Spacers for life: high mortality rate associated with definitive treatment of shoulder periprosthetic infection with permanent antibiotic spacer.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection following shoulder arthroplasty represents a challenging problem for orthopedic surgeons. Although recent studies have supported 2-stage exchanges, this treatment choice may not be appropriate for all patients. Definitive antibiotic spacer placement represents one treatment strategy with limited reported outcomes in the literature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mortality rate and functional outcomes associated with definitive spacer placement. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 17 patients who were treated with definitive antibiotic spacer placement (18 spacers) and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years after surgery. The mortality rate over the study period was determined. Demographic information, clinical course, patient-reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and Veterans RAND 12 [VR-12] score), infection parameters as defined by International Consensus Meeting criteria, radiographic evaluation findings, and rotator cuff integrity at the time of spacer placement were collected. RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent treatment with retained antibiotic spacers at a mean age of 62.4 years (range, 50-73 years). Ten patients were women, and the mean body mass index was 30.5 (range, 22.9-39.9). Spacer placement occurred at a mean of 6.1 years (range, 0.48-14.9 years) following index arthroplasty. Five patients required spacer exchange. The most common organisms were Cutibacterium acnes (6) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (6); in addition, methicillin-resistant S aureus (2), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (2), Serratia marcescens (1), gram-positive cocci (1), Enterobacter faecalis (1), Enterobacter cloacae (1), diphtheroids (1), and an infection with negative culture findings (1) were observed. The mortality rate was 52.9% (9 of 17 patients). Among the 8 surviving patients, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 33.9 (range, 13.3-80.0), the mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score was 35.6 (range, 0.0-80.0), the mean VR-12 mental score was 57.2 (range, 36.6-66.9), and the mean VR-12 physical score was 37.1 (range, 21.7-64.0) at a mean of 4.7 years (range, 2.0-8.8 years). CONCLUSION: Definitive antibiotic spacer placement is an acceptable method to treat infection in medically frail patients who have a high mortality risk. Spacer exchange may be necessary because of persistent infection, and functional results are poor.

A Novel Adjunct Indicator of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Platelet Count and Mean Platelet Volume.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is difficult and often requires a combination of objective findings. The purpose of this study is to determine whether platelets, a known acute phase reactant, would be able to further aid in the diagnosis of PJI. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review study was performed on all revision total hip and knee arthroplasties done between 2000 and 2016 (n = 4939). PJI was defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria (n = 949). Platelet count and mean platelet volume were assessed from each patient's preoperative complete blood count. These values were then assessed as a ratio via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio for PJI patients was 33.45 compared to 25.68 for patients in the aseptic revision cohort (P < .001). ROC curve analysis demonstrates that a ratio of 31.70 has a sensitivity of 48.10 (95% confidence interval 44.9-51.4) and a specificity of 80.85 (95% confidence interval 79.6-82.1). This specificity was higher than that of both estimated sedimentation ratio (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for the same cohorts using optimal values determined via ROC curve analysis. When used in conjunction with ESR and CRP, there was a statistically significant increase in the diagnostic performance of the model used to assess PJI relative to the model that just employed ESR and CRP (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that platelets and their associated serum biomarkers are associated with PJI and warrant consideration in patients who are being evaluated for potential PJI.

Predictors of Perioperative Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Associated With the Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is an association between intraoperative and postoperative femoral fractures and the direct anterior approach (DAA) to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study is to identify risk factors for Vancouver B fractures and to establish a predictable timeline for when these occur. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with Vancouver B periprosthetic femoral fractures (n = 49) after 11,509 elective primary cementless THA procedures through the DAA between 2012 and 2018 at a single institution. Fracture patients were matched to nonfracture patients (n = 267) by date of surgery and surgeon. Clinical and radiographic factors were collected for multivariable analysis to identify predictors of fracture. RESULTS: Periprosthetic Vancouver B femoral fracture incidence was 0.4%. 48 (98%) fractures were postoperative. Fractures occurred at an average of 44 days after surgery (range: 1 to 653 days) with >85% of fractures occurring in the first 6 weeks postoperatively. Significant variables predictive of fracture included >3 degrees valgus and >5 degrees varus coronal stem malalignment, Dorr B and C femoral geometry, lower canal flare index (2.75 vs 3.20), advanced age, increased comorbidities, greater stem canal fill, and right-sided procedures. CONCLUSION: Despite an overall low rate of Vancouver B perioperative periprosthetic femoral fractures, it is a devastating complication that typically presents within the first 6 weeks after DAA THA surgery. The risk is increased in patients with unfavorable proximal femoral geometry, coronal stem malalignment, advanced age, increased comorbidities, and right-sided procedures.

General vs Spinal Anesthesia for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Single-Institution Observational Review.

BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) can be successfully carried out under general (GA) or spinal anesthesia (SA). The existing literature does not adequately illustrate which technique is optimal. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the effects of anesthesia technique on TJA outcomes. METHODS: This 2-year, prospective, observational study was conducted at a single institution where patients receiving primary TJA were consecutively enrolled. Patients were contacted postoperatively to assess for any 90-day complications. The primary outcome of the study was the overall complication rate. RESULTS: A total of 2242 patients underwent total hip arthroplasty (n = 656; 29.26%) or total knee arthroplasty (n = 1586; 70.74%) between 2015 and 2017. Of these procedures, 1325 (59.10%) were carried out under SA and 917 (40.90%) were carried out under GA. Patients in the GA cohort had higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (0.05 SA vs 0.09 GA; P < .05) and higher average body mass index (29.35 SA vs 30.24 GA; P < .05). On multivariate analysis, patients in the SA cohort had a significantly lower overall complication rate relative to their GA counterparts (7.02% vs 10.14%; odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.90; P < .05). In addition, length of stay in the GA cohort was significantly longer (2.43 [SD, 1.62] vs 2.18 [SD, 0.88] days; P < .01) and a larger percentage of GA patients were discharged to a nursing facility (32.28% vs 25.06%; odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.70; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that SA for TJA is associated with a decrease in overall complications and healthcare resource utilization.

Operating Room Traffic Increases Aerosolized Particles and Compromises the Air Quality: A Simulated Study.

BACKGROUND: Strategies to prevent bacterial fallout and reduce particle count in the operating room (OR) are key components of preventing periprosthetic joint infection. Although OR traffic control is an important factor, a quantitative study has not been performed to investigate the influence of personnel and door opening on OR air quality. This simulated study aimed to examine the influence of these 2 factors on particle density in OR with and without the laminar air flow (LAF). METHODS: Both experiments took place within an empty OR of an arthroplasty unit equipped with an LAF system. First, the number of particles in the air was counted using a particle counting apparatus while 9 persons entered the room, one every 15 minutes. Second, the door was opened and closed starting with zero door openings per minute and increasing to 4 in 15-minute increments. Both experiments were performed once with the LAF turned on and once without. RESULTS: The number of personnel in the OR and the number of door openings per minute correlate with the density of particles. Both relationships were significantly reduced by turning the LAF on (correlation coefficients <0.4). With the LAF being turned on, the particle density per person decreased from 211.19 to 18.19 particles/ft3 (P < .001) and the particle density per rate of door openings declined from 117.80 to 1.90 particles/ft3 (P = .017). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that personnel and door opening are a major source of particles in the OR air. Controlling traffic is critical for reduction of particles and is likely to be a key preventative strategy in reducing periprosthetic joint infection. LAF is protective against the negative influence of number of people and door openings.

Does Medicaid Insurance Confer Adequate Access to Adult Orthopaedic Care in the Era of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act?

BACKGROUND: A current appraisal of access to orthopaedic care for the adult patient receiving Medicaid is important, since Medicaid expansion was written into law by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do orthopaedic practices provide varying access to orthopaedic care for simulated patients with Medicaid insurance versus private insurance in a blinded survey? (2) What are the surveyed state-by-state Medicaid acceptance rates for adult orthopaedic practices in the current era of Medicaid expansion set forth by the PPACA? (3) Do surveyed rates of access to orthopaedic care in the adult patient population vary across practice setting (private vs academic) or vary with different Medicaid physician reimbursement rates? (4) Are there differences in the surveyed Medicaid acceptance rates for adult orthopaedic practices in states that have expanded Medicaid coverage versus states that have foregone expansion? METHODS: Simulated Patient Survey: We performed a telephone survey study of orthopaedic offices in four states with Medicaid expansion. In the survey, the caller assumed a fictitious identity as a 38-year-old male who experienced an ankle fracture 1 day before calling, and attempted to secure an appointment within 2 weeks. During initial contact, the fictitious patient reported Medicaid insurance status. One month later, the fictitious patient contacted the same orthopaedic practice and reported private insurance coverage status. National Orthopaedic Survey: Private and academic orthopaedic practices operating in each state in the United States were called and asked to complete a survey assessing their practice model of Medicaid insurance acceptance. State reimbursement rates for three different Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes were collected from state Medicaid agencies. Results Simulated Patient Survey: Offices were less likely to accept Medicaid than commercial insurance (30 of 64 [47%] versus 62 of 64 [97%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.0145; 95% CI, 0.00088-0.23639; p < 0.001), and patients with Medicaid were less likely to be offered an appointment within 2 weeks (23 of 64 [36%] versus 59 of 64 [89%]; OR, 0.0154; 95% CI, 0.00094- 0.251; p < 0.001). The Medicaid acceptance rates observed across states sampled in the simulated patient survey were 67% (Pennsylvania), 21% (New Jersey), 58% (Delaware), and 50% (Maryland) (p = 0.04). National Orthopaedic Survey: Adult patients with Medicaid insurance had limited access to care in 109 of 342 (32%) orthopaedic practices: 37% of private and 13% of academic practices (p < 0.001). Practices that accepted Medicaid received higher reimbursement for each CPT® code relative to those that did not and acceptance of Medicaid became increasingly more likely as reimbursement rates increased (99243: OR, 1.03, 95% CI, 1.02-1.04 per dollar, p < 0.001; 99213: OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07 per dollar, p < 0.001; 28876: OR, 1.01, 95% CI, 1.00-1.01 per dollar, p < 0.001). For a given reimbursement rate, private practices were less likely to take an adult patient with Medicaid relative to an academic practice (99243: OR, 0.11, 95% CI, 0.04-0.33, p < 0.001; 99213: OR, 0.11, 95% CI, 0.04-0.32, p < 0.001; 27786: OR, 0.12, 95% CI, 0.04-0.35, p < 0.001). No difference was observed when comparing Medicaid acceptance rates for all practice types between states that have expanded their Medicaid program versus those that have not (OR, 1.02; 95% CI 0.62-1.70; p = 0.934). CONCLUSIONS: In this two-part survey study, we found that a simulated patient with commercial insurance was more likely to have their insurance accepted and to gain timely access to orthopaedic care than a patient with Medicaid. Academic practice setting and increased Medicaid reimbursement rates were associated with increased access to care for the patient with Medicaid. Inequality in access to orthopaedic care based on health insurance status likely exists for the adult patient with Medicaid. Furthermore, Medicaid expansion has likely realized minimal gains in access to care for the adult orthopaedic patient. Further research is needed in delineating the patient-payer selection criteria used by orthopaedic practices to aid policymakers in reforming the Medicaid program and comprehensibly addressing this access to care disparity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Does Operative Level Impact Dysphagia Severity After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?: A Multicenter Prospective Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between operative level and postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is common after ACDF and has several risk factors, including soft tissue edema. The degree of prevertebral soft tissue edema varies based on the operative cervical level. However, the operative level has not been evaluated as a source of postoperative dysphagia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients undergoing elective ACDF were prospectively enrolled at 3 academic centers. Dysphagia was assessed using the Bazaz Questionnaire, Dysphagia Short Questionnaire, and Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) preoperatively and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Patients were grouped based on the inclusion of specific surgical levels in the fusion construct. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the independent effects of the number of surgical levels and the inclusion of each particular level on dysphagia symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were included. Overall, 24 (18.5%) patients had persistent postoperative dysphagia at 24 weeks and these patients were older, female, and less likely to drink alcohol. There was no difference in operative duration or dexamethasone administration. Patients with persistent dysphagia were significantly more likely to have C4-C5 included in the fusion construct (62.5% vs . 34.9%, P = 0.024) but there were no differences based on the inclusion of other levels. On multivariable regression, the inclusion of C3-C4 or C6-C7 was associated with more severe EAT-10 (ß: 9.56, P = 0.016 and ß: 8.15, P = 0.040) and Dysphagia Short Questionnaire (ß: 4.44, P = 0.023 and (ß: 4.27, P = 0.030) at 6 weeks. At 12 weeks, C3-C4 fusion was also independently associated with more severe dysphagia (EAT-10 ß: 4.74, P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: The location of prevertebral soft tissue swelling may impact the duration and severity of patient-reported dysphagia outcomes at up to 24 weeks postoperatively. In particular, the inclusion of C3-C4 and C4-C5 into the fusion may be associated with dysphagia severity.

Interobserver Reliability in the Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures Using the AO Spine TL Injury Classification System Among 22 Clinical Experts in Spine Trauma Care.

STUDY DESIGN: Reliability study utilizing 183 injury CT scans by 22 spine trauma experts with assessment of radiographic features, classification of injuries and treatment recommendations. OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of the AOSpine TL Injury Classification System (TLICS) including the categories within the classification and the M1 modifier. METHODS: Kappa and Intraclass correlation coefficients were produced. Associations of various imaging characteristics (comminution, PLC status) and treatment recommendations were analyzed through regression analysis. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used for making predictive algorithms. RESULTS: Reliability of the AO Spine TLICS at differentiating A3 and A4 injuries (N = 71) (K = .466; 95% CI .458 - .474; P < .001) demonstrated moderate agreement. Similarly, the average intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) amongst A3 and A4 injuries was excellent (ICC = .934; 95% CI .919 - .947; P < .001) and the ICC between individual measures was moderate (ICC = .403; 95% CI .351 - .461; P < .001). The overall agreement on the utilization of the M1 modifier amongst A3 and A4 injuries was fair (K = .161; 95% CI .151 - .171; P < .001). The ICC for PLC status in A3 and A4 injuries averaged across all measures was excellent (ICC = .936; 95% CI .922 - .949; P < .001). The M1 modifier suggests respondents are nearly 40% more confident that the PLC is injured amongst all injuries. The M1 modifier was employed at a higher frequency as injuries were classified higher in the classification system. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of surgeons differentiating between A3 and A4 injuries in the AOSpine TLICS is substantial and the utilization of the M1 modifier occurs more frequently with higher grades in the system.

Does decompression adjacent to arthrodesis in the lumbar spine predispose patients to adjacent segment degeneration and disease: A retrospective analysis.

Background: The treatment for multi-level spinal stenosis in the setting of single-level instability is a common operative scenario for surgeons who treat degenerative lumbar spine pathology. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the inclusion of adjacent "stable" levels in the arthrodesis construct because of the potential for iatrogenic instability placed on those segments with decompressive laminectomy alone. This study aims to determine whether decompression adjacent to arthrodesis in the lumbar spine is a risk factor for adjacent segment disease (AS Disease). Methods: A retrospective analysis identified consecutive patients over a three-year period who underwent single-level posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) in the setting of single or multi-level spinal stenosis. Patients were required to have a minimum of two-year follow-up. AS Disease was defined as the development of new radicular symptoms referable to a motion segment adjacent to the lumbar arthrodesis construct. The incidence of AS Disease and reoperation rates were compared between cohorts. Results: 133 patients met the inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 54 months. Fifty-four patients had a PLF with adjacent segment decompression, and 79 underwent a single-segment decompression and PLF. 24.1% (13/54) of patients who had a PLF with adjacent level decompression developed AS Disease resulting in a 5.5% (3/54) reoperation rate. 15.2% (12/79) of patients who did not receive an adjacent level decompression developed AS Disease resulting in a reoperation rate of 7.5% (6/79). There was neither a significantly higher rate of AS Disease (p = 0.26) nor reoperation (p = 0.74) between the cohorts. Conclusions: Decompression adjacent to single-level PLF was not associated with an increased rate of AS Disease relative to single-level decompression and PLF.

Evaluating Dysphagia Duration and Severity After ACDF in Patients With Underlying Dysphagia - A Prospective, Multicenter Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of preoperative dysphagia on the postoperative incidence and severity of dysphagia in patients undergoing ACDF at multiple institutions. METHODS: After IRB approval, patients over 18 years of age who underwent an elective ACDF for degenerative conditions were prospectively enrolled at two academic centers from 2018 to 2021. Preoperative dysphagia was self-reported by patients through a pre-operative questionnaire on a binary basis. Patients completed dysphagia surveys (Bazaz, Dysphagia Short Questionnaire, 10-item Eating Assessment Tool) to assess dysphagia severity during their preoperative visit, and these dysphagia surveys were repeated immediately postoperatively, at two weeks and again at six, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Patients were stratified into three subgroups based on dysphagia status preoperatively and immediately postoperatively and compared using ANOVA tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square analysis or Fisher's Exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients (23 with preoperative dysphagia, 145 without preoperative dysphagia) met study criteria and were enrolled in the study. Patients with preoperative dysphagia had less frequent alcohol consumption (23.8% vs 53.7%, P = .0210), and higher rates of dysphagia at 2-weeks (77.8% vs 38.7%, P = .004) and 24-weeks (43.8% vs 14.8%, P = .010) postoperatively. These patients also had higher severity scores for dysphagia on the Bazaz (P = .001), DSQ (P = .012), EAT10 (P = .022) questionnaires at the 2-week follow-up period, higher DSQ scores (P = .036) at the 6-week follow-up period, higher EAT-10 scores (P = .009) at the 12-week follow-up period, and higher Bazaz (P = .001), DSQ (P = .002), and EAT-10 (P = .005) scores at the 24-week follow-up period. There were no differences in demographic, medical history, surgical variables, rates of ENT consultation, length of stay, or other in-hospital events between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing ACDF who had preoperative dysphagia have prolonged postoperative dysphagia and greater dysphagia severity. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of prolonged dysphagia severity that may persist past 24 weeks after surgery when discussing clinical decisions with patients.

Evaluating the Effect of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on Postoperative Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery-A Prospective, Multicenter Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of a preoperative diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease on the incidence and severity of postoperative dysphagia in a multicenter population. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, written informed consent was obtained from all participating patients. Patients over 18 years of age who underwent an elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for a degenerative condition were prospectively enrolled at two academic centers from the years 2018 to 2020. Patients were separated into two groups: those with and without a preoperative diagnosis of GERD. Continuous variables were assessed using either an independent t-test or Mann Whitney U-test for parametric and non-parametric data. All categorical variables were compared using a chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients met study criteria and were subsequently enrolled. Overall rates of postoperative dysphagia increased to 47.3% (n = 53) at 2-weeks but eventually decreased towards the preoperative prevalence of 25.0% at the 24-week mark. Patients with preoperative diagnosis of GERD had lower dysphagia severity scores on a continuous variable analysis in both the DSQ and EAT-10 surveys at 2-week follow-up in addition to the Bazaz survey at 24-week follow-up. Our follow up at 24-weeks was 85.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that having a preoperative diagnosis of GERD has no significant effect on the incidence of dysphagia following ACDF. Nevertheless, having a preoperative diagnosis of GERD does seem to provide some protective effect on the severity of dysphagia that this patient population develops at multiple intervals over a 24-week postoperative period.

Short-Segment versus Long-Segment Spinal Fusion Constructs for the Treatment of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis undergoing short-segment versus long-segment spinal fusion. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients with degenerative thoracolumbar scoliosis undergoing elective spinal fusion at a single academic medical center. Cohorts were divided into short-segment (<3) or long-segment (≥3) groups. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients (122 short, 75 long) were included. Patients undergoing short-segment fusion more frequently presented with radiculopathy (P < 0.001) and had greater baseline visual analog scale (VAS) leg scores (P < 0.001). Patients with long-segment fusions had longer hospital length of stay (short, 3.82 ± 2.98 vs. long, 7.40 ± 6.85 days; P < 0.001), lower home discharge rates (short, 80.3% vs. long, 51.8; P = 0.003), higher revision surgery rates (short, 10.77% vs. long, 25.3%; P = 0.012), and greater percentage curve correction (short, 37.3% ± 25.9% vs. long, 45.1% ± 23.9%; P = 0.048). No significant differences were noted in postoperative complication rates (short, 1.64% vs. long, 5.33%; P = 0.143). At 1 year, patients with long fusions had worse ΔOswestry Disability Index (ODI) (P = 0.024), ΔVAS leg score (P = 0.002), and VAS leg minimum clinically important difference % (P = 0.003). Multivariate regression found that short-segment fusions were associated with greater improvements in ODI (P = 0.029), Physical Component Summary-12 (P = 0.024), and VAS leg score at 1 year (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing short-segment fusions more frequently presented with radiculopathy and had higher preoperative VAS leg scores compared with those receiving long constructs. Short-construct fusions in appropriately selected patients may provide satisfactory improvements in patient-reported outcome measures, particularly ΔODI and ΔVAS leg score, and mitigate hospital length of stay, revision surgery rates, and nonhome discharge.

Management of C0 Sacral Fractures Based on the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification: A Narrative Review.

The Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthese fragen Spine Sacral Injury Classification hierarchically separates fractures based on their injury severity with A-type fractures representing less severe injuries and C-type fractures representing the most severe fracture types. C0 fractures represent moderately severe injuries and have historically been referred to as nondisplaced "U-type" fractures. Injury management of these fractures can be controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative review is to first discuss the Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthese fragen Spine Sacral Injury Classification System and describe the different fracture types and classification modifiers, with particular emphasis on C0 fracture types. The narrative review will then focus on the epidemiology and etiology of C0 fractures with subsequent discussion focused on the clinical presentation for patients with these injuries. Next, we will describe the imaging findings associated with these injuries and discuss the injury management of these injuries with particular emphasis on operative management. Finally, we will outline the outcomes and complications that can be expected during the treatment of these injuries.

Facet Distraction and Dysphagia: A Prospective Evaluation of This Common Postoperative Issue Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Our primary study was to investigate whether the degree of postoperative facet and disk space distraction following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) affects the rate of postoperative dysphagia. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although ACDF is safe and well tolerated, postoperative dysphagia remains a common complication. Intervertebral disk space distraction is necessary in ACDF to visualize the operative field, prepare the endplates for fusion, and facilitate graft insertion. However, the degree of distraction tolerated, before onset of dysphagia, is not well characterized ACDF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted of 70 patients who underwent ACDF between June 2018 and January 2019. Two independent reviewers measured all preoperative and postoperative radiographs measured for interfacet distraction distance and intervertebral distraction distance, with intrareviewer reproducibility measurements after one month. For multilevel surgery, the level with the greatest distraction was measured. Primary outcomes were numerical dysphagia (0-10), Eating Assessment Tool 10, and Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire score collected at initial visit and two, six, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were prospectively enrolled, 59 of whom had adequate radiographs. An average of 1.71 (SD: 0.70) levels were included in the ACDF construct. Preoperatively, 13.4% of patients reported symptoms of dysphagia, which subsequently increased in the postoperative period at through 12 weeks postoperatively, before returning to baseline at 24 weeks. Intrareviewer and interreviewer reliability analysis demonstrated strong agreement. There was no relationship between interfacet distraction distance/intervertebral distraction distance and dysphagia prevalence, numerical rating, Eating Assessment Tool 10, or Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had an ACDF have an increased risk of dysphagia in the short term, however, this resolved without intervention by six months. Our data suggests increased facet and intervertebral disk distraction does not influence postoperative dysphagia rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

A cortical screw based tension band construct for transverse patella fractures: An evolving strategy for addressing common modes of failure.

INTRODUCTION: Displaced patella fractures represent a clinical challenge. We evaluate the effectiveness of an alternative fixation construct to address common modes of fixation failure. METHODS: A retrospective review of 49 patients who underwent fixation via the specific construct at a single institution between 2013 and 2019. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 52.7 weeks (Mean: 75.4 weeks; SD: 54.9; range: 27-267.7 weeks). Construct failure rate was 6.1% (3/49). This included two mechanical hardware failures, one the result of trauma and the other due to noncompliance. CONCLUSIONS: The modified construct represents a safe and effective means of treating transverse patella fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Lateral femoral distraction is a safe and necessary adjunct for articulator visualization during the operative treatment of tibial plateau fractures.

Introduction: Recent evidence suggests use of lateral femoral distractor (LFD) to aid in visualization during surgery for tibial plateau fractures (TPF) may result in an unacceptably high rate of iatrogenic peroneal nerve palsy. We sought to evaluate femoral distractor use for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of TPF and quantify the incidence of peroneal nerve palsy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all patients undergoing ORIF of TPF between 2014 and 2019 by a single fellowship trained orthopaedic traumatologist at a single Level 1 trauma center. Inclusion criteria were use of a LFD during ORIF of TPF. Exclusion criteria were preoperative neurovascular injury in the operative extremity and distraction via pre-existing external fixator. Parameters included patient demographic variables, intraoperative techniques, postoperative outcomes, and fracture classification. Documented clinical exam was used to evaluate peroneal nerve status and injuries were classified as complete or incomplete. Incomplete injuries were classified as sensory or motor. Results: Of 303 patients undergoing ORIF for a TPF, femoral distraction was used in 254 (83.8%) cases, with 201 utilizing applied intraoperative femoral distraction and 53 utilizing pre-existing knee-spanning external fixation for distraction. Three patients were excluded for preoperative sensory peroneal nerve palsy with 175 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The most common fracture type was lateral split depression (n = 130). Zero patients developed complete or incomplete peroneal nerve palsy. Discussion: Our study found no incidence of peroneal nerve palsy when using lateral femoral distraction. This study supports the utilization of lateral distraction for articular visualization and reduction during ORIF of TPF.

Dysphagia and Satisfaction Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Prospective Observation Trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of dysphagia on patient satisfaction following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. BACKGROUND: Difficulty with swallowing is a common complaint following anterior cervical spine surgery. The exact impact of this issue on the patient's overall satisfaction is unknown because of its often-transient nature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective evaluation of all patients from a single surgeon undergoing an anterior cervical spine surgery. Dysphagia was evaluated both preoperatively and postoperatively at set intervals via a combination of 3 validated scoring systems. Mean satisfaction scores at 6 months was evaluated at 6 months via modified CSRS survey. Comparative analysis was performed to determine if there was any relationship between the 2 outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 96.77% (68/71) of enrolled patients completed all of their follow-up surveys. The prevalence of dysphagia was 32.4% at 2 weeks after surgery, 20.6% at 6 weeks, 13.2% at 3 months, and 13.2% at 6 months. In total, 82.35% (56/68) of patients were satisfied with their surgical outcome and only 5.88% (4/68) were dissatisfied with their outcome. There was no relationship between a patient's overall satisfaction level and the presence of dysphagia at any postoperative interval. The absence of neck pain at 6 months was the only significant predictor of patient satisfaction (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Dysphagia is a common but often transient complaint following anterior cervical spine surgery. Fortunately, its presence does not seem to correlate with a patient's overall satisfaction level following surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Periprosthetic joint infections of the shoulder: A 10-year retrospective analysis outlining the heterogeneity among these patients.

Background: Diagnosis and treatment of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection is a difficult problem. The purpose of this study was to utilize the 2018 International Consensus Meeting definition of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection to categorize revision shoulder arthroplasty cases and determine variations in clinical presentation by presumed infection classification. Methods: Retrospective review of patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty at a single institution. Likelihood of periprosthetic joint infection was determined based on International Consensus Meeting scoring. All patients classified as definitive or probable periprosthetic joint infection were classified as periprosthetic joint infection. All patients classified as possible or unlikely periprosthetic joint infection were classified as aseptic. The periprosthetic joint infection cohort was subsequently divided into culture-negative, non-virulent microorganism, and virulent microorganism cohorts based on culture results. Results: Four hundred and sixty cases of revision shoulder arthroplasty were reviewed. Eighty (17.4%) patients were diagnosed as definite or probable periprosthetic joint infection, of which 29 (36.3%), 39 (48.8%), and 12 (15.0%) were classified as virulent, non-virulent, or culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection, respectively. There were significant differences among periprosthetic joint infection subgroups with regard to preoperative C-reactive protein (p = 0.020), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.051), sinus tract presence (p = 0.008), and intraoperative purulence (p < 0.001). The total International Consensus Meeting criteria scores were also significantly different between the periprosthetic joint infection cohorts (p < 0.001). Discussion: While the diagnosis of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection has improved with the advent of International Consensus Meeting criteria, there remain distinct differences between periprosthetic joint infection classifications that warrant further investigation to determine the accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment.

Predictors of Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter prospective study. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the incidence and predictors of postoperative dysphagia in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Dysphagia is a common complication after ACDF that can have significant effect on patients' quality of life, but the frequency of occurrence and potential risk factors are not known. METHODS: A multicenter prospective study was undertaken at three academic sites to evaluate patients undergoing ACDF between September 2018 and September 2020. Included patients were aged 18 to 80 years and were undergoing primary or revision ACDF for a degenerative condition. Dysphagia was assessed using the validated Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) questionnaire, with dysphagia defined as EAT-10 ≥ 3. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients (53.5% female; mean age at surgery 55.0 yr) were included. At preoperative baseline, 23 patients (13.5%) had dysphagia. Rates of dysphagia increased to 45.3% at 2 weeks postoperatively but gradually decreased to 15.3% at 24weeks. On univariate analysis, patients with dysphagia at 2weeks had longer operations (113.1 ±â€Š58.4 vs. 89.0 ±â€Š39.8 minutes, P   =  0.003) and higher baseline dysphagia rates (18.2% vs. 6.2%, P   =  0.018) and were more likely to be female (66.2% vs. 45.7%, P   =  0.009). Patients with prolonged dysphagia had more levels fused (2.1 ±â€Š1.0 vs. 1.7 ±â€Š0.7, P   =  0.020), longer operations (131.8 ±â€Š63.1 vs. 89.3 ±â€Š44.3 min-minutes, P   <  0.001), and higher baseline dysphagia rates (32% vs. 7.1%, P   <  0.001) and were more likely to be smokers (24% vs. 8%, P   =  0.021). On multivariate analysis to determine associations with prolonged dysphagia, only smoking status (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.57-24.5, P   =  0.009) and baseline dysphagia (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.47-17.6, P   =  0.01) remained significant. CONCLUSION: Dysphagia is common immediately after ACDF, but rates of prolonged dysphagia are similar to preoperative baseline rates. We identified dysphagia rates over time and several patient factors associated with development of short- and long-term postoperative dysphagia.Level of Evidence: 3.