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Prospero, and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently completed screening, review, and quality assessment. Eligible articles described the use of ERAS pathways for vascular operations from January 1, 1997, through December 7, 2017. Details regarding patients' demographics and use of the ERAS pathway or selected ERAS components were extracted. When available, results including perioperative morbidity, mortality, and in-hospital length of stay were collected. The studies with control groups that evaluated ERAS-like pathways were meta-analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: In the final analysis, 19 studies were included: four randomized controlled trials and 15 observational studies. By Let Evidence Guide Every New Decision (LEGEND) criteria, the two good-quality studies are randomized controlled trials that evaluated a specific part of an ERAS pathway. All other studies were considered poor quality. Meta-analysis of the five studies describing ERAS-like pathways demonstrated a reduction in length of stay by 3.5 days (P = .0012). CONCLUSIONS: Based on systematic review, the use of ERAS pathways in vascular surgery is limited, and existing evidence of their feasibility and effectiveness is low quality. There is minimal poor- to moderate-quality evidence describing the use of ERAS pathways in open aortic operations. There is scarce, poor-quality evidence related to ERAS pathways in lower extremity operations and no published evidence related to ERAS pathways in endovascular operations. Although the risk of bias is high in most of the studies done to date, all of them observed improvements in length of stay, postoperative diet, and ambulation. It is reasonable to consider the implementation of ERAS pathways in the care of vascular surgery patients, specifically those undergoing open aortic operations, but many of the details will be based on limited data and extrapolation from other surgical specialties until further research is done.

Outcomes and complications after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of patients enrolled in a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption trial for endovascular treatment of complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with fenestrated and/or branched devices. METHODS: This study represents a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients enrolled in a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption trial for endovascular treatment of complex thoracoabdominal aneurysms between July 2012 and July 2017. Subjects included high-risk patients for open repair and patients with unsuitable anatomy for either standard endovascular aneurysm repair or Zenith (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) fenestrated device. Aneurysm classification was based upon Crawford classification. We included the pararenal and paravisceral aneurysms in the type IV aneurysm group, because the repair of these aneurysms usually involved treatment of all four visceral branches. The endografts implanted were custom manufactured devices or off-the-shelf devices based on the Cook Zenith platform. Variables analyzed included preoperative demographics and comorbidities, anatomic aneurysmal characteristics, procedural details, and perioperative complications. RESULTS: One -hundred fifty patients with a mean age of 71 ± 7.9 years were treated; 69% were male. Tobacco use (93%) and hypertension (91%) were the most common risk factors. Fifty-seven patients (38%) had a history of previous aortic repair. The mean aneurysm diameter was 62 ± 12 mm and 14 (9%) aneurysms were associated with chronic dissection. A total of 573 visceral vessels were incorporated (celiac artery/superior mesenteric artery [287 vessels], renal arteries [275 vessels], and 11 additional vessels) and 539 were stented. The celiac artery/superior mesenteric artery received a fenestrated design in 76.1% of cases. Branch designs were used in the renal artery in 13.2%, with the remainder treated with fenestrations. Spinal cord drainage was used in 51% of patients (76/150). The mean operative time, fluoroscopy time, and estimated blood loss were 283 ± 89 minutes, 83 ± 38 minutes, and 417 ± 404 mL, respectively. There were five patients (3.3%) with intraoperative complications, resulting in one intraoperative death. The early mortality was 2.7% (4/150). Major complications included respiratory failure in 7% (10/150), stroke and myocardial infarction in 0.7% each (1/150), and paraplegia in 2.7% (4/150). Acute kidney injury occurred in 4.7% of patients (7/150), two of whom required temporary dialysis. Thirty-nine percent of patients experienced at least one complication. Early branch vessel patency was 99.8% (525/526). Survival, primary, and primary-assisted branch patency at 2 years of follow-up were 79%, 97%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of complex aneurysms is safe and effective when performed in a high-volume center experienced in aortic disease management. Branch vessels patency and the low incidence of paraplegia and mortality support expanded use to treat most complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Cigarette smoking intensity informs outcomes after open revascularization for peripheral artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: Cigarette smoking is the leading risk factor for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Existing literature often defines smoking history in broad categories of current, former, and never smokers, which may not sufficiently identify patients at the highest risk for poor outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of more informative categorization of smoking and to determine the association with important revascularization outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing open lower extremity revascularization for symptomatic PAD, defined as claudication (Rutherford 3) or critical limb ischemia (Rutherford 4-6), during a 5-year period (2013-2017). Smoking history, demographics, and comorbidities were abstracted from electronic health records from seven hospitals within our health care system. Smoking history was defined by intensity (packs/day), duration (years), pack-year history, and cessation time. Outcomes included major adverse limb events (MALEs), death, limb loss, and amputation-free survival. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each parameter adjusted for patients' demographics and comorbidities. Cumulative incidence is reported for outcomes at 30, 180, and 365 days of follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 693 patients undergoing open lower extremity revascularization for PAD (66% critical limb ischemia; 46% diabetes). The 1-year cumulative incidence of MALEs was 29.9% (95% CI, 26.4-33.9), whereas the 1-year incidence of death was 9.8% (95% CI, 7.5-12.7). The broad classification of current and former smokers identified no statistically significant differences in any measured outcomes. Patients who smoked more than one pack/day had 1.48 (95% CI, 1.01-2.16) times increase in risk of MALEs at 1 year compared with patients who smoked one or fewer packs/day. Patients who smoked more than one pack/day also had the highest 1-year amputation incidence (12.7%). Each of the four parameters was associated with increased risk of poor outcomes, although small sample size limited the precision of our estimates. CONCLUSIONS: We found that smoking intensity is particularly informative of outcomes of patients undergoing open lower extremity revascularization for symptomatic PAD. These findings lay the groundwork for future research on relevant smoking history parameters and benefits of smoking reduction and cessation for clinicians to discuss with patients and to better understand and inform patients of intervention risks and expected outcomes.

An Unusual Case of Bilateral Upper Extremity Ischemia Caused by Forearm Vessel Fibromuscular Dysplasia.

Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is a nonatherosclerotic disease that generally affects medium-sized arteries. The distribution typically involves the renal, extracranial carotid/vertebral, and iliac arteries. FMD in other vascular beds is rare. We herein present the case of a 47-year-old female with rapid-onset bilateral digital ischemia. Initial differential diagnosis included vasospastic disorders and vasculitis. An upper extremity arteriogram was suggestive of ulnar and radial FMD. Percutaneous intervention was not successful, and the patient was managed conservatively with symptomatic improvement. This case highlights the important diagnostic and therapeutic considerations in patients with less common etiologies of upper extremity ischemia.

Analysis of Aortic Growth Rates in Uncomplicated Type B Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Uncomplicated type B dissections have historically been treated medically with hemodynamic control. Early progression of the disease and late aneurysmal dilation have been considered as indications for intervention. The aim of this study is to analyze growth rate patterns of type B dissections based on computed tomography (CT) measurements over time. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with acute type B dissection from 2008 to 2014 who had at least 2 follow-up CT scans. Patients with rapid progression requiring interventions were also included. Using M2S software (M2S, Lebanon, NH), we calculated the mean centerline diameter of the true and false lumens at 3 different sites of the descending aorta. Growth rate was calculated as the change in maximal diameter between the first interval and last available CT scans. Primary outcome was to compare the growth rate pattern between the 2 time intervals. Secondary outcomes included early and delayed aortic intervention and overall mortality (OM). RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were included. Average age of patients was 58.7 years. Median follow-up time was 3 months for the first CT and 32 months for the second. OM was 27.8% (n = 30), whereas the disease-specific mortality was 11.1% (n = 12). Thirty-seven percent (n = 40) required operative intervention (18 open and 22 endovascular repair): 20 at 30 days, 12 at 12 months, and 8 patients at >1 year. Mean aortic growth rate was higher in the first time interval compared with the second: 0.89 vs. 0.19 mm/month (P < 0.05) at the proximal descending aorta, 1.01 vs. 0.18 mm/month (P < 0.05) at the mid-descending aorta, and 0.65 vs. 0.28 mm/month; (P < 0.05) at the distal descending aorta. Those who underwent intervention had a higher aortic growth rate at early and late interval (P < 0.05). Age and number of comorbidities were associated with OM. Thrombosis of the false lumen did not affect the mortality and intervention rate. CONCLUSIONS: Type B dissection is associated with aortic growth over time. The overall growth rate was not linear with a more prominent initial phase. Faster aortic growth rate is associated with an increased intervention rate, whereas advanced age and number of comorbidities are associated with increased mortality. Prospectively designed studies are needed to identify the subgroup of patients who may benefit from early intervention based on growth rate measurements.

Long-Term Effect of the Type of Carotid Endarterectomy on Blood Pressure.

BACKGROUND: The dissection of the carotid sinus nerve in eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA) has been hypothesized to cause an increase in postoperative blood pressure (BP). The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of eCEA on BP and changes in BP medications over the course of year-long follow-up after eCEA compared with longitudinal incision carotid endarterectomy patch angioplasty (pCEA). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent CEA between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2014 in the Vascular Surgery Department at The University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics was conducted. Demographics, comorbidities, BP, and number, dosage, and type of antihypertensive medications were collected preoperatively, at 30 days, and at 12 months. The differences in BP and medications between pCEA and eCEA patients were compared. Demographic data and comorbidities were compared using t-tests and chi-squared analysis. Differences in BP and medication dosages were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: In total, 363 CEA procedures were performed during the study period, of which 275 procedures were included in the final analysis. Thirty percent of the patients underwent eCEA. Fifty-four percent of the patients who underwent eCEA and 60% of the patients who underwent pCEA were symptomatic. Thirty-day mortality was 1.4% and 12-month mortality was 6.4% for the entire population. No postoperative neurologic deficits, including stroke, were observed. Analysis of BP did not yield a significant difference among preoperative, 30-day, and 12-month follow-up measurements (P = 0.893). There was no significant change to the number and total daily dose of BP medications preoperatively, at 30 days, or at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: There is no statistical difference in mortality, morbidity, and patency rates at 30 days and 12 months between pCEA and eCEA. eCEA is also not associated with long-term BP changes compared with pCEA.