Characteristics of clinical trials that require participants to be fluent in English.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diverse samples in clinical trials can make findings more generalizable. We sought to characterize the prevalence of clinical trials in the United States that required English fluency for participants to enroll in the trial. METHODS: We randomly chose over 10,000 clinical trial protocols registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and examined the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the trials. We compared the relationship of clinical trial characteristics with English fluency inclusion requirements. We merged the ClinicalTrials.gov data with US Census and American Community Survey data to investigate the association of English-language restrictions with ZIP-code-level demographic characteristics of participating institutions. We used Chi-squared tests, t-tests, and logistic regression models for analyses. RESULTS: English fluency requirements have been increasing over time, from 1.7% of trials having such requirements before 2000 to 9.0% after 2010 (p < 0.001 from Chi-squared test). Industry-sponsored trials had low rates of English fluency requirements (1.8%), while behavioral trials had high rates (28.4%). Trials opening in the Northeast of the United States had the highest regional English requirement rates (10.7%), while trials opening in more than one region had the lowest (3.3%, p<0.001). Since 1995, trials opening in ZIP codes with larger Hispanic populations were less likely to have English fluency requirements (odds ratio=0.92 for each 10% increase in proportion of Hispanics, 95% confidence interval=0.86-0.98, p=0.013). Trials opening in ZIP codes with more residents self-identifying as Black/African American (odds ratio=1.87, 95% confidence interval=1.36-2.58, p<0.001 for restricted cubic spline term) or Asian (odds ratio=1.16 for linear term, 95% confidence interval=1.07-1.25, p<0.001) were more likely to have English fluency requirements. ZIP codes with higher poverty rates had trials with more English-language restrictions (odds ratio=1.06 for a 10% poverty rate increase, 95% confidence interval=1.001-1.11, p=0.045). There was a statistically significant interaction between year and intervention type, such that the increase in English fluency requirements was more common for some interventions than for others. CONCLUSION: The proportion of clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov that have English fluency requirements for study inclusion has been increasing over time. English-language restrictions are associated with a number of characteristics, including the demographic characteristics of communities in which the sponsoring institutions are located.

Patient Experience in Obstetrics in a Military Patient Satisfaction Survey: Findings and Recommendations for Improvement.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the care experience of obstetric patients within the Military Health System and compares them to those of medical and surgical care patients. Specifically, the study seeks to (1) examine how obstetric inpatient experience ratings differ from medical and surgical inpatient experience ratings, (2) understand specific aspects of care that drive overall experience ratings within this population, (3) test whether adherence to nursing practices such as hourly rounding and nurse leader visits affect experience ratings, and (4) describe ways that patient experience information can be presented to healthcare providers to improve performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for this study include Military Health System patient experience survey data (based on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) collected from 2011 through 2019. Analysis includes data collected from 338,124 patients aged 18 years and older. Our analysis involved z-test comparisons of patient experience measure scores, trend analysis, logistic regression-based driver analysis, and correlations. RESULTS: Obstetric ratings are generally lower than those of medical and surgical patients; however, they have been improving at a slightly faster rate year over year. Effective nurse communications with patients are a particularly strong driver for improving their overall care experiences, and practices like hourly nurse rounding, nurse leader visits, and nurse-patient shift change conversations are positively correlated with obstetric patient experience ratings. CONCLUSIONS: This study contextualizes how obstetric inpatient experience ratings differ from those of medical and surgical care patients. Healthcare administrators and policymakers should be aware that obstetric patients may have unique needs and expectations that lead to patient experience ratings differing from those of medical and surgical patients. Effective nurse-patient communications, hourly rounding, nurse leader visits, and nurse-patient shift change conversations could be strategies used to improve obstetric experience ratings.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Patient experience and quality of life.

Objective: To gain insights into NMOSD disease impact, which may negatively affect QoL of patients, their families, and social network. Methods: The current study used validated instruments to assess physical, emotional, and socioeconomic burden of NMOSD on QoL among 193 patients. Results: A majority of patients reported an initial diagnosis of a disease other than NMOSD. Overall, two-thirds of patients reported NMOSD as having a strong negative impact on physical health (Short Form-36 [SF-36] score 27.1 ± 39.1), whereas emotional well-being was relatively unimpaired on average (SF-36 score 54.0 ± 44.9). A subset of patients reported having the highest category of emotional health despite worse physical health or financial burden, suggesting psychological resilience. Pain (r = 0.61) and bowel/bladder dysfunction (r = 0.41) imposed the greatest negative physical impact on overall QoL. In turn, ability to work correlated inversely with worsened health (r = -0.68). Increased pain, reduced sexual function, inability to work, and reduced QoL had greatest negative impacts on emotional well-being. Dissatisfaction with treatment options and economic burden correlated inversely with QoL. Conclusions: Collectively, the current findings advance the understanding of physical, emotional, social, and financial tolls imposed by NMOSD. These insights offer potential ways to enhance QoL by managing pain, enhancing family and social networks, and facilitating active employment.

Temporal trends and characteristics of clinical trials for which only one racial or ethnic group is eligible.

BACKGROUND: Increasing diversity in clinical trials may be worthwhile. We examined clinical trials that restricted eligibility to a single race or ethnicity. METHODS: We reviewed 19,246 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov through January 2013. We mapped trial ZIP-codes to U.S. Census and American Community Survey data. The outcome was whether trials required participants to be from a single racial or ethnic group. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, the odds of trials restricting eligibility to a single race/ethnicity increased by 4% per year (95% CI 1.01-1.08, p = .024). Behavioral (5.79% with single race/ethnicity requirements), skin-related (4.49%), and Vitamin D (6.14%) studies had higher rates of single race/ethnicity requirements. Many other trial-specific characteristics, such as funding agency and region of the U.S. in which the trial opened, were associated with eligibility restrictions. In terms of neighborhood characteristics, studies with single race eligibility requirements were more likely to be located in ZIP-codes with greater percentages of those self-reporting the characteristic. For example, 35.2% (SD = 24.9%) of the population self-reported themselves as Black or African American in ZIP-codes with trials requiring participants to be Black/African American, but only 5.9% (SD = 6.9%) self-reported themselves as Black/African American in ZIP-codes with trials that required Asian ethnicity. In ZIP-codes with trials requiring Asian ethnicity, 24.6% (SD = 16.2%) self-reported as Asian. In ZIP-codes with trials requiring Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, 33.3% (SD = 28.5%) self-reported as Hispanic/Latino. Neighborhood level poverty rates and reduced English language ability were also associated with more single race eligibility requirements. CONCLUSIONS: In selected fields, there has been a modest temporal increase in single race/ethnicity inclusion requirements. Some studies may not fall under regulatory purview and hence may be less likely to include diverse samples. Conversely, some eligibility requirements may be related to health disparities research. Future work should examine whether targeted enrollment criteria facilitates development of personalized medicine or reduces trial access.