Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
HPB (Oxford) ; 23(5): 785-794, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046367

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) has gained momentum in recent years. This study of contemporary data compares economic and clinical outcomes between MILR and open liver resection (OLR). METHODS: We extracted data for patients undergoing liver resection between October 2015-September 2018 from the Premier Healthcare Database. We conducted a propensity score matched analysis to compare complications, in-hospital mortality, inpatient readmissions, discharge to institutional post-acute care, operating room time (ORT), length of stay (LOS), and total hospital cost between MILR and OLR patients. RESULTS: From the eligible OLR (n = 3349) and MILR (n = 1367) patients, we propensity score matched 1261 from each cohort at a 1:1 ratio. After matching, MILR was associated with lower rates of complications (bleeding: 8.2% vs. 17.4%; respiratory failure: 5.5% vs. 10.9%; intestinal obstruction: 3.6% vs. 6.0%, and pleural effusion: 1.9% vs. 4.9%), in-hospital mortality (0.5% vs. 3.0%), 90-day inpatient readmissions (10.4% vs. 14.3%), discharge to institutional post-acute care (6.9% vs. 12.3%), shorter ORT (257 vs. 308 min) and LOS (4.3 vs. 7.2 days), and lower hospital costs ($19463 vs. $29119) (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MILR was associated with lower risk of complications and reduced hospital resource utilizations as compared with OLR.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Surg Endosc ; 34(2): 628-635, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31286250

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury (BDI) is an uncommon but major complication of cholecystectomy that has a poorly defined magnitude of effect on hospital costs. This study sought to calculate the healthcare costs, length of stay, and discharge status associated with bile duct injury in patients undergoing cholecystectomy in the United States. METHODS: The Premier Healthcare Database, which comprises hospital-billing records from over 700 hospitals in the United States, was queried for all patients undergoing cholecystectomy between January 2010 and March 2018. BDI was defined by ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and operative information were extracted. Hospital costs, length of stay, and discharge status were compared between BDI and non-BDI patients. Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding factors. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the association between BDI and the outcomes variables. RESULTS: A total of 1,168,288 cholecystectomies were identified. BDI occurred in 878 patients (0.08%). Laparoscopy was the most common approach (> 95%). The majority of BDI occurred during inpatient admissions (71.0%). BDI patients had higher index admission hospital costs ($18,771 vs. $12,345, p < 0.0001), increased rate of discharge to an institutional post-acute care facility (odds ratio 3.89, 95% CI 2.92-5.19, p < 0.0001), and increased risk of readmission within 30 days after discharge (odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.52-2.28, p < 0.0001), compared to patients without BDI. Among inpatient cholecystectomies, BDI was associated with increased length of stay (8.6 days vs. 4.8 days, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: BDI is associated with significantly increased hospital costs, length of stay, 30-day readmission, and discharge to an institutional post-acute care facility.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Conductos Biliares/lesiones , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 19(2): 181-188, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27684382

RESUMEN

AIMS: To evaluate the real-world effect of laparoscopic bariatric surgery, comprising adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), on the management of obesity-related comorbidities. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgeries between 2006 and 2013 were identified from the Optum Clinformatics administrative claims database. Those surgical patients were matched to medically managed patients (controls) on selected patient characteristics. Comorbidity management was assessed every 6 months up to 5 years after the surgery or an assigned index date for control subjects (follow-up), by evaluating the number of medication classes used to treat type 2 diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia, as well as by evaluating the percentages of patients free of medications for these comorbidities. RESULTS: Patients who underwent LAGB (n = 4208, mean age 46.3 years), LRYGB (n = 4308, mean age 46.4 years) or LSG (n = 545, mean age 45.1 years) and patients in the control cohort (n = 9061, mean age 46.4 years) were similar in age, and the majority of patients in each study cohort were female (69.4%-75.8%). Compared with control subjects, patients who had laparoscopic bariatric surgery had significantly lower medication usage for obesity-related comorbidities, a trend that was evident at 6 months and that continued for up to 5 years of follow-up. Sub-analyses of changes in selected laboratory test values over follow-up corroborated the primary analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had laparoscopic bariatric surgery used fewer medications for type 2 diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia and had significant improvement in cardiometabolic risk factors for up to 5 years of follow-up compared with matched control subjects.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Dislipidemias/epidemiología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Laparoscopía , Obesidad/cirugía , Adulto , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Gastrectomía , Derivación Gástrica , Humanos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
4.
Microbiol Spectr ; : e0040224, 2024 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38953323

RESUMEN

Delayed time to antimicrobial susceptibility results can impact patients' outcomes. Our study evaluated the impact of susceptibility turnaround time (TAT) and inadequate empiric antibacterial therapy (IET) in patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by Enterobacterales (ENT) species on in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS). This retrospective, multicenter investigation which included 29,570 blood ENT-positive admissions across 161 US healthcare facilities evaluated the association between antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) TAT, carbapenem susceptibility, and empiric therapy on post-BSI in-hospital mortality and LOS following an ENT BSI event in adult patients. After adjusting for outcomes covariates, post-BSI in-hospital mortality was significantly higher for patients in the IET vs adequate empiric therapy (AET) group [odds ratio (OR): 1.61 (95% CI: 1.32, 1.98); P < 0.0001], and when AST TAT was >63 h [OR:1.48 (95% CI: 1.16, 1.90); P = 0.0017]. Patients with carbapenem non-susceptible (carb-NS) ENT BSI had significantly higher LOS (16.6 days, 95% CI: 15.6, 17.8) compared to carbapenem susceptible (carb-S, 12.2 days, 95% CI: 11.8, 12.6), (P < 0.0001). Extended AST TAT was significantly associated with longer LOS for TAT of 57-65 h and >65 h (P = 0.005 and P< 0.0001, respectively) compared to TAT ≤42 h (reference). Inadequate empiric therapy (IET), carb-NS, and delayed AST TAT are significantly associated with adverse hospital outcomes in ENT BSI. Workflows that accelerate AST TAT for ENT BSIs and facilitate timely and adequate therapy may reduce post-BSI in-hospital mortality rate and LOS.IMPORTANCEFor patients diagnosed with bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by Enterobacterales (ENT), delayed time to antimicrobial susceptibility (AST) results can significantly impact in-hospital mortality and hospital length of stay. However, this relationship between time elapsed from blood culture collection to AST results has only been assessed, to date, in a limited number of publications. Our study focuses on this important gap using retrospective data from 29,570 blood ENT-positive admissions across 161 healthcare facilities in the US as we believe that a thorough understanding of the dynamic between AST turnaround time, adequacy of empiric therapy, post-BSI event mortality, and hospital length of stay will help guide effective clinical management and optimize outcomes of patients with ENT infections.

5.
Future Microbiol ; 18: 1133-1136, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37902608

RESUMEN

Tweetable abstract Read the commentary by @Kalvin_Yu_MD and Anuprita Patkar, PhD on the higher risk mortality, LOS and cost of hospital-onset bacteremia (HOB), and the implications of a regulatory HOB quality metric for patient care, clinical workflows and hospital administration #PatientSafety #QualityMetric.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infección Hospitalaria , Humanos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Hospitales , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Pharmacotherapy ; 24(10): 1400-7, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15628836

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the 1-year outcomes of a Veterans Administration smoking-cessation program that demonstrates a standard of care comprising extensive counseling, pharmacotherapy, and office spirometry. DESIGN: Prospective one-group pretest-posttest, with an intervention of state-of-the-art practice in smoking cessation. SETTING: Outpatient clinic in a Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC). PATIENTS: Two hundred fifty-two veterans receiving health care at the VAMC. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome measured was the 1-year cessation rate of smokers. Demographic and clinical covariates also were collected. Of the 252 patients who enrolled in the program, 120 never quit smoking for even 1 day. Of the remaining 132 patients, 32 (24%) achieved long-term (1 yr) cessation. The number of visits to the clinic and the number of methods used during the attempt to quit were the only variables significantly associated with long-term smoking cessation (p<0.0001 for each). CONCLUSION: The availability of a standard-of-practice clinic for smoking cessation within a primary care clinic can help patients who have a desire to quit. A combination of intensive counseling, pharmacotherapy, and office spirometry helped patients in a Veterans Administration population to achieve long-term smoking cessation.


Asunto(s)
Consejo Dirigido , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Tabaquismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hospitales de Veteranos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Respiratorios , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Espirometría , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/psicología , Tabaquismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Tabaquismo/fisiopatología , Tabaquismo/psicología , Veteranos
7.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 18(6): 1176-85, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24671472

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and economic burden associated with anastomotic leaks following colorectal surgery. METHODS: Retrospective data (January 2008 to December 2010) were analyzed from patients who had colorectal surgery with and without postoperative leaks, using the Premier Perspective™ database. Data on in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), re-admissions, postoperative infection, and costs were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses, and the propensity score matching (PSM) and generalized linear models (GLM). RESULTS: Of the patients, 6,174 (6.18 %) had anastomotic leaks within 30 days after colorectal surgery. Patients with leaks had 1.3 times higher 30-day re-admission rates and 0.8-1.9 times higher postoperative infection rates as compared with patients without leaks (P < 0.001 for both). Anastomotic leaks incurred additional LOS and hospital costs of 7.3 days and $24,129, respectively, only within the first hospitalization. Per 1,000 patients undergoing colorectal surgery, the economic burden associated with anastomotic leaks--including hospitalization and re-admission--was established as 9,500 days in prolonged LOS and $28.6 million in additional costs. Similar results were obtained from both the PSM and GLM for assessing total costs for hospitalization and re-admission. CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery increase the total clinical and economic burden by a factor of 0.6-1.9 for a 30-day re-admission, postoperative infection, LOS, and hospital costs.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica/economía , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Fuga Anastomótica/mortalidad , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Infecciones/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones/economía , Infecciones/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 15(3): 266-73, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24801549

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Owing to a lack of current understanding of outcomes and costs by type of hysterectomy procedure, we attempt to quantify the incidence and impact of surgical site infection (SSI) in laparoscopic and non-laparoscopic approaches to abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. METHODS: Patients whose data were contained in the Premier Perspectives Database of 600 hospitals in the United States were selected on the basis of a post-operative diagnosis of SSI and treatment with antibiotics. The incidence of SSI and associated hospital length of stay (LOS) and costs were estimated. The effect of SSI on readmission was also analyzed. RESULTS: Of 210,916 hysterectomies included in the study, 55% were open abdominal procedures. Although the overall incidence of SSI in hysterectomy was low, its incidence was greater in open abdominal hysterectomy than in other approaches to hysterectomy. Patients with an SSI experienced a three- to five-fold greater LOS, two-fold greater cost, and three-fold greater risk of hospital readmission than those without an SSI. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides clinical evidence in support of less invasive approaches to hysterectomy. In addition to other documented benefits of such less invasive procedures, the lower incidence of SSIs and lower rates of associated complications and costs with these procedures than with open abdominal hysterectomy should be taken into account when weighing the risks and benefits of a surgical approach for patients whose condition warrants hysterectomy.


Asunto(s)
Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/patología , Adulto , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 26(1): 239-51, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19929615

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review the safety profile of tramadol hydrochloride (tramadol) in the treatment of chronic osteoarthritis pain, with specific reference to the incidence of adverse events (AEs) reported in large clinical trials. METHODS: An extensive review of published clinical trials with tramadol was conducted, using literature searches in MEDLINE and EMBASE (since 1997) and the key search terms: tramadol, immediate-release (IR), extended-release (ER), sustained-release (SR), chronic pain, and osteoarthritis. Studies were included based on appropriate study design, appropriately reported safety data, and chronic osteoarthritis as a pain condition. Secondary analyses of previously published pain studies were excluded. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The most common AEs reported across all tramadol formulations were nausea, dizziness, constipation, vomiting, somnolence, and headache. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity and occurred more commonly during initial treatment than during maintenance treatment. Differences in the rates of selected gastrointestinal and central nervous system AEs were seen between long-acting and immediate-release tramadol formulations, both within individual studies and across all studies. AEs appeared to be dose-dependent in fixed-dose studies. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides a robust base for descriptive assessment of AEs associated with long-acting tramadol formulations. Although the actions of different tramadol formulations are biologically similar, differences in pharmacokinetics, drug-release patterns, and availability may influence the incidence of AEs associated with tramadol. Because of the limitations of a qualitative safety analysis across studies with different populations and study designs, any observed differences should be interpreted with caution, but these differences may help educate healthcare providers about tramadol treatment in patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain and help them select the optimal dose for specific patients.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Tramadol/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacocinética , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Osteoartritis/complicaciones , Dolor/etiología , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Tramadol/farmacocinética , Tramadol/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA