Changes in R-wave amplitude at implantation are associated with gender and orientation of insertable cardiac monitor: observations from the confirm Rx™ body posture and physical activity study.

BACKGROUND: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are small subcutaneously implanted devices that detect changes in R-wave amplitudes (RWAs), effective in arrhythmia-monitoring. Although ICMs have proven to be immensely successful, electrical artefacts are frequent and can lead to misdiagnosis. Thus, there is a growing need to sustain and increase efficacy in detection rates by gaining insight into various patient-specific factors such as body postures and activities. METHODS: RWAs were measured in 15 separate postures, including supine, lying on the right-side (RS) or left-side (LS) and sitting, and two separate ICM orientations, immediately after implantation of Confirm Rx™ ICM in 99 patients. RESULTS: The patients (53 females and 46 males, mean ages 66.62 ± 14.7 and 66.40 ± 12.25 years, respectively) had attenuated RWAs in RS, LS and sitting by ~ 26.4%, ~ 27.8% and ~ 21.2% respectively, compared to supine. Gender-based analysis indicated RWAs in RS (0.32 mV (0.09-1.03 mV), p < 0.0001) and LS (0.37 mV (0.11-1.03 mV), p = 0.004) to be significantly attenuated compared to supine (0.52 mV (0.20-1.03 mV) for female participants. Similar attenuation was not evident for male participants. Further, parasternally oriented ICMs (n = 44), attenuated RWAs in RS (0.37 mV(0.09-1.03 mV), p = 0.05) and LS (0.34 mV (0.11-1.03 mV), p = 0.02) compared to supine (0.48 mV (0.09-1.03 mV). Similar differences were not observed in participants with ICMs in the 45°-relative-to-sternum (n = 46) orientation. When assessing the combined effect of gender and ICM orientation, female participants demonstrated plausible attenuation in RWAs for RS and LS postures compared to supine, an effect not observed in male participants. CONCLUSION: This is the first known study depicting the effects on RWA due to body postures and activities immediately post-implantation with an overt impact by gender and orientation of ICM. Future work assessing the cause of gender-based differences in RWAs may be critical. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials, NCT03803969. Registered 15 January 2019 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT03803969.

Miniaturized implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector (BIOMONITOR III): Insertion procedure assessment, sensing performance, and home monitoring transmission success.

BACKGROUND: Implantable Cardiac Monitors (ICMs) are used for long-term monitoring of arrhythmias. BIOMONITOR III is a novel ICM with a miniaturized profile, long sensing vector due to a flexible antenna, simplified implantation with a dedicated insertion tool for pocket formation and ICM placement in a single step, and daily automatic Home Monitoring (HM) function. METHODS: In 47 patients undergoing BIOMONITOR III insertion for any ICM indication, 16 investigators at 10 Australian sites assessed handling characteristics of the insertion tool, R-wave amplitudes, noise burden, P-wave visibility, and HM transmission success. Patients were followed for 1 month. RESULTS: All 47 attempted insertions were successful. Median time from skin incision to removal of the insertion tool after ICM insertion was 39 s (IQR 19-65) and to wound closure and cleaning was 4.7 min (IQR 3.5-7.8). All aspects of the insertion tool were rated as "good" or "excellent" in ≥97.9% and "fair" in ≤2.1% of patients, except for "force needed for tunnelling" (91.5% good/excellent, 8.5% fair). Based on HM data, R-waves in the first month were stable at 0.70 ± 0.37 mV. Median noise burden (disabling automatic rhythm evaluation) was 0.19% (IQR 0.00-0.93), equivalent to 2.7 min (IQR 0.0-13.4) per day. In HM-transmitted ECG strips with regular sinus rhythm, P-waves were visible in 89 ± 24% of heart cycles. Patient-individual automatic Home Monitoring transmission success was 98.0% ± 5.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The novel ICM performed well in all aspects studied, including fast insertion, reliable R-wave sensing, good P-wave visibility, and highly successful HM transmissions.

R-wave amplitude changes with posture and physical activity over time in an insertable cardiac monitor.

Background: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are accepted tools in cardiac arrhythmia management. Consistent R-wave amplitude (RWA) is essential for optimal detection. Objectives: Assess RWAs with posture/activities at insertion and at 30 days. Methods: Participants (n = 90) with Confirm Rx™ ICM had RWAs measured in different postures (supine, right-side [RS], left-side [LS], sitting, and standing) and defined physical activities (including isometric push [IPUSH] and pull) at 2 time points. ICMs were inserted in 45° to sternum and parasternal orientations. Results: There were significant reductions at insertion with RS, LS, sitting, or standing vs supine (reference position) (all P < .05). At 30 days, significant changes only occurred with LS and sitting (P < .05). Sex had an effect on RWAs, with females having significant variability at insertion (supine vs RS, LS, sitting, standing, and IPUSH; all P < .05). Males showed large RWA interpatient variabilities but minimal differences between positions vs supine. At 30 days, RS, LS, and sitting positions remained significant for females (P < .05), while in males RWAs were higher than at insertion for most postures and activities. The orientation 45° to sternum had consistently higher RWAs vs parasternal orientation at both time points (P < .0001). In females, ICM orientation had no significant effect on RWAs; however, in males the 45° to sternum produced higher RWAs. ICM movement from the insertion site showed no correlation with RWA changes. Conclusion: The mean RWAs were higher at 30 days with less interparticipant and interpostural variability; males had higher RWAs compared to females; 45° to sternum orientation had higher RWAs; and ICM migration from the insertion site did not affect RWAs.

Circular mapping and ablation of the pulmonary vein for treatment of atrial fibrillation: impact of different catheter technologies.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted this study to compare the efficacy and safety of different catheter ablation technologies and of distal versus ostial pulmonary veins (PV) isolation using the circular mapping technique. BACKGROUND: Electrical isolation of the PVs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a technical challenge. METHODS: Two hundred eleven patients (163 men; mean age 53 +/- 11 years) with symptomatic AF were included in this study. In the first 21 patients (group 1), distal isolation (> or = 5 mm from the ostium) was achieved targeting veins triggering AF. In the remaining 190 patients (group 2), ostial isolation of all PVs was performed using 4-mm tip (47 patients), 8-mm tip (21 patients), or cooled-tip (122 patients) ablation catheters. RESULTS: Distal isolation was able to eliminate premature atrial contractions (PACs) and AF in six of 21 patients (29%) and 10 of 34 PVs. After a mean follow-up time of 6 +/- 4 months, no patients treated with the 8-mm tip catheter experienced recurrence of AF, whereas 21% (10 of 47 patients) and 15% (18 of 122 patients) of the patients ablated with the 4-mm tip and the cooled-tip ablation catheters experienced recurrence of AF after a mean follow-up of 10 +/- 3 and 4 +/- 2 months, respectively. Significant complications including stroke, tamponade, and severe stenosis occurred in 3.5% (8/211) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter technologies designed to achieve better lesion size appeared to have a positive impact on procedure time, fluoroscopy time, number of lesions, and overall efficacy. Although distal isolation can be achieved with fewer lesions, ostial isolation is required in the majority of patients to eliminate arrhythmogenic PACs and AF.

Use of different catheter ablation technologies for treatment of typical atrial flutter: acute results and long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: We report the acute success and long-term follow-up in consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of typical right atrial flutter (AFL) using different ablation technologies. METHODS: One hundred and two patients presenting for treatment of AFL to our laboratory were included in the study. Based on availability and physician preference, ablation was performed with either a cooled-tip catheter (39 patients, group I), an 8- or 10-mm tip catheter connected to a high-power radiofrequency (RF) generator (25 patients, group II), or a 4- or 5-mm tip catheter (38 patients, group III). Acute ablation success was achieved in all group II and group III patients. Among the 38 patients undergoing ablation with the conventional catheter tip (group I), crossover to an 8-mm tip or a cooled tip ablation catheter was required in 11 patients (29%). The mean fluoroscopy time was significantly higher in group I (54.3 +/- 26.4 minutes) when compared to group II (39.6 +/- 19.6 minutes; P < 0.05) and group III (40 +/- 16 minutes; P = 0.0.5). After a mean follow up of 20 +/- 5 months no patient in group II experienced recurrence of AFL, whereas 18.4% (7 of 38 patients; P < 0.05) in group I and 10% (4 of 39 patients; P < 0.05) in group III had recurrence of AFL. Ablation technologies designed to obtain larger size lesions appeared to be more effective in achieving acute ablation success of AFL and in limiting the long-term recurrence rate of this arrhythmia.

Nonexcitatory stimulus delivery improves left ventricular function in hearts with left bundle branch block.

INTRODUCTION: Preliminary data in a heart failure animal model and isolated muscle preparation have suggested that nonexcitatory stimulation (NES) improves left ventricular (LV) function. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared biventricular (BV) pacing with NES in an animal model with left bundle branch block (LBBB). The left bundle branch (LBB) was ablated in eight normal heart pigs and led to >50% increase in QRS duration (mean 100 +/- 15 msec). End-diastolic LV pressure, end-systolic LV pressure, LV pressure (LV dP/dtmax), aortic pulse pressure, and LV ejection fraction were measured before pre-LBB ablation and compared with post-LBB ablation (AAI pacing), BV pacing, NES delivery, and BV+NES. Moreover, to evaluate LV diastolic function, we measured the early (E wave) and late flows (A wave) through the mitral valve using spectral Doppler. Compared with post-LBB ablation, NES led to a significant increase in LV dP/dtmax (1,047 +/- 224 mmHg/sec vs 897 +/- 116 mmHg/sec; P < 0.05), LV ejection fraction (64% +/- 18% vs 49% +/- 17%; P < 0.05), and aortic pulse pressure (18 +/- 3.6 mmHg vs 16 +/- 2.8 mmHg; P < 0.05). Moreover, improvement in LV hemodynamic parameters was significantly higher during NES delivery when compared with BV pacing. No significant changes in E wave, A wave, and E/A were recorded during NES, NES+BV, and BV pacing. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data demonstrate that NES is superior to BV pacing in improving LV function in an animal model with LBBB. Moreover, we demonstrated that NES does not affect transmitral valve flow and subsequently LV diastolic function.

Matching approved "nondedicated" hardware to obtain biventricular pacing and defibrillation: feasibility and troubleshooting.

Biventricular ICDs may offer increased benefit for patients with severe congestive heart failure and ventricular arrhythmia. Currently there are no approved dedicated biventricular ICDs available. Twenty-one consecutive patients who had approved nondedicated hardware implanted for biventricular pacing and defibrillation were included in this study. All device therapies were evaluated using stored electrograms. During mean follow-up at 13 +/- 7 months, 8 (36%) patients had inappropriate shocks. Ventricular fibrillation therapy was delivered for slow ventricular tachycardia because of double counting in two patients. In one patient, AV nodal reentrant tachycardia below detection rate cut off triggered device therapy because of ventricular double counting. Sinus tachycardia or premature atrial contraction initiating AV conduction and ventricular double counting resulted in shocks in five patients. The number of shocks per patient ranged from 1 to 64. Two patients required transient disconnection of the LV lead and subsequent ICD generator replacement for premature battery depletion. Two patients required AV junction ablation and three needed slow pathway ablation. Two patients were treated by upgrading to a device that was capable of a higher atrial tracking rate. The patients with impaired AV conduction or constant ventricular pacing did not have inappropriate therapy for sinus tachycardia or supraventricular arrhythmia. Use of conventional nondedicated hardware for biventricular pacer/defibrillator is feasible but should be considered only in patients with poor AV node function or less likely to require antitachycardic therapy, to avoid ICD double counting of ventricular sensed events and consequent high incidence of inappropriate therapies.