Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 41(2): 150-157, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37117039

RESUMEN

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has extended the survivability of critically ill patients beyond their unsupported prognosis and has widened the timeframe for making an informed decision about the goal of care. However, an extended time window for survival does not necessarily translate into a better outcome and the sustaining treatment is ultimately withdrawn in many patients. Emerging evidence has implicated the determining role of palliative care consult (PCC) in direction of the care that critically ill patients receive. Objective: To evaluate the impact of PCC in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WOLST) among critically ill patients, who were placed on venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) at the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital. Methods: In a retrospective observational study, electronic medical records of 750 patients admitted to the ICU of our hospital between January 1, 2015, and October 31, 2021, were reviewed. Data was collected for patients on VV-ECMO, for whom WOLST was withdrawn during the ICU stay. Clinical characteristics and the underlying reasons for WOLST were compared between those who received PCC (PCC group) and those who did not (non-PCC group). Results: A total of 95 patients were included in our analysis, 63 in the PCC group and 32 in the non-PCC group. The average age of the study population was 48.8 ± 12.6 years, and 64.2% were male. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographics or clinical characteristics at the time of ICU admission. The average duration of ICU stay and VV-ECMO were 14.1 ± 19.9 days and 9.4 ± 16.6 days, respectively. The number of PCC visits was correlated with the length of ICU stay. The average duration of ICU stay (40.3 ± 33.2 days vs 27.8 ± 19.3 days, P = .05) and ECMO treatment (31.9 ± 27 days vs 18.6 ± 16.1 days, P = .01) were significantly longer in patients receiving PCC than those not receiving PCC. However, the frequency of life sustaining measures or the underlying reasons for WOLST did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > .05). Conclusion: Among ICU patients requiring ECMO support, longer duration of ICU stay and treatment with a higher number of life-sustaining measures seemed to be correlated with the number of PCC visits. The underlying reasons for WOLST seem not to be affected by PCC.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cuidados Paliativos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Derivación y Consulta
2.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 14(4): 433-42, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22562592

RESUMEN

Atherosclerosis is a highly complex biological process that has become the scourge of modern civilization. Endothelial dysfunction is the first step in the development of atherosclerosis. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays an important role in the development of endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Several studies have shown that in vitro blockade of the RAAS is associated with improvement in markers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation. Many clinical trials have demonstrated a clear benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) manifested by a reduction of cardiovascular events. These findings suggest that ACEIs and ARBs can play an important role in prevention of atherosclerosis and in the delay of its progression. In this review we focus on the importance of RAAS blockade to prevent or delay progression of atherosclerosis and its impact on reduction of cardiovascular events.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Aterosclerosis/prevención & control , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/farmacología , Aterosclerosis/fisiopatología , Endotelio Vascular/fisiopatología , Humanos , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/fisiología
3.
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J ; 16(1): 50-56, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32280418

RESUMEN

Cardiogenic shock presents a significant challenge to the medical community, and there is much debate as to the best classification system and treatment mechanisms. As interventions and technologies improve, systems of care for patients with cardiogenic shock must evolve as well. This review describes the current treatment models for cardiogenic shock, including the "hub-and-spoke" model, and defines specific characteristics of the ideal system of care for this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Hemodinámica , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Función Ventricular , Algoritmos , Terapia Combinada , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Humanos , Recuperación de la Función , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Choque Cardiogénico/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA