RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Beginning in July 2016, transgender service members in the US military were allowed to receive gender-affirming medical care, if so desired. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate variation in time-to-hormone therapy initiation in active duty Service members after the receipt of a diagnosis indicative of gender dysphoria in the Military Health System. RESEARCH DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included data from those enrolled in TRICARE Prime between July 2016 and December 2021 and extracted from the Military Health System Data Repository. PARTICIPANTS: A population-based sample of US Service members who had an encounter with a relevant International Classification of Diseases 9/10 diagnosis code. MEASURES: Time-to-gender-affirming hormone initiation after diagnosis receipt. RESULTS: A total of 2439 Service members were included (M age 24 y; 62% white, 16% Black; 12% Latine; 65% Junior Enlisted; 37% Army, 29% Navy, 25% Air Force, 7% Marine Corps; 46% first recorded administrative assigned gender marker female). Overall, 41% and 52% initiated gender-affirming hormone therapy within 1 and 3 years of diagnosis, respectively. In the generalized additive model, time-to-gender-affirming hormone initiation was longer for Service members with a first administrative assigned gender marker of male relative to female ( P <0.001), and Asian and Pacific Islander ( P =0.02) and Black ( P =0.047) relative to white Service members. In time-varying interactions, junior enlisted members had longer time-to-initiation, relative to senior enlisted members and junior officers, until about 2-years postinitial diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The significant variation and documented inequities indicate that institutional data-driven policy modifications are needed to ensure timely access for those desiring care.
Asunto(s)
Disforia de Género , Personal Militar , Personas Transgénero , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Personas Transgénero/estadística & datos numéricos , Disforia de Género/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto Joven , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos de Reasignación de Sexo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite unique experiences that may increase eating disorder risk, U.S. military service members are an understudied population. The current study examined incidence and prevalence of eating disorder diagnoses in U.S. military personnel. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study utilized Military Health System Data Repository (MDR) data on eating disorder diagnoses (2016-2021). Active duty, Reserve, and National Guard U.S. military service members who received care via TRICARE Prime insurance were identified by ICD-10 eating disorder diagnostic codes. RESULTS: During the 6-year surveillance period, 5189 Service members received incident eating disorders diagnoses, with a crude overall incidence rate of 6.2 cases per 10,000 person-years. The most common diagnosis was other/unspecified specified eating disorders, followed by binge-eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, and anorexia nervosa. There was an 18.5% overall rise in total incident cases across the surveillance period, but this trend was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Point prevalence significantly increased across the 6-year timeframe for total eating disorders (p < 0.001). Period prevalence for 6-year surveillance period was 0.244% for total eating disorders, 0.149% for other/unspecified eating disorder, 0.043% for bulimia nervosa, 0.038% for binge-eating disorder, and 0.013% for anorexia nervosa. DISCUSSION: Overall crude incidence estimates for total eating disorders were higher than reported in prior research that included only active duty Service members and required an eating disorder diagnosis code in the first or second diagnostic position of the medical record. Comprehensive and confidential studies are needed to more thoroughly characterize the nature and scope of eating disorder symptomatology within U.S. military personnel. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: U.S. military service members are a vulnerable population with regard to eating disorder symptoms. Previously reported incidence and prevalence estimates using data from the Military Health System may have been underestimated due to overly stringent case definitions. Given personal and occupational barriers (e.g., career consequences), confidential studies of military personnel may provide more complete data on the scope of eating disorders to inform screening and clinical practice guidelines for military populations.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos , Personal Militar , Humanos , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/epidemiología , Incidencia , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The offspring of US military service members may be at increased risk for eating disorders. However, no epidemiological studies to date have evaluated eating disorder incidence rates and prevalence estimates among military-dependent youth. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study examined eating disorder diagnoses in the military healthcare system (MHS) from 2016 through 2021. Active duty and national guard military-dependent youth, aged 10-17 years, who received care in the MHS via TRICARE Prime insurance, were identified by one or more ICD-10 codes indicative of an eating disorder diagnosis (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, and other-specified eating disorders). RESULTS: During the 6-year surveillance period, 2534 dependents received incident diagnoses of eating disorders, with a crude overall incidence rate of 1.75 cases per 10,000 person-years. The most common diagnosis was other-specified eating disorder, followed by anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder. The crude annual incidence rate of all eating disorder diagnoses increased by nearly 65% from 2016 to 2021. Rates for all diagnoses were highest in 2020 and 2021. Period prevalence estimates were .08% for any eating disorder diagnosis, .01% for anorexia nervosa, .004% for bulimia nervosa, .004% for binge-eating disorder, and .06% for other-specified eating disorders. DISCUSSION: The observed increase in eating disorder diagnoses during the surveillance period appeared to be driven by female dependents. More military dependents experienced a new-onset diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to previous years. These findings highlight the need for eating disorder screening, identification, and treatment for dependents within the MHS. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Children of US military service members may be at increased risk for eating disorders. Results indicate new-onset eating disorder cases increased 65% from 2016 to 2021, primarily among girls compared to boys. The most diagnosed and fastest growing diagnosis was other-specified eating disorder. Rates of anorexia nervosa increased following the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings highlight the need for eating disorder screening, identification, and treatment within the military healthcare system.
Asunto(s)
Anorexia Nerviosa , Trastorno por Atracón , Bulimia Nerviosa , COVID-19 , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos , Personal Militar , Masculino , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Incidencia , Prevalencia , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/epidemiología , Anorexia Nerviosa/terapia , Bulimia Nerviosa/diagnóstico , Bulimia Nerviosa/epidemiología , Trastorno por Atracón/diagnósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Anterior cruciate ligament tears and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are common in young athletes. The modifiable and non-modifiable factors contributing to ACLR failure and reoperation are incompletely understood. The purpose of this study was to determine ACLR failure rates in a physically high-demand population and identify the patient-specific risk factors, including prolonged time between diagnosis and surgical correction, that portend failure. METHODS: A consecutive series of military service members with ACLR with and without concomitant procedures (meniscus [M] and/or cartilage [C]) done at military facilities between 2008 and 2011 was completed via the Military Health System Data Repository. This was a consecutive series of patients without a history of knee surgery for two years prior to the primary ACLR. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were estimated and evaluated with Wilcoxon test. Cox proportional hazard models calculated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to identify demographic and surgical factors that influenced ACLR failure. RESULTS: Of the 2735 primary ACLRs included in the study, 484/2,735 (18%) experienced ACLR failure within four years, including (261/2,735) (10%) undergoing revision ACLR and (224/2,735) (8%) due to medical separation. The factors that increased failure include Army Service (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.67, 2.87), > 180 days from injury to ACLR (HR 1.550, 95% CI 1.157, 2.076), tobacco use (HR 1.429 95% CI 1.174, 1.738), and younger patient age (HR 1.024, 95% CI 1.004, 1.044). CONCLUSION: The overall clinical failure rate of service members with ACLR is 17.7% with minimum four-year follow-up, where more patients are likely to fail due to revision surgery than medical separation. The cumulative probability of survival at 4 years was 78.5%. Smoking cessation and treating ACLR patients promptly are modifiable risk factors impacting either graft failure or medical separation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Menisco , Humanos , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/etiología , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Reoperación , Segunda Cirugía , Menisco/cirugíaRESUMEN
Purpose: This study examined the utilization of gender-affirming health care by active-duty service members during the initial 5½ years that transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals were authorized to serve in the U.S. military. The aim of this study was to inform policy discussions regarding inclusion of TGD individuals in the military. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative health care data from the Military Data Repository (MDR). We assessed the association of demographic factors with the utilization of gender-affirming medical and surgical care. We calculated the incidence rate of initial TGD-related encounters and new prescriptions for gender-affirming hormones among Defense Department Service members between July 2016 and December 2021. Results: We identified 2481 service members with an initial health care encounter with an associated TGD-related diagnosis. More than half (53%) of these service members started gender-affirming hormones, and 14% underwent gender-affirming surgery. Mastectomies and hysterectomies accounted for more than 70% of surgeries. Service members made 3.22 initial encounters with a TGD-related diagnosis per 10,000 service members per year, with an overrepresentation of service members who were designated female in the MDR (8.62), junior enlisted (4.98), and young (4.64). Individuals designated female in the MDR comprised 17% of all service members but accounted for 46% of initial encounters, 51% of new prescriptions, and 73% of surgeries. Conclusion: The study revealed a higher-than-expected number of service members seeking gender-affirming care, particularly among service members designated female in the MDR. Military Health System clinicians provided most of this care, which may mitigate the cost of delivering this essential medical care.
RESUMEN
Importance: Use of exogenous sex steroid hormones, when indicated, may improve outcomes in adolescents and young adults with gender incongruence. Little is known about factors associated with the time from diagnosis of gender dysphoria to initiation of gender-affirming hormone therapy. Identification of inequities in time to treatment may have clinical, policy, and research implications. Objective: To evaluate factors associated with time to initiation of gender-affirming hormone therapy after a diagnosis of gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults receiving care within the US Military Health System. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used TRICARE Prime billing and pharmacy data contained in the Military Health System Data Repository. Patients aged 14 to 22 years, excluding service members and their spouses, who received a diagnosis of gender dysphoria between September 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, were included. The data were analyzed between August 30 and October 12, 2023. Exposures: Included patient characteristics were race and ethnicity, age group, first sex assigned in the medical record, and TRICARE Prime sponsor military rank and service at the time of diagnosis. Health care and contextual characteristics included the year of diagnosis and the primary system in which the patient received health care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the time between initial diagnosis of gender dysphoria to the first prescription for gender-affirming hormone medication within a 2-year period. A Poisson generalized additive model was used to evaluate this primary outcome. Adjusted probability estimates were calculated per specified reference categories. Results: Of the 3066 patients included (median [IQR] age, 17 [15-19] years; 2259 with first assigned gender marker of female [74%]), an unadjusted survival model accounting for censoring indicated that 37% (95% CI, 35%-39%) initiated therapy by 2 years. Age-adjusted curves indicated that the proportion initiating therapy by 2 years increased by age category (aged 14-16 years, 25%; aged 17-18 years, 39%; aged 19-22 years, 55%). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 2-year adjusted probabilities indicated that longer times to hormone initiation were experienced by adolescents aged 14 to 16 years (IRR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.30-0.44) and 17 to 18 years (IRR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79) compared with young adults aged 19 to 22 years and Black compared with White adolescents (IRR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99). Senior officer compared with junior enlisted insurance sponsor rank (IRR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.04-3.55) and civilian compared with military health care setting (IRR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43) was associated with shorter time to hormone initiation. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, most adolescents and young adults with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria receiving health care through the US military did not initiate exogenous sex steroid hormone therapy within 2 years of diagnosis. Inequities in time to treatment indicate the need to identify and reduce barriers to care.
Asunto(s)
Disforia de Género , Personal Militar , Humanos , Adolescente , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Disforia de Género/tratamiento farmacológico , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Personas Transgénero/estadística & datos numéricos , Hormonas Esteroides Gonadales/uso terapéutico , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The DoD and VA Infrastructure for Clinical Intelligence (DaVINCI) data-sharing initiative has bridged the gap between DoD and VA data. DaVINCI utilizes the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) to map DoD and VA-specific health care codes to a standardized terminology. Although OMOP CDM provides a standardized longitudinal view of health care concepts, it fails in capturing multiple and changing relationships beneficiaries have with DoD and VA as it has a static (vs. yearly) person characteristic table. Furthermore, DoD and VA utilize different policies and terminology to identify their respective beneficiaries, which makes it difficult to track patients longitudinally. The primary purpose of this report is to provide a methodology for categorizing beneficiaries and creating continuous longitudinal patient records to maximize the use of the joint DoD and VA data in DaVINCI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For calendar year 2000-2020, we combined DoD and VA OMOP CDM and source databases to uniquely categorize beneficiaries into the following hierarchical groups: Active Duty, Guard, and Reserve Service Members (ADSMs); Separatees; Retirees; Veterans; and Deceased. Once the cohorts were identified, we examined calendar year 2020 health care utilization data using the OMOP VISIT_OCCURRENCE, DRUG_EXPOSURE, MEASUREMENT, and PROCEDURE tables. We also used the Defense Enrollment and Eligibility Reporting System source table to derive enrollment periods for DoD beneficiaries. As VA does not have enrollment plans, we utilized the VA's priority groups (1-5) in the SPATIENT source table to crosswalk the DoD's enrollment concept to the VA. We then assessed lengths of continuous enrollments in DoD and VA and the impact of appending the longitudinal records together. RESULTS: The majority of the ADSMs utilized the DoD system, but about 60,557 (3%) were seen in the VA for varied types of care. The market share of care provided to ADSMs by the VA varied by specialty and location. For Retirees, the split between DoD (1,625,874 [75%]) and VA (895,992 [41%]) health care utilization was more significant. The value added for utilizing DaVINCI in longitudinal studies was the highest for researchers normally limited to DoD data only. For beneficiaries who had 5 years of continuous enrollment, DaVINCI increased the potential study population by over 202% compared to using DoD data alone and by over 14% compared to VA data alone. Among beneficiaries with 20 years of continuous enrollment, DaVINCI increased the potential study population by over 133% compared to DoD data and by nearly 39% compared to VA data. CONCLUSIONS: DaVINCI has successfully combined DoD and VA data and utilized OMOP CDM to standardize health care concepts. However, to fully maximize the potential of DaVINCI's DoD and VA OMOP databases, researchers must uniquely categorize the DaVINCI cohort and build longitudinal patient records across DoD and VA. Because of the low other health insurance rates among DoD enrollees and their choice to enroll to a DoD Primary Care Manager, we believe this population to be the least censored in the DoD. Applying a similar concept through VA's priority groups (1-5) would enable researchers to follow ADSMs as they transition from the military.
RESUMEN
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with concomitant cartilage injuries resulting in ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with cartilaginous procedures are common in the young, high-demand population. The purpose of this study was to report and characterize cartilage treatments performed at the time of index ACLR reconstruction and to determine if those treatments are associated with revision surgery (of any kind) in the 4-year follow-up. We performed a consecutive series of active duty service members in the Military Health System Data Repository with ACLR with and without concomitant cartilage procedures done at military facilities between October 2008 and September 2011. Patients were continuously enrolled with no history of knee surgeries for 2 years prior to primary ACLR. ACLR failure was defined as revision ACLR within 4 years following the primary ACLR. Of the 2,735 primary ACLRs included in the study, 5.3% (143/2,735) underwent isolated ACLR with a cartilage procedure. Of these patients, 23.07% (33/143) experienced ACLR failure within 4 years after ACLR with cartilage procedures, including 33.33% (11/33) undergoing revision ACLR. We found concomitant cartilage procedures at time of index ACLR to have the following rates of revision 35.59% (21/59) for microfracture, 14.63% (6/41) for chondroplasty, and 13.95% (6/43) for osteochondral grafts. The overall clinical failure rate of service members with ACLR plus concomitant cartilage procedure is 23.07% with minimum 4-year follow-up. Further research should be done to identify modifiable demographic and surgical factors associated with failure. This is a retrospective case-control study that reflects level of evidence III.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Cartílago , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/cirugía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Reoperación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) has accounted for the most medical encounters every year for the past decade among Active Duty Service Members (ADSMs) of the U.S. Armed Forces. The objectives of this retrospective, descriptive study were to classify LBP by clinical category (Axial, Radicular, and Other) and duration (Acute, Subacute, and Chronic) and examine the LBP-related health care utilization, access to care, and private sector costs for ADSMs over a 2-year follow-up period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Military Health System Data Repository was queried in fiscal year 2017 for all ADSMs (ages 18-62) with outpatient encounters documented with any of 67 ICD-10 diagnosis codes indicative of LBP. A 1-year clean period before the first (index) outpatient LBP encounter date was used to ensure no recent history of LBP care. Patients were eligible if continuously enrolled and on active duty for 1 year before and 2 years following the index visit. Patients were excluded for non-musculoskeletal causes for LBP, red flags, or acute trauma within 4 weeks of the index visit and/or systemic illness or pregnancy anytime during the clean or follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 52,118 ADSMs met the inclusion criteria, and the cohort was classified by duration of LBP symptoms as Acute [17,916 (34.4%)], Subacute [4,119 (7.9%)], and Chronic [30,083 (57.7%)]. Over 2-year follow-up, 419,983 outpatient visits were recorded, with the majority occurring at MTFs [363,570 (86.6%)]. 13,237 (25.4%) of ADSMs in the total cohort were documented with no other LBP-related visits beyond their index encounter. In contrast, the Chronic cohort comprised the highest number of encounters [371,031 (89.2% of total encounters)], including 86% of imaging studies performed for LBP, and accounted for $9,986,606.17 (94.9%) of total private sector costs over the 2-year follow-up period. Interventional pain procedures ($2,983,767.50) and physical therapy ($2,298,779.07) represented the costliest categories in the private sector for the Chronic cohort, whereas Emergency Department ($283,307.43) and physical therapy ($137,035.54) encounters were the top contributors to private sector costs for the Acute and Subacute cohorts, respectively. Overall reliance on the private sector was highest for specialty care, including 10,721 (75.4%) interventional pain procedures and 306 (66.4%) spine surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Uncovering current trends in health care utilization and access to care for ADSMs newly presenting with LBP is vital for timely and accurate diagnosis, as well as early intervention to prevent progression to chronic LBP and to minimize its negative impact on military readiness and quality of life. This retrospective, descriptive study highlights the burden of chronic LBP on health care utilization and costs within the Military Health System, including reliance on the private sector care, amounting to $10,524,332.04 over the study period.
RESUMEN
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has been providing data to organizations participating in a range of innovation models to help them implement interventions and to provide feedback on performance. The authors studied 18 CMS models to gain a better understanding of factors contributing to model participants' use or nonuse of CMS-provided data. Factors that contribute to greater use include providing data that participants view as actionable, some type of accountability for performance, robust learning support, participants having resources to work with the data, and soliciting ongoing feedback about the data and related learning needs. Factors that discourage data uptake include time lag, lack of aggregated multi-payer data, exclusion of data for sensitive diagnoses, and small sample sizes. Claims-based data from payers can be an important source of information to innovation model participants. Lessons from this study can increase the usefulness of such data.