Application of the ACMG/NSGC genetic referral guidelines for hereditary renal cell carcinoma at the University of Miami, from 2014 to 2017.

Identifying hereditary syndromes among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is essential for surveillance of affected individuals and their at-risk family members and for treatment optimization. We conducted a chart review to determine the percentage of patients with RCC who were seen at the University of Miami Health System (UHealth), and met the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) and the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) genetic referral criteria at the University of Miami. Subsequently, we determined the percentage of those who went on to receive genetic evaluation. Patients selected by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9/10 codes corresponding to kidney cancer who were at least 18 years of age at the time of diagnosis were included in the study. We included a total of 1443 patients in the final analysis, and after exclusion of charts with incorrect ICD codes, insufficient clinical data, unknown pathology, and patients who were not seen. We used chi-square analysis, ANOVA, and t-test. Of 1443 charts reviewed, 65.7% were male and 34.3% were female. 47.7% self-identified as White, 39.2% as Hispanic, 9.1% as Black, and 4.0% as "other." The mean age of RCC diagnosis was 60.0 ± 12.4 years old. In total, 47.0% of patients met ACMG/NSGC referral criteria for genetic evaluation. Of those, only 4.2% had documented genetic assessment. This study showed a low adherence to ACMG/NSGC genetic referral guidelines at our institution and a need for increasing patients' and practitioners' awareness about the significance of genetic assessment for RCC patients and their family members.

Central Neurocytoma Treatment Modalities: A Systematic Review Assessing the Outcomes of Combined Maximal Safe Resection and Radiotherapy with Gross Total Resection.

BACKGROUND: Central neurocytomas (CNCs) are rare intraventricular lesions comprising <1% of primary brain tumors. Their surgical and adjuvant management is unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to update Rades et al.'s 2006 systematic review to assess the outcome differences among 3 fundamental therapies for CNC: gross total resection with and without radiation therapy (RT) versus maximal safe resection with adjuvant RT. METHODS: Articles indexed on PubMed and Google Scholar and published between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2019 were selected using the PRISMA criteria. Studies were excluded if they had fewer than 3 cases, did not categorize extent of resection, or were duplicate studies, technical reports, case reports, or studies without follow-up. Complication rates, recurrence rates, overall survival and progression-free survival were extracted where possible. χ2 proportionality tests were used for comparison (P values >0.05 suggested significance). RESULTS: On aggregation, 615 patients from 13 studies including ours were assessed. Although overall survival was not significantly different (χ2 = 1.56; P = 0.46), the recurrence rate differed significantly between GTR + RT (6.9%, 92.11 months), GTR-RT (23.9%, 96.8 months), and MSR + RT (16.8%, 85 months) (χ2 = 10.94; P = 0.004). Pooled complication rates for GTR and MSR + RT were 31.2% and 24% (P = 0.049), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RT remains an important adjuvant treatment that can improve patient survival in the presence of MSR to levels comparable to those of GTR or GTR + RT. Where total resection carries too much risk, MSR + RT can be considered as the next best alternative for tumor control.