RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Life-threatening hemorrhage from extremity injuries can be effectively controlled in the prehospital environment through direct pressure, wound packing, and the use of tourniquets. Early tourniquet application has been prioritized for rapid control of severe extremity hemorrhage and is a cornerstone of prehospital trauma resuscitation guidelines. Emergency physicians must be knowledgeable regarding the initial assessment and appropriate management of patients who present with a prehospital tourniquet in place. DISCUSSION: An interdisciplinary group of experts including emergency physicians, trauma surgeons, and tactical and Emergency Medical Services physicians collaborated to develop a stepwise approach to the assessment and removal (discontinuation) of an extremity tourniquet in the emergency department after being placed in the prehospital setting. We have developed a best-practices guideline to serve as a resource to aid the emergency physician in how to safely remove a tourniquet. The guideline contains five steps that include: 1) Determine how long the tourniquet has been in place; 2) Evaluate for contraindications to tourniquet removal; 3) Prepare for tourniquet removal; 4) Release the tourniquet; and 5) Monitor and reassess the patient. CONCLUSION: These steps outlined will help emergency medicine clinicians appropriately evaluate and manage patients presenting with tourniquets in place. Tourniquet removal should be performed in a systematic manner with plans in place to immediately address complications.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Torniquetes , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Extremidades , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Currently, the standard of care for treating severe hemorrhage in a military setting is Combat Gauze (CG). Previous work has shown that hydrophobically modified chitosan (hm-C) has significant hemostatic capability relative to its native chitosan counterpart. This work aims to evaluate gauze coated in hm-C relative to CG as well as ChitoGauze (ChG) in a lethal in vivo hemorrhage model. METHODS: Twelve Yorkshire swine were randomized to receive either hm-C gauze (n = 4), ChG (n = 4), or CG (n = 4). A standard hemorrhage model was used in which animals underwent a splenectomy before a 6-mm punch arterial puncture of the femoral artery. Thirty seconds of free bleeding was allowed before dressings were applied and compressed for 3 min. Baseline mean arterial pressure was preserved via fluid resuscitation. Experiments were conducted for 3 h after which any surviving animal was euthanized. RESULTS: hm-C gauze was found to be at least equivalent to both CG and ChG in terms of overall survival (100% versus 75%), number of dressing used (6 versus 7), and duration of hemostasis (3 h versus 2.25 h). Total post-treatment blood loss was lower in the hm-C gauze treatment group (4.7 mL/kg) when compared to CG (13.4 mL/kg) and ChG (12.1 mL/kg) groups. CONCLUSIONS: hm-C gauze outperformed both CG and ChG in a lethal hemorrhage model but without statistical significance for key endpoints. Future comparison of hm-C gauze to CG and ChG will be performed on a hypothermic, coagulopathic model that should allow for outcome significance to be differentiated under small treatment groups.
Asunto(s)
Vendajes , Quitosano/administración & dosificación , Hemorragia/terapia , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentación , Hemostáticos/administración & dosificación , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Administración Tópica , Animales , Quitosano/química , Quitosano/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemostáticos/química , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Interacciones Hidrofóbicas e Hidrofílicas , Distribución Aleatoria , Porcinos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Human diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) often aberrantly express oncogenes that generally contain complex secondary structures in their 5' untranslated region (UTR). Oncogenes with complex 5'UTRs require enhanced eIF4A RNA helicase activity for translation. PDCD4 inhibits eIF4A, and PDCD4 knockout mice have a high penetrance for B-cell lymphomas. Here, we show that on B-cell receptor (BCR)-mediated p70s6K activation, PDCD4 is degraded, and eIF4A activity is greatly enhanced. We identified a subset of genes involved in BCR signaling, including CARD11, BCL10, and MALT1, that have complex 5'UTRs and encode proteins with short half-lives. Expression of these known oncogenic proteins is enhanced on BCR activation and is attenuated by the eIF4A inhibitor Silvestrol. Antigen-experienced immunoglobulin (Ig)G(+) splenic B cells, from which most DLBCLs are derived, have higher levels of eIF4A cap-binding activity and protein translation than IgM(+) B cells. Our results suggest that eIF4A-mediated enhancement of oncogene translation may be a critical component for lymphoma progression, and specific targeting of eIF4A may be an attractive therapeutic approach in the management of human B-cell lymphomas.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras de Señalización CARD/metabolismo , ARN Helicasas DEAD-box/metabolismo , Factor 4A Eucariótico de Iniciación/metabolismo , Guanilato Ciclasa/metabolismo , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos B/metabolismo , Regiones no Traducidas 5'/genética , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Proteínas Reguladoras de la Apoptosis/genética , Proteínas Reguladoras de la Apoptosis/metabolismo , Proteína 10 de la LLC-Linfoma de Células B , Linfocitos B/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos B/metabolismo , Western Blotting , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Señalización CARD/genética , Caspasas/genética , Caspasas/metabolismo , Línea Celular Tumoral , Células Cultivadas , ARN Helicasas DEAD-box/antagonistas & inhibidores , ARN Helicasas DEAD-box/genética , Factor 4A Eucariótico de Iniciación/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factor 4A Eucariótico de Iniciación/genética , Guanilato Ciclasa/genética , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/genética , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/metabolismo , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteína 1 de la Translocación del Linfoma del Tejido Linfático Asociado a Mucosas , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Biosíntesis de Proteínas/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas de Unión al ARN/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ARN/metabolismo , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Proteínas Quinasas S6 Ribosómicas 70-kDa/genética , Proteínas Quinasas S6 Ribosómicas 70-kDa/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Transducción de Señal/genética , Triterpenos/farmacologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In most trauma registries, prehospital trauma data are often missing or unreliable because of the difficult dual task consigned to prehospital providers of recording vital signs and simultaneously resuscitating patients. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the analysis of continuous vital signs acquired automatically, without prehospital provider input, improves vital signs data quality, captures more extreme values that might be missed with conventional human data recording, and changes Trauma Injury Severity Scores compared with retrospectively compiled prehospital trauma registry data. METHODS: A statewide vital signs collection network in 6 medevac helicopters was deployed for prehospital vital signs acquisition using a locally built vital signs data recorder (VSDR) to capture continuous vital signs from the patient monitor onto a memory card. VSDR vital signs data were assessed by 3 raters, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to test interrater reliability. Agreement between VSDR and trauma registry data was compared with the methods of Altman and Bland including corresponding calculations for precision and bias. RESULTS: Automated prehospital continuous VSDR data were collected in 177 patients. There was good agreement between the first recorded vital signs from the VSDR and the trauma registry value. Significant differences were observed between the highest and lowest heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and pulse oximeter from the VSDR and the trauma registry data (P< .001). Trauma Injury Severity Scores changed in 12 patients (7%) when using data from the VSDR. CONCLUSION: Real-time continuous vital signs monitoring and data acquisition can identify dynamic prehospital changes, which may be missed compared with vital signs recorded manually during distinct prehospital intervals. In the future, the use of automated vital signs trending may improve the quality of data reported for inclusion in trauma registries. These data may be used to develop improved triage algorithms aimed at optimizing resource use and enhancing patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Oxígeno/sangre , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess perioperative bleeding complications and in-hospital mortality in patients requiring emergency general surgery presenting with a history of antiplatelet (AP) versus direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus warfarin use. METHODS: A prospective observational study across 21 centers between 2019 and 2022 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, and DOAC, warfarin, or AP use within 24 hours of an emergency general surgery procedure. Outcomes included perioperative bleeding and in-hospital mortality. The study was conducted using analysis of variance, χ 2 , and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Of the 413 patients, 221 (53.5%) reported AP use, 152 (36.8%) DOAC use, and 40 (9.7%) warfarin use. The most common indications for surgery were obstruction (23% [AP], 45% [DOAC], and 28% [warfarin]), intestinal ischemia (13%, 17%, and 23%), and diverticulitis/peptic ulcers (7%, 7%, and 15%). Compared with DOAC use, warfarin use was associated with significantly higher perioperative bleeding complication (odds ratio [OR], 4.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0-9.9]). There was no significant difference in perioperative bleeding complication between DOAC and AP use (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.4-1.1]). Compared with DOAC use, there was no significant difference in mortality between warfarin use (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.2-2.5]) or AP use (OR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.2-1.2]). After adjusting for confounders, warfarin use (OR, 6.3 [95% CI, 2.8-13.9]), medical history, and operative indication were associated with an increase in perioperative bleeding complications. However, warfarin was not independently associated with risk of mortality (OR, 1.3 [95% CI, 0.39-4.7]), whereas intraoperative vasopressor use (OR, 4.7 [95% CI, 1.7-12.8]), medical history, and postoperative bleeding (OR, 5.5 [95% CI, 2.4-12.8]) were. CONCLUSION: Despite ongoing concerns about the increase in DOAC use and lack of readily available reversal agents, this study suggests that warfarin, rather than DOACs, is associated with higher perioperative bleeding complications. However, that risk does not result in an increase in mortality, suggesting that perioperative decisions should be dictated by patient disease and comorbidities rather than type of AP or anticoagulant use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Warfarina , Humanos , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/inducido químicamente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Urgencias Médicas , Factores de Riesgo , Cirugía de Cuidados IntensivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Celebrity injury-related deaths are a common topic of conversation and receive wide media coverage. Despite stereotypes and broad generalizations, it is unclear if the mechanisms of demise echo those of the general population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology underlying celebrity traumatic deaths. METHODS: We evaluated all known injury-related deaths in celebrities (musicians, athletes, actors, politicians and celebrity socialites) that occurred between Jan. 1, 2000, and Sept. 1, 2011. Exclusion criteria were drug/alcohol overdoses and suicides. We used standard statistical methodology. RESULTS: Among 389 celebrities who died because of their injuries, motor vehicle collisions remained the most common mechanism overall. Rappers and politicians had a higher proportion of deaths due to interpersonal violence than all other celebrities. Gunshot wounds were most common in these cohorts (83% and 63%, respectively). Rappers and athletes also died at a younger mean age than other celebrities. Sport-related deaths were most common in boxing and mixed martial arts. Additional mechanisms included airplane crashes, animal interactions and recreational activities. CONCLUSION: Despite occasionally exotic scenarios, most celebrities die of injury mechanisms similar to those of the general population. It is also apparent that rappers and politicians die by violent means at young and middle ages, respectively, more commonly than all other celebrities.
CONTEXTE: Les blessures mortelles chez les gens célèbres sont un inépuisable sujet de conversation et font l'objet d'une vaste couverture médiatique. Au-delà des stéréotypes et des généralisations, on ignore si les mécanismes en cause dans ces blessures suivent la même tendance que dans la population générale. L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer l'épidémiologie sous-jacente des décès d'origine traumatique chez les gens célèbres. MÉTHODES: Nous avons analysé tous les décès de gens célèbres (musiciens, athlètes, acteurs, politiciens et célébrités mondaines) survenus par suite de blessures apparentes entre le 1er janvier 2000 et le 1er septembre 2011. Les critères d'exclusion étaient les surdoses de drogue et d'alcool et les suicides. Nous avons utilisé la méthodologie statistique standard. RÉSULTANTS: Parmi 389 personnes célèbres décédées par suite de blessures, les accidents de la route sont demeurés le mécanisme sous-jacent le plus fréquent dans l'ensemble. Les rappeurs et les politiciens ont présenté la proportion la plus élevée de mort due à la violence interpersonnelle comparativement aux autres célébrités. Les blessures par balle ont été plus fréquentes dans ces cohortes (83 % et 63 %, respectivement). Également, les rappeurs et les athlètes sont décédés à un âge moins avancé que les autres célébrités. Les décès liés à la pratique de sports ont été plus nombreux chez les boxeurs et les adeptes des arts martiaux. Parmi les autres causes relevées, mentionnons : écrasements d'avion, blessures infligées par des animaux et activités récréatives. CONCLUSIONS: À quelques exceptions près, la majorité des célébrités qui meurent à la suite de blessures subissent le même type d'accidents que la population générale. L'étude a aussi fait ressortir que les rappeurs et les politiciens meurent davantage de mort violente à un jeune âge et à un âge moyen respectivement, comparativement aux autres célébrités.
Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Personajes , Accidentes de Aviación/mortalidad , Accidentes de Tránsito/mortalidad , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Traumatismos en Atletas/mortalidad , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is increasing in the Emergency General Surgery (EGS) patient population, our understanding of their bleeding risk in the acute setting remains limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of perioperative bleeding complications in patients using DOACs versus warfarin and AP therapy requiring urgent/emergent EGS procedures (EGSPs). METHODS: This was a prospective observational trial, conducted between 2019 and 2022, across 21 centers. Inclusion criteria were 18 years or older, DOAC, warfarin/AP use within 24 hours of requiring an urgent/emergent EGSP. Demographics, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. ANOVA, χ 2 , and multivariable regression models were used to conduct the analysis. RESULTS: Of the 413 patients enrolled in the study, 261 (63%) reported warfarin/AP use and 152 (37%) reported DOAC use. Appendicitis and cholecystitis were the most frequent indication for operative intervention in the warfarin/AP group (43.4% vs. 25%, p = 0.001). Small bowel obstruction/abdominal wall hernias were the main indication for operative intervention in the DOAC group (44.7% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.001). Intraoperative, postoperative, and perioperative bleeding complications and in-hospital mortality were similar between the two groups. After adjusting for confounders, a history of chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 4.3; p = 0.015) and indication for operative intervention including occlusive mesenteric ischemia (OR, 4.27; p = 0.016), nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (OR, 3.13; p = 0.001), and diverticulitis (OR, 3.72; p = 0.019) were associated with increased perioperative bleeding complications. The need for an intraoperative transfusion (OR, 4.87; p < 0.001), and intraoperative vasopressors (OR, 4.35; p = 0.003) were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Perioperative bleeding complications and mortality are impacted by the indication for EGSPs and patient's severity of illness rather than a history of DOAC or warfarin/AP use. Therefore, perioperative management should be guided by patient physiology and indication for surgery rather than the concern for recent antiplatelet or anticoagulant use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level III.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Warfarina , Humanos , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Coagulación Sanguínea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Administración OralRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine the impact of the indication for shunt placement on shunt-related outcomes after major arterial injuries. We hypothesized that a shunt placed for damage control indications would be associated with an increase in shunt-related complications including shunt dislodgement, thrombosis, or distal ischemia. PATIENTS & METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study (eleven level one US trauma centers) of all adult trauma patients undergoing temporary intravascular shunts (TIVS) after arterial injury was undertaken (January 2017-May 2019). Exclusion criteria included age <15years, shunt placement distal to popliteal/brachial arteries, isolated venous shunts, and death before shunt removal. Clinical variables were compared by indication and shunt-related complications. The primary endpoint was TIVS complications (thrombosis, migration, distal ischemia). RESULTS: The 66 patients who underwent TIVS were primarily young (30years [IQR 22-36]) men (85%), severely injured (ISS 17 [10-25]) by penetrating mechanisms (59%), and had their shunts placed for damage control (41%). After a median SDT of 198min [89-622], 9% experienced shunt-related complications. Compared by shunt placement indication (damage control shunts [n=27] compared to non-damage control shunts [n=39]), there were no differences in gender, mechanism, extremity AIS, MESS score, fractures, or surgeon specialty between the two groups (all p>0.05). Patients with shunts placed for damage control indications had more severe injuries (ISS 23.5 compared to 13; SBP 100 compared to 129; GCS 11 compared to 15; lactate 11.5 compared to 3.6; all p<0.05), and had more frequent shunt complication predictors, but damage control shunts did not have significantly more TIVS complications (11.1% compared to 7.7%, p=0.658). Shunt complication patients were discharged home less often (33% vs 65%; p<0.05) but all survived. CONCLUSION: Shunts placed for damage control indications were not associated with shunt complications in this prospective, multicenter study.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Poplítea , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The US military has prioritized battlefield hemorrhage control. Researchers credit tourniquet use, and a novel trauma care training program, with saving 1000-2000 lives in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Stop the Bleed campaign translates these lessons learned to the public. This is the first analysis of the potential impact of this newfound knowledge about tourniquet use for extremity fatal vascular access hemorrhage in a civilian population. Fatal vascular access hemorrhage includes bleeding from arteriovenous fistulas and grafts used for hemodialysis and central venous catheters. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of decedent records. We selected Maryland death records from 2002-2017 using the following search terms: "graft," "shunt," "fistula," "dialysis," and "central venous catheter." The records were analyzed for potential survivability with a checklist of military criteria modified for a civilian population. Suicides were excluded. Two reviewers independently classified the deaths as either potentially survivable or non-survivable, and a third reviewer broke ties. RESULTS: There were 111 deaths included in the final analysis. Ninety-two of the 111 decedents had potentially survivable extremity fatal vascular access hemorrhage. The remaining 19 records were excluded, because they did not have extremity hemorrhage. Zero decedents had hemorrhage deemed to be non-survivable with prompt tourniquet application. CONCLUSION: This study identified 92 Maryland extremity fatal vascular access hemorrhage decedents who potentially could have survived with tourniquet use-an average of 6 per year. These results suggest the need for further epidemiology investigation, as well as exploration of the risks and benefits of teaching and equipping vascular access patients and their caregivers to use tourniquets for life-threatening bleeding.
RESUMEN
Throughout history, battlefield medicine has led to advancements in civilian trauma care. In the most recent conflicts of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan/Operation Iraqi Freedom, one of the most important advances is increasing use of point-of-injury hemorrhage control with tourniquets. Tourniquets are gradually gaining acceptance in the civilian medical world-in both the prehospital setting and trauma centers. An analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) data shows an increase of prehospital tourniquet utilization from 0 to nearly 4,000 between 2008 and 2016. Additionally, bystander educational campaigns such as the Stop the Bleed program is expanding, now with over 125,000 trained on tourniquet placement. Because the medical community and the population at large has broader acceptance and training on the use of tourniquets, there is greater potential for saving lives from preventable hemorrhagic deaths.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia/terapia , Personal Militar , Torniquetes , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/terapia , Campaña Afgana 2001- , Afganistán , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The overuse of temporary abdominal closure and second look (SL) laparotomy in emergency general surgery (EGS) cases has been questioned in the recent literature. In an effort to hopefully decrease the number of open abdomen (OA) patients, we hypothesize that reviewing our cases, many of these SL patients could be managed with single-stage operative therapy and thus decrease the number of OA patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from Jun 2013-Jun 2014, evaluating EGS patients managed with an OA who required bowel resection in either index or SL laparotomy. Demographics, clinical variables, complications and mortality were collected. Fisher's exact t test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: During this time frame, 96 patients were managed with OA and 59 patients required a bowel resection. 55 (57%) of those required one bowel resection at the index operation with 4 (4.2%) only requiring one bowel resection at the second operation. In the patients requiring bowel resections, 18 (30%) required a resection at SL. At SL laparotomy, resection was required for questionably viable bowel at the index operation 60% (11), whereas 39% (7) had normal appearing bowel. Indications for resection at SL laparotomy included evolution of existing ischemia, new onset ischemia, staple line revision, and "other". 23 patients (39%) were hemodynamically unstable, contributing to the need for temporary abdominal closure. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative shock was the only predictor of need for further resection. Complications and mortality were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Almost one-fifth of the patients undergoing SL laparotomy for open abdomen required bowel resections, with 6.8% of those having normal appearing bowel at index operation, therefore in select EGS patients, SL laparotomy is a reasonable strategy.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Intestinales/cirugía , Laparotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Abdomen/cirugía , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Intestinos/irrigación sanguínea , Intestinos/patología , Isquemia/cirugía , Masculino , Maryland , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Segunda Cirugía/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Innecesarios/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic shock is the second leading cause of death in blunt trauma and a significant cause of mortality in non-trauma patients. The increased use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as a bridge to definitive control for massive hemorrhage has provided promising results in the trauma population. We describe an extension of this procedure to our hemodynamically unstable non-trauma patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients requiring REBOA for end stage non-traumatic abdominal hemorrhage from our tertiary care facility. After excluding patients with trauma, supradiaphragmatic bleed and thoracic/abdominal aortic aneurysms, demographics, etiology of bleed, REBOA placement specifics, complications and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: From August 2013 to August 2016, 11 patients were identified requiring REBOA placement for hemodynamic instability from non-traumatic abdominal hemorrhage. Average patient age was 54.9 (SD 15.2). Sixty-four percent suffered cardiac arrest prior to REBOA, with mean shock index of 1.29. Average time from diagnosis of shock (MAP ≤ 65) or signs of bleeding to placement of REBOA was 177 min. The leading etiologies of hemorrhage were ruptured visceral aneurysm and massive upper gastrointestinal bleed. REBOA was placed by both acute care and vascular surgeons. The procedure was mainly completed in the operating room in 82% of the patients and at the bedside in 18%. One patient expired before operative repair. Definitive surgical control of the source of bleeding was obtained by open surgical approach (n = 6) and combined surgical and endovascular approach (n = 4). In-hospital survival was 64%. There were no local complications related to REBOA placement. CONCLUSION: Similar to the trauma population, REBOA is an adjunctive technique for proximal control of bleeding as well as resuscitation in end stage non-traumatic intra-abdominal hemorrhage. We propose an algorithmic approach to REBOA use in this population and a larger prospective review is necessary to determine both the timing of REBOA placement and which non-traumatic patients may benefit from this technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V. STUDY TYPE: Brief report.
Asunto(s)
Oclusión con Balón/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Abdomen , Adulto , Anciano , Aorta Torácica , Femenino , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , TerapéuticaRESUMEN
Trauma endures as the leading cause of death worldwide, and most deaths occur in the first 24 hours after initial injury as a result of hemorrhage. Historically, about 90% of battlefield deaths occur before the injured person arrives at a theater hospital, and most are due to noncompressible hemorrhage of the torso. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is an evolving technique to quickly place a balloon into the thoracic or abdominal aorta to efficiently block blood flow to distal circulation. Maneuvers, such as resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, to control endovascular hemorrhage offer a potential intervention to control noncompressible hemorrhage. This technique can be performed percutaneously or open in prehospital environments to restore hemodynamic functions and serve as a survival bridge until the patient is delivered to a treatment facility for definitive surgical hemostasis. This article describes the indications, complications, and application of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta to military and civilian aeromedical transport.
Asunto(s)
Aorta/lesiones , Aorta/cirugía , Oclusión con Balón/normas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/normas , Hemorragia/cirugía , Resucitación/normas , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Personal Militar , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The technique of tube thoracostomy has been standardized for years without significant updates. Alternative procedural methods may be beneficial in certain prehospital and inpatient environments with limited resources. We sought to compare the efficacy of chest tube insertion using a novel, endoscopic device (The Reactor™) to standard, open tube thoracostomy. METHODS: Novice users were randomly assigned to pre-specified sequences of six chest tube insertions performed on a human cadaver model in a crossover design, alternating between the Reactor™ and standard technique. All subjects received standardized training in both procedures prior to randomization. Insertion site, which was randomly assigned within each cadaver's hemithorax, was marked by the investigators; study techniques began with skin incision and ended with tube insertion. Adequacy of tube placement (intrapleural, unkinked, not in fissure) and incision length were recorded by investigators blinded to procedural technique. Insertion time and user-rated difficulty were documented in an unblinded fashion. After completing the study, participants rated various aspects of use of the Reactor™ compared to the standard technique in a survey evaluation. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects were enrolled (7 medical students, 9 paramedics) and performed 92 chest tube insertions (n = 46 Reactor™, n = 46 standard). The Reactor™ was associated with less frequent appropriate tube positioning (41.3% vs. 73.9%, P = 0.0029), a faster median insertion time (47.3 s, interquartile range 38-63.1 vs. 76.9 s, interquartile range 55.3-106.9, P < 0.0001) and shorter median incision length (28 mm, interquartile range 23-30 vs. 32 mm, interquartile range 26-40, P = 0.0034) compared to the standard technique. Using a 10-point Likert scale (1-easiest, 10-hardest) participants rated the ease of use of the Reactor™ no different from the standard method (3.8 ± 1.9 vs. 4.7 ± 1.9, P = 0.024). The Reactor™ received generally favorable scores for all parameters on the post-participation survey. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized, assessor-blinded, crossover human cadaver study, chest tube insertion using the Reactor™ device resulted in faster insertion time and shorter incision length, but less frequent appropriate tube placement compared with the standard technique. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and potential advantages of this novel device.
Asunto(s)
Tubos Torácicos , Endoscopía/métodos , Toracostomía/métodos , Toracotomía/métodos , Adulto , Cadáver , Competencia Clínica , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
The Stop the Bleed initiative empowers and trains citizens as immediate responders, to recognize and control severe hemorrhage. We sought to determine the retention of short-term knowledge and ability to apply a Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT) in 10 nonmedical personnel. A standard "Stop the Bleed" (Bleeding Control) course was taught including CAT application. Posttraining performance was assessed at 30 days using a standardized mannequin with a traumatic below-knee amputation. Technique, time, pitfalls, and feedback were all recorded. No participant had placed a CAT before the initial class. After the initial class, self-report by a Likert scale survey revealed an increased confidence in tourniquet application from 2.4 pretraining to 4.7 posttraining. At 30 days, confidence decreased to 3.4 before testing. Six of 10 were successful at tourniquet placement. Completion time was 77.75 seconds (43-157 seconds). Successful participants reported a confidence level of 4.7 versus those unsuccessful at 3.3. The "Stop the Bleed" initiative teaches lifesaving skills to the public through a short training course. This information regarding the training of nonmedical personnel may assist in strengthening training efforts for the public. Further investigations are needed to characterize skill degradation and retention over time.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/educación , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Torniquetes , Baltimore , Cuidadores/psicología , Primeros Auxilios , Humanos , Maniquíes , Recuerdo Mental , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Objectives: Surgical residents express confidence in performing specific vascular exposures before training, but such self-reported confidence did not correlate with co-located evaluator ratings. This study reports residents' self-confidence evaluated before and after Advanced Surgical Skills for Exposure in Trauma (ASSET) cadaver-based training, and 12-18 mo later. We hypothesize that residents will better judge their own skill after ASSET than before when compared with evaluator ratings. Methods: Forty PGY2-7 surgical residents performed four procedures: axillary artery (AA), brachial artery (BA), femoral artery exposure and control (FA), and lower extremity fasciotomy (FAS) at the three evaluations. Using 5-point Likert scales, surgeons self-assessed their confidence in anatomical understanding and procedure performance after each procedure and evaluators rated each surgeon accordingly. Results: For all the three evaluations, residents consistently rated their anatomical understanding (p < 0.04) and surgical performance (p < 0.03) higher than evaluators for both FA and FAS. Residents rated their anatomical understanding and surgical performance higher (p < 0.005) than evaluators for BA after training and up to 18 mo later. Only for third AA evaluation were there no rating differences. Conclusions: Residents overrate their anatomical understanding and performance abilities for BA, FA, and FAS even after performing the procedures and being debriefed three times in 18 mo.
Asunto(s)
Anatomía/normas , Competencia Clínica/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/educación , Adulto , Anatomía/educación , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Evaluación Educacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Masculino , Maryland , Cirujanos/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The management of noncompressible torso hemorrhage remains a significant issue at the point of injury. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been used in the hospital to control bleeding and bridge patients to definitive surgery. Smaller delivery systems and wirefree devices may be used more easily at the point of injury by nonphysician providers. We investigated whether independent duty military medical technicians (IDMTs) could learn and perform REBOA correctly and rapidly as assessed by simulation. METHODS: US Air Force IDMTs without prior endovascular experience were included. All participants received didactic instruction and evaluation of technical skills. Procedural times and pretest/posttest examinations were administered after completion of all trials. The Likert scale was used to subjectively assess confidence before and after instruction. RESULTS: Eleven IDMTs were enrolled. There was a significant decrease in procedural times from trials 1 to 6. Overall procedural time (± standard deviation) decreased from 147.7 ± 27.4 seconds to 64 ± 8.9 seconds (ρ < .001). There was a mean improvement of 83.7 ± 24.6 seconds from the first to sixth trial (ρ < .001). All participants demonstrated correct placement of the sheath, measurement and placement of the catheter, and inflation of the balloon throughout all trials (100%). There was significant improvement in comprehension and knowledge between the pretest and posttest; average performance improved significantly from 36.4.6% ± 12.3% to 71.1% ± 8.5% (ρ < .001). Subjectively, all 11 participants noted significant improvement in confidence from 1.2 to 4.1 out of 5 on the Likert scale (ρ < .001). CONCLUSION: Technology for aortic occlusion has advanced to provide smaller, wirefree devices, making field deployment more feasible. IDMTs can learn the steps required for REBOA and perform the procedure accurately and rapidly, as assessed by simulation. Arterial access is a challenge in the ability to perform REBOA and should be a focus of further training to promote this procedure closer to the point of injury.
Asunto(s)
Aorta , Oclusión con Balón , Auxiliares de Urgencia/educación , Hemorragia/terapia , Personal Militar/educación , Heridas Penetrantes/terapia , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Auxiliares de Urgencia/psicología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/educación , Primeros Auxilios/métodos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Maniquíes , Personal Militar/psicología , Tempo Operativo , Resucitación/educación , Resucitación/métodos , Autoeficacia , Entrenamiento Simulado , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Torso , Estados Unidos , Heridas Penetrantes/complicacionesRESUMEN
Importance: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a percutaneous transfemoral balloon technique used in select centers for resuscitation and temporary hemostasis, often instead of emergency department thoracotomy. The ability to perform aortic occlusion (AO) with an intravascular device allows focused occlusion at the most distal level to perfuse proximal regions while slowing hemorrhage to injured areas. Objective: To describe what is to date the largest single-institution experience with REBOA in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: Use of REBOA at an urban tertiary care facility for severe traumatic hemorrhage, traumatic arrest (AR), or nontraumatic hemorrhage (NTH) was investigated from February 1, 2013, to January 31, 2017, among 90 patients who were not responsive or were transiently responsive to resuscitation measures, or were in arrest, from presumed hemorrhage below the diaphragm. Possible causes were trauma or nontrauma-related hemorrhage. Patients with ruptured aortic aneurysms were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: In-hospital mortality. Results: Of the 90 patients in the study (15 women and 75 men; mean [SD] age, 41.5 [17.4] years), 29 underwent REBOA for severe traumatic hemorrhage, 50 for AR, and 11 for NTH. For the patients with severe traumatic hemorrhage and AR, the median age was 36.2 years (interquartile range, 25.3-55.5 years), mean (SD) admission Glasgow Coma Scale score was 6 (5), and median Injury Severity Score was 39 (interquartile range, 10-75). The distal thoracic aorta was occluded in 73 patients (81%), and in all patients with AR. A total of 17 patients (19%) had distal abdominal AO. Mean (SD) systolic blood pressure improved in patients with severe traumatic hemorrhage, from 68 (28) mm Hg prior to AO, to 131 (12) mm Hg after AO (P < .001). Percutaneous access was used in 30 patients (33%), including 13 patients with AR (26%), and groin cutdown in 60 patients (67%), including 37 patients with AR (74%). Overall 30-day mortality was 62% (n = 56): 11 (39%) in patients with severe traumatic hemorrhage and 45 (90%) in patients with AR. Of the patients with AR, 29 (58%) had return of spontaneous circulation and 11 of those patients (38%) survived to the operating room. All patients who survived AR gained full neurologic recovery. No aortoiliac injury or limb loss occurred from REBOA use. Eleven patients underwent REBOA for NTH; 7 (64%) were in arrest. Overall in-hospital mortality for patients with NTH was 36% (n = 4). No procedural complications occurred in this group. Conclusions and Relevance: REBOA is a minimally invasive alternative to emergency department thoracotomy with aortic cross-clamp to temporize noncompressible torso hemorrhage and obtain proximal control in both traumatic and nontraumatic causes of hemorrhage. REBOA can also be used for more targeted AO in the distal aorta for pelvic, junctional, or extremity hemorrhage.
Asunto(s)
Oclusión con Balón , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Hemorragia/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Resucitación/métodos , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aorta Abdominal , Aorta Torácica , Oclusión con Balón/efectos adversos , Presión Sanguínea , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/fisiopatología , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recuperación de la Función , Resucitación/efectos adversos , Heridas y Lesiones/fisiopatología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a less invasive method of proximal aortic occlusion compared with resuscitative thoracotomy with aortic cross-clamping (RTACC). This study compared time to aortic occlusion with REBOA and RTACC, both including and excluding time required for common femoral artery (CFA) cannulation. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-institution review of REBOA or RTACC performed between February 2013 and January 2016. Time of skin incision to aortic cross-clamp for RTACC, time required for CFA cannulation by percutaneous and open methods, and time from guide-wire insertion to balloon inflation at Zone 1 for REBOA, were obtained from videographic recordings. RESULTS: Eighteen RTACC and 21 REBOAs were performed. Median (Q1, Q3) time from skin incision to aortic cross-clamping was 317 seconds (227, 551 seconds). Median (Q1, Q3) time from start of arterial access to Zone 1 balloon occlusion was 474 seconds (431, 572 seconds) (vs. RTACC, p = 0.01). All REBOA procedures were performed with the same device. The median time to complete CFA cannulation was 247 seconds (range, 164-343 seconds), with no difference between percutaneous or open procedures (p = 0.07). The median (Q1, Q3) time to aortic occlusion in REBOA once arterial access had been established was 245 seconds (179, 295.5 seconds), which was significantly shorter than RTACC (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Once CFA access is achieved, time to aortic occlusion is faster with REBOA. Time to aortic occlusion is less than the time required to cannulate the CFA either by percutaneous or open approaches, emphasizing the importance of accurate and expedient CFA access. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta may represent a feasible alternative to thoracotomy for aortic occlusion. Time to aortic occlusion will likely decrease with the advent of newer REBOA technology. The rate-limiting portion of REBOA continues to be obtaining CFA access. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level V.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Oclusión con Balón/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Hemorragia/terapia , Resucitación/métodos , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Adulto , Femenino , Arteria Femoral , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Unbiased evaluation of trauma core competency procedures is necessary to determine if residency and predeployment training courses are useful. We tested whether a previously validated individual procedure score (IPS) for individual procedure vascular exposure and fasciotomy (FAS) performance skills could discriminate training status by comparing IPS of evaluators colocated with surgeons to blind video evaluations. METHODS: Performance of axillary artery (AA), brachial artery (BA), and femoral artery (FA) vascular exposures and lower extremity FAS on fresh cadavers by 40 PGY-2 to PGY-6 residents was video-recorded from head-mounted cameras. Two colocated trained evaluators assessed IPS before and after training. One surgeon in each pretraining tertile of IPS for each procedure was randomly identified for blind video review. The same 12 surgeons were video-recorded repeating the procedures less than 4 weeks after training. Five evaluators independently reviewed all 96 randomly arranged deidentified videos. Inter-rater reliability/consistency, intraclass correlation coefficients were compared by colocated versus video review of IPS, and errors. Study methodology and bias were judged by Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria. RESULTS: There were no differences (p ≥ 0.5) in IPS for AA, FA, FAS, whether evaluators were colocated or reviewed video recordings. Evaluator consistency was 0.29 (BA) - 0.77 (FA). Video and colocated evaluators were in total agreement (p = 1.0) for error recognition. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.73 to 0.92, dependent on procedure. Correlations video versus colocated evaluations were 0.5 to 0.9. Except for BA, blinded video evaluators discriminated (p < 0.002) whether procedures were performed before training versus after training. Study methodology by Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument criteria scored 15.5/19, Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 showed low bias risk. CONCLUSION: Video evaluations of AA, FA, and FAS procedures with IPS are unbiased, valid, and have potential for formative assessments of competency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level II.