Determining Morbidity of Adding Genioplasty to Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients with dentofacial anomalies may undergo orthognathic surgery to address functional and aesthetic concerns. Past works have evaluated determinants affecting length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing upper and/or lower jaw surgery alone. No studies have assessed the addition of genioplasty to double-jaw (Lefort I, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO))) surgery and its effect on LOS and other outcomes. This study investigates whether the addition of genioplasty incurs additional morbidity to patients undergoing complex orthognathic surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing orthognathic surgery at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Clinical and demographic information were compared across the "double"- and "triple"-jaw cohorts with t tests and Chi-squared analyses. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were utilized to assess the impact of genioplasty when controlling for baseline patient differences. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients received Lefort I and BSSO (double-jaw), and 224 received Lefort I, BSSO, and genioplasty (triple-jaw). Six (22.2%) double-jaw patients were segmental and fifty-eight (25.9%) triple-jaw patients were segmental (p > 0.05), during the study period. Triple-jaw surgery was associated with increased operative time (+ 41.1 min, p < 0.01). There was no increase in LOS, postoperative nausea and vomiting, opioid use, hematoma, or infection (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study attempted to determine if triple-jaw surgery could influence patients' LOS and other surgical outcomes compared to double-jaw surgery. Only the operative time was significantly affected. This indicates that incorporation of a genioplasty can provide aesthetic benefit without incurring significant additional morbidity to the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Development of an Open-Access Webinar Series on Pathways for Global Surgery Engagement for Applicants to US Residency Programs.

BACKGROUND: Global surgery (GS) training pathways in residency are unclear and vary by specialty and program. Furthermore, information on these pathways is not always accessible. To address this gap, we produced a collection of open-access webinars for senior medical students focused on identifying GS training pathways during residency. METHODS: The Global Surgery Student Alliance (GSSA) is a national nonprofit that engages US students and trainees in GS education, research, and advocacy. GSSA organized nine one-hour, specialty-specific webinars featuring residents of surgical specialties, anesthesia, and OBGYN programs. Live webinars were produced via Zoom from August to October 2020, and all recordings were posted to the GSSA YouTube channel. Medical students moderated webinars with predetermined standardized questions and live questions submitted by attendees. Participant data were collected in mandatory registration forms. RESULTS: A total of 539 people were registered for 9 webinars. Among registrants, 189 institutions and 36 countries were represented. Registrants reported education/training levels from less than undergraduate education to attending physicians, while medical students represented the majority of registrants. Following the live webinars, YouTube recordings of the events were viewed 839 times. Webinars featuring otolaryngology and general surgery residents accrued the greatest number of registrations, while anesthesia accrued the least. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students at all levels demonstrated interest in both the live and recorded specialty-specific webinars on GS in residency. To address the gap in developing global surgery practitioners, additional online, open-access education materials and mentorship opportunities are needed for students applying to US residencies.

Major Complications and Associated Risk Factors for Osseous Genioplasty With Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: An American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.

PURPOSE: Patients with significant dentofacial deformities undergoing aesthetic and functional orthognathic surgery may often require genioplasty to advance the position of the pogonion relative to B point. No study to date has evaluated nationally registered data pertaining to addition of osseous genioplasty to bimaxillary orthognathic surgery and its associated clinical outcomes. METHODS: Data was extracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2010 to 2018 using current procedural terminology codes pertaining to Le Fort I osteotomy (LF), bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO), and osseous genioplasty (G) and divided into 2 cohorts: bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with and without osseous genioplasty. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes inherently recorded within National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were identified and recorded. Chi-squared analysis and unpaired 2-tail t tests were performed between the cohorts and their respective outcomes to determine significant relationships with significance set as P < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 373 patients double- or triple-jaw patients identified from the years 2010 to 2018. The most common recorded indication for LF/BSSO was maxillary hypoplasia (27.3%) and mandibular hypoplasia (6.8%). The most common indications for LF/BSSO/G were maxillary hypoplasia (16.1%) and maxillary asymmetry (16.1%). In comparison to LF/BBSO only, LF/BSSO/GP was not associated with any differences in the rate of surgical (0.0% versus 0.31%, P = 0.72) or medical complications (0.0% versus 0.63%, P = 0.60), in addition to unplanned readmissions (0.0% versus 1.56% versus P = 0.41) or reoperations (0.0% versus 1.25%, P = 0.46). However, osseous genioplasty addition was associated with increased overall operating time (271.77 versus 231.75 minutes, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Osseous genioplasty does not alter short-term, 30-day complication rate when performed with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. As reoperation rates remained relatively unchanged, it can be inferred that immediate adverse events or patient dissatisfaction were not apparent within 30 days. Although mean operating time is slightly longer, cardiopulmonary resuscitation without medical comorbidity was achieved at the conclusion of the procedure.

A Comprehensive Single-Center Analysis of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Following Orthognathic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a major clinical end-point for directing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in facial plastic surgery. This study aimed to identify risk factors for PONV and evaluate strategies for PONV reduction in orthognathic surgery patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed among patients receiving orthognathic surgery at our institution from 2011 to 2018. Patient demographics, surgical operative and anesthesia notes, medications, and nausea/vomiting were assessed for each patient. The amount of opioid analgesia given both perioperatively and postoperatively was recorded and converted into morphine equivalents (MEQ). Stepwise regression analysis was used to identify significant risk factors for PONV. Post hoc analyses were employed to compare PONV among patients based on MEQ dosage and antiemetic prophylaxis regimes. RESULTS: A total of 492 patients were included; mean age was 23.0 years (range: 13-60); 54.4% were female. The majority of patients received concurrent Le Fort I osteotomy, BSSO, and genioplasty (70.1%). During hospitalization, 59.4% of patients experienced nausea requiring antiemetic medications and 28.4% experienced emesis. Stepwise regression yielded Apfel scores (P = 0.003) and postoperative opioids (P = 0.013) as the strongest predictors of PONV. Post hoc analyses showed that undertreatment with prophylactic antiemetics (based on Apfel) predicted increased PONV (+12.9%, P = 0.020), and that lower postoperative MEQs (<28.0) predicted decreased PONV (-11.8%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The study findings confirm the high incidence of PONV among orthognathic surgical patients and stratify previously reported PONV risk factors. More aggressive utilization of antiemetic medications and decreased dependence on opioid analgesia may decrease nausea/vomiting following orthognathic surgery.

Adverse events in the treatment of motorcycle-related isolated limb injuries at a regional hospital in Uganda: a prospective clinical analysis.

PURPOSE: Although motorcycle accidents are a leading cause of limb injury in Uganda, little is known about injury care quality at regional hospitals. This study measured the incidence of clinical adverse events (CAEs) and identified associated treatment barriers surrounding motorcycle-related isolated limb injuries at a regional hospital. METHODS: A prospective descriptive study was conducted among patients with motorcycle-related isolated limb injuries at a Ugandan regional hospital between September 2017 and February 2018. Patients were surveyed upon admission and monitored throughout their course of treatment. Weight-bearing status and quality of life measures (EQ-5D) were assessed at four and 12 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four participants enrolled. Of the total participants, 12% refused definitive treatment. Among 108 treated patients, six experienced CAEs: four wound infections, one amputation, and one death. At 12 weeks follow-up, the majority of patients had no difficulty with mobility, pain/discomfort, or self-care, but 51% endorsed challenges completing certain daily chores, and 40% of patients could ambulate without an assistive device with restoration of pre-fracture gait. Both longer hospital stays and poorer 12-week functional recovery were seen among patients sustaining open fracture (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment of isolated limb injuries at a Ugandan Regional Hospital was associated with minimal short-term CAEs. However, patients with more severe injuries may be at risk for delayed post-operative recovery. Future studies measuring long-term functional outcomes should be performed to better understand and optimize injury care in this population.

Race-Based Differences in the Utilization and Timing of Secondary Cleft Procedures in the United States.

Primary CL/P repair, revisions, and secondary procedures-cleft rhinoplasty, speech surgery, and alveolar bone grafting (ABG)-performed from 2014-2018 were identified from the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Utilization estimates were derived via univariable and multivariable logistic regression. A Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test and multivariable linear regression were used to assess differences in timing for each procedure cohort.The primary outcome measures were the odds of a patient being a certain race/ethnicity, and the age at which patients of different race/ethnicity receive surgery.There were 23 780 procedures analyzed. After controlling for sex, diagnosis, and functional status, there were significant differences in utilization estimates across procedure groups. Primarily, utilization was lowest in patient who were Black for cleft rhinoplasty (OR = 0.70, P = .023), ABG (OR = 0.44, P < .001) and speech surgery (OR = 0.57, P = .012), and highest in patients who were Asian patients in all surgery cohorts (OR 2.05-4.43). Timing of surgery also varied by race, although differences were minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of utilization and timing of secondary cleft procedures varied by race, particularly among patients who were Black (poor utilization) or Asian (high utilization). Further studies should identify the causes and implications of underutilized and/or delayed cleft care.

Clinical Practice Trends and Postoperative Outcomes in Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty.

PURPOSE: Optimal correction of the cleft nasal deformity remains challenging. The purpose of this study was to examine the practice patterns and postoperative course of patients undergoing cleft lip repair with rhinoplasty compared to those who have primary lip repair without rhinoplasty. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on the Kids' Inpatient Database. Data were collected from January 2000 to December 2011 and included infants aged 12 months and younger who underwent cleft lip repair. The predictor variable was the addition of rhinoplasty at primary cleft lip repair. Primary outcome variables included hospital setting, year, and admission cost, while secondary outcome variables included length of stay and postoperative complication rate. Independent t-tests and chi-squared tests were performed. Continuous variables were analyzed by multiple linear regression models. RESULTS: The study sample included 4559 infants with 1422 (31.2%) who underwent primary cleft rhinoplasty. Over time, there was a significant increase in the proportion of cleft lip repairs accompanied by a rhinoplasty (p < .01). A greater proportion of patients with unilateral cleft lips received simultaneous rhinoplasty with their lip repairs (33.8 vs 26.0%, p < .01). This cohort had a significantly shorter length of stay (1.6 vs 2.8 days, p < .01) when compared to children that underwent cleft lip repair alone. CONCLUSIONS: Performing primary cleft rhinoplasty is becoming more common among cleft surgeons. Considering comparable costs and complication rates, a rhinoplasty should be considered during the surgical treatment planning of patients with cleft nasal deformities.

Racial Disparities in Complications, Length of Stay, and Costs Among Patients Receiving Orthognathic Surgery in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Black and Hispanic/Latino patients in the United States often experience poorer health outcomes in comparison to White patients. We aimed to assess the impact of race on complications, length of stay, and costs after orthognathic surgery. METHODS: Pediatric and young adult orthognathic surgeries (age <21) were isolated from the Kids Inpatient Database from 2000-2012. Procedures were grouped into cohorts based on the preoperative diagnosis: apnea, malocclusion, or congenital anomaly. T tests and χ2 analyses were employed to compare complications, length of stay (LOS), and costs among Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and other patients in comparison to White patients. Multivariable regression was performed to identify associations between sociodemographic variables and the primary outcomes. Post-hoc χ2 analyses were performed to compare proportions of patients of a given race/ethnicity across the 3 surgical cohorts. RESULTS: There were 8,809 patients identified in the KID database (mean age of 16.3 years). Compared to White patients, complication rates were increased among Hispanic patients (2.1 vs 1.3%, P = .037) and other patients treated for apnea (8.7 vs 0.83%, P = .002). Hospital LOS was increased in both Black (3.3 vs 2.1 days, P < .001) and Hispanic (2.9 days, P < .001) patients. Costs were higher than Whites ($35,633.47) among Hispanic ($48,029.15, P < .001), Black ($47,034.41, P < .001), and Asian/Pacific-Islander ($44,192.49, P < .001) patients. White patients comprised a larger proportion of the malocclusion group (77.8%) than apnea (66.9%, P < .001) or congenital anomaly (59.1%, P < .001), while the opposite was true for Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific-Islander patients. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in complications, LOS, and costs after orthognathic surgery among patients of different race/ethnicity. Further studies are needed to better understand the causes of disparity and their clinical manifestations.

The Geographic Availability of Certified Cleft Care in the United States: A National Geospatial Analysis of 1-Hour Access to Care.

PURPOSE: Children with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) require longitudinal multidisciplinary care. Travel distance to comprehensive cleft centers may be a barrier for some families. This study evaluated the geospatial availability of certified cleft teams across the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A geographic catchment area within a 1-hour travel radius of each American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-certified cleft center was mapped using TravelTime distance matrix programming. The proportion of children located within each catchment area was calculated using county-level data from the National Kids Count Data Center, with aggregate estimates of patients with CLP based on state-level data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. One-hour access was compared across regions and based on urbanization data collected from the US Census. RESULTS: There were 182 American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-certified centers identified. As per study estimates, 28,331 (27.3%) children with CLP did not live within 1-hour travel distance to any center. One-hour access was highest in the Northeast (84.2% of children, P < .001) and lowest in the South (65.7%) and higher in states with the greatest urbanization in comparison with more rural states (85.1 vs 37.4%, P < .001). Similar patterns were seen for access to 2 or more cleft centers. The number of CLP children-per-center was highest in the West (775) and lowest in the Northeast (452). CONCLUSIONS: Travel distances of more than 1 hour may affect more than 25,000 (1 of 4) CLP children in the US, with significant variation across geographic regions. Future studies should seek to understand the impact of and provide strategies for overcoming geographic barriers.

Primary Cleft Palate Repair Among Older-Age Children and Adolescents in the United States.

PURPOSE: Older age cleft palate (CP) repair in international settings has been associated with increased surgical morbidity. This study assesses the prevalence and risks associated with late-age CP repair (age > 5 years) in the United States. METHODS: Primary CP repair patients less than the age of 18 years were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement pediatric database from 2012 to 2018. Total postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations, duration of surgery, and length of stay were recorded. T-tests and χ2 analyses were used to compare variables between age groups 0-5, 6-10, and 11-17. RESULTS: A total of 10,022 primary CP procedures were identified from 2012 to 2018, of which 868 (8.6%) received repair at age > 5 years. Hispanic patients constituted a larger proportion of CP repair from ages 11 to 17 years than repair at other ages (P < .001). In comparison with children treated from ages 0 to 5 years, children operated on between ages 6 and 10 or 11 and 17 years experienced no increases in unplanned readmissions, reoperations, or complication rates after surgery. Patients of ages 6-10 years and 11-17 years had decreased operating room time (P < .001) compared with younger patients. Patients of ages 11-17 years also had decreased hospital length of stay (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Many children in the United States received primary CP repair after the age of 5 years likely due to late treatment of submucosal clefts or delayed care among international immigrants/adoptees. Old age procedures were not associated with increased short-term surgical morbidity in comparison with surgery at earlier time points. The causes and implications of older age primary surgery warrant further study.

Racial Disparities in the Surgical Management of Benign Craniomaxillofacial Bone Lesions.

PURPOSE: Racial disparities can influence surgical care in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine if race and ethnicity were independent risk factors for adverse 30-day outcomes after surgical management of benign craniomaxillofacial bone tumors. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from 2012 to 2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases. Patients undergoing surgical removal of craniomaxillofacial benign lesions based on Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes were included. Patients who had unrelated concurrent surgeries, or malignant, skull-based or soft tissue lesions were excluded. Primary outcomes were surgical complications and hospital length of stay (LOS). Univariate analyses were used with race as the independent variable to identify predictors of primary outcomes. Statistically significant factors were added to a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: This study included 372 patients. Postoperative complications were highest among Black patients, who had a 4-fold increase in minor complications (P = 0.023) and over a 6-fold increase in major complications (P = 0.008) compared to White patients. Black patients also had a mean increase of 2.3 days in LOS compared to White patients (P < 0.001). The multivariate regression model showed higher rates of major complications and longer LOS for Black patients (P = 0.003, P = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Even when controlling for other variables, Black race was an independent risk factor for major complications and increased LOS. Further research should seek to identify the root cause of these findings in order to ensure safe and equitable surgery for all patients, regardless of race or ethnicity.

Decreasing Inpatient Opioid Use Following Orthognathic Surgery.

PURPOSE: Strategies to decrease postoperative opioid use are important for mitigating the immediate and long-term risks associated with their use. We aimed to investigate the impact of perioperative various factors on inpatient opioid needs for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent orthognathic surgery performed by the senior author from 2012 to 2018. Patients were grouped into intravenous (IV) acetaminophen and no-IV acetaminophen cohorts. Opioid medications received by patients during hospital stay were converted to mean morphine equivalents (MME) for comparison. Additional factors that influenced opioid consumption, such as transexamic acid (TXA) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), were identified using univariate analysis. Factors found to have statistical significance were added to a multivariate linear regression model. RESULTS: 319 patients were included. Those who received IV acetaminophen had lower rates of total opioid use (57.3 versus 74.8 MME; P = 0.002) and postoperative opioid use (24.0 versus 37.7 MME; P < 0.001). Perioperative prothrombotic agents, such as TXA, were associated with lower total and postoperative MME (P = 0.005, P = 0.002). Multivariate regression analysis showed that increased PONV resulted in increased postoperative opioid use, whereas perioperative acetaminophen lowered total and postoperative quantities. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative IV acetaminophen is an effective method for decreasing inpatient opioid analgesia after orthognathic surgery. Intravenous TXA and PONV control may provide additional benefit to decreasing inpatient opioid consumption. More research as to the mechanisms and ideal clinical applications for both IV acetaminophen and TXA are warranted.

Neurologic Characterization of Craniosynostosis: Can Direct Brain Recordings Predict Language Development?

PURPOSE: Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC) is associated with language deficits. Conventional tests, such as the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID), may not reflect accurate long-term cognition. Alternatively, mismatch negativity (MMN) waves recorded via electroencephalogram (EEG) measure neural responses to speech and may objectively predict language development. This study aimed to (1) correlate infant MMN to future language achievement and (2) compare MMN among subtypes of NSC. METHODS: Pre and postoperatively (mean operative age 9.5 months), NSC participants received the BSID and EEG phoneme-discrimination paradigm(80 dB,250 Hz). The MMN was the largest negative amplitude in the difference wave 80 to 300 ms after stimuli. To measure cognitive outcome, patients completed a neurodevelopmental battery (Wechsler-Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence and Wechsler-Fundamentals) at >6 years of age. RESULTS: Eleven NSC patients with EEG testing in infancy were neurocognitively tested (average age 8.0 years; 27% female; 55% sagittal, 27% metopic, 9% unicoronal, 9% sagittal/metopic). The left frontal cluster MMN strongly correlated with word-reading (r = 0.713, P = 0.031), reading-comprehension (r = 0.745, P = 0.021), and language-composites (r = 0.0771, P = 0.015). Conversely, BSID scores did not yield significant predictive value (r < 0.5, P > 0.05). Follow-up event related potentials (ERP) comparison included 39 normal control, 18 sagittal, 17 metopic, 6 unilateral-coronal infants. Preoperatively, sagittal (P = 0.003) and metopic (P = 0.003) patients had attenuated left frontal MMN compared to controls. Postoperatively, the sagittal cohort was normalized to controls while metopic patients retained attenuations (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: ERP assessment in NSC had significantly better predictive value for future neurocognition than the BSID. Preoperatively, sagittal and metopic patients had attenuated neural response to language; postoperatively, sagittal patients had improved responses in comparison to metopic patients. Use of ERP assessment may help tailor treatment for language deficits earlier in development.

Chair Versus Chairman: Does Orthopaedics Use the Gendered Term More Than Other Specialties?

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedics is the least gender-diverse medical specialty. Research suggests that the use of gendered language can contribute to workforce disparity and that gender-neutral language supports the inclusion and advancement of women, but the degree to which gender-neutral language is used by academic departments in what typically is a department's highest position (department chair) has not been characterized. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is the proportion of department websites that use the term chairman (as opposed to chair) greater in orthopaedics than in five other surgical and medical specialties? (2) Are departments led by chairs who are women less likely to use "chairman" than those led by men, and does this vary by specialty? METHODS: Seven hundred fourteen official websites of orthopaedic, neurosurgery, general surgery, internal medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology departments affiliated with 129 allopathic medical schools were screened. Any use of the term chairman on title pages, welcome messages, and faculty profile pages was identified using a Boyer-Moore string-search algorithm and terms were classified based on their location on the site. The overall use of the term chairman was compared by specialty and gender of the chair. RESULTS: Sixty percent of orthopaedic department websites (71 of 119) used the term chairman at least once, a proportion higher than that of pediatrics (36% [46 of 128]; OR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.63; p < 0.001), internal medicine (31% [38 of 122]; OR 0.030; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.53; p < 0.001), and obstetrics and gynecology (29% [37 of 126]; OR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.48; p < 0.001), but no different than that of neurosurgery (57% [54 of 94]; OR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.6; p = 0.74) and general surgery (55% [69 of 125]; OR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.4; p = 0.48). Across disciplines, departments whose chairs were women were much less likely to use the term chairman than departments whose chairs were men (14% [17 of 122] versus 50% [297 of 592]; OR 0.16; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.28; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The frequent use of the term chairman in orthopaedics, coupled with the preference of women to use the term chair, suggests considerable room for growth in the use of gender-equal language in orthopaedics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our current efforts to increase the number of women in orthopaedics may be undermined by gendered language, which can create and reinforce gendered culture in the field. Electing to use gender-neutral leadership titles, while a relatively small step in the pursuit of a more gender-equal environment, presents an immediate and no-cost way to support a more inclusive culture and counteract unconscious gender bias. Future studies should explore the individual attitudes of chairs regarding the use of gendered titles and identify additional ways in which biases may manifest; for example, the use of gendered language in interpersonal communications and the presence of unconscious bias in leadership evaluations. Continued efforts to understand implicit bias in orthopaedics can guide actionable strategies for counteracting gendered stereotypes of the specialty, in turn aiding initiatives to recruit and promote women in the field.

Screens in the back: Medical student perspective on curriculum engagement.

Medical students in the United States are engaging less with formal classroom curricula. This shift in decreased attendance and participation is largely driven by an incentive structure in medical education focused on standardized test scores, research and letters of recommendation. In this essay, the authors describe the student experience of a preclinical lecture, struggling to balance learning about a patient with Alcohol Use Disorder with the demands of extracurricular expectations.

Radiographic Predictors of FACE-Q Outcomes Following Non-Operative Orbital Floor Fracture Management.

BACKGROUND: Orbital floor fractures are common injuries treated by multiple surgical subspecialties. Controversy exists regarding the operative indications. This study sought to correlate radiographic characteristics of orbital floor fractures with validated patient reported outcome measures following non-operative management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent non-operative management of an orbital floor fracture at Yale New Haven Hospital from 2013 to 2018 were queried retrospectively. Patients with GCS < 15 and/or distracting facial soft tissue or bony injuries were excluded from analysis. CT images, demographic information, and FACE-Q patient reported outcomes (Satisfaction with Eyes, Psychological Function, Social Function, and Appearance Related Psychosocial Distress) were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS with statistical significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included in the study. The mean time between injury and completion of the survey was 3.6 years. Fifty-six percent of patients had a right-sided fracture. The mean fracture area was 73.6 mm (Range:15-172 mm), and 913 mm (Range: 0-3106) was the mean volume displaced into the maxillary sinus. The unaffected inferior rectus muscle shape (height/width) was 0.5 (Range: 0.2-0.98) compared to 0.8 (Range 0.4-1.6) for the affected inferior rectus. After controlling for the time interval between survey and injury, gender, income, and education, rounding of the inferior rectus muscle was a significant predictor of appearance related psychosocial distress (P = 0.006). Inferior rectus rounding was stratified into "severe" (75%) and "moderate" (25%) categories. Severe rounding was associated with a larger orbital floor fracture area (110 versus 64 mm; P = 0.074), volume displaced into the maxillary sinus (1,716 versus 610 mm; P = 0.024), and worse appearance-related psychosocial distress (70 versus 25; P = 0.013). Sixty-one percent of patients followed up in clinic with a mean duration of 194 days. CONCLUSION: Prior studies have correlated presenting radiographic findings to follow-up clinical findings. However, this study is the first to assess long-term outcomes using validated patient-reported questionnaires. Inferior rectus muscle belly rounding significantly correlated with appearance related psychosocial distress. This radiographic finding may be valuable to consider in orbital floor fracture management.

Hospital Volume Improves Primary, Revision, and Delayed Cleft Palate Repair.

BACKGROUND: High volume centers (HVC) is commonly associated with increased resources and improved patient outcomes. This study assesses efficacy and outcomes of high volume centers in cleft palate repair. METHODS: Cleft palate procedures were identified in the Kids' Inpatient Database from 2003-2009. Demographics, perioperative factors, co-morbidities, and complications in HVC (90th percentile, >48 cases/year) and non-high volume centers (NHVC) were compared across various cohorts of cleft repair. RESULTS: Four thousand five hundred sixty-three (61.7%) total cleft palate surgeries were performed in HVC and 3388 (38.3%) were performed in NHVC. The NHVC treated a higher percentage of Medicaid patients (P = 0.005) and patients from low-income quartiles (P = 0.018). HVC had larger bedsizes (P <0.001), were more often government/private owned (P <0.001), and were more often teaching hospitals (P <0.001) located predominantly in urban settings (P <0.001). The HVC treated patients at younger ages (P = 0.008) and performed more concurrent procedures (P = 0.047). The most common diagnosis at HVC was complete cleft palate with incomplete cleft lip, while the most common diagnosis at NHVC was incomplete cleft palate without lip. Overall, length of stay and specific complication rates were lower in HVC (P = 0.048, P = 0.042). Primaries at HVCs showed lower pneumonia (P = 0.009) and specific complication rates (P = 0.023). Revisions at HVC were associated with older patients, fewer cardiac complications (P = 0.040), less wound disruption (P = 0.050), but more hemorrhage (P = 0.040).

Differential Pulley Release in Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The palmar aponeurosis or "A0 pulley" may play a role in trigger finger pathology. This study assesses the involvement of the A0 pulley in patients receiving trigger finger release. METHODS: This single-surgeon, prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted among consenting patients with symptomatic trigger finger. Intraoperative coin toss was used to randomize initial release of either the A0 or A1 pulley. Following release, active flexion and extension of the affected digit were examined. The remaining pulley was then released in sequence, and clinical trigger status was recorded. RESULTS: Thirty fingers from 24 patients were released; 17 fingers received A0 release first, and 13 received A1 release. Following initial A0 release, 8 fingers (47%) demonstrated complete resolution of symptoms, 4 (24%) demonstrated improvement but incomplete resolution of triggering, and 5 (29.4%) demonstrated no improvement. Following initial A1 release, 6 fingers (46%) demonstrated complete resolution, 3 (23%) demonstrated improvement but incomplete resolution of triggering, and 4 (31%) demonstrated no improvement. All patients demonstrated complete resolution after surgical release of both sites. Neither initial A1 release nor initial A0 release was statistically associated with complete, incomplete, or failed symptom resolution. CONCLUSIONS: These data implicate the A0 pulley as the primary cause of 31% to 47% of trigger fingers in our study. Although larger trials are needed to validate these results, our study suggests that release of both A0 and A1 pulleys may offer greater symptom resolution than release of the A1 pulley alone.

A National Assessment of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cleft Lip Repair.

PURPOSE: This study examined the impact of patient race/ethnicity on the likelihood of experiencing delays to surgery, post-operative surgical complications, and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) following primary cleft lip (CL) repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent CL repair were identified in the 2006-2012 Kids' Inpatient Database. Primary outcomes were defined as treatment after 6-months-old, presence of any surgical complication, LOS >1 day, and total hospital charges. Multivariable analyses were performed to adjust for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics that might account for differences in outcomes. RESULTS: There were 5927 eligible patients with cleft lip: 3724 White, 279 Black, 1316 Hispanic, 277 Asian/Pacific-Islander, and 331 other race/ethnicity. Across all outcomes, there were significant unadjusted differences (p<0.001) by race/ethnicity, with White children having the lowest odds of delayed surgery, complications, and prolonged LOS, and the lowest charges. Multivariable analyses suggested that differences in baseline health status may account for much of this disparity in combination with factors such as income, insurance type, and location. Even after adjusting for co-variates, significantly increased odds of delayed surgery and higher charges remained for Hispanic and Asian/PI patients. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in the odds of delays, complications, prolonged hospital stays, and total charges among CL patients of different race/ethnicity. Advocacy efforts to ameliorate disparity in early infant health may subsequently improve equity in cleft outcomes.