Tumor Regression Grade and Overall Survival following Gastrectomy with Preoperative Therapy for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pre-/perioperative chemotherapy is well-established for management of locoregional gastric cancer (LRGC). The American Joint Committee on Cancer advocates histopathologic assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) but does not endorse a specific schema. We sought to examine the prognostic value of the recently revised National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) definition of TRG specifying TRG0 as no disease in primary tumor or lymph nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical-stage T2+/N+/M0 LRGC receiving preoperative chemotherapy and curative-intent gastrectomy were identified (2000-2020). TRG using the current NCCN definition was retrospectively assigned. Factors associated with TRG were examined using ordinal logistic regression and overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 117 patients, the most common chemotherapy regimen was epirubicin, cisplatin, plus fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/ECX) (n = 48, 41%), followed by folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) (n = 30, 26%), and fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, plus docetaxel (FLOT) (n = 13, 11%). TRG3 was the most common histopathologic response (n = 68, 58%), followed by TRG2 (n = 25, 21%), TRG1 (n = 18, 15%), and, lastly, TRG0 (n = 6, 5.1%). The only preoperative factor independently associated with lower TRG was gastroesophageal junction tumor location (OR 0.24, p = 0.012). Higher TRG was independently associated with worse OS in a stepwise fashion (HR 1.49, p = 0.026). Posttreatment pathologic lymph node status was the strongest prognostic factor (HR 1.93, p = 0.026). Independent prognostic value of TRG and ypT stage could not be shown due to substantial overlap. CONCLUSIONS: TRG using the contemporary NCCN definition is associated with OS in LRGC. TRG0 is uncommon but with excellent prognosis. ypN status is the strongest prognostic factor and the revised NCCN definition acknowledging this is appropriate.

Advances in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Barrett Esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Barrett esophagus (BE) continues to be a major risk factor for developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We review the risk factors, diagnosis, and management of BE, with an emphasis on the most current endoscopic diagnostic modalities for BE. RESULTS: Novel diagnostic modalities have emerged to address the inadequacies of standard, untargeted biopsies, such as dye-based and virtual chromoendoscopy, endoscopic mucosal resection, molecular biomarkers, optical coherence tomography, confocal laser endomicroscopy, volumetric laser endomicroscopy, and endocytoscopy. Treatment of BE depends on the presence of intramucosal cancer or dysplasia, particularly high-grade dysplasia with or without visible mucosal lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Recent advances in endoscopic diagnostic tools demonstrate promising results and help to mitigate the shortcomings of the Seattle protocol. Future research as well as refining these tools may help aid them in replacing standard untargeted biopsies.

Diffuse Intrasinusoidal Hepatic Metastasis from Breast Cancer Presenting as Liver Failure: Effective and Rapid Treatment with Weekly Low-Dose Adriamycin.

BACKGROUND Hepatic metastasis is well known in breast cancer. Approximately 12-20% of breast cancer patients will develop liver metastasis, which usually presents as discrete mass lesions. Rarely, metastatic spread can be so diffuse that it is unidentifiable on imaging but can progress to fulminant hepatic failure. Our case report suggests that clinicians need to have a high index of suspicion when patients present with rapidly decompensating liver failure in the absence of discrete radiologic hepatic lesions, and that weekly Adriamycin should be considered as a first-line therapeutic option. CASE REPORT A 28-year-old African American woman with a history of locally advanced estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-negative, and HER2-negative breast cancer presented with right upper quadrant abdominal pain and bilateral lower extremity swelling. She had been treated 3 years prior with neoadjuvant Adriamycin/cyclophosphamide - Taxol, bilateral mastectomies, radiation therapy, and tamoxifen. Diagnostic imaging revealed massive hepatomegaly and extensive areas of liver ischemia/necrosis without discrete masses or arterial/venous thrombosis. Biopsy of the liver revealed metastatic carcinoma diffusely infiltrating the hepatic sinusoids. Extensive work up for other etiologies of liver disease was negative. The patient's liver function quickly decompensated over several days. She was treated with weekly single-agent low-dose Adriamycin, and this resulted in successful reversal of her liver function tests back to baseline. CONCLUSIONS In addition to having a high index of suspicion for diffuse intrasinusoidal hepatic metastasis, physicians should consider weekly low-dose Adriamycin as a first-line therapeutic option for patients with progressive liver failure and biopsy-confirmed metastatic carcinoma diffusely infiltrating the hepatic sinusoids.

Hepatitis C virus and inflammatory bowel disease.

Gastroenterologists frequently treat patients with complex illnesses such as chronic hepatitis C infections and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Occasionally, a patient will present with these two diseases which behave very differently and the treatment for one may potentially exacerbate the other. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature regarding hepatitis C virus therapy in the setting of IBD as well as the effects of common IBD therapies on the hepatitis C virus. Based on limited data, anti-viral therapy is probably safe in patients with well-controlled IBD, but there might be a risk of causing new onset of IBD. Also, it does not appear that the commonly used medications for IBD have much of an effect on the hepatitis C virus (HCV) or its course.

Role of transplantation in the treatment of benign solid tumors of the liver: a review of the United Network of Organ Sharing data set.

IMPORTANCE: The role of orthotopic liver transplantation for the treatment of benign solid liver tumors (BSLT) is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: To analyze outcomes in the United Network of Organ Sharing data set of patients with a diagnosis of BSLT who underwent transplantation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing data set was performed for all (N = 87,280) patients who underwent transplantation for BSLT in the United States from October 1, 1988, through January 31, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, distribution of the procedures by region and state, and overall survival rates. RESULTS: During the study period, 147 liver transplants (0.17%) were to treat BSLT. Sixty-two patients (42.2%) had adenomas, 29 (19.7%) had focal nodular hyperplasia, 25 (17.0%) had hemangiomas, 11 (7.5%) had hepatic epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas, and 20 (13.6%) were classified as having unknown benign tumors. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 90.9%, 85.2%, and 81.8%, respectively. Using multivariable analysis, we found that age was the only independent factor associated with patient survival. The overall 5-year survival rate for patients older than 50 years was 88% compared with 91% in younger individuals (95% CI, 148-384; P = .005). Region 3 (Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Puerto Rico) contributed the maximum number (33 [22.4%]) of these transplants. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although liver transplantation cannot be considered a first-line treatment, it is a valid therapeutic option in selected patients who are not amenable to resection. Only 0.17% of the transplants in the United States are performed for this indication, with satisfying long-term results. Age was an independent predictor of patient survival. Further studies are needed to better understand the role of liver transplantation in the treatment of BSLT.

Acute pancreatitis secondary to hemobilia after percutaneous liver biopsy.

Percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) is a valuable diagnostic tool. Complication rates vary depending on the technique used, experience of the physician, number of passes, bleeding parameters and other factors. Hemorrhage is a common complication after PLB and can present as intraperitoneal bleeding, intrahepatic or subcapsular hematoma, or rarely as hemobilia. Acute pancreatitis is a rare complication of hemobilia. We describe a single case of acute pancreatitis caused by biliary obstruction due to hemobilia following PLB. The obstruction was successfully managed with biliary stent drainage.

Wireless capsule endoscopy indication as a predictor of study quality.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess whether specific indications are associated with poor visualization during wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) studies . Four hundred consecutive WCE studies performed at our institute were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Data was available on cases involving 176 males and 224 females. About 23 capsules failed to exit the stomach (excluded from the study). Poor visualization was reported in 66 (17%) WCE studies. The most common indications were gastrointestinal (GI) blood loss (271 cases; 72%), abdominal pain and/or diarrhea (73 cases; 19%), and suspected inflammatory bowel disease (46 cases; 12%). Of the 271 patients suffering GI bleeding, visualization was reported to be poor in 53 (19%) patients; among those showing other indications, visualization was poor in 13 (11%) patients (P = 0.02). After controlling for secondary indications and age, GI bleeding was associated with a higher rate of poor visualization compared to all other indications (odds ratio 2.6; 95% confidence interval 1.4-6.8). CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal bleeding as study indication for WCE is associated with a higher rate of poor visualization.

An instrument to predict endoscopy tolerance: a prospective randomized study.

Our purpose in this study was to determine if the use of an instrument developed by our group to direct sedation choice improves patient satisfaction with endoscopy sedation compared to standard sedation practice. After 200 enrollments, data were available for 194 patients who completed the study. There were nine cases of dissatisfaction: five (5%) in the control group and four (4%) in the intervention group (P = 0.78). The 95% confidence intervals (1%-10%) were almost identical, indicating no difference between groups. The study was stopped after an interim analysis showed no significant difference in satisfaction between the groups. This could have been because the assumption that patients with increased risk of dissatisfaction do better with deeper sedation is incorrect. Another explanation could be the increased awareness of the value of benzodiazepines in endoscopy. Consistent with our findings, nervousness rather than pain predicted dissatisfaction, and the optimal use of anxiolytics with amnesic properties may be comparable to that of propofol.

Development of an instrument to assess and predict satisfaction and poor tolerance among patients undergoing endoscopic procedures.

We aimed to test the reliability of a developed questionnaire that measures and predict aversive endoscopic experience. Two questionnaires (pre- and postprocedure) were given to patients presenting for routine endoscopy. The first questionnaire elicited demographics, prior endoscopic experience, history of drug or alcohol use, patient expectations, and levels of anxiety and nervousness before procedure. After endoscopy, tolerance and willingness to repeat the examination were determined. The primary outcome of "adverse endoscopic experience" (AEE) was defined as a score of > or =5 on the postprocedure overall level of satisfaction or unwillingness to repeat endoscopy. Thirteen of 148 subjects reported an AEE. Items measuring the primary outcome were internally validated by reliability analysis which significantly correlated with measures of aversive experience like pain, nervousness, and suffering during the procedure. Preprocedure factors that were associated with AEE in the univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were nervousness (P = 0.02) and chronic use of psychotropic drugs or alcohol (P = 0.03). In conclusion, we have developed a questionnaire that reliably measures aversive endoscopic experience. Nervousness before procedure and chronic use of psychotropic drugs are reliable predictors of such experience.