The profile of cardiac patients with renal artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the prevalence and severity of renal artery stenosis (RAS) in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization who were deemed at risk for RAS based on clinical or laboratory criteria for study entry, but who had not previously been suspected of having RAS. BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of atherosclerotic RAS remains problematic because its clinical manifestations are nonspecific. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing non-emergent cardiac catheterization at a single institution during a 12-month period were evaluated using standardized clinical, laboratory, and angiographic criteria. Patients exhibiting at least one of four predefined selection criteria (severe hypertension, unexplained renal dysfunction, acute pulmonary edema with hypertension, or severe atherosclerosis) were prospectively registered and underwent coincident diagnostic renal angiography. RESULTS: Renal angiography was performed in 851 patients and was diagnostic in 837. Angiographically evident renal atherosclerosis was present in 39% of the population, with RAS > or =50% in 120 (14.3%) and severe stenosis (> or =70%) in 61 (7.3%). Severe stenosis was present in 48 (7%) patients with severe atherosclerosis, 38 (16%) with renal dysfunction, 25 (9%) with hypertension, and 2 (22%) with acute pulmonary edema with hypertension. The prevalence was higher in those exhibiting multiple selection criteria. In a multivariate model, severe RAS was associated with age, female gender, reduced creatinine clearance, increased systolic blood pressure, and peripheral or carotid artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: In a population at risk of, but not previously suspected of having RAS, severe RAS is associated with simple and readily determined clinical and laboratory patient characteristics. These data facilitate focused application of diagnostic renal angiography.

Six-month angiographic and 12-month clinical follow-up of MultiLink long (25 to 35 mm) stents for long coronary narrowings in patients with angina pectoris.

There are limited prospective angiographic data on stent deployment for long coronary lesions. This multicenter prospective study enrolled 120 patients with a single de novo stenosis >20 mm in length, in a native vessel > or =3 mm diameter, suitable for a MultiLink stent 25 to 35 mm in length with additional stent deployment if required. Quantitative angiography before and immediately after stenting and at 6-month follow-up assessed restenosis for the complete lesion and for 5-mm segments of the stented and adjacent nonstented vessel. By 1 year, myocardial infarction had occurred in 3% and target vessel repeat revascularization in 12% of patients. The mean stented length (35.8 +/- 14.6 mm) closely matched mean lesion length (30.1 +/- 13.5 mm). Restenosis to > or =50% diameter loss occurred in 32% of patients, but to > or =70% in only 8%. Of the 147 segments (5 mm in length) with baseline stenosis <25%, only 3 patients (2%) developed restenosis of > or =50%, and only in 1 of these was it > or =70%. Stenting of long narrowings is associated with good clinical outcome and a low rate of severe restenosis. Mildly diseased segments of long lesions covered by a stent rarely became severely narrowed and had negligible influence on the overall restenosis rate. These data support a strategy of full lesion coverage by stent deployment.