Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications, affect more than half the patients who undergo open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Whether hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy results in lower morbidity than open esophagectomy is unclear. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial involving patients 18 to 75 years of age with resectable cancer of the middle or lower third of the esophagus. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo transthoracic open esophagectomy (open procedure) or hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (hybrid procedure). Surgical quality assurance was implemented by the credentialing of surgeons, standardization of technique, and monitoring of performance. Hybrid surgery comprised a two-field abdominal-thoracic operation (also called an Ivor-Lewis procedure) with laparoscopic gastric mobilization and open right thoracotomy. The primary end point was intraoperative or postoperative complication of grade II or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (indicating major complication leading to intervention) within 30 days. Analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: From October 2009 through April 2012, we randomly assigned 103 patients to the hybrid-procedure group and 104 to the open-procedure group. A total of 312 serious adverse events were recorded in 110 patients. A total of 37 patients (36%) in the hybrid-procedure group had a major intraoperative or postoperative complication, as compared with 67 (64%) in the open-procedure group (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.55; P<0.001). A total of 18 of 102 patients (18%) in the hybrid-procedure group had a major pulmonary complication, as compared with 31 of 103 (30%) in the open-procedure group. At 3 years, overall survival was 67% (95% CI, 57 to 75) in the hybrid-procedure group, as compared with 55% (95% CI, 45 to 64) in the open-procedure group; disease-free survival was 57% (95% CI, 47 to 66) and 48% (95% CI, 38 to 57), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found that hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy resulted in a lower incidence of intraoperative and postoperative major complications, specifically pulmonary complications, than open esophagectomy, without compromising overall and disease-free survival over a period of 3 years. (Funded by the French National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00937456 .).

Health-related Quality of Life Following Hybrid Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer, Analysis of a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Controlled Trial: The MIRO Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (HMIE) has been shown to reduce major postoperative complications compared with open esophagectomy (OE) for esophageal cancer. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare short- and long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following HMIE and OE within a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial at 13 study centers between 2009 and 2012. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with resectable cancers of the middle or lower third of the esophagus were randomized to undergo either transthoracic OE or HMIE. Patients were followed-up every 6 months for 3 years postoperatively and global health assessed with EORTC-QLQC30 and esophageal symptoms assessed with EORTC-OES18. RESULTS: The short-term reduction in global HRQOL at 30 days specifically role functioning [-33.33 (HMIE) vs -46.3 (OE); P = 0.0407] and social functioning [-16.88 (HMIE) vs -35.74 (OE); P = 0.0003] was less substantial in the HMIE group. At 2 years, social functioning had improved following HMIE to beyond baseline (+5.37) but remained reduced in the OE group (-8.33) (P = 0.0303). At 2 years, increases in pain were similarly reduced in the HMIE compared with the OE group [+6.94 (HMIE) vs +14.05 (OE); P = 0.018]. Postoperative complications in multivariate analysis were associated with role functioning, pain, and dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy has substantial effects upon short-term HRQOL. These effects for some specific parameters are, however, reduced with HMIE, with persistent differences up to 2 years, and maybe mediated by a reduction in postoperative complications.

Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available concerning short-term results of minimally invasive surgery in patients > 70 years old requiring distal pancreatectomy. The aim of this study was to compare short-term results after laparoscopic (LDP) versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) in this subgroup of patients. METHODS: All patients > 70 years who underwent distal pancreatectomy in 3 expert centers between 1995 and 2017 were included and data were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes in LDP and ODP groups were compared. RESULTS: A distal pancreatectomy was performed in 109 elderly patients; LDP group included 53 patients while ODP group included 56. There were 55 (50.5%) males and 54 (49.5%) women with a median age of 75 years (range 70-87). Fifty (45.9%) patients were 70-74, 40 (36.7%) patients were 75-79, and 19 (17.4%) patients were over 80 years. Nine (8.2%) patients required conversion to open surgery. The median operative time was not different between LDP and ODP (204 vs. 220 min, p = 0.62). The intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the LDP group (238 ± 312 vs. 425 ± 582 ml, p = 0.009) with no difference regarding the intraoperative transfusion rate. 90-day mortality (0 vs. 5%, p = 0.42), overall complication (45.4 vs. 51.8%, p = 0.53), major complication (18.2 vs. 12.5%, p = 0.43), grade B/C pancreatic fistula (6.8 vs. 7.1%, p = 0.71), were comparable in the 2 groups. Only postoperative confusion rate was significantly lower in the LDP group (4.5 vs. 25%, p = 0.01). Median length of stay was significantly lower in the LDP group (14 ± 10 vs. 16 ± 11 days, p = 0.04). R0 resection was performed in 94% of LDP patients and 89% in ODP patients without significant difference (p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach seems to reduce blood loss, postoperative confusion, and length of stay in elderly patients requiring distal pancreatectomy.

Endoscopic transmural management of abdominal fluid collection following gastrointestinal, bariatric, and hepato-bilio-pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative collections are a recognized source of morbidity after abdominal surgery. Percutaneous drainage is currently considered the standard treatment but not all collections are accessible using this method. Since the adoption of EUS, endoscopic transmural drainage has become an attractive option in the management of such complications. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and modalities of endoscopic transmural drainage in the treatment of post-operative collections. METHODS: Data of all patients referred to our dedicated multidisciplinary facility from 2014 to 2017 for endoscopic drainage of symptomatic post-operative collections after failure of percutaneous drainage or when it was deemed impossible, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (17 males and 15 females) with a median age of 53 years old (range 31-74) were included. Collections resulted from pancreatic (n = 10), colorectal (n = 6), bariatric (n = 5), and other type of surgery (n = 11). Collection size was less than 5 cm in diameter in 10 (31%), between 5 and 10 cm in 17 (53%) ,and more than 10 cm in 5 (16%) patients. The median time from surgery to endoscopic drainage was 38 days (range 6-360). Eight (25%) patients underwent endoscopic guided drainage whereas 24 (75%) patients underwent EUS-guided drainage. Technical success was 100% and clinical success was achieved in 30 (93.4%) after a mean follow-up of 13.5 months (1.2-24.8). Overall complication was 12.5% including four patients who bled following trans-gastric drainage treated with conservative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The present series suggests that endoscopic transmural drainage represents an interesting alternative in the treatment of post-operative collection when percutaneous drainage is not possible or fails.

Specific features of colorectal cancer in patients with metabolic syndrome: a matched case-control analysis of 772 patients.

PURPOSE: Although association between colorectal cancer (CRC) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) is established, specific features of CRC arising in patients presenting with MetS have not been clearly identified. METHOD: All patients who underwent colectomy for CRC from January 2005 to December 2014 at Institut Mutualiste Montsouris were identified from a prospectively collected database and characteristics were compared in the entire population and in a 1:2 matched case-control analysis [variables on which matching was performed were CRC localization (right- or left-sided) and AJCC stage (0 to IV)]. RESULTS: Out of the 772 identified patients, 98 (12.7%) presented with MetS. Entire population analysis revealed that CRC associated with MetS was more frequent in men (71.4 vs. 47.8%, p < 0.001), more often right-sided (71.4 vs. 50.4%, p < 0.001) and presented with less synchronous liver metastasis (4.1 vs. 8.7%, p = 0.002). Case-control analysis confirmed the gender association (p < 0.001) and showed HNPCC (p < 0.001) and history family of CRC (p = 0.010) to be significantly more frequent in Non-MetS patients. CONCLUSIONS: CRC associated with MetS is more frequent in men, more often right-sided, and presents with fewer synchronous metastasis. Further investigations should be designed in order to confirm these results and to enhance our knowledge of carcinogenesis related to MetS.

Management of postoperative bleeding after laparoscopic left colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Lower gastrointestinal bleeding after left colectomy is an uncommon complication that can lead to critical situation. Diagnostic and therapeutic manoeuvres should be performed in emergency with step-by-step strategy in order to avoid reoperation. This study aims to identify bleeding risks factors and describe a management strategy. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent left colectomy with primary anastomosis, from May 2004 to December 2013. We studied their demographic characteristics, surgical procedures and postoperative courses, more specifically hemorrhagic complications, management of bleeding and outcomes. RESULTS: Hemorrhagic anastomotic complication occurred in 47 of the 729 (6.4 %) patients after left colectomy. Neither anticoagulant nor antiaggregant treatment was associated with postoperative bleeding. Among the 47 patients with bleeding, endoscopy was performed in 37 (78.7 %). At the time of endoscopy, the bleeding was spontaneously stopped in nine (24.3 %). Therapeutic strategy used clips in 10 (27.0 %) cases, mucosal sclerosis in 11 (29.7 %) and both in 7 (18.9 %) cases. Four (8.5 %) patients required blood transfusion for treatment of this gastrointestinal bleeding. Five (10.6 %) patients with bleeding were reoperated in this group because early endoscopy showed associated anastomotic leakage. Based on a multivariate analysis, stapled anastomosis and diverticular disease were independent factors associated with anastomotic bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative anastomotic bleeding is not so uncommon after left colectomy. This complication should be particularly dreaded in patients who underwent stapled colorectal anastomosis for diverticular disease. With the use of clip or mucosal sclerosis, early endoscopy is a safe and efficient treatment.

Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer decreases respiratory postoperative complications but seems to be associated with higher occurrence of hiatal hernia (HH). This study describes the incidence of this complication and the results of surgical repair. METHODS: Among 390 patients with esophageal cancer treated by esophagectomies with laparoscopic gastric dissection from 2000 to 2013, 32 (8.2%) patients developed HH. Demographics, diagnostic, surgical management and outcomes data were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 25 men and 7 women with a median age of 60 years (39-78). The median time between esophagectomy and diagnosis of HH was 10 months (3 days-96 months). The most frequent symptoms at the time of diagnosis were pain (32%), dyspnea (21%) and vomiting (10%), while HH was asymptomatic in 10 patients. HH was located in the left chest in 97% of patients and involved either the transverse colon (91%), or omentum (25%) or the small bowel (12%). The operation included the reintegration of the viscera associated with the closure of the pillars (100%) and the establishment of a mesh (71%). The operation was carried out by laparoscopy in 19 (59%) patients and was conducted in emergency in 6 (19%) patients. No patient died, and the overall morbidity was 25%. After a median follow-up of 40 months (range 1-55), five patients died due to oncologic evolution and six (19%) patients had recurrence of HH who required a second operation. CONCLUSION: HH is a common complication after laparoscopic-assisted esophagectomy. Despite the use of mesh, postoperative morbidity and recurrence incidence remain high.

Large gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the stomach: Is laparoscopy reasonable?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection (LR) offers significant advantages compared to open resections for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). We aimed to evaluate whether LR outcomes jeopardised short and long-term outcomes of patients with large GISTs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 50 patients undergoing surgery for gastric GISTs, 12 underwent LR for large GISTs (>5 cm). Their characteristics, perioperative results and survival were retrospectively compared to those of 22 patients who underwent LR for 'small GIST'. RESULTS: The two groups were similar regarding demographics, rate of wedge resection and mean blood loss. No patient required transfusion or conversion. Operative time was significantly increased in the 'large GIST' group (160 min vs 112 min, P = 0.001). Mean tumour size was significantly lower in the 'small GIST' group (8.4 cm vs 2.4 cm, P = 0.0001). Resection margins were negative. The mortality rate was nil and the overall morbidity rates was similar in both groups. Median length of hospital stay was significantly increased in the 'large GIST' group (7 days vs 5 days, P = 0.004). Median follow-up was 47 months and one patient in the 'small GIST' group developed recurrence and died during follow-up 11 years after surgery. No patient died during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: LR for large GISTs is safe and technically feasible and does not negatively influence the oncologic course. Prospective randomised trials should be performed before using this approach in routine surgical care.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: What Is the Impact on Postoperative Outcome and Oncologic Results?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the postoperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs). BACKGROUND: The feasibility of the laparoscopic approach for gGIST resection has been demonstrated; however, its impact on outcomes, particularly its oncologic safety for tumors greater than 5 cm, remains unknown. METHODS: Among 1413 patients treated for a GIST in 61 European centers between 2001 and 2013, patients who underwent primary resection for a gGIST smaller than 20 cm (N = 666), by either laparoscopy (group L, n = 282) or open surgery (group O, n = 384), were compared. Multivariable analyses and propensity score matching were used to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality and morbidity rates in groups L and O were 0.4% versus 2.1% (P = 0.086) and 11.3% vs 19.5% (P = 0.004), respectively. Laparoscopic resection was independently protective against in-hospital morbidity (odds ratio 0.54, P = 0.014). The rate of R0 resection was 95.7% in group L and 92.7% in group O (P = 0.103). After 1:1 propensity score matching (n = 224), the groups were comparable according to age, sex, tumor location and size, mitotic index, American Society of Anesthesiology score, and the extent of surgical resection. After adjustment for BMI, overall morbidity (10.3% vs 19.6%; P = 0.005), surgical morbidity (4.9% vs 9.8%; P = 0.048), and medical morbidity (6.2% vs 13.4%; P = 0.01) were significantly lower in group L. Five-year recurrence-free survival was significantly better in group L (91.7% vs 85.2%; P = 0.011). In tumors greater than 5 cm, in-hospital morbidity and 5-year recurrence-free survival were similar between the groups (P = 0.255 and P = 0.423, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection for gGISTs is associated with favorable short-term outcomes without compromising oncologic results.

Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial - the MIRO trial.

BACKGROUND: Open transthoracic oesophagectomy is the standard treatment for infracarinal resectable oesophageal carcinomas, although it is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates of 2 to 10% and 30 to 50%, respectively, for both the abdominal and thoracic approaches. The worldwide popularity of laparoscopic techniques is based on promising results, including lower postoperative morbidity rates, which are related to the reduced postoperative trauma. We hypothesise that the laparoscopic abdominal approach (laparoscopic gastric mobilisation) in oesophageal cancer surgery will decrease the major postoperative complication rate due to the reduced surgical trauma. METHODS/DESIGN: The MIRO trial is an open, controlled, prospective, randomised multicentre phase III trial. Patients in study arm A will receive laparoscopic-assisted oesophagectomy, i.e., a transthoracic oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and laparoscopic gastric mobilisation. Patients in study arm B will receive the same procedure, but with the conventional open abdominal approach. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the major postoperative 30-day morbidity. Secondary objectives are to assess the overall 30-day morbidity, 30-day mortality, 30-day pulmonary morbidity, disease-free survival, overall survival as well as quality of life and to perform medico-economic analysis. A total of 200 patients will be enrolled, and two safety analyses will be performed using 25 and 50 patients included in arm A. DISCUSSION: Postoperative morbidity remains high after oesophageal cancer surgery, especially due to major pulmonary complications, which are responsible for 50% of the postoperative deaths. This study represents the first randomised controlled phase III trial to evaluate the benefits of the minimally invasive approach with respect to the postoperative course and oncological outcomes in oesophageal cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00937456 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer: Results of the MIRO Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Available data comparing the long-term results of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (HMIE) with that of open esophagectomy are conflicting, with similar or even better results reported for the minimally invasive esophagectomy group. Objective: To evaluate the long-term, 5-year outcomes of HMIE vs open esophagectomy, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and pattern of disease recurrence, and the potential risk factors associated with these outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial is a post hoc follow-up study that analyzes the results of the open-label Multicentre Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial, which enrolled patients from 13 different centers in France and was conducted from October 26, 2009, to April 4, 2012. Eligible patients were 18 to 75 years of age and were diagnosed with resectable cancer of the middle or lower third of the esophagus. After exclusions, patients were randomized to either the HMIE group or the open esophagectomy group. Data analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis from November 19, 2019, to December 4, 2020. Interventions: Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (laparoscopic gastric mobilization with open right thoracotomy) was compared with open esophagectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points of this follow-up study were 5-year OS and DFS. The secondary end points were the site of disease recurrence and potential risk factors associated with DFS and OS. Results: A total of 207 patients were randomized, of whom 175 were men (85%), and the median (range) age was 61 (23-78) years. The median follow-up duration was 58.2 (95% CI, 56.5-63.8) months. The 5-year OS was 59% (95% CI, 48%-68%) in the HMIE group and 47% (95% CI, 37%-57%) in the open esophagectomy group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.48-1.06). The 5-year DFS was 52% (95% CI, 42%-61%) in the HMIE group vs 44% (95% CI, 34%-53%) in the open esophagectomy group (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.55-1.17). No statistically significant difference in recurrence rate or location was found between groups. In a multivariable analysis, major intraoperative and postoperative complications (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.41-3.45; P < .001) and major pulmonary complications (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.21-3.10; P = .005) were identified as risk factors associated with decreased OS. Similarly, multivariable analysis of DFS identified overall intraoperative and postoperative complications (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.28-2.90; P = .002) and major pulmonary complications (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.19-2.86; P = .006) as risk factors. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found no difference in long-term survival between the HMIE and open esophagectomy groups. Major postoperative overall complications and pulmonary complications appeared to be independent risk factors in decreased OS and DFS, providing additional evidence that HMIE may be associated with improved oncological results compared with open esophagectomy primarily because of a reduction in postoperative complications. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00937456.

Computed tomography versus water-soluble contrast swallow in the detection of intrathoracic anastomotic leak complicating esophagogastrectomy (Ivor Lewis): a prospective study in 97 patients.

PURPOSE: Water-soluble contrast swallow (CS) is usually performed before refeeding for anastomosis assessment after esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis but the sensitivity of CS is low. Another diagnostic approach is based on analysis of computed tomography (CT) scan with oral contrast and of CT mediastinal air images. We undertook to compare them prospectively. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with an esophageal carcinoma operated by intrathoracic anastomosis were included prospectively in a study based on a CT scan at postoperative day 3 (without oral and intravenous contrast) and CT scan and CS at day 7. CT scan analysis consisted of assessing contrast and air leakage. In case of doubt, an endoscopy was done. RESULTS: A diagnosis of anastomotic leak was made in 13 patients (13.4%), in 2 cases before day 7 and in 3 beyond day 7. At day 3, 94 CT scans were performed, but the diagnostic value was poor. In 95 patients with both CS and CT scan at day 7, CS disclosed a leak in 5 of 11, and CT scan was abnormal in 8 of 11. Leakage of contrast and/or presence of mediastinal gas had the best negative predictive value (95.8%). Endoscopy was done in 16 patients with only mediastinal gas at day 7 CT scan. It disclosed a normal anastomosis in 11, fibrin deposits in 4, and a leak in 1. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with CS only, CT at day 7 improves the sensitivity and negative predictive value for diagnosing an anastomotic leak. In case of doubt endoscopy is advisable. This approach provides an accurate assessment of the anastomosis before refeeding.

Laparoscopic repeat surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Results of the analyses of a cohort study of 117 patients from a multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Short and long-term outcomes after repeat anti-reflux surgery (RARS) are still debated and generally not considered as satisfying as after primary anti-reflux surgery (PARS). The aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes after RARS and risk factors associated to intra-operative and post-operative complications. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective survey from four European laparoscopic centers. Patients who underwent elective RARS from January 2005 to October 2017 for dysphagia or for persistent reflux disease refractory to medical treatment were analyzed. Data on demographic characteristics, including type and timing of previous operations as well as intra-operative details (surgical technique, type of RARS, conversion to open surgery, prosthetic material placement) were collected. Patients who underwent operations in the emergency setting, interventions mixed with bariatric procedures and PARS performed in other surgical departments were not included in this study. Primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate risk factors associated with intraoperative and postoperative complications. Secondary endpoint was to evaluate clinical outcomes and to identify any possible correlation with clinical and surgical parameters. RESULTS: Among 1662 patients who underwent PARS, failure occurred in 174 (10.5%) patients. Repeat surgery was performed in 117 (7%) patients, after a mean time of 80 months (range 4-315). RARS was carried out laparoscopically in 88% of cases. Prosthetic mesh to reinforce hiatoplasty was used in 22.2% of patients. Intra-operative upper gastro-intestinal tract's injuries occurred in 6 (5.1%) patients. Perioperative mortality was nil and 13 (11.1%) patients experienced postoperative complications. Mean length of hospital stay was 9.6 ± 6.4 days. Based on a multivariable analysis, age >70 years (OR 1.074, C.I.95% 1.018-1.133, p = 0.008) and body mass index (BMI) < 23 (OR 0.172, C.I.95% 0.052-0.568, p = 0.004) were independently associated to postoperative complications. After a mean follow-up time of 36 months (range 6-107), 24 (20.5%) patients presented recurrent symptoms. Based on a multivariable analysis, early onset of dysphagia (OR 3.539, C.I.95% 1.254-9.990, p = 0.017), open approach (OR 4.505, C.I.95% 1.314-15.442, p = 0.016) and the use of prosthetic material (OR 2.790, C.I.95% 0.930-8.776, p = 0.047) were significantly associated to good clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat anti-reflux surgery is a safe and feasible procedure in high-volume centers, with acceptable perioperative outcomes. Long-term results are favorable with a success rate of almost 80%. Advanced age (>70 years) and low BMI (<23 kg/m2) were factor predicting perioperative complications. The use of prosthesis for hiatoplasty was associated to better functional outcomes.

Effects of age after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: Are there any specific outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic approach in colorectal surgery has demonstrated to give advantages in terms of postoperative outcomes, particularly in high-risk patients. The aim was to assess the impact of patients' age on the short-term outcomes after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer. METHODS: From January 2004 to September 2014, all patients who underwent laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer in a single institution were divided into four groups (A: <64 years; B: 65-74 years; C: 75-84 years; D ≥85 years). Risk factors for postoperative complications were determined on multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Laparoscopic right colectomy was performed in 507 patients, including 171 (33.7%) in A, 168 (33.1%) in B, 131 (25.8) in C and 37 (7.4%) in D. Patients in Group C and Group D had higher ASA score (p<0.0001) and presented more frequently with anaemia (20.6% and 29.7%, p=0.001). Stages III and IV were more frequently encountered in groups C and D. Overall morbidity was 27.5% without any difference in the four groups (24.5%, 29.1%, 7.5% and 18.4% respectively, p=0.58). The rate of minor complications (such as wound infection or postoperative ileus) was higher in Group D compared to other groups (p=0.05). The only independent variable correlated with postoperative morbidity was intraoperative blood transfusion (OR 2.82; CI 95% 1.05-4.59, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The present series suggests that patient's age did not significantly jeopardize the postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer.

NKp30 isoforms and NKp30 ligands are predictive biomarkers of response to imatinib mesylate in metastatic GIST patients.

Despite effective targeted therapy acting on KIT and PDGFRA tyrosine kinases, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) escape treatment by acquiring mutations conveying resistance to imatinib mesylate (IM). Following the identification of NKp30-based immunosurveillance of GIST and the off-target effects of IM on NK cell functions, we investigated the predictive value of NKp30 isoforms and NKp30 soluble ligands in blood for the clinical response to IM. The relative expression and the proportions of NKp30 isoforms markedly impacted both event-free and overall survival, in two independent cohorts of metastatic GIST. Phenotypes based on disbalanced NKp30B/NKp30C ratio (ΔBClow) and low expression levels of NKp30A were identified in one third of patients with dismal prognosis across molecular subtypes. This ΔBClow blood phenotype was associated with a pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In addition, detectable levels of the NKp30 ligand sB7-H6 predicted a worse prognosis in metastatic GIST. Soluble BAG6, an alternate ligand for NKp30 was associated with low NKp30 transcription and had additional predictive value in GIST patients with high NKp30 expression. Such GIST microenvironments could be rescued by therapy based on rIFN-α and anti-TRAIL mAb which reinstated innate immunity.

Pre-operative predictive factors of early recurrence after resection of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia.

OBJECTIVES: To determine pre-operative predictive factors of early recurrence in patients with esophageal and cardial adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent resection for esophageal and cardial adenocarcinoma in our institution between October 1992 and October 2001. Patient files were studied and classified according to the occurrence of early recurrence (within one year) (group A) and patients without recurrence (group B). Pre-operative clinical, biological and radiological parameters were recorded. Both groups were compared in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent surgical resection. Tumor was located in lower esophagus in 71 cases and at the cardia in 29 cases. R0 resection was feasible in 95 cases. Hospital mortality was 2%. Survival rate at 3 years was 56%. Recurrence before 1 year occurred in 28 patients (group A) and not in 72 (group B). In univariate analysis, younger age (P=0.01), dysphagia (P=0.04) and percentage of weight loss (P<0.0004) were significantly different between both groups. Weight loss more than 10% was observed in 2 patients of group B, and in 9 patients of group A. In multivariate analysis, weight loss more than 10% was the only pre-operative factor associated with early recurrence (P=0.018). CONCLUSION: Important weight loss could be a pre-operative predictive factor of early recurrence after resection of esophageal and cardial adenocarcinoma and surgery as first line treatment could be avoided in these patients.

Totally laparoscopic right hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 1987, the surgical applications of laparoscopy have grown to involve most areas of general surgery. Until recently, however, major liver surgery remained outside of the scope of minimally invasive surgery. Building on advances in laparoscopic equipment, techniques, and ongoing experience in hepatic surgery, major liver resection has been performed laparoscopically in some select centers. At our institute, a safe and standardized approach to minimally invasive major hepatectomy has been developed. This article illustrates the relevant technical maneuvers in the performance of a totally laparoscopic right hepatectomy. Common pitfalls and areas of concern are discussed. METHODS: A detailed description of a standardized procedure is presented. The technique was developed from a single-institution experience of 41 laparoscopic right hepatectomies performed in a tertiary care referral center for laparoscopic digestive surgery. The prevention of bleeding and gas embolism are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic right hepatectomy is feasible and safe if the appropriate expertise and equipment are available. In selected patients, this new approach can be proposed by a surgeon experienced in laparoscopic and hepatic surgery as an alternative to conventional open liver resection.